Influence of wound closure materials and surgical techniques on healing quality
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.87.68091Keywords
surgical sutures, wound healing, scar formation, wound complications, tissue adhesivesAbstract
Background: Surgical wound closure is critical for post-operative healing and scar formation, with outcomes dependent on anatomical location, tissue characteristics, and material choice. Recent advances in closure methods including absorbable sutures, monofilament sutures, staples, and tissue adhesives have improved healing rates and cosmetic outcomes.
Aim of the study: This research comprehensively compares different wound closure materials and techniques on post-operative healing, scar quality, and complication rates. Analysis includes assessment by anatomical location, wound size, and patient-related risk factors.
Materials and methods: This review synthesizes evidence from randomized controlled trials, meta-analyses, and clinical guidelines in surgery, dermatology, and plastic surgery. The analysis of each material includes its composition, recommended locations, impact on the healing process, healing time and final scar outcome.
Results: Absorbable sutures and monofilament non-absorbable sutures demonstrated lower tissue reactivity and favorable healing times in most sites. Subcuticular techniques provided better cosmetic outcomes, tissue adhesives achieved rapid closure for low-tension wounds, and barbed sutures reduced closure time without increasing complications.
Conclusion: There is no universally optimal wound closure material; selection should be individualized according to wound location, tissue type, and patient profile. Absorbable monofilament sutures and subcuticular closure techniques often yield the best balance of healing and scar quality, with patient health and technique playing pivotal roles in determining outcomes.
References
1. Greenbaum, S., Zak, S., Tesoriero, P. J., Rudy, H., Vigdorchik, J., Long, W. J., & Schwarzkopf, R. (2021). A Single-Center Randomized Prospective Study Investigating the Efficacy of Various Wound Closure Devices in Reducing Postoperative Wound Complications. Arthroplasty Today, 9, 83–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.artd.2021.04.016
2. Al-Mubarak, L., & Al-Haddab, M. (2013). Cutaneous wound closure materials: An overview and update. Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery, 6(4), 178. https://doi.org/10.4103/0974-2077.123395
3. Aburakawa, N., Saito, Y., Higuchi, A., Iida, K., Wada, N., Mikami, M., & Urushidate, S. (2025). Research on Postoperative Scar Quality of Sutures and Skin Surface Adhesives. Journal of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 4(3), 2024–0044. https://doi.org/10.53045/jprs.2024-0044
4. Baygar, T., Ugur, A., Karaca, I. R., Kilinc, Y., Gultekin, S. E., & Sarac, N. (2024). Fabrication of a Biocompatible Nanoantimicrobial Suture for Rapid Wound Healing after Surgery. ACS Omega, 9(21), 22573–22580. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c09484
5. Vasalou, V., Kotidis, E., Tatsis, D., Boulogeorgou, K., Grivas, I., Koliakos, G., Cheva, A., Ioannidis, O., Tsingotjidou, A., & Angelopoulos, S. (2023). The Effects of Tissue Healing Factors in Wound Repair Involving Absorbable Meshes: A Narrative Review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 12(17), 5683. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm12175683
6. Rouhani, D. S., Singh, N. K., Chao, J. J., Almutairi, A., Seradj, M. H., Badowski-Platz, R., Toranto, J. D., & Mofid, M. M. (2024). Superiority of a Silk Surgical Site Wound Closure Device over Synthetic Dressings. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery, 154(6), 1233–1244. https://doi.org/10.1097/PRS.0000000000011316
7. Sajid, M. S. (2014). Systematic review of absorbable vs non-absorbable sutures used for the closure of surgical incisions. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Surgery, 6(12), 241. https://doi.org/10.4240/wjgs.v6.i12.241
8. Kristen Tamsil, A. D. J. R. S. A. F. I. and C. P. Kristen Tamsil, Anna Delay, Janae Rasmussen, Shantanu Amin, Faaiz Ibrahim and Carla Polanco. The Role of Superficial Skin Closure Technique on Postoperative Wound Healing Following Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Literature Review. https://doi.org/10.61440/JOP.2025.v3.26
9. Cammarota, M. C., Moura, L. G., Ribeiro Junior, I., Lima, R. Q. de, Almeida, C. M. de, Daher, L. M. C., Soares, D. A. dos S., Galdino, M. C. A., Mendonça, F. T., & Daher, J. C. (2017). Comparison between surgical sutures and Prineo<sup>®</sup> in terms of esthetic result and scar formation. Revista Brasileira de Cirurgia Plástica (RBCP) – Brazilian Journal of Plastic Sugery, 32(1), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.5935/2177-1235.2017RBCP0014
10. Idupulapati, H., Ramakrishnan, K., Scott, C., Narayanan, V., Chandran, S., & Gurram, P. (2023). Knotless barbed suture versus conventional polydioxanone suture material for intraoral surgical incisions - A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Oral Biology and Craniofacial Research, 13(6), 688–692. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.08.008
11. Mun, J., Hyun, S.-J., Lee, J.-K., An, S., & Kim, K.-J. (2023). Surgical and Clinical Outcomes Associated With the Use of Barbed Sutures and Self-Adhering Mesh System and Polymeric Glue for Wound Closure in Multilevel or Revision Spinal Surgery: A Matched Cohort Comparative Study With Conventional Wound Closure Procedure. Neurospine, 20(3), 981–988. https://doi.org/10.14245/ns.2346534.267
12. Niederstätter, I. M., Schiefer, J. L., & Fuchs, P. C. (2021). Surgical Strategies to Promote Cutaneous Healing. Medical Sciences, 9(2), 45. https://doi.org/10.3390/medsci9020045
13. Ye, H., & Rinkevich, Y. (2023). Fascia Layer—A Novel Target for the Application of Biomaterials in Skin Wound Healing. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 24(3), 2936. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032936
14. Öksüz, K. E., Kurt, B., Şahin İnan, Z. D., & Hepokur, C. (2023). Novel Bioactive Glass/Graphene Oxide-Coated Surgical Sutures for Soft Tissue Regeneration. ACS Omega, 8(24), 21628–21641. https://doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.3c00978
15. Marsidi, N., Scheepens, K. M. J., Goeman, J. J., Horeman, T., & Genders, R. E. (2023). Dynamic characteristics of skin reaction force in different body postures. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 2222. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-27489-4
16. Scribante, A., Ghizzoni, M., Pellegrini, M., Poli, P. P., Maiorana, C., & Spadari, F. (2023). Microbiological and Clinical Assessments of Suture Materials and Cyanoacrylate Application in Impacted Third Molar Surgeries: A Scoping Review. Journal of Functional Biomaterials, 14(10), 529. https://doi.org/10.3390/jfb14100529
17. Abboud, N. M., el Hajj, H., Abboud, S., Dibo, S., & Abboud, M. H. (2020). A New Suturing Method for Optimal Wound Healing: Technique and Experience. Aesthetic Surgery Journal Open Forum, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1093/asjof/ojaa008
18. Malothu Ravinder, V. P. Comparative Study On Wound Healing Between Absorbable and NonAbsorbable Sutures in Clean Surgical Wounds.
19. Shah, R. P., Sah, L. L., & Pandit, R. K. (2023). Comparing clinical outcomes between patients receiving non-absorbable and delayed absorbable sutures for abdominal wound closure after laparotomy. International Surgery Journal, 10(8), 1284–1288. https://doi.org/10.18203/2349-2902.isj20232321
20. Wilaporn Phakdeedindan, C. K. Cosmetic Outcome of Wound Closure between Steri-Strips (3MTM Steri-Strip) and Simple Interrupted Nylon 6-0 Sutures in Out-Patient Cervical Lymph Node Excision: A Randomized Controlled Trial. https://doi.org/10.35755/jmedassocthai.2021.07.12306
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Aleksandra Ocimek, Dominika Marszałek, Klaudia Kurzątkowska, Michalina Czudowska, Magdalena Zawadzka, Aleksandra Bystros, Marta Drozdowska, Emilia Borychowska, Zofia Aneta Mierzejewska, Karolina Gwóźdź
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 8
Number of citations: 0
