Pedagogical conditions for the implementation of the integrative approach in the professional training of future bachelors of vocational education in the field of digital technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.93.75302Keywords
education, professional, competency-based education, educational technology, digital technology, curriculum, facultyAbstract
Introduction and purpose. The digital transformation of vocational education and the human-centred priorities of Industry 5.0 require that the pedagogical and the digital-technological components of teacher training cease to be delivered in parallel and become genuinely interpenetrating. Theoretical substantiation of the integrative approach does not by itself guarantee an educational result: it becomes operational only when supported by a controllable set of pedagogical conditions. The purpose is to substantiate and structurally describe such a set for the training of future bachelors of vocational education specialising in digital technologies.
Brief description of the state of knowledge. Pedagogical conditions are most often presented in the literature as unordered lists, without an explicit derivation procedure and without showing which component of competence each condition supports and which educational barrier it neutralises. Here five conditions were derived from three complementary sources: the seven-component structure of professional competence, the methodological triad of the systems, competence and activity approaches, and the educational barriers identified in the analysis of the state of the problem. A conditions-components matrix was constructed and two analytical indices were computed from it.
Summary. The set comprises content integration; a human-centred integrative digital learning environment; practice-oriented and project technologies; readiness of the teaching staff; and the subject position of students. Readiness of the teaching staff possesses the highest integrative capacity and is system-forming, whereas the cognitive-content and reflective-evaluative components receive the weakest support and form the principal risk zone of the design.
References
1. Turchyn R. B. Synergy of scientific ideas of the integrative approach in the professional training of future bachelors of vocational education in the field of digital technologies. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training: Methodology, Theory, Experience, Problems. 2025;78:376-387. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2025-78-376-387. Ukrainian.
2. Turchyn R. Integrative approach to the design of didactic teaching aids in the professional training of future bachelors of vocational education in the field of digital technologies. Problems of the Modern Textbook. 2026;36:291-310. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1309-2026-36-291. Ukrainian.
3. Potapchuk O. Analysis of the effectiveness of the training system of future computer profile specialists for the application of digital technologies. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2024;58:225-233. https://doi.org/10.12775/jehs.2024.58.016
4. Senkivska L. The role of digital technologies in education. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2022;12(1):419-423. https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.01.036
5. Zeng X., Li Y. Strategies for talent’s digital competence development at higher vocational colleges for digital transformation. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2023;13(1):23-30. https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.13.01.003
6. Horbatiuk R., Kozak Yu. Pedagogical conditions of formation of graphic competence of future engineers-teachers of the computer profile in pedagogical universities. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology. 2018;6(3). https://doi.org/10.32919/uesit.2018.03.04
7. Pidhorna T., Tverdokhlib I. Peculiarities of preparing future teachers for the implementation of the integrative approach in the educational process. Ukrainian Educational Journal. 2023;3:132-143. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1317-2023-3-132-143. Ukrainian.
8. Bakhtiiarova Kh. Integrative approach in the training of future teachers of vocational education. Professional Pedagogics. 2021;1(22):143-150. https://doi.org/10.32835/2707-3092.2021.22.143-150. Ukrainian.
9. Lavnikov O.A., Lesyk A.S. Integrative approach in the system of higher education: concept and features. Bulletin of Alfred Nobel University. Series: Pedagogy and Psychology. 2020;1(19):195-199. https://doi.org/10.32342/2522-4115-2020-1-19-23. Ukrainian.
10. Tovkanets O. Integrative approach in the development of European higher education. Scientific Bulletin of Uzhhorod University. Series: Pedagogy. Social Work. 2023;1(52):218-222. https://doi.org/10.24144/2524-0609.2023.52.218-222. Ukrainian.
11. Titarenko V. Theoretical and methodical aspects of the formation of integral competence in future specialists of vocational education. Ukrainian Professional Education. 2025;17:32-39. https://doi.org/10.33989/2519-8254.2025.17.342363. Ukrainian.
12. Herasymenko L. The structure of the educational process on the basis of the integrative approach in the system of professional training of medical students. Health & Education. 2023;1:7-13. https://doi.org/10.32782/health-2023.1.2. Ukrainian.
13. Zakharova O.V., Dariienko A.V. Prospects for the implementation of integrative learning in the professional training of future civil aviation pilots. Academic Notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences. 2024;214:377-380. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2024-1-214-377-380. Ukrainian.
14. Kichuk N.V., Dziuba O.A. Integrated approach to the professional training of specialists of the artistic and pedagogical profile. Academic Notes. Series: Pedagogical Sciences. 2024;214:39-43. https://doi.org/10.36550/2415-7988-2024-1-214-39-43. Ukrainian.
15. Sasina I., Herashchenko S., Markus I. Integrative approach in the professional training of future teachers-rehabilitologists. Scientific Journal: Correctional Pedagogy. 2025;49:144-151. https://doi.org/10.31392/UDU-nc.series19.2025.49.22. Ukrainian.
16. Shevchuk L.D., Zyma V.V. From digital literacy to technological culture: professional training of future teachers of vocational education. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training. 2026;79:47-58. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2026-79-47-58. Ukrainian.
17. Pryvezentsev O.S. Modelling the training of bachelors of vocational education (digital technologies) in higher education institutions for interface design. Innovative Pedagogy. 2026;92(2):146-151. https://doi.org/10.32782/ip/92.2.27. Ukrainian.
18. Klochko O. Development of critical thinking of future teachers of computer science and mathematics with the use of artificial intelligence tools. Modern Information Technologies and Innovation Methodologies of Education in Professional Training. 2024;72:14-26. https://doi.org/10.31652/2412-1142-2024-72-14-26. Ukrainian.
19. Previr M., Kyrylenko O. Study of the expediency of using the classical approach in teaching programming in the era of generative artificial intelligence. Problems of the Modern Textbook. 2025;35:94-106. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1309-2025-35-94-106. Ukrainian.
20. Potapchuk O., Hevko I., Lutsyk I. Preparation of future teachers for the use of immersive technologies in professional activities. Information Technologies and Learning Tools. 2025;110(6):151-164. https://doi.org/10.33407/itlt.v110i6.6257
21. Aliekseieva S. Innovations and prospects in educational practices: non-formal education. Problems of the Modern Textbook. 2024;32:6-12. https://doi.org/10.32405/2411-1309-2024-32-6-12. Ukrainian.
22. Chaikovska H. Integration of education for sustainable development in a higher education institution: problems and prospects. Social Work and Education. 2023;10(1):123-133. https://doi.org/10.25128/2520-6230.23.1.1
23. El-Hamamsy L., Bruno B., Chessel-Lazzarotto F., Chevalier M., Roy D., Dehler Zufferey J., Mondada F. The symbiotic relationship between educational robotics and computer science in formal education. Education and Information Technologies. 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10494-3
24. Gormaz-Lobos D., Galarce-Miranda C., Hortsch H. Online engineering pedagogy: a proposal for specialization of the teacher training in engineering. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy. 2021;11(5):105-121. https://doi.org/10.3991/ijep.v11i5.22427
25. Hashim M., Tlemsani I., Matthews R. Higher education strategy in digital transformation. Education and Information Technologies. 2022;27:3171-3195. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10639-021-10739-1
26. Pinto M., Leite C. Digital technologies in support of students learning in higher education: literature review. Digital Education Review. 2020;37:343-360. https://doi.org/10.1344/der.2020.37.343-360
27. Colasante M., Bevacqua J., Muir S. Flexible hybrid format in university curricula to offer students in-subject choice of study mode: an educational design research project. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice. 2020;17(3). https://doi.org/10.53761/1.17.3.9
28. Zeng W. An empirical research on China’s policy for ICT integration in basic education from 1988 to 2021. Educational Technology Research and Development. 2022;70:1059-1082. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-022-10079-y
29. Liang H., Song M., Li J., et al. Interdisciplinary educational ecosystem and students’ interdisciplinary competence: evidence from research universities in China. Higher Education. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-026-01673-7
30. Overend D. Undisciplined learning spaces: an environmental model for interdisciplinary education. Postdigital Science and Education. 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42438-026-00645-5
31. Tynjala P., Virtanen A., Klemola U., Kostiainen E., Rasku-Puttonen H. Developing social competence and other generic skills in teacher education: applying the model of integrative pedagogy. European Journal of Teacher Education. 2016;39(3):368-387. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2016.1171314
32. Juraev M.M., Aroyev D.D. Interdisciplinary integration is an important part of developing the professional training of students. Open Access Repository. 2023;9(1):93-101. https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/H85SF
33. Zhang C., Chen Y., Chen H., Chong D. Industry 4.0 and its implementation: a review. Information Systems Frontiers. 2024;26(5):1773-1783. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-021-10153-5
34. Sharma R., Vinodkumar N., Mabrouk F., Sarabdeen M. From awareness to participation: how curriculum innovation and participatory pedagogies foster SDG engagement in higher education. Frontiers in Education. 2026;11:1706434. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2026.1706434
35. Fedorets V.M., Klochko O.V., Tverdokhlib I.A., Sharyhin O.A. Cognitive aspects of interaction in the “Human–Artificial Intelligence” system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2024;2871(1):012023. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2871/1/012023
36. Klochko O.V., Fedorets V.M., Klochko V.I., Klochko K.A. Anthropologically oriented strategies of interaction in the Human-Computer system. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2023;2611(1):012018. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2611/1/012018
37. European Commission. Digital Education Action Plan 2021-2027: improving the provision of digital skills in education and training. Brussels: European Commission; 2023. Available from: https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/actions (Access: 20.05.2026).
38. UNESCO. AI competency framework for teachers. Paris: UNESCO; 2024. Available from: https://www.unesco.org/en/articles/ai-competency-framework-teachers (Access: 20.05.2026).
39. Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine. Standard of Higher Education of Ukraine, first (bachelor’s) level, field of knowledge 01 Education/Pedagogy, speciality 015 Vocational Education (by specialisations). Order №. 1460 of 21.11.2019. Kyiv; 2019. Available from: https://mon.gov.ua (Access: 20.05.2026). Ukrainian.
40. Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine. Strategy for the digital development of innovation activity of Ukraine for the period up to 2030. Order № 1351 of 2024. Kyiv; 2024. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1351-2024-r (Access: 20.05.2026). Ukrainian.
41. Kozlovskyi Yu.M. Integration processes in vocational education: methodology, theory, methods. Monograph. Lviv: Lviv Polytechnic Publishing House; 2018. 420 p. Ukrainian.
42. Hedzyk A.A. Formation of informatics competence of future teachers of vocational training in digital technologies in higher education institutions [dissertation]. Kyiv: Mykhailo Drahomanov Ukrainian State University; 2023. Ukrainian.
43. Semenov YeK. Application of digital technologies for the formation of professional competence of future teachers of vocational training. Monograph. Vinnytsia; 2022. 284 p. https://doi.org/10.31652/378.6.147.091.33-1-284. Ukrainian.
44. Opachko M.V. Systems and integrative approaches in education. Teaching and methodological manual. Uzhhorod: Uzhhorod National University; 2020. 76 p. Ukrainian.
45. Hevko I.V. Formation of professional competence of the future teacher of technologies. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2017;7(7):787-799. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.844085
46. Hevko I.V. Formation of the bases of professional pedagogical activity in the professional training of the teacher of technology. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. 2017;7(3). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.843553
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ihor Hevko, Rostyslav Turchyn

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 67
Number of citations: 0