Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Review of Current Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes
  • Home
  • /
  • Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Review of Current Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 92 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Review of Current Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes

Authors

  • Maciej Dobrucki Dr. Tytus Chałubiński Radom Specialist Hospital https://orcid.org/0009-0002-0124-1853
  • Katarzyna Jolanta Kuc Dr. Tytus Chałubiński Radom Specialist Hospital: ul. Lekarska 4, 26-610 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0002-9585-4377
  • Krzysztof Brzezicki Dr. Ludwik Rydygier Provincial Hospital, Szpitalna 60, 16-400 Suwałki: Suwałki, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0005-4315-0644
  • Katarzyna Zegadło Military Institute of Medicine - National Research Institute: Warsaw, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8489-2058
  • Mateusz Cieciora University of Technology and Humanities in Radom: ul. Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0711-9377
  • Aleksandra Cieciora University of Technology and Humanities in Radom: ul. Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0009-7999-4047
  • Patryk Jakubiak Dr. Tytus Chałubiński Radom Specialist Hospital: ul. Lekarska 4, 26-610 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0006-9138-7213
  • Małgorzata Kawiorska University of Technology and Humanities in Radom: ul. Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0000-3184-7659
  • Julia Surowiec University of Technology and Humanities in Radom: ul. Chrobrego 27, 26-600 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0009-3356-8261
  • Wiktoria Ruta Bełcikowska-Skowron Dr. Tytus Chałubiński Radom Specialist Hospital: ul. Lekarska 4, 26-610 Radom, PL https://orcid.org/0009-0001-1789-1845

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.92.72701

Keywords

Fluid Therapy, Septic Shock, Sepsis, Resuscitation, Hemodynamics

Abstract

Introduction and purpose: Sepsis induces profound microvascular derangements, making prompt fluid resuscitation a management cornerstone. Historically guided by Early Goal-Directed Therapy (EGDT), landmark trials have refuted EGDT's rigidity, driving a shift toward individualized hemodynamics. The purpose of this review is to systematically evaluate goal-directed fluid therapy in septic shock, contrasting fluid composition, timing, and volume dosing to delineate clinical strategies that optimize survival.

Description of the state of knowledge: Guidelines recommend crystalloids as first-line therapy and restrict synthetic colloids due to severe acute kidney injury (AKI) risks. Balanced crystalloids demonstrate marginal or comparable efficacy in reducing mortality rates relative to normal saline, the administration of which is often associated with the development of hyperchloremic metabolic acidosis. Hyperoncotic albumin appears to mitigate the risk of renal injury. The 30 mL/kg fluid mandate faces scrutiny, as non-individualized dosing may increase the risk of severe fluid overload. Current management utilizes the ROSE framework, favoring restrictive strategies and de-escalation. Obese patients require Ideal Body Weight dosing to prevent miscalculations.

Summary: Meticulous fluid stewardship is essential to mitigate organ failure and maximize survival. Dynamic physiological indices outperform static parameters in predicting fluid responsiveness. Integrating personalized targets like capillary refill time normalization improves clinical outcomes. Individualized resuscitation appears to mitigate pathological venous congestion, which is often associated with improved long-term prognostic benefits.

References

1. Wang J, Blake LM, Orozco N, et al. Dynamic measures of fluid responsiveness to guide resuscitation in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Care Explor. 2025;7(9):e1303. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001303

2. Martin GS, Bassett P. Crystalloids vs. colloids for fluid resuscitation in the intensive care unit: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Crit Care. 2019;50:144-154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2018.11.031

3. Rowan KM, Angus DC, Bailey M, et al; PRISM Investigators. Early, goal-directed therapy for septic shock - a patient-level meta-analysis. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(23):2223-2234. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1701380

4. Zhang Y, Wang M, Lu Z, Yang M. Effect of fluid resuscitation strategies for obese patients with sepsis and septic shock: a systematic review. Intensive Care Res. 2023;3(1):61-68. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44231-022-00019-y

5. Zampieri FG, Machado FR, Biondi RS, et al; BaSICS investigators and the BRICNet members. Effect of intravenous fluid treatment with a balanced solution vs 0.9% saline solution on mortality in critically ill patients: the BaSICS randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2021;326(9):1-12. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2021.11684

6. Golla R, Kumar S, Dhibhar DP, Bhalla A, Sharma N. 0.9% saline V/S Ringer’s lactate for fluid resuscitation in adult sepsis patients in emergency medical services: an open-label randomized controlled trial. Hong Kong J Emerg Med. 2022;29(5):271-280. https://doi.org/10.1177/1024907920948983

7. Semler MW, Kellum JA. Balanced crystalloid solutions. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2019;199(8):952-960. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.201809-1677CI

8. Vijendra B, Bertol AB, de Almeida MMG, de Freitas PHAG, Simão ÁMS, de Faria BL. Balanced crystalloid versus saline for resuscitation in pediatric septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr. 2025;25(1):81. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-025-05442-w

9. Semler MW, Self WH, Wanderer JP, et al; SMART Investigators and the Pragmatic Critical Care Research Group. Balanced crystalloids versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2018;378(9):829-839. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1711584

10. Evans L, Rhodes A, Alhazzani W, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign: international guidelines for management of sepsis and septic shock 2021. Intensive Care Med. 2021;47(11):1181-1247. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06506-y

11. Finfer S, Micallef S, Hammond N, et al; PLUS Study Investigators and the Australian New Zealand Intensive Care Society Clinical Trials Group. Balanced multielectrolyte solution versus saline in critically ill adults. N Engl J Med. 2022;386(9):815-826. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa2114464

12. Trepatchayakorn S, Sakunpunphuk M, Samransamruajkit R. Balanced salt solution versus normal saline in resuscitation of pediatric sepsis: a randomized, controlled trial. Indian J Pediatr. 2021;88(9):921-924. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12098-021-03808-3

13. Lewis SR, Pritchard MW, Evans DJ, et al. Colloids versus crystalloids for fluid resuscitation in critically ill people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018;8(8):CD000567. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD000567.pub7

14. Cai XE, Ling WT, Cai XT, Yan MK, Zhang YJ, Xu JY. Effect of restrictive fluid resuscitation on severe acute kidney injury in septic shock: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open. 2025;15(2):e086367. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2024-086367

15. Markwart R, Saito H, Harder T, et al. Epidemiology and burden of sepsis acquired in hospitals and intensive care units: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Intensive Care Med. 2020;46(8):1536-1551. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-020-06106-2

16. Kuttab HI, Lykins JD, Hughes MD, et al. Evaluation and predictors of fluid resuscitation in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2019;47(11):1582-1590. https://doi.org/10.1097/CCM.0000000000003960

17. Brown RM, Semler MW. Fluid management in sepsis. J Intensive Care Med. 2019;34(5):364-373. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885066618784861

18. Song B, Fu K, Zheng X, Liu C. Fluid resuscitation in adults with severe infection and sepsis: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Front Med. 2025;12:1543586. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2025.1543586

19. Liu C, Mao Z, Hu P, et al. Fluid resuscitation in critically ill patients: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Ther Clin Risk Manag. 2018;14:1701-1709. https://doi.org/10.2147/TCRM.S175080

20. Long J, Chen Z, Luo X, Zhen L, Chi X. Fluid resuscitation management in patients with sepsis and septic shock: a network meta-analysis. Am J Emerg Med. 2025;96:80-90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2025.06.001

21. Rudd KE, Johnson SC, Agesa KM, et al. Global, regional, and national sepsis incidence and mortality, 1990-2017: analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study. Lancet. 2020;395(10219):200-211. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32989-7

22. Acharya P, Virani S, Afreen S, et al. Efficacy of early goal-directed therapy in septic shock management: a systematic review. Cureus. 2024;16(11):e74358. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.74358

23. Mouncey PR, Osborn TM, Power GS, et al; ProMISe Trial Investigators. Trial of early, goal-directed resuscitation for septic shock. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(14):1301-1311. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1500896

24. Oczkowski S, Alshamsi F, Belley-Cote E, et al. Surviving Sepsis Campaign guidelines 2021: highlights for the practicing clinician. Pol Arch Intern Med. 2022;132(7-8):16290. https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.16290

25. Rhee C, Chiotos K, Cosgrove SE, et al. Infectious Diseases Society of America position paper: recommended revisions to the National Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock Early Management Bundle (SEP-1) sepsis quality measure. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(4):541-552. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/ciaa059

26. Antal O, Ștefănescu E, Mleșnițe M, Bălan AM, Hagău N. Initial fluid resuscitation following adjusted body weight dosing in sepsis and septic shock. J Crit Care Med (Targu Mures). 2019;5(4):130-135. https://doi.org/10.2478/jccm-2019-0025

27. Monnet X, Teboul JL. My patient has received fluid. How to assess its efficacy and side effects? Ann Intensive Care. 2018;8(1):54. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13613-018-0400-z

28. Moschopoulos CD, Dimopoulou D, Dimopoulou A, et al. New insights into the fluid management in patients with septic shock. Medicina (Kaunas). 2023;59(6):1047. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina59061047

29. Hernandez G, Ospina-Tascón GA, Kattan E, et al; ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 Investigators for the ANDROMEDA Research Network, Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Reanimation and Pain Therapy (SEDAR), and Latin American Intensive Care Network (LIVEN). Personalized hemodynamic resuscitation targeting capillary refill time in early septic shock: the ANDROMEDA-SHOCK-2 randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2025;334(22):1988-1999. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2025.20402

30. Wiedermann CJ. Phases of fluid management and the roles of human albumin solution in perioperative and critically ill patients. Curr Med Res Opin. 2020;36(12):1961-1973. https://doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2020.1840970

31. Tseng CH, Chen TT, Wu MY, Chan MC, Shih MC, Tu YK. Resuscitation fluid types in sepsis, surgical, and trauma patients: a systematic review and sequential network meta-analyses. Crit Care. 2020;24(1):693. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-020-03419-y

32. Rogowska-Borettini K, Malmur PA, Biaduń-Mućko W, et al. Bloodstream infections. Quality in Sport. 2026;49:67557. https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2026.49.67557

33. Piękoś D, Stachowicz A, Sobczyk G, Ozga D. Practical possibilities in using qSOFA scale by Emergency Medical Teams. Figshare. Journal contribution. Published online 2018. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.6983213.v1

34. Suetrong B, Pisitsak C, Boyd JH, Russell JA, Walley KR. Hyperchloremia and moderate increase in serum chloride are associated with acute kidney injury in severe sepsis and septic shock patients. Crit Care. 2016;20(1):315. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13054-016-1499-7

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-06-09

How to Cite

1.
DOBRUCKI, Maciej, KUC, Katarzyna Jolanta, BRZEZICKI, Krzysztof, ZEGADŁO, Katarzyna, CIECIORA, Mateusz, CIECIORA, Aleksandra, JAKUBIAK, Patryk, KAWIORSKA, Małgorzata, SUROWIEC, Julia and BEŁCIKOWSKA-SKOWRON, Wiktoria Ruta. Goal-Directed Fluid Therapy in Sepsis and Septic Shock: A Review of Current Therapeutic Strategies and Outcomes. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 9 June 2026. Vol. 92, p. 72701. [Accessed 10 June 2026]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2026.92.72701.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 92 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Maciej Dobrucki, Katarzyna Jolanta Kuc, Krzysztof Brzezicki, Katarzyna Zegadło, Mateusz Cieciora, Aleksandra Cieciora, Patryk Jakubiak, Małgorzata Kawiorska, Julia Surowiec, Wiktoria Ruta Bełcikowska-Skowron

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 13
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Fluid Therapy, Septic Shock, Sepsis, Resuscitation, Hemodynamics
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop