Zum Inhalt springen Zur Hauptnavigation springen Zur Fußzeile springen
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language
    • Deutsch
    • English
    • Español (España)
    • Français (France)
    • Italiano
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Aktuelle Ausgabe
  • Archiv
  • Über uns
    • Über die Zeitschrift
    • Beitragseinreichung
    • Redaktion
    • Schutz personenbezogener Daten
    • Kontakt
  • Registrieren
  • Einloggen
  • Language:
  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Litteraria Copernicana

An Attempt to Read Mencius’ Philosophy with Help of Cicero: Focusing on the Relationship of the Term 'ren' 仁 with the Building of Empire
  • Home
  • /
  • An Attempt to Read Mencius’ Philosophy with Help of Cicero: Focusing on the Relationship of the Term 'ren' 仁 with the Building of Empire
  1. Home /
  2. Archiv /
  3. Bd. 32 Nr. 4 (2019): Alia Latinitas /
  4. Studia i rozprawy

An Attempt to Read Mencius’ Philosophy with Help of Cicero: Focusing on the Relationship of the Term 'ren' 仁 with the Building of Empire

Autor/innen

  • Jaewon Ahn Institute of Humanities | Seoul National University / South Korea
  • Jungsam Yum Inha Institute for Chinese Studies | Inha University / South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/LC.2019.048

Schlagworte

Mencius, Cicero, ren, humanitas, Chinese empire, true king, perfect man, orator perfectus

Abstract

Already in 17th century, Ph. Couplet (1623–1693) used Ciceronian terminology to interprete the texts of Confucian philosophy, including that of Mencius (372–289 BCE), an important philosopher especially in terms of understanding Chinese ethics and morals. This paper attempts to read Mencius’ political term “empire”  in the context of political philosophy. The paper observes Mencius’s political idea with help of that of Cicero. For this, it demostrates how and why Mencius introduces the ren as a principle of Kingship and the building of Empire. According to him, the ren is a core principle in operating the empire that was formulated with the tianxia (“all-under-heaven”). However, the ren is an ambivalent concept. On one side, the ren is a universal value that stands fundamentally against violence. On the other side, historically to see, the ren was an imperial ideology, because as a part of the “all-under-heaven” policy represented by Mencius was de facto nothing but a regional hegemon.

Literaturhinweise

Ahn, Jaewon 2011. “A comparative study on Cicero’s orator perfectus and Confucius’ rex perfectus”. Papers on Rhetoric 10: 1–22.

Ahn, Jaewon 2012. “Some observations on Philippe Couplet (1623–1693)’s reading of Ye-King 『易經』 – focusing on his Latin translation of the Kien figure (謙掛)”. Inmunnonchong [=The Journal of Humanities] 67: 461–510.

Cicero 1968 [1949]. De inventione. Transl. Harry M. Hubbell. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Cicero 1967 [1930]. Oratio Pro Sexto Roscio Amerino. Warmington, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Confucius Sinarum philosophus, sive Scientia sinensis, latine exposita . Studio & opera Prosperi Intorcetta, Christiani Herdtrich, Francisci Rougemont, Philippi Couplet patrum Societatis Jesu... Adjecta est tabula chronologica sinicć monarchić ab hujus exordio ad haec usque tempora 1687. Paris: D. Horthemels.

Ivanhoe, Philip J. (ed.) 2011. Mencius. Transl. Irene Bloom. New York: Columbia University Press.

Kim Hak-Ju (ed.) 2013. Mencius 孟子. Seoul: Seoul National University Press.

Kim, Sungmoon 2011. “Confucian Constitutionalism: Mencius and Xunzi on Virtue, Ritual and Royal Transmission”. The Review of Politics 73: 471–399.

Lat, Cod. 6277.

Mutschler, Fritz-Heiner at al. 2009. Conceiving the Empire; China and Rome compared. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Stanislas, Julien 1829. Meng Tseu vel Mencium inter Sinenses philosophos, ingenio, doctrina, nominisque claritate Confucio proximum, edidit, Latina interpretatione, ad interpretationem Tartaricam utramque recensita, instruixit, et perpetuo commentario, e Sinicis deprompto, illustravit Stanislaus Julien. Lutetiae Parisiorum: Societatis Asiaticae et Comitis de Lasteyrie impensis.

Storch, Helmut 2007. “Humanitas”. Realencyclopädie der classischen Altertumswissenschaft. Leiden: Brill. http://referenceworks.brillonline.com/entries/brill-s-new-pauly/ humanitas-e.

Tao Liang and Ian M. Sullivan 2010. “Political Thought in Early Confucianism”. Frontiers of Philosophy in China 5–2: 212–236.

Yearley, Lee H. 1990. Mencius and Aquinas: Theories of Virtue and Conceptions of Courage. New York: State University of New York Press.

Litteraria Copernicana

Downloads

  • PDF (English)

Veröffentlicht

2019-12-30

Zitationsvorschlag

1.
AHN, Jaewon und YUM, Jungsam. An Attempt to Read Mencius’ Philosophy with Help of Cicero: Focusing on the Relationship of the Term ’ren’ 仁 with the Building of Empire. Litteraria Copernicana. Online. 30 Dezember 2019. Vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 75-87. [Accessed 7 Juli 2025]. DOI 10.12775/LC.2019.048.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Bibliografische Angaben herunterladen
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Ausgabe

Bd. 32 Nr. 4 (2019): Alia Latinitas

Rubrik

Studia i rozprawy

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 578
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Autor/innenverzeichnis durchblättern
  • Issue archive

User

User

Aktuelle Ausgabe

  • Atom-Logo
  • RSS2-Logo
  • RSS1-Logo

Informationen

  • Für Leser/innen
  • Für Autor/innen
  • Für Bibliothekar/innen

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Sprache

  • Deutsch
  • English
  • Español (España)
  • Français (France)
  • Italiano
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Mencius, Cicero, ren, humanitas, Chinese empire, true king, perfect man, orator perfectus
Aufwärts

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop