Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.95.73695Keywords
Artificial inteligence, medical education, machine learning, large language models, clinical reasoning, educational technologyAbstract
Introduction and purpose. Artificial intelligence has gained growing attention in medical education, especially since ChatGPT appeared in late 2022. Large language models proved capable of reaching or exceeding passing thresholds on USMLE-style questions or official practice materials, which sparked both enthusiasm and concern among educators. This review aims to present how AI tools are currently used across the medical education continuum, what problems they create and where the field may be heading.
Brief description of the state of knowledge. Machine learning and natural language processing are already being used in preclinical teaching, especially in anatomy and pharmacology, through adaptive quizzes, intelligent tutoring, and question generation. In clinical training, AI-powered virtual patients allow students to practise history-taking and diagnostic reasoning in a safe setting, while AI-enhanced surgical simulators give objective, real-time feedback on technical skills. Large language models are also being tested as item writers for medical examinations, with early studies showing acceptable question quality after expert review. At the same time, serious problems remain: AI systems can produce confident but wrong medical information, student overreliance may weaken independent reasoning, academic integrity is harder to enforce and algorithmic bias may disadvantage certain groups.
Summary. AI offers real opportunities to personalise learning, broaden access, and improve assessment in medical education. Realising these benefits without harm will require clear institutional policies, faculty development, rigorous outcome research, and a commitment to preserving the human side of medicine.
References
1. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e13930. doi:10.2196/13930
2. Masters K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):976-980. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1595557
3. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198
4. Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, Chartash D. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e45312. doi:10.2196/45312
5. Nori H, King N, McKinney SM, Carignan D, Horvitz E. Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems. arXiv. Published March 24, 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.13375
6. Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. 2023;620(7972):172-180. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2
7. Singhal K, Tu T, Gottweis J, et al. Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models. Nat Med. 2025;31(3):943-950. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03423-7
8. Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence for medical education: potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22-27. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439
9. Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram KM. Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2021;96(11S):S62-S70. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004291
10. Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 2024;46(4):446-470. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314198
11. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1233-1239. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr2214184
12. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-453. doi:10.1126/science.aax2342
13. Kıyak YS, Emekli E. ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: a literature review. Postgrad Med J. 2024;100(1189):858-865. doi:10.1093/postmj/qgae065
14. Park JJ, Tiefenbach J, Demetriades AK. The role of artificial intelligence in surgical simulation. Front Med Technol. 2022;4:1076755. doi:10.3389/fmedt.2022.1076755
15. Masters K. Ethical use of artificial intelligence in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 158. Med Teach. 2023;45(6):574-584. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2186203
16. Association of American Medical Colleges. Principles for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in and for Medical Education. Published 2024.
17. American Medical Association. AMA Principles for Augmented Intelligence Development, Deployment, and Use. Published 2024.
18. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health. Published 2021.
19. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: Guidance on Large Multi-Modal Models. Published 2024.
20. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8
21. Safranek CW, Sidamon-Eristoff AE, Gilson A, Chartash D. The role of large language models in medical education: applications and implications. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e50945. doi:10.2196/50945
22. Abd-Alrazaq A, AlSaad R, Alhuwail D, et al. Large language models in medical education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48291. doi:10.2196/48291
23. Abdellatif H, Al Mushaiqri M, Albalushi H, Al-Zaabi AA, Roychoudhury S, Das S. Teaching, learning and assessing anatomy with artificial intelligence: the road to a better future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14209. doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209
24. Totlis T, Otountzidis N, Papadopoulos S, Piagkou M, Natsis K. The potential role of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in anatomy education: a conversation with ChatGPT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2023;45(10):1321-1329. doi:10.1007/s00276-023-03229-1
25. Kıyak YS, Soylu A, Coşkun Ö, Budakoğlu İİ, Peker TV. Can ChatGPT generate acceptable case-based multiple-choice questions for medical school anatomy exams? Clin Anat. 2025;38(4):505-510. doi:10.1002/ca.24271
26. Combs CD. Emerging roles of virtual patients in the age of AI. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(2):E153-E159. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.153
27. Mergen M, Junga A, Risse B, Valkov D, Graf N, Marschall B. Immersive training of clinical decision making with AI driven virtual patients-a new VR platform called medical tr.AI.ning. GMS J Med Educ. 2023;40(2):Doc18. doi:10.3205/zma001600
28. Fazlollahi AM, Bakhaidar M, Alsayegh A, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated surgical skills among medical students: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2149008. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49008
29. Cheung BHH, Lau GKK, Wong GTC, et al. ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions-a multinational prospective study. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290691
30. Coşkun Ö, Kıyak YS, Budakoğlu İİ. ChatGPT to generate clinical vignettes for teaching and multiple-choice questions for assessment: a randomized controlled experiment. Med Teach. 2025;47(2):268-274. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2327477
31. Kanjee Z, Crowe B, Rodman A. Accuracy of a generative artificial intelligence model in a complex diagnostic challenge. JAMA. 2023;330(1):78-80. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.8288
32. Cabral S, Restrepo D, Kanjee Z, et al. Clinical reasoning of a generative artificial intelligence model compared with physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(5):581-583. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0295
33. Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J, et al. Influence of a large language model on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical vignette study. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(10):e2440969. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969
34. Hamilton A, Molzahn A, McLemore K. The evolution from standardized to virtual patients in medical education. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71224. doi:10.7759/cureus.71224
35. Winkler-Schwartz A, Bissonnette V, Mirchi N, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):1681-1690. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015
36. Weber-Wulff D, Anohina-Naumeca A, Bjelobaba S, et al. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. Int J Educ Integr. 2023;19:26. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z
37. Strong E, DiGiammarino A, Weng Y, Kumar A, Hosamani P, Hom J, Chen JH. Chatbot vs medical student performance on free-response clinical reasoning examinations. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(9):1028-1030. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2909
38. Mondal H. Ethical engagement with artificial intelligence in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 2025;49(1):163-165. doi:10.1152/advan.00188.2024
39. Katznelson G, Gerke S. The need for health AI ethics in medical school education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(4):1447-1458. doi:10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3
40. Grunhut J, Wyatt ATM, Marques O. Educating future physicians in artificial intelligence (AI): an integrative review and proposed changes. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021;8:23821205211036836. doi:10.1177/23821205211036836
41. Rudnik A, Jendro O, Mastej A, et al. Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing everyday medical practice. J Educ Health Sport. 2023;28(1):155-165. doi:10.12775/JEHS.2023.28.01.012
42. Lucas HC, Upperman JS, Robinson JR. A systematic review of large language models and their implications in medical education. Med Educ. 2024;58(11):1276-1285. doi:10.1111/medu.15402
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Paweł Klimas, Piotr Wysokiński, Sebastian Szmeja, Julia Masalska, Kacper Robert Toczydłowski, Paweł Adam Król, Martyna Michalik, Maria Mamczak, Stanisław Ferdynand Strzępek, Natalia Mazek

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 33
Number of citations: 0