Problems of organization of facilitation interaction between teacher and student
Keywords
pedagogical university, problems, future teacher, student, facilitation interaction, facilitation qualities, organization, educational processAbstract
The article is devoted to defining the essence of the concepts "interaction", "facilitation interaction", "facilitation interaction of a teacher with students" and the problem of organizing the facilitation interaction of a teacher with students. The basic ideas of facilitation interaction are due to a set of factors of the educational environment. Facilitation interaction in its structure has socio-cultural foundations that determine the methodological, theoretical and practical possibilities of facilitation as a humanistically oriented process that implements the principles of democracy and freedom in productive activities and communication, the variability of schooling.
Based on the scientific analysis of foreign works of scientists, the factors contributing to the facilitation interaction are identified: actualization of the facilitation potential of the educational environment, involvement of the facilitation potential of the environment, manifestation of facilitation in a certain sphere of life, influence of the sphere its various angles. Facilitation interaction in our study, based on the scientific work of foreign scientists, is defined as subject-subject interaction, which includes emotional contact, creating an educational environment for positive motivation, joint personal growth and self-improvement of teacher and student.
References
Bens I. Advanced Facilitating Strategies: tools & techniques to master difficult situations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, 2005. 312 р.
Dictionary-reference book on pedagogy and psychology of higher school / [prepared by NE Gerasimova and others]. Cherkasy: ChNU, 2010. 212 p.
Fisun O.V. Implementation of facilitation ideas in the teacher's activity. Pedagogy of formation of creative personality in higher and general education schools. Zaporizhzhia. 2009. Vip. 5 (58) .С. 385-391.
Galitsan O.A. Preconditions for the formation of facilitation orientation of future teachers in the educational space of higher education. Science and education. 2016. №10. P.69-76.
Dimukhametov R.S., Sokolova N.A., Locksmith M.V., Zherebkina V.F. et al. Facilitation approach in the training of social educators: a monograph. Chelyabinsk-Kostanay, 2016. 306 с
Kotova I.B., Shiyanov E.N. Pedagogical interaction. Rostov-on-Don: Publishing House of the Rostov Pedagogical University, 1997.112 p.
Kovalchuk Z.Ya. Psychological analysis of interpersonal interaction of a teacher with high school students: author's ref. dis. Cand. psychologist. Science: 19.00.07. H.: 2006. 20 p.
Kravchynska T. Pedagogy of partnership - basic ideas, principles and essence. URL: https://www.google.com/search?q= –108.
Kurland Z., Foksha O., Popovsky Yu. Research of pedagogical facilitation of the teacher as vitagenic pedagogical technology. Science and Education, 2018, Issue 4. pp. 168–176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24195/2414-4665-2018-4-22.
Manko V.A. Tolerant relationships as one of the conditions for the effectiveness of pedagogical communication. Pedagogy of education and sports. 2006. № 11. S. 64–66.
Orlov A.B. Facilitator and group: from interpersonal to trans personal communication. Psychotherapist. magazine. No. 2, 1994. pp. 7–27.
Perepelyuk I.R. Organizational and pedagogical conditions of partnership of preschool educational institution and family in the Republic of Poland: dis ... Cand. ped. Science: 13.00.04. Chernivtsi, 2018. 266 p.
Preditkevich O.S. Determining the readiness of commanders of military units for pedagogical facilitation. Young Scientist, 2017. № 11 (51). Pp. 408–411.
Prokopenko I.A. Formation of professional competence of the future teacher: European experience. Professional Education: Methodology, Theory and Technologies. Pereyaslav-Khmelnytsky: PE "SKD", 2018. Is. 8. Р. 197–214
Rogers K. Client-centered psychotherapy / trans. from English. T. Rozhkov, Yu. Ovchinnikov, G. Pimochkin. M .: April-Press: EKSMO-Press, 2002.
Rozumna T.S. Preparation of future teachers of humanities for the organization of interactive interaction: dis ... Cand. ped. Science: 13.00.04. Berdyansk, 2012. 227 p.
Rubinstein S. L. Being and consciousness. Man and the world. M. SPb. : Peter, 2003.512 p.
Sannikova O.P. Facilitation in the system of individual psychological features of personality. Science and Education, 2004. № 6–7. C 251 - 253.
Shakhmatova O.N. Pedagogical facilitation: features of formation and development. Scientific research in education. 2006. No. 3. P. 118–125.
Taylor D. Issues, Trends, and Challenges in Distance Education: An International Perspective. Public Administration Undergraduate University of Arizona. 2006. № 53. P. 1–23.
Troitska O.M. Philosophical aspects of dialogic development of interaction of nature and man. Current issues of philosophy and sociology. Odessa, 2016. Vip. 12. S. 124–128.
Yankovych O.I., Bednarek Yu., Andzheevska A. Educational technologies of modern educational institutions: educational and methodical manual. Ternopil: TNPU named after V. Hnatiuk, 2015. 212 p.
Yudin E. G. Methodology of Science. Consistency. Activity. M.: Editorial URSS, 1997.442 p.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 241
Number of citations: 0