Patient satisfaction and quality of life after septoplasty in adults: literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.81.60019Keywords
Septoplasty, quality of life, #surgery, Nasal obstruction, patient satisfaction, deviated nasal septumAbstract
Background: Septoplasty is a common surgical procedure designed to correct a deviated nasal septum and relieve symptoms of nasal obstruction. While the primary goal of the surgery is to improve nasal airflow, patient satisfaction and quality of life (QoL) have become important measures of surgical success. Understanding the impact of septoplasty on QoL is essential to optimise patients’ outcomes and refine treatment approaches. Despite its widespread use, number of high-quality studies have been limited. However, in recent years there have been a growing interest in assessing its effectiveness using objective and patient-reported outcomes.
Objective: The aim of this literature review is to analyse the effectiveness of septoplasty, including the impact of septoplasty on patient satisfaction and quality of life, and to assess predictors of surgical success.
State of knowledge: Septoplasty is a surgical procedure aimed at correcting a deviated nasal septum to improve nasal airflow and relieve obstruction. Recent studies show, that septoplasty leads to significant improvement in nasal breathing, sleep quality, daily functioning, mental state and olfactory function. Psychological factors, preoperative expectations and degree of nasal deviation have been identified as key determinants of surgical outcome.
Conclusion: Septoplasty is an effective procedure that leads to significant improvements in quality of life and general satisfaction from surgery. Several factors have been identified that influence surgical outcome including patient mental state, patient expectation, severity of septal deviation and surgical technique. To optimise results, surgeons should focus on refining surgical techniques, patient selection and management of patients’ expectations.
References
1. Clark, D.W., et al., Nasal airway obstruction: Prevalence and anatomic contributors. Ear Nose Throat J, 2018. 97(6): p. 173-176.
2. Alghamdi, F.S., et al., Nasal Septal Deviation: A Comprehensive Narrative Review. Cureus, 2022. 14(11): p. e31317.
3. Alessandri-Bonetti, M., et al., Efficacy of Septoplasty in Patients with Nasal Obstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Laryngoscope, 2023. 133(12): p. 3237-3246.
4. Valero, A., et al., Position paper on nasal obstruction: evaluation and treatment. J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 2018. 28(2): p. 67-90.
5. Srinivasan, D.G., et al., Comparison of the Efficacy of Septoplasty with Nonsurgical Management in Improving Nasal Obstruction in Patients with Deviated Nasal Septum - A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2022. 26(2): p. e226-e232.
6. Taha, H.I., et al., Septoplasty versus non-surgical management for deviated nasal septum: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2024.
7. Batbaatar, E., et al., Determinants of patient satisfaction: a systematic review. Perspectives in Public Health, 2017. 137(2): p. 89-101.
8. Srinivasan, D.G., et al., Comparison of the Efficacy of Septoplasty with Nonsurgical Management in Improving Nasal Obstruction in Patients with Deviated Nasal Septum – A Randomized Clinical Trial. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021. 26(02): p. e226-e232.
9. Tsang, C.L.N., et al., Long-term patient-related outcome measures of septoplasty: a systematic review. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2018. 275(5): p. 1039-1048.
10. Fearington, F.W., et al., Long-Term Outcomes of Septoplasty With or Without Turbinoplasty: A Systematic Review. The Laryngoscope, 2024. 134(6): p. 2525-2537.
11. Bayraktar, C. and S. Dogan, The effectiveness of final intraoperative endoscopic control in conventional septoplasty. The European Research Journal, 2016. 2(3): p. 177-181.
12. Garzaro, M., et al., Endoscopic versus conventional septoplasty: objective/subjective data on 276 patients. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019. 276(6): p. 1707-1711.
13. Bresler, A., et al., Functional and Aesthetic Outcomes of Extracorporeal Septoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 2020. 129(4): p. 401-410.
14. Devseren, N.O., et al., A randomized clinical study: outcome of submucous resection of compensatory inferior turbinate during septoplasty. Rhinology, 2011. 49(1): p. 53-7.
15. Samarei, R. and S. Mabarian, A randomised trial comparing the subjective outcomes following septoplasty with or without inferior turbinoplasty. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2020. 137(4): p. 277-283.
16. Bin Lajdam, G., et al., Septoplasty versus septoplasty with turbinate reduction for nasal obstruction due to deviated nasal septum: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology, 2022. 60(6): p. 411-420.
17. Zhang, K., et al., Systematic Review of Surgical Interventions for Inferior Turbinate Hypertrophy. Am J Rhinol Allergy, 2023. 37(1): p. 110-122.
18. Ghosh, S.K., M. Dutta, and D. Haldar, Role of Bilateral Inferior Turbinoplasty as an Adjunct to Septoplasty in Improving Nasal Obstruction and Subjective Performance in Patients With Deviated Nasal Septum Associated With Allergic Rhinitis: An Interventional, Prospective Study. Ear Nose Throat J, 2023. 102(7): p. 445-452.
19. Wang, W.-W. and B.-C. Dong, Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2017. 274(11): p. 3915-3925.
20. Vermişli Çiftçi, S., et al., Quality of life and patient satisfaction following septoplasty: comparison of general and local anesthesia. B-ENT, 2021. 17.
21. Albazee, E., et al., Sphenopalatine ganglion block for pain control after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis. Rhinology, 2024. 62(6): p. 642-651.
22. Guven, S.G. and Y. Gorgulu, The impact of preoperative psychological characteristics on postoperative satisfaction and quality of life in patients undergoing septoplasty and inferior turbinate ablation surgery. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2022. 279(8): p. 4007-4015.
23. Saragusty, C., E. Berant, and E. Yaniv, Association of attachment anxiety and satisfaction with nasal surgery. Rhinology, 2011. 49(1): p. 117-20.
24. Alessandri-Bonetti, M., et al., Anxiety and depression mood disorder in patients with nasal septal deviation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 2022. 43(5): p. 103517.
25. Avcu, M. and M. Metin, Evaluation of the relationship between patient expectation, patient expectation coverage rates and patient satisfaction in open primary septorhinoplasty surgery: a prospective randomized study. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2021. 278(7): p. 2337-2346.
26. Pedersen, L., et al., Prognostic factors for outcome after septoplasty in 888 patients from the Swedish National Septoplasty Register. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019. 276(8): p. 2223-2228.
27. Rhee, J.S., et al., A Systematic Review of Patient-Reported Nasal Obstruction Scores Defining Normative and Symptomatic Ranges in Surgical Patients. Jama Facial Plastic Surgery, 2014. 16(3): p. 219-225.
28. Hendry, J., et al., The Glasgow Benefit Inventory: a systematic review of the use and value of an otorhinolaryngological generic patient-recorded outcome measure. Clin Otolaryngol, 2016. 41(3): p. 259-75.
29. Medeiros, N., et al., Disease-Specific Vs Non-Specific Questionnaires on Septoplasty Outcomes. Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology, 2022. 34(3): p. 163-170.
30. van Egmond, M., et al., Septoplasty with or without concurrent turbinate surgery versus non-surgical management for nasal obstruction in adults with a deviated septum: a pragmatic, randomised controlled trial. Lancet, 2019. 394(10195): p. 314-321.
31. Fearington, F.W., et al., Long-Term Outcomes of Septoplasty With or Without Turbinoplasty: A Systematic Review. Laryngoscope, 2024. 134(6): p. 2525-2537.
32. Wu, Y., et al., The benefits of septoplasty for patients with deviated nasal septum and allergic rhinitis: a meta-analysis. Scientific Reports, 2024. 14(1): p. 28855.
33. Farmer, R.L., R.K. Garg, and A.M. Afifi, Can Functional Nasal Surgery Treat Chronic Headaches? A Systematic Review. Plast Reconstr Surg, 2018. 142(6): p. 1583-1592.
34. Deveci, I., et al., Impact of Nasal Septal Surgery on Sleep Quality and Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder. J Craniofac Surg, 2018. 29(7): p. e632-e635.
35. Correa, E.J., et al., Role of Nasal Surgery in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Systematic Review. Sleep Sci, 2024. 17(3): p. e310-e321.
36. Grabosky, A., et al., Change in olfactory function after septoplasty. A systematic review and meta-analysis. Rhinology, 2021. 59(2): p. 144-150.
37. Patel, Z.M., et al., International consensus statement on allergy and rhinology: Olfaction. International Forum of Allergy & Rhinology, 2022. 12(4): p. 327-680.
38. Voizard, B., et al., North American survey and systematic review on caudal Septoplasty. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2020. 49(1): p. 38.
39. Althobaiti, K.H., et al., Common Causes of Failed Septoplasty: A Systematic Review. Cureus, 2022. 14(12): p. e33073.
40. Pedersen, L., et al., A comparison of men and women undergoing septoplasty-the Swedish national septoplasty register. Front Surg, 2023. 10: p. 1223607.
41. Besharah, B.O., et al., Endoscopic septoplasty versus conventional septoplasty for nasal septum deviation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Ann Med Surg (Lond), 2023. 85(8): p. 4015-4025.
42. Trimartani, K. and F.A. Damara, The comparison of endoscopic septoplasty and conventional septoplasty: A PRISMA analysis. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2023. 140(5): p. 211-219.
43. Valsamidis, K., et al., Predictive factors of patients’ general quality of life after nasal septoplasty. European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, 2019. 276(2): p. 429-438.
44. Brescia, G., et al., Conventional septoplasty complications: A Systematic review and meta-analysis. American Journal of Otolaryngology, 2023. 44(4): p. 103811.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Bartłomiej Wójcik, Jakub Wójcik, Ewa Błaszczak, Krzysztof Gil, Aleksander Małachowski, Tomasz Wójcik, Piotr Dryżałowski, Sara Steć, Katarzyna Czajka

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 234
Number of citations: 0