The effect of general anesthesia on hemostasis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.94.74834Keywords
general anesthesia, propofol, sufentanil, hemostasis, rotational thromboelastometry, ROTEM, hypercoagulability, clot kineticsAbstract
Background: The growing number of surgical patients requiring long-term anticoagulation or presenting with coagulopathies necessitates a precise understanding of how anesthetic induction agents affect the hemostatic system.
Objective: To evaluate the acute impact of propofol and sufentanil induction on primary and secondary hemostasis using rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM) and flow cytometry (FC).
Methods: A prospective pilot study was conducted on 7 adult patients (ASA physical status I) scheduled for elective surgery. Blood samples were collected immediately before and 5–7 minutes after intravenous induction with propofol and sufentanil (prior to surgical incision to exclude surgical trauma influence). Hemostatic parameters evaluated included ROTEM (EXTEM/INTEM: CT, CFT, Alpha angle, MCF, A10, A20) and FC (total and activated platelet counts). Nonparametric paired data were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.
Results: A statistically significant increase in the EXTEM Alpha angle was observed post-induction (p = 0.047), indicating an accelerated rate of clot formation. A trend toward hypercoagulability was noted for EXTEM CFT (p = 0.063) and INTEM CT (p = 0.108). Other ROTEM parameters (MCF, A10, A20) showed no significant changes. Flow cytometry revealed less than a 5% difference in total and activated platelet counts (p > 0.50), indicating no clinically relevant alterantion of platelet function.
Conclusion: Induction of general anesthesia with propofol and sufentanil in ASA I patients exerts minimal influence on hemostasis, displaying only a slight trend toward hypercoagulability. Both agents can be safely administered without compromising perioperative coagulation dynamics.
References
1. Kubisz P (Eds.). Hematológia a transfuziológia: učebnica. 1st ed. Bratislava: Grada Publishing; 2006., p323.
2. XXIII Slovensko-Česká konferencia Hemostáza a trombóza 19-21.05.2016, Martin. 2016. Vaskulárna Medicína, 8(2), 95–97.
3. Staško, J., Kubisz, P. Trombohemostatic disease reseach New-York: Nova Science Publishezs, 2007, p. 202.
4. Faraday N. Platelets, perioperative hemostasis, and anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2002 May;96(5):1042-3. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200205000-00003. PMID: 11981140.
5. Bon-wook Koo, Hyo-Seok Na, Jeon Yeong Tae, Hwang, Jung-Won, Do, SangHwan. The influence of propofol and sevoflurane on hemostasis: a rotational thromboelastographic study. 2014; 9(4): 292-297.
6. Schöchl, H., Forster, L., Woidke, R., Solomon, C. and Voelckel, W. (2010), Use of rotation thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) to achieve successful treatment of polytrauma with fibrinogen concentrate and prothrombin complex concentrate. Anaesthesia, 65: 199-203. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2044.2009.06188.x
7. Nakayama Y, Nakajima Y, Tanaka KA, Sessler DI, Maeda S, Iida J, Ogawa S, Mizobe T. Thromboelastometry-guided intraoperative haemostatic management reduces bleeding and red cell transfusion after paediatric cardiac surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2015 Jan;114(1):91-102. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeu339. Epub 2014 Oct 10. PMID: 25303988.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Natalia Bordun, Beata Drobná Saniová, Oleg Tarabrin, Roman Sukhonos

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 25
Number of citations: 0