Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Review of Current Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.92.72701Keywords
Fluid Therapy, Septic Shock, Sepsis, Resuscitation, HemodynamicsAbstract
Introduction and purpose: Sepsis induces profound microvascular derangements, making prompt fluid resuscitation a management cornerstone. Historically guided by Early Goal-Directed Therapy (EGDT), landmark trials have refuted EGDT's rigidity, driving a shift toward individualized hemodynamics. The purpose of this review is to systematically evaluate goal-directed fluid therapy in septic shock, contrasting fluid composition, timing, and volume dosing to delineate clinical strategies that optimize survival.
Description of the state of knowledge: Guidelines recommend crystalloids as first-line therapy and restrict synthetic colloids due to severe acute kidney injury (AKI) risks. Balanced crystalloids demonstrate marginal or comparable efficacy in reducing mortality rates relative to normal saline, the administration of which is often associated with the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Hyperoncotic albumin appears to mitigate the risk of renal injury. The 30 mL/kg fluid mandate faces scrutiny, as non-individualized dosing may increase the risk of severe fluid overload. Current management utilizes the ROSE framework, favoring restrictive strategies and de-escalation. Obese patients require Ideal Body Weight dosing to prevent miscalculations.
Summary: Meticulous fluid stewardship is essential to mitigate organ failure and maximize survival. Dynamic physiological indices outperform static parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness. Integrating personalized targets like capillary refill time normalization improves clinical outcomes. Individualized resuscitation appears to mitigate pathological venous congestion, which is often associated with improved long-term prognostic benefits.
References
1. Wang J, Blake LM, Orozco N, et al. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2025;7(9):e1303. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001303
2. Martin GS, Bassett P. Crystalloids vs. colloids for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2019;50:144-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.031
3. Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, et al; PRISM Investigators. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock - a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2223-2234. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701380
4. Zhang Y, Wang M, Lu Z, Yang M. Effect of fluid resuscitation strategies for obese patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Intensive Care Res. 2023;3(1):61-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-022-00019-y
5. Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al; BaSICS investigators and the BRICNet members. Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(9):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11684
6. Golla R, Kumar S, Dhibhar DP, Bhalla A, Sharma N. 0.9% saline V/S Ringer’s lactate for fluid resuscitation in adult sepsis patients in emergency medical services: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2022;29(5):271-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024907920948983
7. Semler MW, Kellum JA. Balanced crystalloid solutions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(8):952-960. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201809-1677CI
8. Vijendra B, Bertol AB, de Almeida MMG, de Freitas PHAG, Simão ÁMS, de Faria BL. Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05442-w
9. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829-839. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1711584
10. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y
11. Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al; PLUS Study Investigators and the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(9):815-826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114464
12. Trepatchayakorn S, Sakunpunphuk M, Samransamruajkit R. Balanced salt solution versus normal saline in resuscitation of pediatric sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88(9):921-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03808-3
13. Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Evans DJ, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD000567. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7
14. Cai XE, Ling WT, Cai XT, Yan MK, Zhang YJ, Xu JY. Effect of restrictive fluid resuscitation on severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2025;15(2):e086367. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086367
15. Markwart R, Saito H, Harder T, et al. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(8):1536-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2
16. Kuttab HI, Lykins JD, Hughes MD, et al. Evaluation and predictors of fluid resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(11):1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003960
17. Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid management in sepsis. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(5):364-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618784861
18. Song B, Fu K, Zheng X, Liu C. Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe infection and sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Med. 2025;12:1543586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1543586
19. Liu C, Mao Z, Hu P, et al. Fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1701-1709. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S175080
20. Long J, Chen Z, Luo X, Zhen L, Chi X. Fluid resuscitation management in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a network meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;96:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.06.001
21. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7
22. Acharya P, Virani S, Afreen S, et al. Efficacy of early goal-directed therapy in septic shock management: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(11):e74358. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74358
23. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301-1311. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500896
24. Oczkowski S, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 2021: highlights for the practicing clinician. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022;132(7-8):16290. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16290
25. Rhee C, Chiotos K, Cosgrove SE, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America position paper: recommended revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) sepsis quality measure. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(4):541-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa059
26. Antal O, Ștefănescu E, Mleșnițe M, Bălan AM, Hagău N. Initial fluid resuscitation following adjusted body weight dosing in sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2019;5(4):130-135. https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2019-0025
27. Monnet X, Teboul JL. My patient has received fluid. How to assess its efficacy and side effects? Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0400-z
28. Moschopoulos CD, Dimopoulou D, Dimopoulou A, et al. New insights into the fluid management in patients with septic shock. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(6):1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061047
29. Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Kattan E, et al; ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Investigators for the ANDROMEDA Research Network, Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), and Latin American Intensive Care Network (LIVEN). Personalized hemodynamic resuscitation targeting capillary refill time in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2025;334(22):1988-1999. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.20402
30. Wiedermann CJ. Phases of fluid management and the roles of human albumin solution in perioperative and critically ill patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(12):1961-1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1840970
31. Tseng CH, Chen TT, Wu MY, Chan MC, Shih MC, Tu YK. Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):693. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y
32. Rogowska-Borettini K, Malmur PA, Biaduń-Mućko W, et al. Bloodstream infections. Quality in Sport. 2026;49:67557. https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.49.67557
33. Piękoś D, Stachowicz A, Sobczyk G, Ozga D. Practical possibilities in using qSOFA scale by Emergency Medical Teams. Figshare. Journal contribution. Published online 2018. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6983213.v1
34. Suetrong B, Pisitsak C, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Hyperchloremia and moderate increase in serum chloride are associated with acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1499-7
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Maciej Dobrucki, Katarzyna Jolanta Kuc, Krzysztof Brzezicki, Katarzyna Zegadło, Mateusz Cieciora, Aleksandra Cieciora, Patryk Jakubiak, Małgorzata Kawiorska, Julia Surowiec, Wiktoria Ruta Bełcikowska-Skowron

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 13
Number of citations: 0