Modern Solutions to Old Problems: A Review of Emerging Digital Technologies in Post-stroke Neurorehabilitation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2026.87.67605Keywords
neurorehabilitation, stroke, virtual reality, robotic-assisted training, telerehabilitationAbstract
Introduction. Stroke is one of the leading causes of chronic disability worldwide. Conventional rehabilitation frequently faces challenges regarding accessibility, high costs, and difficulties in sustaining patient motivation. These constraints often lead to insufficient training intensity, thereby limiting therapeutic efficacy. Consequently, exploring alternative therapeutic solutions is necessary to enhance clinical outcomes.
Aim. This review evaluates the effectiveness of Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR), Robotic-Assisted Training (RAT), and telerehabilitation in post-stroke recovery.
Methods. A search of PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted. Included were randomized controlled trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses examining digital technologies in neurorehabilitation.
Results. VR and AR improve motor and cognitive functions via immersive feedback. RAT proves effective in delivering high-intensity practice, particularly for lower limb mobility in severe cases, though its superiority over conventional therapy for upper limbs remains inconclusive. Telerehabilitation offers accessibility comparable to face-to-face therapy but relies heavily on patient adherence.
Conclusions. Digital technologies address traditional limitations by enabling high-dosage, engaging training that facilitates functional recovery. Future research should focus on optimizing protocols and integrating these solutions into long-term plans.
References
1. Aminov A, Rogers JM, Middleton S, Caeyenberghs K, Wilson PH. What do randomized controlled trials say about virtual rehabilitation in stroke? A systematic literature review and meta-analysis of upper-limb and cognitive outcomes. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2018 Mar 27;15(1):29.
2. Żyga J. Current advances in ischemic stroke management. J Educ Health Sport. 2022 Aug 20;12(8):644–9.
3. Kheirollahzadeh M, Sarvghadi P, Bani Hani J, Azizkhani S, Monnin C, Choukou MA. Digital Health Technologies to Support At-Home Recovery of People with Stroke: A Scoping Review. Appl Sci. 2025 May 10;15(10):5335.
4. Macko A, Wojciechowska U, Łuniewski B, Nowicka I, Dziemiańczuk J, Macedońska W, et al. Effect of Diabetes on Neurological and Cognitive Outcomes. Qual Sport. 2025 Nov 22;47:66715.
5. Senadheera I, Hettiarachchi P, Haslam B, Nawaratne R, Sheehan J, Lockwood KJ, et al. AI Applications in Adult Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: A Scoping Review Using AI. Sensors. 2024 Oct 12;24(20):6585.
6. Lin DJ, Backus D, Chakraborty S, Liew SL, Valero-Cuevas FJ, Patten C, et al. Transforming modeling in neurorehabilitation: clinical insights for personalized rehabilitation. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2024 Feb 4;21(1):18.
7. Giles D, Foulon C, Pombo G, Ruffle JK, Xu T, Jäger HR, et al. Individualized prescriptive inference in ischaemic stroke. Nat Commun. 2025 Oct 16;16(1):8968.
8. Górniak A, Kubas A, Widawski M, Gizińska N, Sobczyk A, Lewandowska P, et al. The Impact of Virtual Reality Training on Sport Injury Rehabilitation – a Literature Review. Qual Sport. 2025 Jun 2;42:60339.
9. Singh H, Nguyen T, Hahn-Goldberg S, Lewis-Fung S, Smith-Bayley S, Nelson MLA. A qualitative study exploring the experiences of individuals living with stroke and their caregivers with community-based poststroke services: A critical need for action. Lavorgna L, editor. PLOS ONE. 2022 Oct 10;17(10):e0275673.
10. Bae S, Park HS. Development and validation of immersive hand rehabilitation system using a VR rhythm game with vibrotactile feedback: an fNIRS pilot study [Internet]. 2022 [cited 2025 Dec 8]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-2054240/v1
11. Balestra N, Sharma G, Riek LM, Busza A. Automatic Identification of Upper Extremity Rehabilitation Exercise Type and Dose Using Body-Worn Sensors and Machine Learning: A Pilot Study. Digit Biomark. 2021 Jul 2;5(2):158–66.
12. Tamayo-Serrano P, Garbaya S, Blazevic P. Gamified In-Home Rehabilitation for Stroke Survivors: Analytical Review. Int J Serious Games [Internet]. 2018 Mar 26 [cited 2025 Dec 8];5(1). Available from: http://journal.seriousgamessociety.org/index.php/IJSG/article/view/224
13. Brien JO. Virtual Reality to Improve Motor Function After Stroke: Past, Present, and Future. Open Access J Neurol Neurosurg [Internet]. 2019 Mar 18 [cited 2025 Dec 8];10(2). Available from: https://juniperpublishers.com/oajnn/OAJNN.MS.ID.555785.php
14. Kozlowski AJ, Fabian M, Lad D, Delgado AD. Feasibility and Safety of a Powered Exoskeleton for Assisted Walking for Persons With Multiple Sclerosis: A Single-Group Preliminary Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jul;98(7):1300–7.
15. Hunaepi H, Sudiatmika AAIAR, Fadly W. Augmented Reality in Education: A Meta-Analysis Of (Quasi-) Experimental Studies to Investigate the Impact. Reflect J. 2023 Dec 1;3(2):74–87.
16. Rost NS, Brodtmann A, Pase MP, Van Veluw SJ, Biffi A, Duering M, et al. Post-Stroke Cognitive Impairment and Dementia. Circ Res. 2022 Apr 15;130(8):1252–71.
17. Lohse KR, Hilderman CGE, Cheung KL, Tatla S, Van Der Loos HFM. Virtual Reality Therapy for Adults Post-Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Exploring Virtual Environments and Commercial Games in Therapy. Quinn TJ, editor. PLoS ONE. 2014 Mar 28;9(3):e93318.
18. Faria AL, Andrade A, Soares L, I Badia SB. Benefits of virtual reality based cognitive rehabilitation through simulated activities of daily living: a randomized controlled trial with stroke patients. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2016 Dec;13(1):96.
19. Zhang T, Zhang M, Luo J. Review Of The Application Of Artificial Intelligence (AI) Exercise Training In Improving Cognitive Function In The Elderly Population. Qual Sport. 2025 Feb 10;38:58019.
20. Janssen J, Verschuren O, Renger WJ, Ermers J, Ketelaar M, Van Ee R. Gamification in Physical Therapy: More Than Using Games. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2017 Jan;29(1):95–9.
21. Kim A, Schweighofer N, Finley JM. Locomotor skill acquisition in virtual reality shows sustained transfer to the real world. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2019 Dec;16(1):113.
22. Jo S, Jang H, Kim H, Song C. 360° immersive virtual reality-based mirror therapy for upper extremity function and satisfaction among stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med [Internet]. 2024 Apr [cited 2025 Nov 10];60(2). Available from: https://www.minervamedica.it/index2.php?show=R33Y2024N02A0207
23. Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Crotty M. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Stroke Group, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2017 Nov 20 [cited 2025 Nov 10];2018(1). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub4
24. Lülsdorff K, Junker FB, Studer B, Wittenberg H, Pickenbrock H, Schmidt-Wilcke T. Neurorehabilitation of the upper extremity – immersive virtual reality vs. electromechanically assisted training. A comparative study. Front Neurol. 2023 Dec 21;14:1290637.
25. Shin S, Hwang G, Kim Y, Park E, Cho DR, Baik H, et al. Role of fully-immersive virtual reality for paretic arm recovery in stroke rehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2025 Sep 15;16:1653749.
26. Zhang B, Li D, Liu Y, Wang J, Xiao Q. Virtual reality for limb motor function, balance, gait, cognition and daily function of stroke patients: A systematic review and meta‐analysis. J Adv Nurs. 2021 Aug;77(8):3255–73.
27. Patsaki I, Dimitriadi N, Despoti A, Tzoumi D, Leventakis N, Roussou G, et al. The effectiveness of immersive virtual reality in physical recovery of stroke patients: A systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2022 Sep 22;16:880447.
28. Zhang J, Liu M, Yue J, Yang J, Xiao Y, Yang J, et al. Effects of virtual reality with different modalities on upper limb recovery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis on optimizing stroke rehabilitation. Front Neurol. 2025 Apr 1;16:1544135.
29. De Rooij IJM, Van De Port IGL, Punt M, Abbink-van Moorsel PJM, Kortsmit M, Van Eijk RPA, et al. Effect of Virtual Reality Gait Training on Participation in Survivors of Subacute Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Phys Ther. 2021 May 4;101(5):pzab051.
30. Lin CJ, Lin K chung, Lau HY, Hsieh Y wei, Li Y chun, Chen WS, et al. Effects of Mirror Therapy Preceding Augmented Reality in Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial [Internet]. 2024 [cited 2025 Dec 12]. Available from: https://www.researchsquare.com/article/rs-5417696/v1
31. Kraśnik W, Jankowska O, Kurzeja J, Piotrowicz K, Piotrowicz H, Bajkacz A, et al. The Benefits and challenges of virtual reality application in rehabilitation for chronic conditions. J Educ Health Sport. 2024 Dec 18;75:56379.
32. Quan W, Liu S, Cao M, Zhao J. A Comprehensive Review of Virtual Reality Technology for Cognitive Rehabilitation in Patients with Neurological Conditions. Appl Sci. 2024 Jul 19;14(14):6285.
33. Jonsdottir J, Baglio F, Gindri P, Isernia S, Castiglioni C, Gramigna C, et al. Virtual Reality for Motor and Cognitive Rehabilitation From Clinic to Home: A Pilot Feasibility and Efficacy Study for Persons With Chronic Stroke. Front Neurol. 2021 Apr 7;12:601131.
34. Turolla A, Dam M, Ventura L, Tonin P, Agostini M, Zucconi C, et al. Virtual reality for the rehabilitation of the upper limb motor function after stroke: a prospective controlled trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2013;10(1):85.
35. Leong SC, Tang YM, Toh FM, Fong KNK. Examining the effectiveness of virtual, augmented, and mixed reality (VAMR) therapy for upper limb recovery and activities of daily living in stroke patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2022 Aug 24;19(1):93.
36. Shin S, Lee HJ, Chang WH, Ko SH, Shin YI, Kim YH. A Smart Glove Digital System Promotes Restoration of Upper Limb Motor Function and Enhances Cortical Hemodynamic Changes in Subacute Stroke Patients with Mild to Moderate Weakness: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 10;11(24):7343.
37. Ochandorena-Acha M, Terradas-Monllor M, Nunes Cabrera TF, Torrabias Rodas M, Grau S. Effectiveness of virtual reality on functional mobility during treadmill training in children with cerebral palsy: a single-blind, two-arm parallel group randomised clinical trial (VirtWalkCP Project). BMJ Open. 2022 Nov;12(11):e061988.
38. Kim N, Park Y, Lee BH. Effects of community-based virtual reality treadmill training on balance ability in patients with chronic stroke. J Phys Ther Sci. 2015;27(3):655–8.
39. Han SH, Jang HJ, Lee JW, Cheong JW, Kim YD, Nam HS, et al. The effect of virtual reality-based treadmill gait training on functional mobility and balance in chronic stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 21;16:1603233.
40. Kim N, Hee Lee B, Kim Y, Min W. Effects of Virtual Reality Treadmill Training on Community Balance Confidence and Gait in People Post-Stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Exp Stroke Transl Med [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2025 Nov 11];09(01). Available from: http://www.openaccessjournals.com/articles/effects-of-virtual-reality-treadmill-training-on-community-balance-confidence-and-gait-in-people-poststroke-arandomized-controlled-11899.html
41. Yang H, Gao Z, Zhou Y, Liao Z, Song C, Mao Y. Effects of gait adaptation training on augmented reality treadmill for patients with stroke in community ambulation. Int J Qual Health Care. 2024 Feb 20;36(1):mzae008.
42. Galperin I, Mirelman A, Schmitz-Hübsch T, Hsieh KL, Regev K, Karni A, et al. Treadmill training with virtual reality to enhance gait and cognitive function among people with multiple sclerosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Neurol. 2023 Mar;270(3):1388–401.
43. Mirelman A, Rochester L, Maidan I, Del Din S, Alcock L, Nieuwhof F, et al. Addition of a non-immersive virtual reality component to treadmill training to reduce fall risk in older adults (V-TIME): a randomised controlled trial. The Lancet. 2016 Sep;388(10050):1170–82.
44. Zhang B, Wong KP, Kang R, Fu S, Qin J, Xiao Q. Efficacy of Robot-Assisted and Virtual Reality Interventions on Balance, Gait, and Daily Function in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2023 Oct;104(10):1711–9.
45. Lloréns R, Gil-Gómez JA, Alcañiz M, Colomer C, Noé E. Improvement in balance using a virtual reality-based stepping exercise: a randomized controlled trial involving individuals with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2015 Mar;29(3):261–8.
46. Al-Yahya E, Johansen-Berg H, Kischka U, Zarei M, Cockburn J, Dawes H. Prefrontal Cortex Activation While Walking Under Dual-Task Conditions in Stroke: A Multimodal Imaging Study. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016 Jul;30(6):591–9.
47. Warutkar V, Dadgal R, Mangulkar UR. Use of Robotics in Gait Rehabilitation Following Stroke: A Review. Cureus. 2022 Nov;14(11):e31075.
48. Lin Y, Li QY, Qu Q, Ding L, Chen Z, Huang F, et al. Comparative Effectiveness of Robot-Assisted Training Versus Enhanced Upper Extremity Therapy on Upper and Lower Extremity for Stroke Survivors: A Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Aug 26;54:jrm00314.
49. Park JM, Park HJ, Yoon SY, Kim YW, Shin JI, Lee SC. Effects of Robot-Assisted Therapy for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: An Umbrella Review of Systematic Reviews. Stroke. 2025 May;56(5):1243–52.
50. Bosomworth H, Rodgers H, Shaw L, Smith L, Aird L, Howel D, et al. Evaluation of the enhanced upper limb therapy programme within the Robot-Assisted Training for the Upper Limb after Stroke trial: descriptive analysis of intervention fidelity, goal selection and goal achievement. Clin Rehabil. 2021 Jan;35(1):119–34.
51. Huo C, Shao G, Chen T, Li W, Wang J, Xie H, et al. Effectiveness of unilateral lower-limb exoskeleton robot on balance and gait recovery and neuroplasticity in patients with subacute stroke: a randomized controlled trial. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2024 Dec 5;21(1):213.
52. Lee J, Kim DY, Lee SH, Kim JH, Kim DY, Lim KB, et al. End-effector lower limb robot-assisted gait training effects in subacute stroke patients: A randomized controlled pilot trial. Medicine (Baltimore). 2023 Oct 20;102(42):e35568.
53. Tam PK, Tang N, Kamsani NSB, Yap TY, Coffey-Aladdin I, Goh SM, et al. Overground robotic exoskeleton vs conventional therapy in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: results from a pragmatic, multicentre implementation programme. J Neuroengineering Rehabil. 2025 Jan 6;22(1):3.
54. Yu Y, Huang W, Tuerxun H, Zheng Y, Su L, Li X, et al. Enhanced neuroplasticity and gait recovery in stroke patients: a comparative analysis of active and passive robotic training modes. BMC Neurol. 2025 May 31;25(1):239.
55. Kim YH. Robotic assisted rehabilitation therapy for enhancing gait and motor function after stroke. Precis Future Med. 2019 Sep 30;3(3):103–15.
56. Meng G, Ma X, Chen P, Xu S, Li M, Zhao Y, et al. Effect of early integrated robot-assisted gait training on motor and balance in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a single-blinded randomized controlled trial. Ther Adv Neurol Disord. 2022 Jan;15:17562864221123195.
57. Takebayashi T, Takahashi K, Amano S, Gosho M, Sakai M, Hashimoto K, et al. Robot-Assisted Training as Self-Training for Upper-Limb Hemiplegia in Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Stroke. 2022 Jul;53(7):2182–91.
58. Singh N, Saini M, Kumar N, Srivastava MVP, Mehndiratta A. Evidence of neuroplasticity with robotic hand exoskeleton for post-stroke rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2021 May 6;18(1):76.
59. Laver KE, Lange B, George S, Deutsch JE, Saposnik G, Chapman M, et al. Virtual reality for stroke rehabilitation. Cochrane Central Editorial Service, editor. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [Internet]. 2025 Jun 20 [cited 2025 Nov 10];2025(6). Available from: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/14651858.CD008349.pub5
60. Chen SC, Lin CH, Su SW, Chang YT, Lai CH. Feasibility and effect of interactive telerehabilitation on balance in individuals with chronic stroke: a pilot study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2021 Dec;18(1):71.
61. Lin KH, Chen CH, Chen YY, Huang WT, Lai JS, Yu SM, et al. Bidirectional and multi-user telerehabilitation system: clinical effect on balance, functional activity, and satisfaction in patients with chronic stroke living in long-term care facilities. Sensors. 2014 Jul 11;14(7):12451–66.
62. Xing Y, Xiao J, Zeng B, Wang Q. ICTs and interventions in telerehabilitation and their effects on stroke recovery. Front Neurol. 2023;14:1234003.
63. Lee SJ, Lee EC, Kim M, Ko SH, Huh S, Choi W, et al. Feasibility of dance therapy using telerehabilitation on trunk control and balance training in patients with stroke: A pilot study. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Sep 2;101(35):e30286.
64. Saywell NL, Vandal AC, Mudge S, Hale L, Brown P, Feigin V, et al. Telerehabilitation After Stroke Using Readily Available Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2021 Jan;35(1):88–97.
65. Cacciante L, Pietà CD, Rutkowski S, Cieślik B, Szczepańska-Gieracha J, Agostini M, et al. Cognitive telerehabilitation in neurological patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurol Sci. 2022 Feb;43(2):847–62.
66. Federico S, Cacciante L, De Icco R, Gatti R, Jonsdottir J, Pagliari C, et al. Telerehabilitation for Stroke: A Personalized Multi-Domain Approach in a Pilot Study. J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 6;13(12):1692.
67. Maggio MG, Baglio F, Arcuri F, Borgnis F, Contrada M, Diaz MDM, et al. Cognitive telerehabilitation: an expert consensus paper on current evidence and future perspective. Front Neurol. 2024;15:1338873.
68. Bellomo RG, Paolucci T, Saggino A, Pezzi L, Bramanti A, Cimino V, et al. The WeReha Project for an Innovative Home-Based Exercise Training in Chronic Stroke Patients: A Clinical Study. J Cent Nerv Syst Dis. 2020;12:1179573520979866.
69. Allegue DR, Sweet SN, Higgins J, Archambault PS, Michaud F, Miller WC, et al. Lessons Learned From Clinicians and Stroke Survivors About Using Telerehabilitation Combined With Exergames: Multiple Case Study. JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Sep 15;9(3):e31305.
70. Maresca G, Maggio MG, De Luca R, Manuli A, Tonin P, Pignolo L, et al. Tele-Neuro-Rehabilitation in Italy: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Front Neurol. 2020 Sep 30;11:563375.
71. Zaremba B, Gorecka A, Wysokińska O, Cholewa K, Milanowska J. New directions in treatment of the ischemic stroke. J Educ Health Sport. 2020 Jul 10;10(7):66–77.
72. Gelineau A, Perrochon A, Daviet JC, Mandigout S. Compliance with Upper Limb Home-Based Exergaming Interventions for Stroke Patients: A Narrative Review. J Rehabil Med. 2022 Nov 24;54:jrm00325.
73. Liu Y, Shan Y, Zhang M, Ji B, Zhou Y. Digital Divide in Smart Sports Applications for the Elderly and Its Mitigation. Qual Sport. 2025 Apr 14;40:60013.
74. Krakauer JW. Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation: Curr Opin Neurol. 2006 Feb;19(1):84–90.
75. Lohse K, Shirzad N, Verster A, Hodges N, Van Der Loos HFM. Video Games and Rehabilitation: Using Design Principles to Enhance Engagement in Physical Therapy. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2013 Dec;37(4):166–75.
76. Jang SH, You SH, Hallett M, Cho YW, Park CM, Cho SH, et al. Cortical Reorganization and Associated Functional Motor Recovery After Virtual Reality in Patients With Chronic Stroke: An Experimenter-Blind Preliminary Study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005 Nov;86(11):2218–23.
77. Ballester BR, Maier M, Duff A, Cameirão M, Bermúdez S, Duarte E, et al. A critical time window for recovery extends beyond one-year post-stroke. J Neurophysiol. 2019 Jul 1;122(1):350–7.
78. De Crignis AC, Ruhnau ST, Hösl M, Lefint J, Amberger T, Dressnandt J, et al. Robotic arm training in neurorehabilitation enhanced by augmented reality – a usability and feasibility study. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2023 Aug 12;20(1):105.
79. Gooch HJ, Hill JE, Jones SP, Stockley RC. The Effectiveness and Use of Digital Technology Interventions for Upper Limb Rehabilitation at Home in Acute and Subacute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis [Internet]. 2025 [cited 2025 Dec 8]. Available from: http://medrxiv.org/lookup/doi/10.1101/2025.11.14.25340164
80. Mehrholz J, Pollock A, Pohl M, Kugler J, Elsner B. Systematic review with network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of robotic-assisted arm training for improving activities of daily living and upper limb function after stroke. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2020 Dec;17(1):83.
81. Huang Y, Yang B, Wong TWL, Ng SSM, Hu X. Personalized robots for long-term telerehabilitation after stroke: a perspective on technological readiness and clinical translation. Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Jan 8;4:1329927.
82. Øra HP, Kirmess M, Brady MC, Sørli H, Becker F. Technical Features, Feasibility, and Acceptability of Augmented Telerehabilitation in Post-stroke Aphasia-Experiences From a Randomized Controlled Trial. Front Neurol. 2020;11:671.
83. Urbina J, Abarca VE, Elias DA. Integration of music-based game approaches with wearable devices for hand neurorehabilitation: a narrative review. J NeuroEngineering Rehabil. 2024 May 29;21(1):89.
84. Tosto-Mancuso J, Tabacof L, Herrera JE, Breyman E, Dewil S, Cortes M, et al. Gamified Neurorehabilitation Strategies for Post-stroke Motor Recovery: Challenges and Advantages. Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep. 2022 Mar;22(3):183–95.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Simon Matczak, Maria Namysł, Kinga Woźniak, Maciej Bieniek, Sandra Dachowska, Jan Haraj, Marcin Sobkowiak, Aleksandra Fałczyńska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 24
Number of citations: 0
