Comparative characteristics of RFA and conservative methods of treatment of chronic knee pain syndrome
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.86.74990Keywords
neuropathic pain, nociceptive pain, osteoarthritis, knee replacement, multidisciplinary approachAbstract
Introduction. Chronic knee pain syndrome associated with osteoarthritis is one of the most common causes of reduced physical activity, disability, and deterioration in the quality of life of elderly patients. Despite the widespread use of conservative treatment methods, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), intra-articular injections of hyaluronic acid, corticosteroids, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) therapy, their effectiveness in achieving long-term pain control remains limited. In this regard, genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation (RFA) has attracted considerable interest as a modern minimally invasive treatment modality capable of providing sustained analgesic effects and improving patients’ functional status. The aim of the study was to conduct a comparative evaluation of the effectiveness of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation and the main conservative treatment methods for chronic knee pain syndrome in patients with osteoarthritis based on changes in pain intensity.
Materials and Methods. A retrospective-prospective clinical study was conducted involving 200 patients aged 45–75 years with clinically and instrumentally confirmed knee osteoarthritis. The patients were divided into five treatment groups: NSAIDs combined with therapeutic exercise (n = 45), intra-articular hyaluronic acid injections (n = 35), intra-articular corticosteroid injections (n = 30), PRP therapy (n = 40), and genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation combined with a multidisciplinary approach (n = 50). Treatment efficacy was assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) before treatment and after 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Statistical analysis was performed using descriptive statistics, the Shapiro–Wilk test, and one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a significance level of p < 0.05.
Results and Conclusions. A statistically significant reduction in pain intensity was observed in all treatment groups throughout the six-month follow-up period (p < 0.001). The lowest effectiveness was demonstrated by NSAID therapy combined with therapeutic exercise, where pain intensity decreased by 25.4% in women and 22.4% in men after six months. Hyaluronic acid and corticosteroid injections resulted in pain reduction ranging from 31.6% to 38.8%, whereas PRP therapy achieved a reduction of 47.0%–52.8%. The best outcomes were obtained in the RFA group combined with a multidisciplinary approach, where pain intensity after six months decreased by 68.0% in women and 61.9% in men. The mean VAS score after RFA was 2.38 ± 0.71 points in women and 2.92 ± 0.83 points in men, corresponding to a transition from severe to mild pain. The advantages of RFA were maintained across all age groups, including patients aged 70–75 years. The obtained results indicate that genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation combined with a multidisciplinary approach is the most effective treatment method for chronic knee pain syndrome among the investigated modalities, providing the greatest and most sustained pain reduction in patients with knee osteoarthritis.
References
1. Bannuru, R. R., et al. (2019). OARSI Guidelines for the Non-Surgical Management of Knee, Hip, and Polyarticular Osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 27(11), 1578–1589. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2019.06.011
2. Bannuru, R. R., et al. (2015). Comparative effectiveness of pharmacologic interventions for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Annals of Internal Medicine, 162(1), 46–54. https://doi.org/10.7326/M14-1231
3. Barreto, R. B., et al. (2026). Efficacy and safety of genicular nerve ablation techniques for knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis of sham-controlled randomized trials. Pain Medicine, 27(4), 449–461. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf140
4. Carlone, A. G., Grothaus, O., Jacobs, C., & Duncan, S. T. (2021). Is cooled radiofrequency genicular nerve block and ablation a viable option for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis? Arthroplasty Today, 7, 220–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2020.12.003
5. Chen, A. F., et al. (2020). Cooled radiofrequency ablation provides extended clinical utility in the management of knee osteoarthritis: 12-month results from a prospective, multi-center, randomized, cross-over trial comparing cooled radiofrequency ablation to a single hyaluronic acid injection. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 21(1), Article 363. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12891-020-03380-5
6. Chen, J., Zhou, Q., Yu, W., & Cao, D. (2025). A critical overview of systematic reviews of radiofrequency ablation for knee osteoarthritis. Disability and Rehabilitation, 47(20), 5161–5170. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638288.2025.2469771
7. Choi, W. J., et al. (2011). Radiofrequency treatment relieves chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A double-blind randomized controlled trial. Pain, 152(3), 481–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pain.2010.09.029
8. Conger, A., et al. (2021). Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of painful knee osteoarthritis: Current evidence and future directions. Pain Medicine, 22(Suppl. 1), S20–S23. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnab129
9. da Costa, B. R., et al. (2021). Effectiveness and safety of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and opioid treatment for knee and hip osteoarthritis: Network meta-analysis. BMJ, 375, n2321. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n2321
10. Elemam, E. M., Abdel Dayem, O. T., Mousa, S. A., & Mohammed, H. M. (2022). Ultrasound-guided monopolar versus bipolar radiofrequency ablation for genicular nerves in chronic knee osteoarthritis pain: A randomized controlled study. Annals of Medicine and Surgery, 77, 103680. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amsu.2022.103680
11. Ferreira-Silva, N., et al. (2025). Navigating current controversies in radiofrequency ablation of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain in osteoarthritis: A daring discourse. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2025-106518
12. Fransen, M., et al. (2015). Exercise for osteoarthritis of the knee. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 1, CD004376. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD004376.pub3
13. Jevsevar, D. S., Donnelly, P., Brown, G. A., & Cummins, D. S. (2015). Viscosupplementation for osteoarthritis of the knee: A systematic review of the evidence. The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 97(24), 2047–2060. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00743
14. Kanjanapanang, N., et al. (2026). Effectiveness of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in osteoarthritis and post-surgical knee pain: Systematic review. Pain Medicine, 27(2), 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf115
15. Katz, J. N., Arant, K. R., & Loeser, R. F. (2021). Diagnosis and treatment of hip and knee osteoarthritis: A review. JAMA, 325(6), 568–578. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2020.22171
16. Kolasinski, S. L., et al. (2020). 2019 American College of Rheumatology/Arthritis Foundation guideline for the management of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and knee. Arthritis Care & Research, 72(2), 149–162. https://doi.org/10.1002/acr.24131
17. Kwon, H. J., et al. (2024). Effectiveness of the cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves in patients with chronic knee pain due to osteoarthritis: A double-blind, randomized, controlled study. Medicina, 60(6), 857. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina60060857
18. Li, G., Zhang, Y., Tian, L., & Pan, J. (2021). Radiofrequency ablation reduces pain for knee osteoarthritis: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. International Journal of Surgery, 91, 105951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2021.105951
19. Lyman, J., et al. (2022). Cooled radiofrequency ablation of genicular nerves provides 24-month durability in the management of osteoarthritic knee pain: Outcomes from a prospective, multicenter, randomized trial. Pain Practice, 22(6), 571–581. https://doi.org/10.1111/papr.13139
20. Malaithong, W., Tontisirin, N., Seangrung, R., Wongsak, S., & Cohen, S. P. (2023). Bipolar radiofrequency ablation of the superomedial (SM), superolateral (SL) and inferomedial (IM) genicular nerves for chronic osteoarthritis knee pain: A randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial with 12-month follow-up. Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, 48(4), 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1136/rapm-2022-103976
21. McAlindon, T. E., et al. (2014). OARSI guidelines for the non-surgical management of knee osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 22(3), 363–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2014.01.003
22. Messier, S. P., et al. (2021). Effect of high-intensity strength training on knee pain and knee joint compressive forces among adults with knee osteoarthritis: The START randomized clinical trial. JAMA, 325(7), 646–657. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.0411
23. Moseng, T., et al. (2024). EULAR recommendations for the non-pharmacological core management of hip and knee osteoarthritis: 2023 update. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 83(6), 730–740. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard-2023-225041
24. Neogi, T. (2013). The epidemiology and impact of pain in osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis and Cartilage, 21(9), 1145–1153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2013.03.018
25. Peng, Y.-H., & Peng, Y. (2025). Clinical efficacy of genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation in knee osteoarthritis patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PM&R, 17(Suppl. 1), S118. https://doi.org/10.1002/pmrj.232_70065
26. Quazi, M., et al. (2026). Genicular nerve radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic knee pain: Systematic review with Bayesian network meta-analysis. Pain Medicine, 27(6), 635–648. https://doi.org/10.1093/pm/pnaf181
27. Shanahan, E. M., et al. (2023). Genicular nerve block for pain management in patients with knee osteoarthritis: A randomized placebo-controlled trial. Arthritis & Rheumatology, 75(2), 201–209. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.42384
28. Soetjahjo, B., et al. (2024). The analgesic effectiveness of genicular nerve-targeted cooled and pulsed radiofrequency ablation for osteoarthritis knee pain: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Pain Physician, 27(7), 357–373.
29. Tsiplakos, P., et al. (2025). Cooled radiofrequency ablation versus cryoneurolysis of the genicular nerves for the symptomatic pain management in knee osteoarthritis: A prospective, randomized, single-blinded clinical trial. Cureus, 17(12), e98323. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.98323
30. Vallejo, R., et al.. (2023). A randomized controlled study of the long-term efficacy of cooled and monopolar radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of chronic pain related to knee osteoarthritis. Interventional Pain Medicine, 2(2), 100249. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inpm.2023.100249
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Ivan Savitsky

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 12
Number of citations: 0