Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Psychosomatic Disorders and the Physician-Patient Relationship - A Review
  • Home
  • /
  • Psychosomatic Disorders and the Physician-Patient Relationship - A Review
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 88 (2026) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Psychosomatic Disorders and the Physician-Patient Relationship - A Review

Authors

  • Michał Włodarczyk University Medical and Dental Clinic Unimedyk, Poznań, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0006-8864-3511
  • Maria Skommer Department and Institute of Clinical Psychology, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3930-3909

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.88.68244

Keywords

doctor-patient relationship, communication, stress, mental health

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Psychosomatic disorders present a significant challenge in medicine, where somatic symptoms are closely connected to psychological and social factors. Family physicians play a central role in recognizing and managing these patients, whose complex needs often lead to repeated consultations and increased healthcare utilization. This review aims to analyze the physician-patient relationship in the care of patients with psychosomatic disorders and its impact on diagnosis and treatment.

Materials and Methods: The study is a literature review including scientific articles, monographs and textbooks in family medicine, psychosomatics and clinical psychology. Literature was searched in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar. Publications were selected based on relevance, scientific value and focus on physician-patient interaction, communication, patient personality traits and the role of Balint groups.

State of Knowledge: Psychosomatic disorders manifest in cardiovascular diseases, peptic ulcers, eating disorders, skin diseases and sleep disorders with psychological factors influencing symptom development and course. Effective care relies on a biopsychosocial approach, empathetic communication and physician awareness of relational dynamics. Participation in Balint groups enhances empathy, improves patient communication and reduces physician burnout.

Conclusions: The physician-patient relationship is a key therapeutic tool in psychosomatic care. Holistic treatment addressing both somatic and psychological needs, combined with effective communication and physician self-awareness, improves patient outcomes and fosters long-term therapeutic engagement.

References

1. Haller H, Cramer H, Lauche R, Dobos G. Somatoform disorders and medically unexplained symptoms in primary care. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112(16):279-287. https://doi.org/10.3238/arztebl.2015.0279

2. Kroenke K, Mangelsdorff AD. Common symptoms in ambulatory care: incidence, evaluation, therapy and outcome. Am J Med. 1989;86(3):262-266. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9343(89)90293-3

3. Popiołek L, Siga O, Dzieża-Grudnik A, et al. Personality traits and hypertension-mediated organ damage. Personality traits and organ complications of arterial hypertension. Psychiatr Pol. 2019;53(5):1003-1020. https://doi.org/10.12740/PP/108453

4. Sahoo S, Padhy SK, Padhee B, Singla N, Sarkar S. Role of personality in cardiovascular diseases: An issue that needs to be focused too!. Indian Heart J. 2018;70 Suppl 3:S471-S477. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ihj.2018.11.003

5. García-Vera MP, Sanz J, Espinosa R, Fortún M, Magán I. Differences in emotional personality traits and stress between sustained hypertension and normotension. Hypertens Res. 2010;33(3):203-208. https://doi.org/10.1038/hr.2009.210

6. Unterrainer J, Michal M, Rahm B, et al. Association of Type D personality with cognitive functioning in individuals with and without cardiovascular disease - The Gutenberg Health Study. Int J Cardiol. 2016;214:256-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.03.221

7. Grande G, Jordan J, Kümmel M, et al. Evaluation of the German Type D Scale (DS14) and prevalence of the Type D personality pattern in cardiological and psychosomatic patients and healthy subjects. Psychother Psychosom Med Psychol. 2004;54(11):413-422. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-2004-828376

8. Oliva F, Versino E, Gammino L, et al. Type D personality and essential hypertension in primary care: A cross-sectional observational study within a cohort of patients visiting general practitioners. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2016;204(1):43-48. https://doi.org/10.1097/NMD.0000000000000421

9. Balog P. Negative emotions associated with cardiovascular diseases. Orv Hetil. 2018;159(48):2005-2010. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2018.31221

10. Hosseini SH, Mokhberi V, Mohammadpour RA, Mehrabianfard M, Lashak NB. Anger expression and suppression among patients with essential hypertension. Int J Psychiatry Clin Pract. 2011;15:214-218. https://doi.org/10.3109/13651501.2011.572168

11. Montenegro CEL, Montenegro ST. Anger and cardiovascular disease: An old and complicated relationship. Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018;111(3):417-418. https://doi.org/10.5935/abc.20180176

12. Pickering TG. White coat hypertension. Curr Opin Nephrol Hypertens. 1996;5(2):192-198. https://doi.org/10.1097/00041552-199603000-00017

13. Sapolsky RM. Why zebras don’t get ulcers: Psychophysiology of stress. Warsaw: Scientific Publishers PWN; 2020.

14. World Health Organization. Hypertension [Internet]. Western Pacific Region; 2025 [cited 2026 Jan 3]. Available from: https://www.who.int/westernpacific/health-topics/hypertension#tab=tab_1

15. Kirenko J, Byra S. Personal resources in psychosomatic diseases. Lublin: Maria Curie-Skłodowska University Press; 2008.

16. Kempisty-Jeznach E. Patients under stress: Psychosomatic problems. Warsaw: Prószyński i S-ka; 2023.

17. Levenstein S. Stress and peptic ulcer: Life beyond Helicobacter. BMJ. 1998;316(7130):538-541. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.316.7130.538

18. Levenstein S, Rosenstock S, Jacobsen RK, Jorgensen T. Psychological stress increases risk for peptic ulcer, regardless of Helicobacter pylori infection or use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2015;13(3):498-506.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cgh.2014.07.052

19. Mojs E, Skommer M, Stelcer B, eds. Elements of general and clinical psychology. Poznań: Karol Marcinkowski Medical University Scientific Publishing House; 2011.

20. Konturek PC, Brzozowski T, Konturek SJ. Stress and the gut: Pathophysiology, clinical consequences, diagnostic approach and treatment options. J Physiol Pharmacol. 2011;62(6):591-599.

21. Luban-Plozza B, Poldinger W, Kroger F, Wasilewski B. Psychosomatic disorders in medical practice. Warsaw: PZWL Medical Publishing; 1995.

22. Tylka J. Psychosomatics. Warsaw: Cardinal Stefan Wyszyński University Press; 2000.

23. Najm WI. Peptic ulcer disease. Prim Care. 2011;38:383-394, vii. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pop.2011.05.001

24. Torpy JM, Lynm C, Golub RM. JAMA patient page. Peptic ulcer disease. JAMA. 2012;307(12):1329. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2012.184

25. Lanas A, Chan FKL. Peptic ulcer disease. Lancet. 2017;390(10094):613-624. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32404-7

26. Melmed RN, Gelpin Y. Duodenal ulcer: The helicobacterization of a psychosomatic disease? Isr J Med Sci. 1996;32(3-4):211-216.

27. Levenstein S. The very model of a modern etiology: A biopsychosocial view of peptic ulcer. Psychosom Med. 2000;62:176-185. https://doi.org/10.1097/00006842-200003000-00003

28. Herszényi L, Juhász M, Mihály E, Tulassay Z. Peptic ulcer disease and stress. Orv Hetil. 2015;156(35):1426-1429. https://doi.org/10.1556/650.2015.30249

29. Yegen BC. Lifestyle and peptic ulcer disease. Curr Pharm Des. 2018;24(18):2034-2040. https://doi.org/10.2174/1381612824666180510092303

30. Lee YB, Yu J, Choi HH, et al. The association between peptic ulcer diseases and mental health problems: A population-based study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2017;96(34):e7828. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000007828

31. Kurata JH, Nogawa AN. Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer: Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori and smoking. J Clin Gastroenterol. 1997;24(1):2-17. https://doi.org/10.1097/00004836-199701000-00002

32. Deding U, Ejlskov L, Grabas MP, Nielsen BJ, Torp-Pedersen C, Bøggild H. Perceived stress as a risk factor for peptic ulcers: A register-based cohort study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2016;16:140. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12876-016-0554-9

33. Chen TS, Chang FY. Clinical characteristics of Helicobacter pylori-negative duodenal ulcer disease. Hepatogastroenterology. 2008;55(86-87):1615-1618.

34. Kim SY, Min C, Oh DJ, Choi HG. Reciprocal association between depression and peptic ulcers: Two longitudinal follow-up studies using a national sample cohort. Sci Rep. 2020;10:1749. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-020-58783-0

35. Lavender JM, Wonderlich SA, Engel SG, Gordon KH, Kaye WH, Mitchell JE. Dimensions of emotion dysregulation in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: A conceptual review of the empirical literature. Clin Psychol Rev. 2015;40:111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpr.2015.05.010

36. Trompeter N, Bussey K, Forbes MK, et al. Emotion dysregulation and eating disorder symptoms: Examining distinct associations and interactions in adolescents. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022;50(5):683-694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10802-022-00898-1

37. Evers C, Marijn Stok F, de Ridder DT. Feeding your feelings: Emotion regulation strategies and emotional eating. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2010;36(6):792-804. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210371383

38. Eichin KN, Georgii C, Schnepper R, et al. Emotional food-cue-reactivity in anorexia nervosa and bulimia nervosa: An electroencephalography study. Int J Eat Disord. 2023;56(11):2096-2106. https://doi.org/10.1002/eat.24028

39. Nowowiejska J, Baran A, Flisiak I. Psoriasis and cardiometabolic disorders. Dermatology Review. 2020;107(6):508-520. https://doi.org/10.5114/dr.2020.103887

40. Reich A, Adamski Z, Chodorowska G, et al. Psoriasis: Diagnostic and therapeutic recommendations of the Polish Dermatological Society. Part 2. Dermatology Review. 2020;107(2):110-137. https://doi.org/10.5114/dr.2020.95259

41. Choi HG, Park B, Hong SM, et al. Psoriasis increases the risk of sudden sensorineural hearing loss: A longitudinal follow-up study using a national sample cohort. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(24):9310. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249310

42. Bylund S, Kobyletzki LB, Svalstedt M, Svensson Å. Prevalence and incidence of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review. Acta Derm Venereol. 2020;100(12):adv00160. https://doi.org/10.2340/00015555-3510

43. Frazier W, Bhardwaj N. Atopic dermatitis: Diagnosis and treatment. Am Fam Physician. 2020;101(10):590-598.

44. Cierpiatkowska L. Psychopathology. Poznań: Scientific Publishing SCHOLAR; 2009.

45. Ohayon MM. Epidemiology of insomnia: What we know and what we still need to learn. Sleep Med Rev. 2002;6(2):97-111. https://doi.org/10.1053/smrv.2002.0186

46. Yu NX, Chan JSM, Ji X, et al. Stress and psychosomatic symptoms in Chinese adults with sleep complaints: Mediation effect of self-compassion. Psychol Health Med. 2019;24(2):241-252. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2018.1546014

47. Pereira D, Elfering A. Social stressors at work, sleep quality and psychosomatic health complaints - A longitudinal ambulatory field study. Stress Health. 2014;30(1):43-52. https://doi.org/10.1002/smi.2494

48. Kim EJ, Dimsdale JE. The effect of psychosocial stress on sleep: A review of polysomnographic evidence. Behav Sleep Med. 2007;5(4):256-278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15402000701557383

49. Meule A, Riemann D, Voderholzer U. Sleep quality in persons with mental disorders: Changes during inpatient treatment across 10 diagnostic groups. J Sleep Res. 2023;32(2):e13624. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsr.13624

50. Warnes H. An integrative model for the treatment of psychosomatic disorders: The place of sleep and dreams revisited. Psychother Psychosom. 1976-1977;27(2):65-75. https://doi.org/10.1159/000286998

51. Zhang J, Li X, Tang Z, et al. Effects of stress on sleep quality: Multiple mediating effects of rumination and social anxiety. Psicol Reflex Crit. 2024;37(1):10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-024-00294-2

52. Engel GL. Psychological behavior in health and illness. Translation by Adler R. Bern, Stuttgart, Wien: Huber; 1970.

53. Balint M. The doctor, his patient and the illness. London: International Universities Press; 1957.

54. Salinsky J, Sackin P. What are you feeling, doctor? Identifying and avoiding defensive patterns in the consultation. Oxford: Radcliffe Medical Press; 2000.

55. Gaertner H. A medic’s perspective. In: Magdoń M, ed. Empathy in medicine. Kraków: Universitas; 2002.

56. Johnson AH, Nease DE Jr, Milberg LC, Addison RB. Essential characteristics of effective Balint group leadership. Fam Med. 2004;36(4):253-259.

57. Wiesenhütter E. Medical psychology for preclinical students. Berlin: Urban & Schwarzenberg; 1960.

58. Lustig M. Balint groups - an Australian perspective. Aust Fam Physician. 2006;35(8):639-642, 652.

59. Balint M. Notes on parapsychology and parapsychological healing. Int J Psychoanal. 1955;36(1):31-35.

60. Wasilewski B, Engel L, eds. Group Balint training: Theory and application. Warsaw: IPS Publishing; 2011.

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

1.
WŁODARCZYK, Michał and SKOMMER, Maria. Psychosomatic Disorders and the Physician-Patient Relationship - A Review. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 16 February 2026. Vol. 88, p. 68244. [Accessed 16 February 2026]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2026.88.68244.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 88 (2026)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Michał Włodarczyk, Maria Skommer

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 8
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

doctor-patient relationship, communication, stress, mental health
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop