Postoperative Wound Complications in Obstetrics and Gynecology. Treatment and prevention methods
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.79.58174Keywords
suture, closure, method, technique, material, complication, surgical site infection, bioscreen, wound-healing technologies, active dressings, Negative Pressure Wound TherapyAbstract
Introduction and purpose: Postoperative wound complications are a significant concern in obstetrics and gynecology, particularly with the increasing cesarean section rates globally. This study aims to analyze and evaluate current prevention and treatment methods for postoperative wound complications, focusing on cesarean sections, while identifying innovative approaches and knowledge gaps to inspire further research. Description of the State of Knowledge: The most frequent complications—SSI, wound dehiscence, and fistula formation—are exacerbated in high-risk groups, such as patients with diabetes, obesity, hypertension, or those undergoing emergency cesarean sections. While surgical advancements and new wound care materials offer potential solutions, discrepancies in their efficacy, particularly for high-risk populations, remain unresolved. Techniques such as continuous suturing and mass closure reduce hernia risks, while innovative interventions, including Negative Pressure Wound Therapy and active dressings (hydrogel, hydrocolloid, alginate), show promise in promoting healing and minimizing complications. Materials and Methods: This study involved a comprehensive literature review of databases such as PubMed, Medline, and Cochrane, focusing on surgical techniques, wound healing mechanisms, and advanced dressing technologies. Results: Findings underscore the value of continuous suturing and mass closure techniques in reducing postoperative hernias and other complications. Innovative methods, including NPWT and active dressings, demonstrate potential in improving healing outcomes for high-risk patients. Summary: Optimizing surgical techniques and postoperative wound care protocols is essential for reducing complications. Further research is needed to standardize guidelines and assess innovative wound management strategies, particularly in obstetrics and gynecology.
References
1. Heller L, Levin SL, Butler CE. Management of abdominal wound dehiscence using vacuum assisted closure in patients with compromised healing. Am J Surg. 2006 Feb;191(2):165-72. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2005.09.003. PMID: 16442940.
2. Aksamija G, Mulabdic A, Rasic I, Aksamija L. Evaluation of Risk Factors of Surgical Wound Dehiscence in Adults After Laparotomy. Med Arch. 2016 Oct;70(5):369-372. doi: 10.5455/medarh.2016.70.369-372. Epub 2016 Oct 25. PMID: 27994299; PMCID: PMC5136427.
3. Dodd JM, Crowther CA. Risks and morbidity associated with previous cesarean section. Womens Health (Lond). 2007 Jan;3(1):55-61. doi: 10.2217/17455057.3.1.55. PMID: 19803865.
4. Jamie, Whitney, and Patrick Duff. "Preventing infections during elective C/S and abdominal hysterectomy." CONTEMPORARY OB GYN 48.1 (2003): 60-69. [Google Scholar]
5. Nice C, Feeney A, Godwin P, Mohanraj M, Edwards A, Baldwin A, Choyce A, Hunt A, Kinnaird C, Maloney M, Anderson W, Campbell L. A prospective audit of wound infection rates after caesarean section in five West Yorkshire hospitals. J Hosp Infect. 1996 May;33(1):55-61. doi: 10.1016/s0195-6701(96)90029-8. PMID: 8738202. [Google Scholar]
6. Betrán AP, Merialdi M, Lauer JA, Bing-Shun W, Thomas J, Van Look P, Wagner M. Rates of caesarean section: analysis of global, regional and national estimates. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2007 Mar;21(2):98-113. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.2007.00786.x. PMID: 17302638.
7. Diener MK, Voss S, Jensen K, Büchler MW, Seiler CM. Elective midline laparotomy closure: the INLINE systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2010 May;251(5):843-56. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181d973e4. PMID: 20395846.
8. van ‘t Riet M, Steyerberg EW, Nellensteyn J, Bonjer HJ, Jeekel J (2002) Meta-analysis of techniques for closure of midline abdominal incisions. Br J Surg 89:1350–1356
9. Fortelny, René. (2015). Muysoms FE, Antoniou SA, Bury K, Campanelli G, Conze J, Cuccurullo D, de Beaux AC, Deerenberg EB, East B, Fortelny RH, Gillion JF, Henriksen NA, Israelsson L, Jairam A, Jänes A, Jeekel J, López-Cano M, Miserez M, Morales-Conde S, Sanders DL, Simons MP, Śmietański M, Venclauskas L, Berrevoet F. European Hernia Society guidelines on the closure of abdominal wall incisions. Hernia 2015 Feb;19(1):1-24.
10. Weiland DE, Bay RC, Del Sordi S. Choosing the best abdominal closure by meta-analysis. Am J Surg. 1998 Dec;176(6):666-70. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00277-3. PMID: 9926810.
11. Rucinski J, Margolis M, Panagopoulos G, Wise L. Closure of the abdominal midline fascia: meta-analysis delineates the optimal technique. Am Surg. 2001 May;67(5):421-6. PMID: 11379640.
12. Cengiz Y, Gislason H, Svanes K, Israelsson LA. Mass closure technique: an experimental study on separation of wound edge. Eur J Surg. 2001 Jan;167(1):60-3. doi: 10.1080/110241501750069846. PMID: 11213824.
13. Wissing J, van Vroonhoven TJ, Schattenkerk ME, Veen HF, Ponsen RJ, Jeekel J. Fascia closure after midline laparotomy: results of a randomized trial. Br J Surg. 1987 Aug;74(8):738-41. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800740831. PMID: 3307992.
14. Sajid MS, Parampalli U, Baig MK, McFall MR. A systematic review on the effectiveness of slowly-absorbable versus non-absorbable sutures for abdominal fascial closure following laparotomy. Int J Surg. 2011;9(8):615-25. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.09.006. Epub 2011 Oct 30. PMID: 22061310.
15. Israelsson LA, Millbourn D. Prevention of incisional hernias: how to close a midline incision. Surg Clin North Am. 2013 Oct;93(5):1027-40. doi:10.1016/j.suc.2013.06.009. PMID: 24035074.
16. Alanis MC, Villers MS, Law TL, Steadman EM, Robinson CJ. Complications of cesarean delivery in the massively obese parturient. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Sep;203(3):271.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.06.049. Epub 2010 Aug 3. PMID: 20678746.
17. Monstrey S, Middelkoop E, Vranckx JJ et al (2014) Updated Scar Management Practical Guidelines: Non-invasive and invasive measures. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery 67(8): 1017–25. doi:10.1016/j.bjps.2014.04.011
18. Rousseau T, Plomion C, Sandy-Hodgetts K. An advanced transparent hydropolymer wound dressing for undisturbed post-op management of surgical wounds following hip and knee replacement: A prospective observational series. Int Wound J. 2022 Oct;19(6):1456-1462. doi: 10.1111/iwj.13742. Epub 2022 Jan 28. PMID: 35092178; PMCID: PMC9493219.
19. Freedman BR, Hwang C, Talbot S, Hibler B, Matoori S, Mooney DJ. Breakthrough treatments for accelerated wound healing. Sci Adv. 2023 May 19;9(20):eade7007. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.ade7007. Epub 2023 May 17. PMID: 37196080; PMCID: PMC10191440.
20. Mangram AJ, Horan TC, Pearson ML, Silver LC, Jarvis WR. Guideline for prevention of surgical site infection, 1999. Hospital Infection Control Practices Advisory Committee. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 1999 Apr;20(4):250-78; quiz 279-80. doi: 10.1086/501620. PMID: 10219875
21. Paweł Stanirowski, Włodzimierz Sawicki (2013). Modern methods of therapy of hard-to-heal post-operative wounds in obstetrics and gynecology – analysis of applicability and effectiveness of use. Postępy Nauk Medycznych, 26(7), -.
22. Kamat AA, Brancazio L, Gibson M. Wound infection in gynecologic surgery. Infect Dis Obstet Gynecol. 2000;8(5-6):230-4. doi: 10.1155/S1064744900000338. PMID: 11220483; PMCID: PMC1784694.
23. Wloch C, Wilson J, Lamagni T, Harrington P, Charlett A, Sheridan E. Risk factors for surgical site infection following caesarean section in England: results from a multicentre cohort study. BJOG. 2012 Oct;119(11):1324-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2012.03452.x. Epub 2012 Aug 1. PMID: 22857605.
24. Yerushalmy A, Reches A, Lessing JB, Schechner V, Carmeli Y, Grisaru D. Characteristics of microorganisms cultured from infected wounds post-hysterectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 Dec;141(2):169-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.07.024. Epub 2008 Sep 4. PMID: 18775598.
25. Thurman AR, Anca Y, White CA, Soper DE. Post-cesarean delivery infectious morbidity: Focus on preoperative antibiotics and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Am J Infect Control. 2010 Oct;38(8):612-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ajic.2010.02.013. Epub 2010 Jun 3. PMID: 20627452.
26. Dissemond J, Assadian O, Gerber V, Kingsley A, Kramer A, Leaper DJ, Mosti G, Piatkowski de Grzymala A, Riepe G, Risse A, Romanelli M, Strohal R, Traber J, Vasel-Biergans A, Wild T, Eberlein T. Classification of wounds at risk and their antimicrobial treatment with polihexanide: a practice-oriented expert recommendation. Skin Pharmacol Physiol. 2011;24(5):245-55. doi: 10.1159/000327210. Epub 2011 Apr 20. PMID: 21508658.
27. Müller G, Kramer A. Biocompatibility index of antiseptic agents by parallel assessment of antimicrobial activity and cellular cytotoxicity. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2008 Jun;61(6):1281-7. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkn125. Epub 2008 Mar 25. PMID: 18364400.
28. Vejzovic D, Iftic A, Ön A, Semeraro EF, Malanovic N. Octenidine's Efficacy: A Matter of Interpretation or the Influence of Experimental Setups? Antibiotics (Basel). 2022 Nov 19;11(11):1665. doi: 10.3390/antibiotics11111665. PMID: 36421309; PMCID: PMC9686575.
29. Stanirowski PJ, Wnuk A, Cendrowski K, Sawicki W. Growth factors, silver dressings and negative pressure wound therapy in the management of hard-to-heal postoperative wounds in obstetrics and gynecology: a review. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Oct;292(4):757-75. doi: 10.1007/s00404-015-3709-y. Epub 2015 Apr 12. PMID: 25864095; PMCID: PMC4560760.
30. Connery SA, Downes KL, Young C. A retrospective study evaluating silver-impregnated dressings on cesarean wound healing. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2012 Sep;25(9):414-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ASW.0000419407.37323.e8. PMID: 22914038.
31. Connery SA, Yankowitz J, Odibo L, Raitano O, Nikolic-Dorschel D, Louis JM. Effect of using silver nylon dressings to prevent superficial surgical site infection after cesarean delivery: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019 Jul;221(1):57.e1-57.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2019.02.053. Epub 2019 Mar 5. PMID: 30849351.
32. Connery S, Tanner JP, Odibo L, Raitano O, Nikolic-Dorschel D, Louis JM. Effect of Using Silver Nylon Dressings on Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Delivery. Am J Perinatol. 2023 Dec;40(16):1811-1819. doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1739521. Epub 2021 Nov 28. PMID: 34839470.
33. Natarajan S, Williamson D, Grey J, Harding KG, Cooper RA. Healing of an MRSA-colonized, hydroxyurea-induced leg ulcer with honey. J Dermatolog Treat. 2001 Mar;12(1):33-6. doi: 10.1080/095466301750163563. PMID: 12171686.
34. Scheck SM, Sircar S. Experiences implementing hydrocolloid dressings after caesarean section. J Wound Care. 2023 Apr 2;32(4):200-205. doi: 10.12968/jowc.2023.32.4.200. PMID: 37029963.
35. Francesko A, Petkova P, Tzanov T. Hydrogel Dressings for Advanced Wound Management. Curr Med Chem. 2018;25(41):5782-5797. doi: 10.2174/0929867324666170920161246. PMID: 28933299.
36. Tsubouchi, Hiroaki MD, PhD; Awaji, Takuya MD; Hirose, Rikuto MD; Kishida, Kenji MD; Yamashita, Saya MD, PhD; Furuya, Kiichiro MD, PhD; Chang, Yangshil MD; Shikado, Kayoko MD; Kohta, Masushi PhD; Ogita, Kazuhide MD, PhD. Preventive Effect of Hydrocolloid Dressings on Hypertrophic Scarring of Post-Cesarean Section Wounds: A Randomized Pilot Study. Advances in Skin & Wound Care 37(7):p 360-367, July 2024. | DOI: 10.1097/ASW.0000000000000155
37. Jurić Vukelić D, Jurić J. Hydrocolloid Dressing Application in the Treatment of Chronic Wounds and Relation to Quality of Life. Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Sep;56(3):544-549. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.03.22. PMID: 29479921.
38. Yongli Hou, Yan Gao, Xiaorui Wang, Yongai Zhang, Jing Li, Haimiao Zhang, Xiujuan Li,Alginate-aloe vera film contains zinc oxide nanoparticles with high degradability and biocompatibility on post-cesarean wounds, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and Technology, Volume 66, 2021, 102631, ISSN 1773-2247, doi:10.1016/j.jddst.2021.102631.
39. Meng X, Li G. Effect of Alginate Gelatin Hydrogel Composited with Nano-Zinc on Cesarean Section Wound Healing. J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2022 Feb 1;18(2):600-606. doi: 10.1166/jbn.2022.3263. PMID: 35484735.
40. Gillespie BM, Thalib L, Ellwood D, Kang E, Mahomed K, Kumar S, Chaboyer W. Effect of negative-pressure wound therapy on wound complications in obese women after caesarean birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2022 Jan;129(2):196-207. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16963. Epub 2021 Nov 8. PMID: 34622545.
41. Tian Y, Li K, Zeng L. A systematic review with meta-analysis on prophylactic negative pressure wound therapy versus standard dressing for obese women after caesarean section. Nurs Open. 2023 Sep;10(9):5999-6013. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1912. Epub 2023 Jun 26. PMID: 37365685; PMCID: PMC10416001.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mirosław Sawicki, Wojciech Nowak, Maciej Gołębski , Jagoda Mikołajczyk, Zuzanna Kukla , Stella Mieruszyńska, Paulina Krzemińska, Izabela Sadowska, Jakub Włosiański, Sebastian Musialik

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 28
Number of citations: 0