When chance leads to a breakthrough: serendipity in medicine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.92.72706Keywords
Serendipity, chance in science, scientific methodology, philosophy of science, accidental discoveries, antibiotics, penicillin, streptomycin, diagnostic imaging, X-ray radiation, ultrasonography, immunology, vaccination, metabolism, insulin, cardiovascular diseases, propranolol, sildenafil, anticancer therapies, tamoxifen, imatinib, clinical trials, medical ethics, medical innovations, artificial intelligence in medicine, statistical correlations, translational discoveries.Abstract
The text analyzes the role of serendipity—accidental discoveries—in the development of medicine and pharmacology, emphasizing that many breakthrough therapies have emerged as unintended outcomes of research conducted for entirely different purposes. Drawing on numerous historical and contemporary examples—such as the discovery of penicillin, statins, tamoxifen, sildenafil, and new applications of propranolol—the author demonstrates that the key factor is not chance itself, but the ability of well-prepared researchers to interpret unexpected findings.
The theoretical section discusses the concept of serendipity in the context of the philosophy of science and the psychology of discovery, referring to the ideas of thinkers such as Popper, Kuhn, and Pasteur. It highlights that scientific discoveries are processes requiring both knowledge and openness to anomalies, as well as the ability to connect seemingly unrelated facts. The historical analysis shows that chance has played a significant role in the development of antibiotics, diagnostic imaging, vaccination, and hormonal therapies.
The contemporary section emphasizes the importance of new technologies, including Big Data analysis and artificial intelligence, which enable the identification of non-obvious correlations and accelerate the discovery process. At the same time, the author draws attention to the limitations and risks associated with excessive reliance on incidental observations, stressing the need for their verification through scientific methods and consideration of ethical aspects.
The paper concludes that chance is an important but insufficient factor in the advancement of medicine—its significance emerges only when combined with knowledge, critical thinking, and research responsibility.
References
1.Banting F., notatka z 31 października 1920 r., cyt. w: Bliss M., The Discovery of Insulin, (w:) Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1982.
2.Beauchamp T.L., Childress J.F., Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 7th edition, Oxford 2013.
3.Berenson R.M., Glucagon Discovery and Clinical Applications, (w:) Endocrinology Journal, 1978.
4.Bruner J., The Act of Discovery, 1961.
5.Csikszentmihalyi M., Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention, 1996.
6.Dean O.M. i in., Minocykline: therapeutic potential in psychiatry, (w:) Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry, 2017, 51(5).
7.Druker B.J., Talpaz M., Resta D.J. i in., STI571: A selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor is effective in chronić myeloid leukemia, (w:) The New England Journal of Medicine, 2001, nr 344.
8.Dussik L., Medical Applications of Ultrasound, (w:) Journal of Medical Physics, 1954.
9.Elion G.B., Furman P.A., De Clercq J.A., Hitchings G.H., The selective antiviral activity of acyclovir, (w:) Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 1977, 74(12).
10.Endo A., Kuroda M., Tsujita Y., A new inhibitor of cholesterogenesis produced by Penicillium citrinum, (w:) Journal of Antibiotics, 1976, 29(12).
11.Faber S., Methotrexate in Cancer Therapy, 1957.
12.Feyerabend P., Against Method, 1975.
13.Flaming A., A Medium for the Isolation of Pfeiffer’s Bacillus, 1929.
14.Frazer I., Zhou J., Virus-like particles in papillomavirus vaccine development, 1991-1992.
15.Healy D., The Antidepressant Era, 1997.
16.Hirsch R., Aspirin and Willow Bark History, (w:) Journal of Pharmacology, 2001.
17.Jenner E., An Inquiry into the Causes and Effects of the Variolae Vaccinae, a Disease Discovered in some of the Western Counties of England, particulary Gloucestershire, and Known by the Name of the Cow Pox, 1798.
18.Koestler A., The Act of Creation, 1964.
19.Kuhn T.S., The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 1962.
20.Lakatos I., Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research Programmes, (w:) Lakatos I., Musgrave A., Criticism and the Growth of Knowledge, Cambridge 1970.
21.Mayer-Schönberger V., Cukier K., Big Data, 2013.
22.Merton R.K., Barber E., The Travels and Adventures of Serendipity, Princeton 2004.
23.Popper K., The Logic of Scientific Discovery, 1959.
24.Riedel S., Edward Jenner and the history of smallpox and vaccination, (w:) Baylor University Medical Center Proceedings, 2005, 18(1).
25.Röntgen W.C., Eine neue Art von Strahlen, 1896.
26.Shearer M.J., Vitamin K deficiency bleeding (VKDB) in early infancy, (w:) Blood Reviews, 2009, 23(2).
27.Silverman M., The Story of Sildenafil, (w:) Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 2009.
28.Stewart L.J., Lane H.P., Propranolol in the Treatment of Performance Anxiety, (w:) Brithish Medical Journal, 1967, nr 4.
29.Vallery-Radot R., The Life of Pasteur, 1902.
30.Waksman S.A., Schatz A., Bugie E., Streptomycin, a substance exhibiting antibiotic activity against gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria, (w:) Proceedings of the Society for Experimental Biology and Medicine, 1944, 55(1).
31.Waksman S.A., Streptomycin: Background, Discovery and Development, 1953.
32.Walpole H., The Letters of Horace Walpole, Londyn 1754.
33.Withering H., An Account of the Foxglove and its Medical Uses, 1785.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Karol Hinc

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 61
Number of citations: 0