The dark side of the taiga. The relations between the people and the land in Tofalariya
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/LSE.2023.62.12Keywords
Tofalariya, Siberia, environment, taiga, dark ecology, agency, anthropocentrismAbstract
The purpose of this article is to make a multi-faceted anthropological analysis of selected narratives concerning the ways of experiencing the taiga in the context of local hunting practices used by representatives of the Tofalar community. Tofalars are one of the smallest indigenous ethnic groups in Russia (ca. 800 people). They live in three villages in the eastern part of the Sayan range in the Irkutsk region. Their way of life is connected with the surrounding environment, which in this case is the mountain taiga. My field studies indicate that the inhabitants of Tofalaria experience the taiga in a way that is difficult to describe in the light of Western epistemology based on an anthropocentric perspective. In analysing this problem, I use the work of modern anthropologists who are trying to develop a new anthropological approach, in which the human being is not in a privileged position (e.g. Tim Ingold, Viveiros de Castro, Łukasz Smyrski). The second point of reference for me is the work of contemporary philosophers, associated with the current of speculative realism, which combines a critical attitude to anthropocentrism and frequent references to the category of ‘dark’ (e.g. Timothy Morton’s dark ecology, Ben Woodard’s dark vitalism).
References
Augé, M. (2011). Nie-miejsca. Wprowadzenie do antropologii hipernowoczesności (przeł. R. Chymkowski). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Chodzidło, T. (1960). Karagasi – Tofałary. Lud, 46, 9–134.
Chudinov, B. (1931). Puteshestviye po Karagassii. Moskva: Molodaya gvardiya.
Donahoe, B. (2002). „Hey, You! Get Offa My Taiga!” Comparing the Sense of Property Rights Among the Tofa and Tozhu-Tyva. Max Planck Institute for Social Anthropology Working Papers, 38, 1–29.
Gruppuso, P., Whitehouse, A. (2020). Exploring taskscapes: an introduction. Social Anthropology, 2 (3), 588–597.
Halemba, A. (2022). Góry Ałtaju nie mają duchów. Etnografia poza człowiekiem. Etnografia Polska, 66, 19–23.
Hastrup, K. (2004). O ugruntowaniu się światów – podstawy empiryczne antropologii (przeł. E. Klekot). W: M. Kempny, E. Nowicka (red.), Badanie kultury. Elementy teorii antropologicznej. Kontynuacje (s. 87–99). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.
Ingold, T. (2000). The Perception of the Environment Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill. London and New York: Routledge.
Ingold, T. (2018). Splatać otwarty świat. Architektura, antropologia, design (przeł. E. Klekot, D. Wąsik). Kraków: Instytut Architektury.
Ingold,T., Kurttila, T. (2000). Perceiving the Environment in Finnish Lapland. Body & Society, 6, 183–196.
Krivonogov, V. (1998). Etnicheskiye protsessy u malochislennykh narodov Sredney Sibiri. Krasnoyarsk: Krasnoyarskiy Pedagogicheskiy Universitet.
Latour, B. (2014). Peresborka sotsial’nogo: vvedeniye v aktorno-setevuyu teoriyu. Sankt-Peterburg: iz. dom. VSHE.
Meillassoux, Q. (2017). Posle konechnosti. Esse o neobkhodimosti kontingentnosti. Ekaterinburg: Kabinetnyy uchenyy.
Melnikowa, L. (1994). Tofy. Irkutsk: Vostochno-Sibirskoje Knizhnoje izdatelstvo.
Morton, T. (2007). Ecology without Nature. Rethinking Environmental Aesthetics. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: Harvard University Press.
Morton, T. (2019). Stat’ Ekologichnym. Moskva: Ad Marginem Press.
Ortner, S.B. (2016). Dark anthropology and its others: Theory since the eighties. Journal of Ethnographic Theory, 6 (1), 47–73.
Rassadin, I. (2005). Khozyaystvo, byt i kul’tura tofalarov. Ulan-Ude: BNTs SO RAN.
Schaeffer, J. (2010). Konets chelovecheskoy isklyuchitel’nosti. Moskva: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.
Smyrski, Ł. (2018). Między władzą spojrzenia a praktyką. Antropologia krajobrazu. Warszawa: Oficyna Naukowa.
Taylor, C. (2018). A Secular Age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Viveiros de Castro, E. (2017). Kannibal’skiye metafiziki. Rubezhi poststrukturnoy antropologii. Moskva: Ad Marginem Press.
Wala, K. (2017). Ułożyć świat na nowo. Rekonstrukcja koncepcji Tima Ingolda (cz. II). Etnografia. Praktyki. Teorie. Doświadczenia, 3, 303–329.
Wielecki, K. (red.) (2015). Syberia: tradycja i modernizacja. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo ciągłe nieperiodyczne Wydziału „Artes Liberales” Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
Woodard, B. (2016). Dinamika slizi, zarozhdeniye, mutatsiya i polzuchest’ zhizni. Perm: Hyle Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Lodz Ethnographic Studies

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
- The authors give the publisher (Polish Ethnological Society) non-exclusive license to use the work in the following fields:
- recording of a Work / subject of a related copyright;
- reproduction (multiplication) Work / subject of a related copyright in print and digital technique (ebook, audiobook);
- marketing of units of reproduced Work / subject of a related copyright;
- introduction of Work / object of related copyright to computer memory;
- dissemination of the work in an electronic version in the formula of open access under the Creative Commons license (CC BY - ND 4.0).
- The authors give the publisher the license free of charge.
- The use of the work by publisher in the above mentioned aspects is not limited in time, quantitatively nor territorially.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 296
Number of citations: 0