Health education, communication and safety culture in diagnostic imaging: a narrative review of up-to-date guidelines
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.88.69433Keywords
Diagnostic Imaging, Patient Safety, Radiation Protection, Health Education, Artificial Intelligence, Medical EducationAbstract
Introduction. Advances in diagnostic imaging have increased precision and patient access, but also generated new safety challenges regarding ionizing radiation, magnetic field hazards, and procedural complexity. Technological optimization is fundamental, although real-world safety outcomes are heavily influenced by organizational and patient-related factors.
Aim. This narrative review synthesizes up-to-date international guidelines and literature (published between 2015 and 2026), focusing on health education and clinical communication as vital yet underutilized contributors to patient safety.
A brief description of the state of knowledge. Radiation protection remains anchored in the ALARA principle. However, the importance of automated dose tracking systems and AI-assisted image reconstruction is growing. Technology alone cannot completely eliminate all risks; motion artefacts, repeat scans, and workflow delays often result from scan-related anxiety and limited health literacy. Evidence points to the effectiveness of structured patient preparation, particularly Virtual Reality (VR) in pediatrics, to reduce sedation requirements and improve cooperation. Broader safety discussions now include a “Just Culture” approach, burnout prevention, and “Green Radiology” practices.
Summary. Patient safety in diagnostic imaging is a multidimensional issue. Enhancing it requires combining technological optimization with effective health education. Developing communication competencies among radiological personnel via digital technologies, including artificial intelligence, further supports safe practice. To maintain a patient-centered safety culture that evolves as technology changes, embedding health literacy and effective communication strategies into medical curricula is recommended.
References
1. International Atomic Energy Agency. Radiation Protection and Safety in Medical Uses of Ionizing Radiation: Specific Safety Guide No. SSG-46. Vienna: International Atomic Energy Agency; 2018. Available from: https://www.iaea.org/publications/11102/radiation-protection-and-safety-in-medical-uses-of-ionizing-radiation (Accessed: 22 Feb 2026).
2. Pedrosa I, Altman DA, Dillman JR, Hoff MN, McKinney AM, Reeder SB, et al. American college of radiology manual on MR safety: 2024 update and revisions. Radiology. 2025 Apr;315(1):e241405. DOI: 10.1148/radiol.241405. PMID: 40167436.
https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.241405
3. van der Molen AJ, Reimer P, Dekkers IA, Bongartz G, Bellin M-F, Bertolotto M, et al. Post-contrast acute kidney injury. Part 2: risk stratification, role of hydration and other prophylactic measures, patients taking metformin and chronic dialysis patients : Recommendations for updated ESUR Contrast Medium Safety Committee guidelines. Eur Radiol. 2018 Jul;28(7):2856–69. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5247-4. PMID: 29417249. PMCID: PMC5986837.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-017-5247-4
4. Power SP, Moloney F, Twomey M, James K, O’Connor OJ, Maher MM. Computed tomography and patient risk: Facts, perceptions and uncertainties. World J Radiol. 2016 Dec 28;8(12):902–15. DOI: 10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902. PMID: 28070242. PMCID: PMC5183924.
https://doi.org/10.4329/wjr.v8.i12.902
5. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (Ed.) Medical Radiation Exposure of Patients in the United States: Recommendations of the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements; NCRP Report; National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements: Bethesda, MD, USA, 2019; ISBN 978-1-944888-16-9.
6. Bui KT, Liang R, Kiely BE, Brown C, Dhillon HM, Blinman P. Scanxiety: a scoping review about scan-associated anxiety. BMJ Open. 2021 May 26;11(5):e043215. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043215. PMID: 34039571. PMCID: PMC8160190.
https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-043215
7. Łoginoff J, Augustynowicz K, Świąder K, Ostaszewska S, Morawski P, Pactwa F, et al. Advancements in radiology and diagnostic imaging. J Educ Health Sport. 2023 May 26;33(1):45–51. DOI: 10.12775/JEHS.2023.33.01.005.
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.33.01.005
8. Albakri AA, Alzahrani MM, Alghamdi SH. Medical imaging in pregnancy: safety, appropriate utilization, and alternative modalities for imaging pregnant patients. Cureus. 2024 Feb 17;16(2):e54346. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.54346. PMID: 38500900. PMCID: PMC10945608.
https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.54346
9. Pietrukaniec PD, Omasta B, Kamińska-Omasta K, Krupa O, Rybak D, Romańczuk KB, et al. Modern imaging methods in the diagnosis of neurodegenerative diseases. QS. 2025 Feb 5;38:58200. DOI: 10.12775/QS.2025.38.58200.
https://doi.org/10.12775/QS.2025.38.58200
10. Sammet S. Magnetic resonance safety. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2016 Mar;41(3):444–51. DOI: 10.1007/s00261-016-0680-4. PMID: 26940331. PMCID: PMC4848040.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-016-0680-4
11. Gulani V, Calamante F, Shellock FG, Kanal E, Reeder SB, International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. Gadolinium deposition in the brain: summary of evidence and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2017 Jul;16(7):564–70. DOI: 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8. PMID: 28653648.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30158-8
12. Tsai LL, Grant AK, Mortele KJ, Kung JW, Smith MP. A practical guide to MR imaging safety: what radiologists need to know. Radiographics. 2015 Oct;35(6):1722–37. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2015150108. PMID: 26466181.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2015150108
13. Kollmann C, Jenderka K-V, Moran CM, Draghi F, Jimenez Diaz JF, Sande R. EFSUMB Clinical Safety Statement for Diagnostic Ultrasound - (2019 revision). Ultraschall Med. 2019 Oct 8; DOI: 10.1055/a-1010-6018. PMID: 31594007.
https://doi.org/10.1055/a-1010-6018
14. Srivastava S, Yu B, Giraud D, Dighe M, Dhyani M, Barr RG. Overview of diagnostic ultrasound safety: review for research and institutional review boards. J Ultrasound Med. 2026 Mar;45(3):487–96. DOI: 10.1002/jum.70085. PMID: 41059940.
https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.70085
15. Nyhsen CM, Humphreys H, Koerner RJ, Grenier N, Brady A, Sidhu P, et al. Infection prevention and control in ultrasound - best practice recommendations from the European Society of Radiology Ultrasound Working Group. Insights Imaging. 2017 Dec;8(6):523–35. DOI: 10.1007/s13244-017-0580-3. PMID: 29181694. PMCID: PMC5707224.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s13244-017-0580-3
16. Lell MM, Kachelrieß M. Recent and upcoming technological developments in computed tomography: high speed, low dose, deep learning, multienergy. Invest Radiol. 2020 Jan;55(1):8–19. DOI: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000601. PMID: 31567618.
https://doi.org/10.1097/RLI.0000000000000601
17. Gottumukkala RV, Kalra MK, Tabari A, Otrakji A, Gee MS. Advanced CT techniques for decreasing radiation dose, reducing sedation requirements, and optimizing image quality in children. Radiographics. 2019 Mar 29;39(3):709–26. DOI: 10.1148/rg.2019180082. PMID: 30924753.
https://doi.org/10.1148/rg.2019180082
18. Ashmore J, Di Pietro J, Williams K, Stokes E, Symons A, Smith M, et al. A Free Virtual Reality Experience to Prepare Pediatric Patients for Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2019 Apr 18;2(1):e11684. DOI: 10.2196/11684. PMID: 31518319. PMCID: PMC6716438.
19. Eijlers R, Utens EMWJ, Staals LM, de Nijs PFA, Berghmans JM, Wijnen RMH, et al. Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Virtual Reality in Pediatrics: Effects on Pain and Anxiety. Anesth Analg. 2019 Nov;129(5):1344–53. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000004165. PMID: 31136330. PMCID: PMC6791566.
https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004165
20. Council of the European Union. Council Directive 2013/59/EURATOM of 5 December 2013. Official Journal of the European Union. 2013;L13:1–73. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2013/59/oj (Accessed: 22 Feb 2026).
21. Miller DL, Vano E, Balter S, Kitahara CM, Wunderle KA, Reimer P, et al. Occupational protection in interventional radiology. A joint guideline of the cardiovascular and interventional radiological society of europe and the society of interventional radiology. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2026 Feb 12; DOI: 10.1007/s00270-025-04195-4. PMID: 41677810.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00270-025-04195-4
22. López PO, Dauer LT, Loose R, Martin CJ, Miller DL, Vañó E, et al. ICRP publication 139: occupational radiological protection in interventional procedures. Ann ICRP. 2018 Mar;47(2):1–118. DOI: 10.1177/0146645317750356. PMID: 29532669.
https://doi.org/10.1177/0146645317750356
23. Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2185–95. DOI: 10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7. PMID: 30377791. PMCID: PMC6443602.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7
24. Garba I, Engel-Hills P, Davidson F, Ismail A. Radiation dose management system in computed tomography procedures: a systematic review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2023 Apr 19; DOI: 10.1093/rpd/ncad124. PMID: 37078550.
https://doi.org/10.1093/rpd/ncad124
25. Frija G, Blažić I, Frush DP, Hierath M, Kawooya M, Donoso-Bach L, et al. How to improve access to medical imaging in low- and middle-income countries ? EClinicalMedicine. 2021 Aug;38:101034. DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101034. PMID: 34337368. PMCID: PMC8318869.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101034
26. Аndreev O, Таgunova I, Gushcha S, Volyanska V, Ivchenko N. Development of medical education in the context of european integration. Pedag Psychol Sport. 2025 May 11;22:60879. DOI: 10.12775/PPS.2025.22.60879.
https://doi.org/10.12775/PPS.2025.22.60879
27. Pesapane F, Codari M, Sardanelli F. Artificial intelligence in medical imaging: threat or opportunity? Radiologists again at the forefront of innovation in medicine. Eur Radiol Exp. 2018 Oct 24;2(1):35. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6. PMID: 30353365. PMCID: PMC6199205.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-018-0061-6
28. Giger ML. Machine learning in medical imaging. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018 Mar;15(3 Pt B):512–20. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028. PMID: 29398494.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.028
29. Lyu Q, Tan J, Zapadka ME, Ponnatapura J, Niu C, Myers KJ, et al. Translating radiology reports into plain language using ChatGPT and GPT-4 with prompt learning: results, limitations, and potential. Vis Comput Ind Biomed Art. 2023 May 18;6(1):9. DOI: 10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5. PMID: 37198498. PMCID: PMC10192466.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s42492-023-00136-5
30. Chetlen AL, Chan TL, Ballard DH, Frigini LA, Hildebrand A, Kim S, et al. Addressing burnout in radiologists. Acad Radiol. 2019 Apr;26(4):526–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.07.001. PMID: 30711406. PMCID: PMC6530597.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acra.2018.07.001
31. Roletto A, Zanardo M, Bonfitto GR, Catania D, Sardanelli F, Zanoni S. The environmental impact of energy consumption and carbon emissions in radiology departments: a systematic review. Eur Radiol Exp. 2024 Feb 29;8(1):35. DOI: 10.1186/s41747-024-00424-6. PMID: 38418763. PMCID: PMC10902235.
https://doi.org/10.1186/s41747-024-00424-6
32. Awad El-Karim L, Kielar A, Krishna S, Elias ZF, Panet H, Maura B. Sustainable radiology: health equity and quality improvement. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2025 May 26;8465371251340243. DOI: 10.1177/08465371251340243. PMID: 40420555.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandra Tołkacz, Aleksandra Kwiatkowska, Maja Gewald, Adrianna Król, Julia Sobczak, Aleksandra Kosikowska

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 111
Number of citations: 0