Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives
  • Home
  • /
  • Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 95 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives

Authors

  • Paweł Klimas Św. Wincentego a Paulo Hospital, 1 Wójta Radtkego St., 81-348 Gdynia, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8803-0476
  • Piotr Wysokiński Śniadeckiego Voivodeship Hospital in Bialystok, ul. M. C. Skłodowskiej 26, 15-278 Białystok, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0008-9960-3026
  • Sebastian Szmeja Śniadeckiego Voivodeship Hospital in Bialystok, ul. M. C. Skłodowskiej 26, 15-278 Białystok, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0000-7230-6365
  • Julia Masalska Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration Aleja Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn https://orcid.org/0009-0005-3155-9987
  • Kacper Robert Toczydłowski Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration with the Warmia-Mazury Oncology Centre in Olsztyn, Aleja Wojska Polskiego 37, 10-228 Olsztyn, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0001-9632-9358
  • Paweł Adam Król Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration with the Warmia-Mazury Oncology Centre in Olsztyn https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1137-7240
  • Martyna Michalik National Medical Institute of the Ministry of the Interior and Administration (PIM MSWiA), ul. Wołoska 137, 02-507 Warsaw, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0005-7235-3037
  • Maria Mamczak Szpital Praski p.w. Przemienienia Pańskiego w Warszawie https://orcid.org/0009-0001-6295-9220
  • Stanisław Ferdynand Strzępek Medical University of Bialystok: Bialystok, Podlasie, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0008-5517-4485
  • Natalia Mazek Clinical Hospital of the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Administration with the Warmia-Mazury Oncology Centre in Olsztyn https://orcid.org/0009-0002-8173-6791

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.95.73695

Keywords

Artificial inteligence, medical education, machine learning, large language models, clinical reasoning, educational technology

Abstract

Introduction and purpose. Artificial intelligence has gained growing attention in medical education, especially since ChatGPT appeared in late 2022. Large language models proved capable of reaching or exceeding passing thresholds on USMLE-style questions or official practice materials, which sparked both enthusiasm and concern among educators. This review aims to present how AI tools are currently used across the medical education continuum, what problems they create and where the field may be heading.

Brief description of the state of knowledge. Machine learning and natural language processing are already being used in preclinical teaching, especially in anatomy and pharmacology, through adaptive quizzes, intelligent tutoring, and question generation. In clinical training, AI-powered virtual patients allow students to practise history-taking and diagnostic reasoning in a safe setting, while AI-enhanced surgical simulators give objective, real-time feedback on technical skills. Large language models are also being tested as item writers for medical examinations, with early studies showing acceptable question quality after expert review. At the same time, serious problems remain: AI systems can produce confident but wrong medical information, student overreliance may weaken independent reasoning, academic integrity is harder to enforce and algorithmic bias may disadvantage certain groups.

Summary. AI offers real opportunities to personalise learning, broaden access, and improve assessment in medical education. Realising these benefits without harm will require clear institutional policies, faculty development, rigorous outcome research, and a commitment to preserving the human side of medicine.

References

1. Chan KS, Zary N. Applications and challenges of implementing artificial intelligence in medical education: integrative review. JMIR Med Educ. 2019;5(1):e13930. doi:10.2196/13930

2. Masters K. Artificial intelligence in medical education. Med Teach. 2019;41(9):976-980. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2019.1595557

3. Kung TH, Cheatham M, Medenilla A, et al. Performance of ChatGPT on USMLE: potential for AI-assisted medical education using large language models. PLOS Digit Health. 2023;2(2):e0000198. doi:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000198

4. Gilson A, Safranek CW, Huang T, Socrates V, Chi L, Taylor RA, Chartash D. How does ChatGPT perform on the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE)? JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e45312. doi:10.2196/45312

5. Nori H, King N, McKinney SM, Carignan D, Horvitz E. Capabilities of GPT-4 on medical challenge problems. arXiv. Published March 24, 2023. doi:10.48550/arXiv.2303.13375

6. Singhal K, Azizi S, Tu T, et al. Large language models encode clinical knowledge. Nature. 2023;620(7972):172-180. doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06291-2

7. Singhal K, Tu T, Gottweis J, et al. Toward expert-level medical question answering with large language models. Nat Med. 2025;31(3):943-950. doi:10.1038/s41591-024-03423-7

8. Boscardin CK, Gin B, Golde PB, Hauer KE. ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence for medical education: potential impact and opportunity. Acad Med. 2024;99(1):22-27. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000005439

9. Lee J, Wu AS, Li D, Kulasegaram KM. Artificial intelligence in undergraduate medical education: a scoping review. Acad Med. 2021;96(11S):S62-S70. doi:10.1097/ACM.0000000000004291

10. Gordon M, Daniel M, Ajiboye A, et al. A scoping review of artificial intelligence in medical education: BEME Guide No. 84. Med Teach. 2024;46(4):446-470. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2314198

11. Lee P, Bubeck S, Petro J. Benefits, limits, and risks of GPT-4 as an AI chatbot for medicine. N Engl J Med. 2023;388(13):1233-1239. doi:10.1056/NEJMsr2214184

12. Obermeyer Z, Powers B, Vogeli C, Mullainathan S. Dissecting racial bias in an algorithm used to manage the health of populations. Science. 2019;366(6464):447-453. doi:10.1126/science.aax2342

13. Kıyak YS, Emekli E. ChatGPT prompts for generating multiple-choice questions in medical education and evidence on their validity: a literature review. Postgrad Med J. 2024;100(1189):858-865. doi:10.1093/postmj/qgae065

14. Park JJ, Tiefenbach J, Demetriades AK. The role of artificial intelligence in surgical simulation. Front Med Technol. 2022;4:1076755. doi:10.3389/fmedt.2022.1076755

15. Masters K. Ethical use of artificial intelligence in health professions education: AMEE Guide No. 158. Med Teach. 2023;45(6):574-584. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2023.2186203

16. Association of American Medical Colleges. Principles for the Responsible Use of Artificial Intelligence in and for Medical Education. Published 2024.

17. American Medical Association. AMA Principles for Augmented Intelligence Development, Deployment, and Use. Published 2024.

18. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health. Published 2021.

19. World Health Organization. Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health: Guidance on Large Multi-Modal Models. Published 2024.

20. Baethge C, Goldbeck-Wood S, Mertens S. SANRA-a scale for the quality assessment of narrative review articles. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2019;4:5. doi:10.1186/s41073-019-0064-8

21. Safranek CW, Sidamon-Eristoff AE, Gilson A, Chartash D. The role of large language models in medical education: applications and implications. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e50945. doi:10.2196/50945

22. Abd-Alrazaq A, AlSaad R, Alhuwail D, et al. Large language models in medical education: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. JMIR Med Educ. 2023;9:e48291. doi:10.2196/48291

23. Abdellatif H, Al Mushaiqri M, Albalushi H, Al-Zaabi AA, Roychoudhury S, Das S. Teaching, learning and assessing anatomy with artificial intelligence: the road to a better future. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022;19(21):14209. doi:10.3390/ijerph192114209

24. Totlis T, Otountzidis N, Papadopoulos S, Piagkou M, Natsis K. The potential role of ChatGPT and artificial intelligence in anatomy education: a conversation with ChatGPT. Surg Radiol Anat. 2023;45(10):1321-1329. doi:10.1007/s00276-023-03229-1

25. Kıyak YS, Soylu A, Coşkun Ö, Budakoğlu İİ, Peker TV. Can ChatGPT generate acceptable case-based multiple-choice questions for medical school anatomy exams? Clin Anat. 2025;38(4):505-510. doi:10.1002/ca.24271

26. Combs CD. Emerging roles of virtual patients in the age of AI. AMA J Ethics. 2019;21(2):E153-E159. doi:10.1001/amajethics.2019.153

27. Mergen M, Junga A, Risse B, Valkov D, Graf N, Marschall B. Immersive training of clinical decision making with AI driven virtual patients-a new VR platform called medical tr.AI.ning. GMS J Med Educ. 2023;40(2):Doc18. doi:10.3205/zma001600

28. Fazlollahi AM, Bakhaidar M, Alsayegh A, et al. Effect of artificial intelligence tutoring vs expert instruction on learning simulated surgical skills among medical students: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2):e2149008. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.49008

29. Cheung BHH, Lau GKK, Wong GTC, et al. ChatGPT versus human in generating medical graduate exam multiple choice questions-a multinational prospective study. PLoS One. 2023;18(8):e0290691. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0290691

30. Coşkun Ö, Kıyak YS, Budakoğlu İİ. ChatGPT to generate clinical vignettes for teaching and multiple-choice questions for assessment: a randomized controlled experiment. Med Teach. 2025;47(2):268-274. doi:10.1080/0142159X.2024.2327477

31. Kanjee Z, Crowe B, Rodman A. Accuracy of a generative artificial intelligence model in a complex diagnostic challenge. JAMA. 2023;330(1):78-80. doi:10.1001/jama.2023.8288

32. Cabral S, Restrepo D, Kanjee Z, et al. Clinical reasoning of a generative artificial intelligence model compared with physicians. JAMA Intern Med. 2024;184(5):581-583. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2024.0295

33. Goh E, Gallo R, Hom J, et al. Influence of a large language model on diagnostic reasoning: a randomized clinical vignette study. JAMA Netw Open. 2024;7(10):e2440969. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.40969

34. Hamilton A, Molzahn A, McLemore K. The evolution from standardized to virtual patients in medical education. Cureus. 2024;16(10):e71224. doi:10.7759/cureus.71224

35. Winkler-Schwartz A, Bissonnette V, Mirchi N, et al. Artificial intelligence in medical education: best practices using machine learning to assess surgical expertise in virtual reality simulation. J Surg Educ. 2019;76(6):1681-1690. doi:10.1016/j.jsurg.2019.05.015

36. Weber-Wulff D, Anohina-Naumeca A, Bjelobaba S, et al. Testing of detection tools for AI-generated text. Int J Educ Integr. 2023;19:26. doi:10.1007/s40979-023-00146-z

37. Strong E, DiGiammarino A, Weng Y, Kumar A, Hosamani P, Hom J, Chen JH. Chatbot vs medical student performance on free-response clinical reasoning examinations. JAMA Intern Med. 2023;183(9):1028-1030. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2023.2909

38. Mondal H. Ethical engagement with artificial intelligence in medical education. Adv Physiol Educ. 2025;49(1):163-165. doi:10.1152/advan.00188.2024

39. Katznelson G, Gerke S. The need for health AI ethics in medical school education. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2021;26(4):1447-1458. doi:10.1007/s10459-021-10040-3

40. Grunhut J, Wyatt ATM, Marques O. Educating future physicians in artificial intelligence (AI): an integrative review and proposed changes. J Med Educ Curric Dev. 2021;8:23821205211036836. doi:10.1177/23821205211036836

41. Rudnik A, Jendro O, Mastej A, et al. Artificial intelligence is revolutionizing everyday medical practice. J Educ Health Sport. 2023;28(1):155-165. doi:10.12775/JEHS.2023.28.01.012

42. Lucas HC, Upperman JS, Robinson JR. A systematic review of large language models and their implications in medical education. Med Educ. 2024;58(11):1276-1285. doi:10.1111/medu.15402

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-09-14

How to Cite

1.
KLIMAS, Paweł, WYSOKIŃSKI, Piotr, SZMEJA, Sebastian, MASALSKA, Julia, TOCZYDŁOWSKI, Kacper Robert, KRÓL, Paweł Adam, MICHALIK, Martyna, MAMCZAK, Maria, STRZĘPEK, Stanisław Ferdynand and MAZEK, Natalia. Artificial Intelligence in Medical Education: A Narrative Review of Current Applications and Future Perspectives. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 14 September 2026. Vol. 95. [Accessed 17 September 2026]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2026.95.73695.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 95 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Paweł Klimas, Piotr Wysokiński, Sebastian Szmeja, Julia Masalska, Kacper Robert Toczydłowski, Paweł Adam Król, Martyna Michalik, Maria Mamczak, Stanisław Ferdynand Strzępek, Natalia Mazek

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 33
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Artificial inteligence, medical education, machine learning, large language models, clinical reasoning, educational technology
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop