Enhanced Screw Fixation in Osteoporotic Proximal Femoral Fracture: Augmentation vs Without Augmentation. Literature Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.82.60597Keywords
Proximal femoral fractures, Osteoporotic fracture, Hip fracture, cement augmentation, enhanced nail fixation, enhanced screw fixation, Osteoporosis, trochanter fractures, femoral head fractures, acetabular fracture, femoral neck fractures, Pertrochanteric fractures, postmenopausal women, cephalomedullary nail, proximal femoral nail antirotation, fracture healingAbstract
Introduction and purpose: Osteoporosis is a common cause of proximal femoral fractures, which also are called hip fractures. The incidence of osteoporosis is increasing and becoming widely population disease. The division of proximal femoral fractures is based on anatomy, which includes trochanter, neck and head of femur fractures. There are the most severe osteoporotic fractures with a high mortality and disability. Therefore, decreased thickness in osteoporosis implies mechanical difficulties with treatment. Treatment is dependent on the appropriate scales, related to the anatomical division of hip fractures. It contains appropriate fixation with sliding hip screw with plate or nailing. In other cases, especially in elderly patients with symptomatic hip arthritis, total hip arthroplasty may be considered.
Aim of the study: Proximal femoral fractures in osteoporotic patients are not only associated with difficulties in treatment, but more importantly with high mortality and disability. This is why further development of treatments is so important. In the following work, it is shown up-to-date methods of treatment proximal femoral fractures. Furthermore, promising method with enhanced screw fixation with augmentation is shown with particular attention to safety and good functional results.
Material and methods: Review of studies available through sources on PubMed, Google Scholar, and the National Library of Medicine.
Conclusions: Proximal femoral fractures vary significantly in treatment depending on the division by anatomy. In addition to anatomy, it is important to consider age and co-morbid symptomatic hip arthritis in treatment. The cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation increases the implant stability in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. Moreover, cement augmentation is safe method of treatment with good fracture healing.
References
1. JA, K., Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level Technical report. . 2007.
2. Anderson, K.D., et al., Biomechanics of Implant Fixation in Osteoporotic Bone. Curr Osteoporos Rep, 2020. 18(5): p. 577-586.
3. Drozdzowska, B., [Osteoporotic fractures]. Endokrynol Pol, 2009. 60(6): p. 498-502.
4. Kanis, J.A., Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int, 1994. 4(6): p. 368-81.
5. Hernlund, E., et al., Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos, 2013. 8(1): p. 136.
6. Meinberg, E.G., et al., Fracture and Dislocation Classification Compendium-2018. J Orthop Trauma, 2018. 32 Suppl 1: p. S1-S170.
7. Pipkin, G., Treatment of grade IV fracture-dislocation of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1957. 39-A(5): p. 1027-42 passim.
8. Kazley, J.M., et al., Classifications in Brief: Garden Classification of Femoral Neck Fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res, 2018. 476(2): p. 441-445.
9. Shen, M., et al., An update on the Pauwels classification. J Orthop Surg Res, 2016. 11(1): p. 161.
10. Evans, E.M., The treatment of trochanteric fractures of the femur. J Bone Joint Surg Br, 1949. 31B(2): p. 190-203.
11. Jensen, J.S., Classification of trochanteric fractures. Acta Orthop Scand, 1980. 51(5): p. 803-10.
12. Lips, P., Epidemiology and predictors of fractures associated with osteoporosis. Am J Med, 1997. 103(2A): p. 3S-8S; discussion 8S-11S.
13. Makitie, R.E., et al., Abnormal Bone Tissue Organization and Osteocyte Lacunocanalicular Network in Early-Onset Osteoporosis Due to SGMS2 Mutations. JBMR Plus, 2021. 5(11): p. e10537.
14. Pouresmaeili, F., et al., A comprehensive overview on osteoporosis and its risk factors. Ther Clin Risk Manag, 2018. 14: p. 2029-2049.
15. Kruczyński, J., Wiktora Degi ortopedia i rehabilitacja. 2023.
16. Gluszko, P., et al., Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Poland. Update 2022. Endokrynol Pol, 2023. 74(1): p. 5-15.
17. Saad, A., et al., The incidence and management of Isolated Greater Trochanteric Fractures - A systematic review of 166 cases. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2021. 21: p. 101537.
18. Michael Baumgaertner, T.A., Jong-Keon Oh, AO surgery reference, Third edition surgeryreference.aofoundation.org, 2022.
19. Ren, H., et al., Does isolated greater trochanter implication affect hip abducent strength and functions in intertrochanteric fracture? BMC Musculoskelet Disord, 2019. 20(1): p. 79.
20. Fixation using Alternative Implants for the Treatment of Hip fractures, I., Fracture fixation in the operative management of hip fractures (FAITH): an international, multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2017. 389(10078): p. 1519-1527.
21. Gupta, G.K., et al., Comparison of Femoral Neck System Versus Cannulated Cancellous Screws for the Fixation of Femoral Neck Fracture in Young Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Cureus, 2022. 14(11): p. e32011.
22. Saad, A., et al., Femoral neck system reduces surgical time and complications in adults with femoral neck fractures: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Orthop Trauma, 2022. 30: p. 101917.
23. Yildirim, C., et al., Biomechanical comparison of four different fixation methods in the management of Pauwels type III femoral neck fractures: Is there a clear winner? Injury, 2022. 53(10): p. 3124-3129.
24. Liu, Y., et al., Comparing total hip arthroplasty and hemiarthroplasty for the treatment of displaced femoral neck fracture in the active elderly over 75 years old: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized control trials. J Orthop Surg Res, 2020. 15(1): p. 215.
25. Falotico, G.G., et al., Total hip arthroplasty versus hemiarthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fracture: a protocol for an overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open, 2021. 11(11): p. e051840.
26. Droll, K.P., H. Broekhuyse, and P. O'Brien, Fracture of the femoral head. J Am Acad Orthop Surg, 2007. 15(12): p. 716-27.
27. Menger, M.M., et al., Fractures of the femoral head: a narrative review. EFORT Open Rev, 2021. 6(11): p. 1122-1131.
28. Ehlinger, M., et al., Early prediction of femoral head avascular necrosis following neck fracture. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res, 2011. 97(1): p. 79-88.
29. P von der Linden, A.G., V Boner, M Windolf, A Appelt, N Suhm, Biomechanical evaluation of a new augmentation method for enhanced screw fixation in osteoporotic proximal femoral fractures. J Orthop Res. 2006 Dec;24(12):2230-7. doi: 10.1002/jor.20299., 2006.
30. Fensky, F., et al., Cement augmentation of the proximal femoral nail antirotation for the treatment of osteoporotic pertrochanteric fractures--a biomechanical cadaver study. Injury, 2013. 44(6): p. 802-7.
31. Neuerburg, C., et al., [Augmentation techniques on the proximal femur]. Unfallchirurg, 2015. 118(9): p. 755-64.
32. Kammerlander, C., et al., Long-term results of the augmented PFNA: a prospective multicenter trial. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg, 2014. 134(3): p. 343-9.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Karolina Niewczas, Adrianna Brzozowska, Michał Bzoma, Julia Gugulska, Anna Bielicka, Irmina Czerepak, Piotr Komasara, Dominik Domoń, Adam Niedziela, Katarzyna Kozon, Hubert Bochenek

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 9
Number of citations: 0