Current trends in ACL reconstructions. A Perspective Review of Recent Literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.82.60477Keywords
anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, ACL injury trends, ACL surgical techniques, graft choices, rehabilitation protocolsAbstract
INTRODUCTION
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) plays a vital role in maintaining knee stability and supporting physical activity. ACL injuries, whether due to trauma or overuse, are common in both athletes and the general population, often resulting in impaired function and an elevated risk of osteoarthritis. In recent years, ACL reconstruction techniques have evolved significantly due to advancements in medical technology, a deeper understanding of knee biomechanics, and a stronger focus on patient outcomes. This review integrates current evidence on surgical innovations, graft selection, and rehabilitation to guide clinicians in optimizing ACL reconstruction and improving patient quality of life.
METHODS
This review synthesizes literature from 2020 to 2025, focusing on ACL reconstruction techniques, graft selection, and adjunctive procedures. A systematic search was conducted using databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar with terms including "ACL reconstruction," "graft choices," and "rehabilitation protocols." Studies addressing surgical innovations and outcomes were included without exclusion criteria.
AIM OF THE STUDY
The aim is to synthesize and critically appraise current trends in ACL reconstruction based on recent evidence.
CONCLUSION
ACL reconstruction requires precise surgical technique, appropriate graft choice, structured rehabilitation, and psychological support. Autografts have shown favorable outcomes, while personalized rehab protocols enhance recovery. Addressing mental health during rehabilitation is also essential. Future strategies should focus on standardizing care, integrating psychological support, and exploring regenerative therapies. A multidisciplinary approach is key to improving outcomes and quality of life after ACL injuries.
References
1.Petersen, W., Bierke, S., Stöhr, A., Stoffels, T., & Häner, M. (2023). A systematic review of transphyseal acl reconstruction in children and adolescents: comparing the transtibial and independent femoral tunnel drilling techniques. Journal of Experimental Orthopaedics, 10(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00577-0
2.Guo, Z. and Liu, F. (2023). Progress in research on and classification of surgical methods of arthroscopic reconstruction of the acl and all using a shared tendon graft through the femoral tunnel. Frontiers in Surgery, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2023.1292530
3.Laddha, M., Gowtam, S., & Jain, P. (2022). Single-tunnel double-bundle-like effect with footprint enhancing anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy Techniques, 11(3), e307-e314. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eats.2021.10.023
4.Herzog M., Marshall S., Lund J., Pate V., Mack C., & Spang J. (2018). Trends in incidence of acl reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States, 2002-2014. Sports Health a Multidisciplinary Approach, 10(6), 523-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/1941738118803616
5.Mogoş Ş., D’Ambrosi R., Antonescu D., Stoica, I. (2021). Combined anterior cruciate ligament and anterolateral ligament reconstruction results in superior rotational stability compared with isolated anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in high grade pivoting sport patients: a prospective randomized clinical trial. The Journal of Knee Surgery, 36(01), 054-061. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1729621
6.Hurley E., Bloom D., Hoberman A., Anil U., Gonzalez‐Lomas G., Strauss E., Alaia M. (2021). There are differences in knee stability based on lateral extra-articular augmentation technique alongside anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 29(11), 3854-3863. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06416-4
7.Saithna A., Thaunat M., Delaloye J., Ouanezar H., Fayard J., Sonnery‐Cottet B. (2018). Combined acl and anterolateral ligament reconstruction. JBJS Case Connector, 8(1), e2. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.st.17.00045
8.Helito C., Camargo D., Sobrado M., Bonadio M., Giglio P., Pécora J., Demange M. (2018). Combined reconstruction of the anterolateral ligament in chronic acl injuries leads to better clinical outcomes than isolated acl reconstruction. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 26(12), 3652-3659. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-4934-2
9.Rothrauff B., Jorge A., de Sa D., Kay J., Fu F., Musahl V. (2019). Anatomic acl reconstruction reduces risk of post-traumatic osteoarthritis: a systematic review with minimum 10-year follow-up. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 28(4), 1072-1084. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05665-2
10.Wang H., Zong L., Hu X., Ao Y. (2022). Efficacy of stem cell therapy for tendon graft ligamentization after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 10(6). https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671221098363
11.Getgood A., Brown C., Lording T., Amis A., Claes S., Geeslin, A., Musahl, V. (2018). The anterolateral complex of the knee: results from the international alc consensus group meeting. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 27(1), 166-176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5072-6
12.Balendra G., Willinger L., Pai V., Mitchell A., Lee J., Jones M., Williams, A. (2021). Anterolateral complex injuries occur in the majority of ‘isolated’ anterior cruciate ligament ruptures. Knee Surgery Sports Traumatology Arthroscopy, 30(1), 176-183. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06543-6
13.Chen J., Wang C., Xu C., Qiu J., Xu J., Tsai T., Zhao, J. (2021). Effects of anterolateral structure augmentation on the in vivo kinematics of anterior cruciate ligament–reconstructed knees. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 49(3), 656-666. https://doi.org/10.1177/0363546520981743
14.Murray M., Kalish L., Fleming B., Flutie B., Freiberger,C., Henderson R., Micheli, L. (2019). Bridge-enhanced anterior cruciate ligament repair: two-year results of a first-in-human study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, 7(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/2325967118824356
15.Barié A., Sprinckstub T., Huber J., Jaber A. (2020). Quadriceps tendon vs. patellar tendon autograft for acl reconstruction using a hardware-free press-fit fixation technique: comparable stability, function and return-to-sport level but less donor site morbidity in athletes after 10 years. Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, 140(10), 1465-1474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03508-1
16.Widner M., Dunleavy M., Lynch S. (2019). Outcomes following acl reconstruction based on graft type: are all grafts equivalent?. Current Reviews in Musculoskeletal Medicine, 12(4), 460-465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-019-09588-w
17.Ma R., Sheth C., Fenkell B., Büyük, A. (2022). The role of bracing in acl injuries: the current evidentiary state of play. The Journal of Knee Surgery, 35(03), 255-265. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0042-1742304
18.Boer B., Hoogeslag R., Brouwer R., Demmer A., Huis in ‘t Veld R. (2018). Self-reported functional recovery after reconstruction versus repair in acute anterior cruciate ligament rupture (ROTOR): a randomized controlled clinical trial. Bmc musculoskeletal disorders. https://doi:10.1186/s12891-018-2028-4.
19.Mansour J., Ghanimeh J., Ghoul A., Estephan M., Khoury A., Daher M. (2023). Bridge enhanced ACL repair vs. ACL reconstruction for ACL tears: A systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.SICOT J. 2023:9:8. https://doi:10.1051/sicotj/2023007.
20.Shen et al. (2022). Early outcomes of primary repair versus reconstruction for acute anterior cruciate ligament injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Dec 23;101(51):e32411. https://doi:10.1097/md.0000000000032411.
21.Robinson J., Inderhaug E., Brown C., Harlem T., Spalding T. (2020). Anterior Cruciate Ligament Femoral Tunnel Placement: An Analysis of the Intended Versus Achieved Position for 221 International High-Volume ACL Surgeons" The american journal of sports medicine. https://doi:10.1177/0363546520906158.
22. Mahapatra P., Horriat S., Annand B. (2018). Anterior cruciate ligament repair – past, present and future. Journal of experimental orthopaedics. https://doi:10.1186/s40634-018-0136-6.
23.Weng P., Chen C., Lin Y., Chen K., Yeh Y., Lai J., Chiang C., Wong C. (2023). Platelet-Rich Fibrin–Augmented Gap-Bridging Strategy in Rabbit Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair.The american journal of sports medicine. https://doi:10.1177/03635465221149993.
24.Meena A., Farinelli L., Hoser C., Abermann E., Hepperger C., Patralekh M., Herbort M., Fink C. (2024). Primary Versus Revision ACL Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Autograft: A Matched-Control Cohort Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi:10.1177/23259671231224501
25.Ferreira A., Saithna A., Carrozzo A., Guy S., Vieira T., Barth J., Sonnery-Cottet B. (2022). The Minimal Clinically Important Difference, Patient Acceptable Symptom State, and Clinical Outcomes of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Repair Versus Reconstruction: A Matched-Pair Analysis From the SANTI Study Group. The American Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi:10.1177/03635465221126171.
26.Nelson C., Rajan L., Day J., Hinton R., Bodendorfer B. (2021). Postoperative Rehabilitation of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review" Sports Medicine and Arthroscopy Review 2021 Jun 1;29(2):63-80. https://doi:10.1097/jsa.0000000000000314
27.Irfan A., Kerr S., Hopper G., Wilson W., Wilson L., Mackay G. (2021).A Criterion Based Rehabilitation Protocol for ACL Repair with Internal Brace Augmentation" International Journal of Sports Physical Therapy. https://doi:10.26603/001c.22217
28.Hourston G., Kankam H., McDonnell S.(2022). A systematic review of anterior cruciate ligament primary repair rehabilitation. Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics and Trauma. https://doi:10.1016/j.jcot.2022.101774
29.Kawashima T., Omi Y., Kuriyama S., Hoshida T., Sugimoto D. (2021). Effect of Graft Rupture Prevention Training on Young Athletes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: An 8-Year Prospective Intervention Study. Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine. https://doi:10.1177/2325967120973593
30.Pamboris G., Pavlou K., Paraskevopoulos E., Mohagheghi A. (2024). Effect of open vs. closed kinetic chain exercises in ACL rehabilitation on knee joint pain, laxity, extensor muscles strength, and function: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Frontiers in Sports and Active Living. https://doi:10.3389/fspor.2024.1416690
31.G Pipino, R Mardones, A Tedesco, A Giai Via, D.C Vaccarisi, R Borghi, E Tomasi. (2023). Rehabilitation after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Dry Land vs Aquatic Rehabilitation. Muscles Ligaments and Tendons Journal. https://doi:10.32098/mltj.03.2023.10
32.Piussi R., Nilsson E., Karlsson H., Hagglund M., Ivarsson A., Samuelsson K., Holmberg H., Senorski E. (2024). Wrestling with a ghost: facing an opponent I can neither see nor clinch – the experience of professional wrestlers who have suffered an ACL injury. BMJ Open Sport & Exercise Medicine. https://doi:10.1136/bmjsem-2023-001782
33.McIntosh C., O.Brien D., Reid D., Ellis R. (2024). The efficacy of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation compared to conservative management for reducing the incidence of post-traumatic osteoarthritis following anterior cruciate ligament injury: A systematic review. New Zealand Journal of Physiotherapy. https://doi:10.15619/nzjp.v52i2.339.
34.Murray, M., Wekesser, M., DeFreese, J., Kuenze, C., Brinkman, C., Gould, D., Baez, S. (2025). Patient perceptions of psychological and rehabilitation experiences after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a qualitative study. Journal of Sport Rehabilitation, 34(2), 77-83. https://doi.org/10.1123/jsr.2023-0385
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Joanna Brzoza, Wiktor Werenkowicz, Aleksandra Boral, Dominika Kryś, Julia Koczur, Michał Górski, Wiktoria Pniok, Wojciech Kurkiewicz, Kinga Bylica, Bartłomiej Czarnecki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 60
Number of citations: 0
