Embryological results in married couples with combination of male and female factors
Keywords
infertility, combination of female and male infertility factors, fluorescence in situ hybridization, motile sperm organelle morphology examination, time lapse of embryos, comparative genomic hybridization, next generation sequencing, embryological resultsAbstract
The treatment of married couples with a combination of male and female infertility factors is quite complicated and often requires assisted reproductive technologies (ART), but according to ESHRE, after ICSI, the pregnancy rate is 28.4% for aspiration and 35.0% for transfer. One of the ways to improve the effectiveness of ART in this case is to use additional methods of selection of sperm and fertilized oocytes. The purpose of the study was to evaluate the embryological results of conducting cycles of ART in married couples with a combination of female and male infertility factors using modern methods of selection of sperm and embryos. Material and methods. There were 213 married couples of group I under prospective observation with a combination of male and female factors who had applied for ART. All men in group I suffered from pathozoospermia. Control group K consisted of 34 couples with secondary infertility of tube genesis, who consisted of conditionally somatically healthy women with a history of childbirth, without fallopian tubes, and their men with normozoospermia. The study group I was randomized into two groups: the main group A (n = 100) - the ART cycle was performed according to the proposed personalized method with additional methods for the selection of gametes and embryos; comparison group B (n = 113) - pre-conceptual training and the ART cycle were performed according to conventional methods. Groups A and B were stratified each into 3 subgroups. The A1 (n = 32) and B1 (n = 36) subgroups included married couples in whom women had chronic anovulation; in subgroup A2 (n = 37) and B2 (n = 35) - married couples in whom women had tubal infertility; in subgroup A3 (n = 31) and B3 (n = 42) are married couples in which women had a combination of tubal and anovulatory factors of infertility. Group A used additional methods for the selection of sperm and embryos: fluorescence in situ hybridization, examination of morphology of organelles of moving sperm at magnification × 6 600, time lapse microscopy of embryos and comparative genome-hybridization, sequencing of the new generation. Results. The use of modern methods for the selection of gametes and embryos has resulted in a statistically significant increase in the percentage of mature oocytes from the total number of oocytes by 1.18 times, the number of received embryos from one woman - by 1.27, the number of received embryos of excellent and good quality per woman - by 1.85, the percentage of embryos of excellent and good quality from the total number of embryos - 1.45 times. Conclusions. In patients with a combination of male and female infertility factors, additional selection of gametes and embryos is a way to improve the effectiveness of infertility treatments in the ART cycles.
References
Armstrong S, Arroll N, Cree LM, Jordan V, Farquhar C. Time-lapse systems for embryo incubation and assessment in assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;2.
Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F. Selection of spermatozoa with normal nuclei to improve the pregnancy rate with intracytoplasmic sperm injection. N Engl J Med.2001; 345:1067-8.
Battista La Sala G, Nicoli A, Fornaciari E, Falbo A, Rondini I, Morini D, Valli B, Villani MT, Palomba S.Retraction Note: Intracytoplasmic morphologically selectedsperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperminjection: a randomized controlled trial. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2017 Aug 11;15(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12958-017-0279-9.
Berkovitz A, Dekel Y, Goldstein R, Bsoul S, Machluf Y, Bercovich D. The significance of human spermatozoa vacuoles can be elucidated by a novel procedure of array comparative genomic hybridization.Hum Reprod. 2018 Apr 1;33(4):563-571. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dey019.
Donker RB, Vloeberghs V, Groen H, Tournaye H, van Ravenswaaij-Arts CMA, Land JA. Chromosomal abnormalities in 1663 infertile men with azoospermia: the clinical consequences. Hum Reprod. 2017 Dec 1;32(12):2574-2580. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex307.
Durak Aras B, Aras I, Can C, Toprak C, Dikoglu E, Bademci G, Ozdemir M, Cilingir O, Artan S.Exploring the relationship between the severity of oligozoospermia and the frequenciesof sperm chromosome aneuploidies. Andrologia. 2012 Dec;44(6):416-22. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2012.01298.x.
Gaspard O, Vanderzwalmen P, Wirleitner B, Ravet S, Wenders F, Eichel V, Mocková A, Spitzer D, Jouan C, Gridelet V, Martens H, Henry L, Zech H, d'Hauterive SP, Nisolle M. Impact of high magnification sperm selection on neonatal outcomes: a retrospective study.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2018 Jun;35(6):1113-1121. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1167-8.
Glujovsky D, Farquhar C, Quinteiro Retamar AM, Alvarez Sedo CR, Blake D. Cleavage stage versus blastocyst stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 30;(6):CD002118. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002118.pub5.
Goswami G, Sharma M, Jugga D, Gouri DM.Can intracytoplasmic Morphologically SelectedSpermatozoa Injection be Used as First Choice of Treatment for Severe Male Factor Infertility Patients? J Hum Reprod Sci. 2018 Jan-Mar;11(1):40-44. doi: 10.4103/jhrs.JHRS_74_17.
Kim SW, Jee BC, Kim SK, Kim SH. Sperm DNA fragmentation and sex chromosome aneuploidy after swim-up versus density gradient centrifugation. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2017 Dec;44(4):201-206. doi: 10.5653/cerm.2017.44.4.201.
Knez K, Zorn B, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. The IMSI procedure improves poor embryo development in the same infertile couples with poor semen quality: a comparative prospective randomized study. Reprod Biol Endocrinol. 2011 Aug 29;9:123. doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-9-123.
Luna D, Hilario R, Dueñas-Chacón J, Romero R, Zavala P, Villegas L, García-Ferreyra J. The IMSI Procedure Improves Laboratory and Clinical Outcomes Without Compromising the Aneuploidy Rate When Compared to the Classical ICSI Procedure. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health. 2015 Nov 12;9:29-37. doi: 10.4137/CMRH.S33032.
McAuliffe ME, Williams PL, Korrick SA, Dadd R, Marchetti F, Martenies SE, Perry MJ.Human sperm sex chromosome disomy and sperm DNA damage assessed by the neutralcomet assay. Hum Reprod. 2014 Oct 10;29(10):2148-55. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu177.
Mehdi M, Gmidène A, Brahem S, Guerin JF, Elghezal H, Saad A. Aneuploidy rate in spermatozoa of selected men with severe teratozoospermia. Andrologia. 2012 May;44 Suppl 1:139-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0272.2010.01152.x.
Meldrum DR. Introduction: nongenetic markers of oocyte and embryo competence. Fertil Steril. 2015;103:301–2. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.117.
Mikitenko TO, Philip LA. An overview of current methods of pre-implantation genetic research. Woman's health. 2014; 9 (95): 42-51.
Nosenko O, Paliy H, Packova A, Golovatiuk K, Zaharenko I, Dubinina V. The retrospective analysis of morphokinetics of transferred embrios from couples with different infertility forms. Giorn It Obst Gin. 2015; XXXVI; 6: 542-545.
Polanski LT, Coelho Neto MA, Nastri CO, Navarro PA, Ferriani RA, Raine-Fenning N, et al. Time-lapse embryo imaging for improving reproductive outcomes: systematic review and meta-analysis. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014;44:394–401. doi: 10.1002/uog.13428.
Practice Committees of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) for non-male factor infertility: a committee opinion. Fertil Steril. 2012;98:1395–9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012. 08.026.
Racowsky C1, Kovacs P, Martins WP. A critical appraisal of time-lapse imaging for embryo selection: where are we and where do we need to go? J Assist Reprod Genet. 2015 Jul;32(7):1025-30. doi: 10.1007/s10815-015-0510-6.
Setti AS, Figueira RC, Braga DP, Aok, T.,Iaconelli A, Jr., Borges E Jr. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection is beneficial in cases of advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized study. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013. 171:286-90.
Setti AS, Paes de Almeida Ferreira Braga D, Iaconelli AJr, Aoki T, Borges EJr. Twelve years of MSOME and IMSI: a review. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Oct;27(4):338-52. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.06.011.
Taherzadeh S, Khalili MA, Agha-Rahimi A, Anbari F, Ghazali S, Macchiarelli G. Vitrification Increased Vacuolization of Human Spematozoa: Application of MSOME Technology. J Reprod Infertil. 2017 Apr-Jun;18(2):225-230.
Wang CZ, Feng GX, Zhang B, Zhou H, Shu JH, Gan XY, Lin RY, Chen HH. Effects of IVF versus ICSI on the outcomes of electiveblastocyst culture. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2014 Aug;20(8):697-701.
Watanabe H. Risk of chromosomal aberration in spermatozoa during intracytoplasmic sperm injection. J Reprod Dev. 2018 Jul 7. doi: 10.1262/jrd.2018-040.
Xie D, Qiu Z, Luo C, Chu Q, Quan S. Effect of spermatozoa from different sources on normal fertilization of oocytes and embryo quality and development inintracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2014 Jun;34(6):857-61.
Zanetti BF, Braga DPAF, Provenza RR, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr.Sperm morphological normality under high magnification is correlated to male infertility and predicts embryo development. Andrology. 2018 Feb 18. doi: 10.1111/andr.12473.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 397
Number of citations: 0