Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Surgical Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux and Ureteral Strictures in Atypical Ureteral Anatomy: A Narrative Review
  • Home
  • /
  • Surgical Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux and Ureteral Strictures in Atypical Ureteral Anatomy: A Narrative Review
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 91 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Surgical Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux and Ureteral Strictures in Atypical Ureteral Anatomy: A Narrative Review

Authors

  • Monika Kamińska Medical University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6138-708X
  • Bartosz Niemiec Human Anatomy Research Group, Medical University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0007-1168-9930
  • Zuzanna Drozd Medical University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0004-5277-9404
  • Bruno Olesiński Medical University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0001-2387-4742
  • Szymon Piosik Medical University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0003-5142-0275
  • Natalia Dudziak Medical University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0000-6631-3358
  • Łukasz Piasecki Medical University of Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0000-8545-4949
  • Zuzanna Guzowicz Human Anatomy Research Group, Medical University in Lublin https://orcid.org/0009-0005-9203-4746
  • Patrycja Gągałka Uniwersytet Medyczny w Lublinie https://orcid.org/0009-0004-9984-0241

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.91.70640

Keywords

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux, Ureteral Obstruction, Urogenital Abnormalities, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures

Abstract

Introduction and Objective: Congenital anomalies of the ureter affect 1% of the population and can lead to complications like vesicoureteral reflux (VUR) and ureteral strictures (US). This review aims to summarize current surgical treatments for these conditions, focusing specifically on patients with atypical anatomy, such as ectopic, retrocaval, or duplex ureters.

Review Methods: A literature review of PubMed and Scopus databases was conducted, in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines, focusing on English-language papers published within the last five years. Evaluated surgical approaches included open, endoscopic, laparoscopic, and robotic methods. Following the application of specific inclusion and exclusion criteria, a total of 33 articles were selected for qualitative synthesis. Due to the early diagnosis of these anomalies, the analyzed data primarily concerns pediatric patients.

Results: Open surgery remains the gold standard for severe VUR, but minimally invasive laparoscopic and robotic options are gaining popularity. For complex congenital anomalies, treatments must be highly customized. Functioning ectopic ureters require reimplantation, while poorly functioning ones are managed with laparoscopic clipping. Retrocaval ureters or duplex systems benefit from advanced robotic repairs. Obstructive megaureters and ureteroceles are initially treated with less invasive endoscopic methods (balloon dilation or incision) to relieve pressure.

Summary: The management of VUR and US in patients with complex anatomy lacks a single standard approach, requiring individualization based on specific anatomy and kidney function. While open surgery is effective, urology is shifting toward minimally invasive techniques to lower risks. There is a notable lack of comprehensive literature regarding surgical outcomes in adults and complex congenital presentations.

References

[1] Kispert A. Ureter development and associated congenital anomalies. Nat Rev Nephrol 2025;21:366–82. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-025-00951-4.

[2] Houat AP, Guimarães CTS, Takahashi MS, Rodi GP, Gasparetto TPD, Blasbalg R, et al. Congenital Anomalies of the Upper Urinary Tract: A Comprehensive Review. RadioGraphics 2021;41:462–86. https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2021200078.

[3] Leslie SW, Aeddula NR. Vesicoureteral Reflux. StatPearls, Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2025.

[4] Gnech M, ’T Hoen L, Zachou A, Bogaert G, Castagnetti M, O’Kelly F, et al. Update and Summary of the European Association of Urology/European Society of Paediatric Urology Paediatric Guidelines on Vesicoureteral Reflux in Children. Eur Urol 2024;85:433–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eururo.2023.12.005.

[5] Läckgren G, Cooper CS, Neveus T, Kirsch AJ. Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux: What Have We Learned Over the Last 20 Years? Front Pediatr 2021;9:650326. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2021.650326.

[6] Nascimben F, Molinaro F, Maffi M, Nino F, Lachkar A, Zislin M, et al. Endoscopic injection vs anti-reflux surgery for moderate- and high-grade vesicoureteral reflux in children: a cost-effectiveness international study. J Robot Surg 2024;18:371. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11701-024-02103-5.

[7] Johnson EK, Chalmers DJ, Nelson CP, Li I, Iwaniuk M, Grant C, et al. Antireflux Surgery at National Surgical Quality Improvement Program-Pediatric Hospitals. J Urol 2021;205:1189–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000001439.

[8] Escolino M, Kalfa N, Castagnetti M, Caione P, Esposito G, Florio L, et al. Endoscopic injection of bulking agents in pediatric vesicoureteral reflux: a narrative review of the literature. Pediatr Surg Int 2023;39:133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-023-05426-w.

[9] Fernández-Alcaráz D, Robles-Torres JI, García-Hernández C, Guillén-Lozoya AH, Landa-Juárez S. Laparoscopic vs Open Extravesical Ureteral Reimplantation in Pediatric Population: A Single-Center Experience: Pediatric Laparoscopic and Open Ureteral Reimplantation. Urol J 2022:7217. https://doi.org/10.22037/uj.v19i.7217.

[10] Sforza S, Marco BB, Haid B, Baydilli N, Donmez MI, Spinoit A-F, et al. A multi-institutional European comparative study of open versus robotic-assisted laparoscopic ureteral reimplantation in children with high grade (IV–V) vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol 2024;20:283–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2023.11.006.

[11] Kruppa C, Wilke A, Hörz C, Kosk T, Hörz T, Fitze G, et al. Vesicoscopic vs. Open Ureteral Reimplantation According to Cohen and Leadbetter-Politano for Vesicoureteral Reflux. J Clin Med 2023;12:5686. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175686.

[12] Zhu X, Wang J, Zhu H, Huang L, Chen C, Wang L, et al. Lich-Gregoir vesico-ureteral reimplantation for duplex kidney anomalies in the pediatric population: a retrospective cohort study between laparoscopic and open surgery. Transl Pediatr 2021;10:26–32. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-20-163.

[13] Law ZW, Ong CCP, Yap T-L, Loh AHP, Joseph U, Sim SW, et al. Extravesical vs. intravesical ureteric reimplantation for primary vesicoureteral reflux: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Front Pediatr 2022;10:935082. https://doi.org/10.3389/fped.2022.935082.

[14] Shadpour P, Abian N, Emami M, Beyrami D. Comparing clinical and radiological success in open versus endoscopic surgery of primary vesicoureteral reflux. J Pediatr Urol 2025;21:985–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpurol.2025.01.021.

[15] Mizuno K, Nishio H, Matsumoto D, Sakata T, Nakane A, Kamisawa H, et al. Factors associated with reflux resolution in extravesical laparoscopic and robotic surgery. BJUI Compass 2025;6:e70054. https://doi.org/10.1002/bco2.70054.

[16] Carbonara U, Crocerossa F, Mehrazin R, Campi R, Marchioni M, Morlacco A, et al. Robotic ureteral reimplantation: systematic review and pooled analysis of comparative outcomes in adults. Minerva Urol Nephrol 2022;74. https://doi.org/10.23736/S2724-6051.21.04558-4.

[17] Ripatti L, Viljamaa H-R, Kauko T, Kytö V, Rautava P, Sipilä J, et al. Trends in the surgical management of vesicoureteral reflux in Finland in 2004–2014. Scand J Urol 2021;55:67–71. https://doi.org/10.1080/21681805.2020.1849387.

[18] Lanfranchi G, Paraboschi I, Pierucci UM, Mantica G, Costanzo S, Marinoni F, et al. Efficacy of Three Different Injection Techniques for the Endoscopic Treatment of Vesicoureteral Reflux (VUR) in Children: A Review of 10 Years of Experience. Res Rep Urol 2024;16:151–9. https://doi.org/10.2147/RRU.S467018.

[19] Paffenholz P, Heidenreich A. Modern surgical strategies in the management of complex ureteral strictures. Curr Opin Urol 2021;31:170–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/MOU.0000000000000849.

[20] Wang Y, Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Yang C, Fang L, Yu D. Laparoscopic ureteroplasty with oral mucosal graft for ureteral stricture: Initial experience of eighteen patients. Asian J Surg 2023;46:751–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.06.156.

[21] Ou Y, Zhang G, Zhu X, Yin H, Gou X, Deng Y. Evaluation of risk factors, treatment options, and prognostic-related factors in patients with benign ureteral strictures: An 8-year single-center experience. Int J Urol 2023;30:847–52. https://doi.org/10.1111/iju.15211.

[22] Hook S, Gross AJ, Netsch C, Becker B, Filmar S, Vetterlein MW, et al. [Update on ureteral reconstruction 2024]. Urol Heidelb Ger 2024;63:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00120-023-02232-z.

[23] Elbers JR, Rodríguez Socarrás M, Rivas JG, Autran AM, Esperto F, Tortolero L, et al. Robotic Repair of Ureteral Strictures: Techniques and Review. Curr Urol Rep 2021;22:39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11934-021-01056-8.

[24] Poujade L, Branchereau J, Rigaud J, Perrouin-Verbe M-A. Ileal ureter replacement: Early morbidity and long-term results. Prog En Urol 2021;31:357–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.purol.2020.10.002.

[25] Bu L, Nie F, Li Y, Wang T, Yang X, Yang D. Ectopic Ureter—A Retrospective Analysis, Symptom and Treatment. Arch Esp Urol 2022;75:807. https://doi.org/10.56434/j.arch.esp.urol.20227510.118.

[26] Li Z, Psooy K, Morris M, Dharamsi N, Retrosi G. Laparoscopic ligation of ectopic ureter in pediatric patients: a safe surgical option for the management of urinary incontinence due to ectopic ureters. Pediatr Surg Int 2021;37:667–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00383-020-04852-4.

[27] Lanfranchi G, Paraboschi I, Mantica G, Costanzo S, Selvaggio GGO, Lopez M, et al. Ureteral clipping for managing persistent urinary dribbling caused by ectopic ureters associated with non-functioning renal moieties in girls with complex duplex kidneys: a narrative review of the literature. Transl Pediatr 2025;14:1317325–1311325. https://doi.org/10.21037/tp-2025-17.

[28] Maro IM, Nhungo CJ, Ngereja SJ, Lori JM, Nsato SB, Njiku KM, et al. Retrocaval ureter: a case report and review of the literature. J Med Case Reports 2024;18:573. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13256-024-04942-0.

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-05-07

How to Cite

1.
KAMIŃSKA, Monika, NIEMIEC, Bartosz, DROZD, Zuzanna, OLESIŃSKI, Bruno, PIOSIK, Szymon, DUDZIAK, Natalia, PIASECKI, Łukasz, GUZOWICZ, Zuzanna and GĄGAŁKA, Patrycja. Surgical Management of Vesicoureteral Reflux and Ureteral Strictures in Atypical Ureteral Anatomy: A Narrative Review. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 7 May 2026. Vol. 91, p. 70640. [Accessed 13 May 2026]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2026.91.70640.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 91 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Monika Kamińska, Bartosz Niemiec, Zuzanna Drozd, Bruno Olesiński, Szymon Piosik, Natalia Dudziak, Łukasz Piasecki, Zuzanna Guzowicz, Patrycja Gągałka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 68
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Vesico-Ureteral Reflux, Ureteral Obstruction, Urogenital Abnormalities, Urologic Surgical Procedures, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop