Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

The effectiveness of different massage techniques in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain
  • Home
  • /
  • The effectiveness of different massage techniques in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 84 (2025) /
  4. Medical Sciences

The effectiveness of different massage techniques in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain

Authors

  • I. Badyin Ukrainian Research Institute Transport Medicine
  • V. Khomutets Wellness & Aesthetics

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.84.65612

Keywords

low back pain, massage therapy, myofascial release, rehabilitation, randomized controlled trial

Abstract

Radiculopathy and chronic low back pain represent common conditions that substantially impair quality of life through persistent nociceptive symptoms, secondary myotonic syndrome, and functional limitations. Massage techniques are increasingly regarded as supportive interventions within multimodal rehabilitation, yet comparative evidence across modalities remains limited. The present prospective, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial enrolled 110 adults aged 18 to 65 years with subacute or chronic low back pain of 6 weeks to 12 months duration. Participants were allocated to classical therapeutic massage, myofascial release, trigger point therapy, or a control group receiving standard rehabilitation without massage. Each intervention lasted six weeks, with 18 sessions delivered by experienced therapists in accordance with standardized protocols. All patients followed an identical educational and exercise program and used analgesics as required. The primary endpoint was change in the Oswestry Disability Index, while secondary measures included pain intensity on the numeric rating scale, muscle stiffness, range of motion, endurance, quality of life, analgesic use, and global impression of change, with assessments performed up to six months. At six weeks, all massage modalities significantly reduced pain and disability compared with controls, with myofascial release producing the greatest improvements in functional outcomes and patient satisfaction. Classical massage and trigger point therapy also demonstrated clinically meaningful benefi

ts, particularly in mobility and spasm reduction. Improvements were sustained at three and six months, with no serious adverse events reported. These findings support the integration of massage, and particularly myofascial release, into evidence-based rehabilitation protocols for patients with low back pain.

References

1. Andreeva T, Stoyanov O, Mirdjuraev E, Chebotareva G, Kalashnikov V, Vastyanov R, Dariy V. Clinical and morphometric features in cervical spine pathology in humans and animals. PJS [Internet]. 2024 Oct. 22 [cited 2025 Jul. 24]; 14(3):147-54. Available from: https://pjs.zaslavsky.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/430

2. Zhou T, Salman D, McGregor AH. Recent clinical practice guidelines for the management of low back pain: a global comparison. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 May 1;25(1):344. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07468-0. PMID: 38693474; PMCID: PMC11061926.

3. Jorgensen SP, Chiodo AE. Musculoskeletal mimics for lumbosacral radiculopathy. Part 2: Specific disorders. Muscle Nerve. 2025 Jan;71(1):22-28. doi: 10.1002/mus.28279. Epub 2024 Nov 5. PMID: 39498771.

4. Lemoon K. Clinical reasoning in massage therapy. Int J Ther Massage Bodywork. 2008 Aug 20;1(1):12-8. doi: 10.3822/ijtmb.v1i1.2. PMID: 21589814; PMCID: PMC3091448.

5. Yefimenko P. B. Differentiated approach to massage of patients with osteochondrosis of the lumbosacral spine. Slobozhanskyi naukovo-sportivniy visnyk. 2013. No. 3. P. 115-118. - Access mode: http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/snsv_2013_3_29. (in Ukrainian)

6. Cosamalón-Gan I, Cosamalón-Gan T, Mattos-Piaggio G, Villar-Suárez V, García-Cosamalón J, Vega-Álvarez JA. Inflammation in the intervertebral disc herniation. Neurocirugia (Engl Ed). 2021 Jan-Feb;32(1):21-35. English, Spanish. doi: 10.1016/j.neucir.2020.01.001. Epub 2020 Mar 10. PMID: 32169419.

7. Badin I.Yu., Kozachenko A.I. Massage technologies in aesthetic medicine. O., 2010 - 236 p. (in Russian)

8. Qaseem A, Wilt TJ, McLean RM, Forciea MA; Clinical Guidelines Committee of the American College of Physicians; Denberg TD, Barry MJ, Boyd C, Chow RD, Fitterman N, Harris RP, Humphrey LL, Vijan S. Noninvasive Treatments for Acute, Subacute, and Chronic Low Back Pain: A Clinical Practice Guideline From the American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Apr 4;166(7):514-530. doi: 10.7326/M16-2367. Epub 2017 Feb 14. PMID: 28192789.

9. Expert Panel on Neurological Imaging; Hutchins TA, Peckham M, Shah LM, Parsons MS, Agarwal V, Boulter DJ, Burns J, Cassidy RC, Davis MA, Holly LT, Hunt CH, Khan MA, Moritani T, Ortiz AO, O'Toole JE, Powers WJ, Promes SB, Reitman C, Shah VN, Singh S, Timpone VM, Corey AS. ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Low Back Pain: 2021 Update. J Am Coll Radiol. 2021 Nov;18(11S):S361-S379. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2021.08.002. PMID: 34794594.

10. S3-Leitlinie Nationale VersorgungsLeitlinie Kreuzschmerz https://register.awmf.org/de/leitlinien/detail/nvl-007

11. Shirado O, Arai Y, Iguchi T, Imagama S, Kawakami M, Nikaido T, Ogata T, Orita S, Sakai D, Sato K, Takahata M, Takeshita K, Tsuji T; Structured abstract preparation team. Formulation of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain- the revised 2019 edition. J Orthop Sci. 2022 Jan;27(1):3-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2021.06.024. Epub 2021 Nov 23. PMID: 34836746.

12. Demont A, Benaïssa L, Recoque V, Desmeules F, Bourmaud A. Spinal pain patients seeking care in primary care and referred to physiotherapy: A cross-sectional study on patients characteristics, referral information and physiotherapy care offered by general practitioners and physiotherapists in France. PLoS One. 2022 Sep 6;17(9):e0274021. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0274021. PMID: 36067139; PMCID: PMC9447922.

13. Jenks A, Hoekstra T, van Tulder M, Ostelo RW, Rubinstein SM, Chiarotto A. Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, Oswestry Disability Index, and Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale: Which Has Superior Measurement Properties in Older Adults With Low Back Pain? J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2022 Jul;52(7):457-469. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2022.10802. Epub 2022 May 18. PMID: 35584027.

14. Miller FG. Bioethics as a Vocation. Perspect Biol Med. 2020;63(3):429-443. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2020.0031. PMID: 33416617.

15. Robinson CL, Phung A, Dominguez M, Remotti E, Ricciardelli R, Momah DU, Wahab S, Kim RS, Norman M, Zhang E, Hasoon J, Orhurh V, Viswanath O, Yazdi C, Chen GH, Simopoulos TT, Gill J. Pain Scales: What Are They and What Do They Mean. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2024 Jan;28(1):11-25. doi: 10.1007/s11916-023-01195-2. Epub 2023 Dec 7. PMID: 38060102.

16. Franchignoni F, Giordano A, Ferriero G, Monticone M. Measurement precision of the Pain Catastrophizing Scale and its short forms in chronic low back pain. Sci Rep. 2022 Jul 14;12(1):12042. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-15522-x. PMID: 35835830; PMCID: PMC9283330.

17. Taheri, N., Becker, L., Reitmaier, S et al. Schober test is not a valid assessment tool for lumbar mobility. Sci Rep 14, 5451 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54787-2

18. Demoulin C, Vanderthommen M, Duysens C, Crielaard JM. Spinal muscle evaluation using the Sorensen test: a critical appraisal of the literature. Joint Bone Spine. 2006 Jan;73(1):43-50. doi: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2004.08.002. PMID: 16461206.

19. Unver T, Unver B, Kacmaz KS. The test-retest reliability and minimal clinically important difference of the Dubousset Functional Test and its correlation with Rolland Morris disability questionnaire in chronic non-specific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):2086-2092. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07720-6. Epub 2023 Apr 29. PMID: 37119310.

20. Kurosawa S, Yamaguchi T, Mori A, Tsukagoshi M, Okuda I, Ikeda M, Fuji S, Yamashita T, Ogawa C, Ito A, Tanaka T, Inamoto Y, Kim SW, Fukuda T. Prognostic Impact of Pretransplantation Quality of Life and Its Post-Transplantation Longitudinal Change after Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Prospective Study That Administered the Short-Form Health Survey (SF-12) and EuroQol 5. Transplant Cell Ther. 2021 Nov;27(11):935.e1-935.e9. doi: 10.1016/j.jtct.2021.07.026. Epub 2021 Aug 8. PMID: 34371214.

21. TIBCO Statistica® User's Guide https://docs.tibco.com/pub/stat/14.0.0/doc/html/UsersGuide/GUID-058F49FC-F4EF-4341-96FB-A785C2FA76E9-homepage.html

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-08-28

How to Cite

1.
BADYIN, I. and KHOMUTETS, V. The effectiveness of different massage techniques in the rehabilitation of patients with low back pain. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 28 August 2025. Vol. 84, p. 65612. [Accessed 23 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2025.84.65612.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 84 (2025)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2025 I. Badyin, V. Khomutets

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 151
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

low back pain, massage therapy, myofascial release, rehabilitation, randomized controlled trial
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop