Spatial differences in the development of the construction sector in the regions of Ukraine
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.79.65742Keywords
construction industry, spatial differences, regional development, reconstruction, infrastructure, innovations, , UkraineAbstract
The article examines the spatial differences in the development of the construction sector in the regions of Ukraine in the conditions of war destruction and post-war challenges. The role of the construction industry as a key factor in the restoration of social, industrial and transport infrastructure, as well as as a system-forming element of the regional economy, is determined. Regional features are analyzed: in Western Ukraine - the predominance of housing construction for internally displaced persons, in Central - the concentration of production facilities and infrastructure projects, in the South - large-scale tasks of reconstruction of ports, hydraulic structures and transport hubs, in the East - colossal destruction and the need for long-term reconstruction strategies, in the North - an emphasis on the restoration of border areas and small towns. It is established that spatial disparities in the development of the construction sector determine the need for a regionally differentiated policy of reconstruction and integration into the European economic space. Particular attention is paid to the introduction of innovative and "green" technologies as tools for modernization of the industry.
References
1. Dolishnii, M. I. (2006). Rehionalna polityka v Ukraini: suchasnyi stan i stratehiia rozvytku. Lviv: IRD NAN Ukrainy.
2. Topchiiev, O. H. (2005). Suspilno-heohrafichni doslidzhennia: metodolohiia, metody, metodyka. Odesa: Astroprynt.
3. Topchiiev, O. H. (2012). Metodolohiia suspilnoi heohrafii. Odesa: Astroprynt.
4. Kovalchuk, S. V. (2021). Prostorovi osoblyvosti rozvytku budivelnoi promyslovosti Ukrainy. Rehionalna ekonomika, 2, 45–56.
5. Onyshchenko, S. V. (2018). Investytsiini protsesy u budivelnomu kompleksi Ukrainy. Ekonomika budivnytstva i miskoho hospodarstva, 14(1), 22–31.
6. Onyshchenko, S. V. (2020). Rehionalni vidminnosti rozvytku budivelnoi haluzi: ekonomiko-heohrafichnyi analiz. Ekonomika Ukrainy, 9, 34–47.
7. Hubskyi, B. V. (2010). Investytsii ta rehionalnyi rozvytok. Kyiv: KNEU.
8. Melnyk, A. F. (2014). Ekonomika infrastruktury. Kyiv: Tsentr uchbovoi literatury.
9. Derzhavna sluzhba statystyky Ukrainy. (2023). Budivelna diialnist v Ukraini u 2022 rotsi. Kyiv: Derzhstat. https://www.ukrstat.gov.ua
10. Kyiv School of Economics (KSE). (2023). Russia will pay: Assessment of damages to Ukraine’s infrastructure. Kyiv: KSE Institute.https://kse.ua
11. World Bank. (2023). Ukraine Rapid Damage and Needs Assessment: February 2022 – February 2023. Washington, D.C.: World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org
12. European Bank for Reconstruction and Development (EBRD). (2023). Annual Review of Transition. London: EBRD. https://www.ebrd.com
13. United Nations Development Programme (UNDP). (2023). Resilient Recovery Framework 2023–2026. New York: UNDP. https://www.undp.org
14. European Commission. (2024). Regulation (EU) 2024/1679 on the Trans-European Transport Network (TEN-T). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Union. https://transport.ec.europa.eu
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 O. Greits, S. Kudelina

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 81
Number of citations: 0