Mirror reflection vs carbon footprint: A mathematical substantiation of the solar energy reflection method for counteracting global warming
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.77.57919Keywords
global warming, mirror reflection, carbon footprint, solar radiation, greenhouse effect, climate change, energy balance, environmental compensationAbstract
Objective: To develop and mathematically substantiate a method for counteracting global warming using mirror reflection of solar radiation, and evaluate its effectiveness compared to existing methods, based on reducing carbon footprint.
Materials and Methods: Mathematical methods for calculating energy balance, statistical analysis of solar radiation data (4.5-5.4 kWh/m² per day), analysis of global CO₂ emissions (37.8×10¹² kg) were used. Correlation analysis methods, Student's t-test, and calculation of confidence intervals (95%) were applied. Mathematical modeling of reflection efficiency was conducted considering various mirror installation configurations.
Results: It was established that one square meter of mirror surface provides reflection efficiency of 280 ± 4.69 W/m² (p < 0.001) and can protect an area of 5,000-11,000 m² from global warming. It was proven that this method compensates for 370-740 kg of CO₂ emissions per year per square meter of mirror. Efficiency can be increased by 40-60% using sun tracking systems and by 30% when placed on marine platforms.
Conclusion: The mirror reflection method demonstrates high effectiveness in counteracting global warming, surpassing traditional methods of reducing carbon footprint. The statistical significance of the results and economic feasibility confirms the promise of practical application of the method at both individual and industrial levels.
References
1.Wynes S, Nicholas KA. The climate mitigation gap: education and government recommendations miss the most effective individual actions. Environ Res Lett. 2017 Jul.
2.Emissions Gap Report 2023 [Internet]. UNEP; 2023. Available from: https://www.unep.org/resources/emissions-gap-report-2023 [Accessed 2023 Nov 20].
3.Negative emission technologies: What role in meeting Paris Agreement targets? [Internet]. EASAC. Available from: https://easac.eu/publications/details/easac_net/ [Accessed 2021 Jun 29].
4.Bitcoin consumes 'more electricity than Argentina' [Internet]. BBC. Available from: https://www.bbc.com/news/technology-56012952 [Accessed 2023 Feb 10].
5.Zhukov A, Gushcha S. Stop global warming. J Educ Health Sport. 2020;10(3):18–33. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2020.10.03.002.
6.Solomon S, Qin D, Manning M, Alley RB, Berntsen T, Bindoff NL, et al. Technical Summary. In: Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
7.Kiehl JT, Trenberth KE. Earth's Annual Global Mean Energy Budget. Bull Am Meteorol Soc. 1997;78:197–208.
8.Kilkist-tepla-oderzhuvanogo-zemleyu-vid-soncya [Internet]. Available from: https://collectedpapers.com.ua/ru/air-environment-of-the-earth/kilkist-tepla-oderzhuvanogo-zemleyu-vid-soncya [Accessed 2021 May 19].
9.Al-Gezi M. Development of a solar energy complex with parabolic trench-concentrators operating in Iraq [Internet]. 2016. Available from: https://www.npi-tu.ru/assets/diss/d212.304.08/files/al- gezi-moafak/ [Accessed 2021 May 19].
10.Loeb NG, Johnson GC, Thorsen TJ, Lyman JM, Rose FG, Kato S. Satellite and Ocean Data Reveal Marked Increase in Earth's Heating Rate. Geophys Res Lett. 2021 Jun 15. doi: https://doi.org/10.1029/2021GL093047.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Anatoliy Zhukov, Walery Zukow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 37
Number of citations: 0
