The Barriers to the Early Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma in General Practice: A Narrative Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.92.72463Keywords
Multiple myeloma, primary care, diagnostic delay, CRAB criteria, oncological vigilanceAbstract
Background Multiple myeloma is a malignant hematological neoplasm characterized by the uncontrolled proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells in the bone marrow and monoclonal protein synthesis, resulting in numerous organ complications. Despite significant therapeutic advances early diagnosis still remains a critical factor in treatment efficacy. Diagnostic delays in multiple myeloma are among the longest of all hematological malignancies, often leading to irreversible organ damage. This issue is most prevalent in primary care, where low oncological vigilance and difficulties in interpreting early non-specific clinical manifestations often result in multiple consultations before a specialist referral.
Aim The aim of this study is to analyze the factors contributing to diagnostic delays of multiple myeloma in general practice, evaluate the most common non-specific symptoms, and emphasize the importance of timely diagnosis.
Material and Methods A narrative review was conducted using databases such as PubMed and Polish medical journals. The study analyzed publications concerning multiple myeloma patients, with a particular focus on the frequency of specific symptoms and the underlying causes of delayed diagnosis.
Conclusions The average time to diagnose multiple myeloma is one of the longest in oncology. A key barrier is the non-specific clinical presentation, which leads to symptoms being attributed to more common chronic conditions. Consequently, nearly half of all patients require at least three primary care visits before receiving a preliminary diagnosis. Because diagnosis within three months correlates directly with longer remission, rapid intervention is vital. Improving the diagnostic process by routinely incorporating CRAB criteria and increasing oncological vigilance among primary care physicians are priority challenges to improve patient prognosis.
References
1. Padala, S. A., Barsouk, A., Barsouk, A., Rawla, P., Vakiti, A., Kolhe, R., Kota, V., & Ajebo, G. H. (2021). Epidemiology, Staging, and Management of Multiple Myeloma. In Medical sciences (Vol. 9, Number 1). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI).
https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9010003
2. Irimia, R., Badelita, S., Barbu, S., Cirlan, I. L., Zidaru, L., & Coriu, D. (2024). Determining diagnostic delays in Romanian multiple myeloma patients using the Aarhus statement. Frontiers in Medicine, 11. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1372907
3. Seesaghur, A., Petruski-Ivleva, N., Banks, V. L., Wang, J. R., Abbasi, A., Neasham, D., & Ramasamy, K. (2021). Clinical features and diagnosis of multiple myeloma: A population-based cohort study in primary care. BMJ Open, 11(10). https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052759
4. Zorlu, T., Kayer, M. A., Okumus, N., Ulaş, T., Dal, M. S., & Altuntas, F. (2025). Challenges, Difficulties, and Delayed Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. In Diagnostics (Vol. 15, Number 13). Multidisciplinary Digital Publishing Institute (MDPI). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics15131708
5. Mikhael, J., Bhutani, M., & Cole, C. E. (2023). Multiple Myeloma for the Primary Care Provider: A Practical Review to Promote Earlier Diagnosis Among Diverse Populations. In American Journal of Medicine (Vol. 136, Number 1, pp. 33–41). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjmed.2022.08.030
6. Hussein, M. (1994). Multiple myeloma: an overview of diagnosis and management. Cleveland Clinic Journal of Medicine, 61(4), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.3949/ccjm.61.4.285
7. Medical Masterclass contributors, & Firth, J. (2019). Haematology: multiple myeloma. Clinical Medicine (London, England), 19(1), 58–60. https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.19-1-58
8. Shephard EA, Neal RD, Rose P et al. Quantifying the risk of multiple myeloma from symptoms reported in primary care patients: A large case-control study using electronic records. British Journal of General Practice 2015;65(631):e106–13. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp15X683545.
9. Zagzag, J., Hu, M. I., Fisher, S. B., & Perrier, N. D. (2018). Hypercalcemia and cancer: Differential diagnosis and treatment. CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, 68(5), 377–386. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21489
10. Koshiaris, C., Van Den Bruel, A., Oke, J. L., Nicholson, B. D., Shephard, E., Braddick, M., & Hamilton, W. (2018). Early detection of multiple myeloma in primary care using blood tests: A case-control study in primary care. British Journal of General Practice, 68(674), e586–e593. https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp18X698357
11. Fotiou, D., Dimopoulos, M. A., & Kastritis, E. (2016). Managing renal complications in multiple myeloma. Expert Review of Hematology, 9(9), 839–850. https://doi.org/10.1080/17474086.2016.1210003
12. Rajkumar, S. V. (2009). Multiple myeloma. Current Problems in Cancer, 33(1), 7–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.currproblcancer.2009.01.001
13. Nau, K. C., & Lewis, W. D. (2008). Multiple myeloma: diagnosis and treatment. American Family Physician, 78(7), 853–859.
14. Kariyawasan, C. C., Hughes, D. A., Jayatillake, M. M., & Mehta, A. B. (2007). Multiple myeloma: Causes and consequences of delay in diagnosis. QJM: An International Journal of Medicine, 100(10), 635–640. https://doi.org/10.1093/qjmed/hcm077
15. Baur-Melnyk, A., & Reiser, M. F. (2009). Multiple myeloma. Seminars in Musculoskeletal Radiology, 13(2), 111–119. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0029-1220882
16. Deyo, R. A. (1992). What Can the History and Physical Examination Tell Us About Low Back Pain? JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 268(6), 760. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.1992.03490060092030
17. Koes, B. W., van Tulder, M. W., & Thomas, S. (2006). Diagnosis and treatment of low back pain. BMJ, 332(7555), 1430–1434. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.332.7555.1430
18. George, E. D., & Sadovsky, R. (1999). Multiple myeloma: recognition and management. American Family Physician, 59(7), 1885–1894.
19. Koshiaris, C. (2019). Methods for Reducing Delays in the Diagnosis of Multiple Myeloma. International Journal of Hematologic Oncology, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.2217/ijh-2018-0014
20. Diamond, E., Lahoud, O. B., & Landau, H. (2018). Managing multiple myeloma in elderly patients. In Leukemia and Lymphoma (Vol. 59, Number 6, pp. 1300–1311). Taylor and Francis Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1080/10428194.2017.1365859
21. Virk, J., & Hillengass, J. (2025). Imaging in multiple myeloma. Presse Medicale (Paris, France : 1983), 54(1), 104263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lpm.2024.104263
22. Lasocki, A., Gaillard, F., & Harrison, S. J. (2017). Multiple myeloma of the spine. In Neuroradiology Journal (Vol. 30, Number 3, pp. 259–268). SAGE Publications Inc. https://doi.org/10.1177/1971400917699426
23. Bloodwise. The current state of blood cancer diagnosis in England: an End the Delays campaign report [Internet]. London: Bloodwise; 2019 [cited 2026 Apr 18]. Available from: https://bcuk.cdn.ngo/documents/bloodwise-delayed-diagnosis-report_RIQgdp7.pdf.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandra Adamczyk, Karolina Żeżawska, Adrian Pal, Patryk Cegiełka, Maria Magdalena Sicińska, Alicja Cienkowska, Marcin Ślot, Izabella Głowacka, Mikołaj Szczęsny, Małgorzata Katra

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 10
Number of citations: 0