Telemedicine – assesment of society’s opinion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2021.11.05.004Keywords
medicine, teleconsultation, pandemic, telemedicine, e-consultationAbstract
During the COVID-19 pandemic, it is necessary to use some safety measures due to decrease spreading of the virus. One of them is introducing teleconsultations as a form of medical consultation. It allows patients to talk with the doctor without visiting the hospital.
The aim of the study is to present the society’s opinion on teleconsultations and its most common disadvantages. The method of the study was an online survey, conducted on 68 people, whose answers were statistically analyzed.
During the pandemic, 85% of the respondents took part in the teleconsultation. After thay, they rated quality of the teleconsultation form 1 to 5, where 5 was the highest rate. Only 26,8% of them rated their teleconsultation 5, 17,9% - 4, 16,1% - 3, 26,8% - 2 and 12,5% - 1. Most of the respondents decided to took part in the teleconsultation because they needed a prescription (53%).
According to respondents’ opinion, the most important advantages of the teleconsultation are: ability to stay home (59,7%), lower risk of infection (35,8%), quick help (22,4%) and ability to have the prescription without going out (73,1%).
The most important disadvantages were: lack of ability of physical examination (91%), problems with communication (40,3%), problems with describing their own symptoms (43,3%), problems with contacting a doctor (58,2%) and higher risk of wrong diagnosis (82,1%).
Teleconsultations provide patients’ safety, however, they are associated with danger of the wrong diagnosis. Although, most patients (73%) would like to be able to take part in the teleconsultation after the pandemic. Because of that, it is crucial for modern medicine to improve the quality of teleconsultation and to learn, how to communicate with patients during the remote conversations.
References
Światłoń A. https://agnieszkaswiatlon.pl/standardy-organizacyjne-teleporady/ dostęp: 28.12.2020
Bollmeier S. Direct to Consumer Telemedicine: Is Healthcare From Home Best? Mo Med. 2020 Jul-Aug; 117(4): 303–309.
Ministerstwo Zdrowia, Dz.U. 2020 poz. 1395 https://isap.sejm.gov.pl/isap.nsf/DocDetails.xsp?id=WDU20200001395 dostęp: 28.12.2020
Mastalerz-Migas A. https://www.gov.pl/web/rpp/teleporada-w-podstawowej-opiece-zdrowotnej dostęp: 28.12.2020
Janicka B. https://pulsmedycyny.pl/bozena-janicka-nowe-obowiazki-dla-lekarzy-rodzinnych-to-gwozdz-do-trumny-poz-1001394 dostęp: 28.12.2020
American Thoracic Society: Patient Education Information Series Telemedicine–Getting Care to Patients Closer to Home https://www.atsjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1164/rccm.2020C5 dostęp: 28.12.2020
Mukhopadhyay M., Ghosh K. Risk and Opportunity of Telemedicine in Healthcare Management (June 25, 2020). Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3635122 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3635122
Mozzami B. COVID-19 and telemedicine: Immediate action required for maintaining healthcare providers well-being, Journal of Clinical Virology Volume 126, May 2020, 104345
Bokolo Anthony Jnr. Use of Telemedicine and Virtual Care for Remote Treatment in Response to COVID-19 Pandemic. J Med Syst 44, 132 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-020-01596-5
Miller E.A. Telemedicine and doctor-patient communication: an analytical survey of the literature; J Telemed Telecare 2001;7(1):1-17. doi: 10.1258/1357633011936075.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 631
Number of citations: 0