Dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) - current state of knowledge and perspective for further research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.78.57718Keywords
Chronic Coronary Artery Disease (CAD), Dual Antiplatelet Therapy (DAPT), Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI), Antiplatelet MedicationsAbstract
Introduction and purpose: aa Chronic coronary artery disease (CAD) is a prevalent condition affecting millions of people worldwide, significantly reducing quality of life and increasing the risk of myocardial infarction (MI). Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), often combined with stent implantation, is a cornerstone of CAD treatment. However, it induces a prothrombotic state, necessitating dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) to mitigate the risk of thrombosis and MI. Despite its established role, the optimal duration and specific composition of DAPT still remain under investigation. This article aims to summarise current knowledge on DAPT and highlight gaps requiring further research.
Description of the state of knowledge: DAPT typically involves acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) 75 mg and clopidogrel 75 mg for 6 months after PCI. While this is effective in reducing thrombotic events, it also increases bleeding risk. Current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines recommend tailoring DAPT duration and composition based on individual patient risk factors for bleeding and ischemia. Alternatives include shortening DAPT to 1–3 months for patients with high bleeding risk or intensifying it with stronger antiplatelet agents like ticagrelor or prasugrel for those at high ischemic risk. However, evidence supporting these alternatives remains limited, and require further investigation. Emerging options, such as vorapaxar, present additional potential, but also require further validation.
Summary: CAD management through PCI relies heavily on effective DAPT. Current strategies emphasize balancing ischemic and bleeding risks in optimising treatment. Although significant progress has been made, optimal DAPT regimens for specific patient groups remain uncertain, particularly in cases of shortened or intensified therapy. Continued research is crucial to refine treatment protocols and improve patient outcomes.
References
1. Cassar A, Holmes DR, Jr., Rihal CS, et al. Chronic coronary artery disease: diagnosis and management. Mayo Clin Proc. 2009; 84: 1130-1146.
2. Maroszyńska-Dmoch E, Wożakowska-Kapłon B. Choroba wieńcowa w populacji młodych dorosłych: skala problemu, czynniki ryzyka i rokowanie — przegląd literatury. Folia Cardiologica. 2014; 9: 267-274.
3. Boden WE, O'Rourke RA, Teo KK, et al. Optimal medical therapy with or without PCI for stable coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2007; 356: 1503-1516.
4. Huczek Z. Ryzyko zakrzepicy ostrej, podostrej i późnej w stentach wieńcowych. Choroby Serca i Naczyń. 2016; 13: 464-466.
5. Valgimigli M, Bueno H, Byrne RA, et al. 2017 ESC focused update on dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease developed in collaboration with EACTS: The Task Force for dual antiplatelet therapy in coronary artery disease of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2018; 39: 213-260.
6. Chau KH, Kirtane AJ, Easterwood RM, et al. Stent Thrombosis Risk Over Time on the Basis of Clinical Presentation and Platelet Reactivity: Analysis From ADAPT-DES. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021; 14: 417-427.
7. Vrints C, Andreotti F, Koskinas KC, et al. 2024 ESC Guidelines for the management of chronic coronary syndromes. Eur Heart J. 2024; 45: 3415-3537.
8. Deshpande NV, Admane P, Mardikar HM. Bleeding on dual antiplatelet therapy: real-life challenges. European Heart Journal Supplements. 2018; 20: B1-B9.
9. Valgimigli M, Cao D, Angiolillo DJ, et al. Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy for Patients at High Bleeding Risk Undergoing PCI. Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2021; 78: 2060-2072.
10. Angiolillo DJ, Galli M, Collet JP, et al. Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention. EuroIntervention. 2022; 17: e1371-e1396.
11. Capodanno D, Mehran R, Krucoff MW, et al. Defining Strategies of Modulation of Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients With Coronary Artery Disease: A Consensus Document from the Academic Research Consortium. Circulation. 2023; 147: 1933-1944.
12. Gwon H-C, Hahn J-Y, Park KW, et al. Six-Month Versus 12-Month Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stents. Circulation. 2012; 125: 505-513.
13. Han Y, Xu B, Xu K, et al. Six Versus 12 Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Biodegradable Polymer Sirolimus-Eluting Stent. Circulation: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016; 9: e003145.
14. Hong S-J, Shin D-H, Kim J-S, et al. 6-Month Versus 12-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Following Long Everolimus-Eluting Stent Implantation: The IVUS-XPL Randomized Clinical Trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2016; 9: 1438-1446.
15. Schulz-Schüpke S, Byrne RA, ten Berg JM, et al. ISAR-SAFE: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of 6 vs. 12 months of clopidogrel therapy after drug-eluting stenting. European Heart Journal. 2015; 36: 1252-1263.
16. Valgimigli M, Campo G, Monti M, et al. Short- Versus Long-Term Duration of Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy After Coronary Stenting. Circulation. 2012; 125: 2015-2026.
17. Feres F, Costa RA, Abizaid A, et al. Three vs Twelve Months of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Zotarolimus-Eluting Stents: The OPTIMIZE Randomized Trial. JAMA. 2013; 310: 2510-2522.
18. Hong S-J, Kim J-S, Hong SJ, et al. 1-Month Dual-Antiplatelet Therapy Followed by Aspirin Monotherapy After Polymer-Free Drug-Coated Stent Implantation: One-Month DAPT Trial. JACC: Cardiovascular Interventions. 2021; 14: 1801-1811.
19. Kim B-K, Hong M-K, Shin D-H, et al. A New Strategy for Discontinuation of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy: The RESET Trial (REal Safety and Efficacy of 3-month dual antiplatelet Therapy following Endeavor zotarolimus-eluting stent implantation). Journal of the American College of Cardiology. 2012; 60: 1340-1348.
20. Valgimigli M, Gragnano F, Branca M, et al. P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy or dual antiplatelet therapy after coronary revascularisation: individual patient level meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. BMJ. 2021; 373: n1332.
21. Isshiki T, Kimura T, Ogawa H, et al. Prasugrel, a third-generation P2Y12 receptor antagonist, in patients with coronary artery disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention. Circ J. 2014; 78: 2926-2934.
22. Koshy AN, Giustino G, Sartori S, et al. Ticagrelor or prasugrel versus clopidogrel in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention for chronic coronary syndromes. Eurointervention. 2023; 18: 1244-+.
23. Lattuca B, Mazeau C, Cayla G, et al. Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel for Complex Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Chronic Coronary Syndrome. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2024; 17: 359-370.
24. Mehilli J, Baquet M, Hochholzer W, et al. Randomized Comparison of Intensified and Standard P2Y(12)-Receptor-Inhibition Before Elective Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: The SASSICAIA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2020; 13: e008649.
25. Silvain J, Lattuca B, Beygui F, et al. Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in elective percutaneous coronary intervention (ALPHEUS): a randomised, open-label, phase 3b trial. Lancet. 2020; 396: 1737-1744.
26. Zheng YY, Wu TT, Yang Y, et al. Personalized antiplatelet therapy guided by a novel detection of platelet aggregation function in stable coronary artery disease patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2020; 6: 211-221.
27. Costa F, Montalto C, Branca M, et al. Dual antiplatelet therapy duration after percutaneous coronary intervention in high bleeding risk: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. European Heart Journal. 2022; 44: 954-968.
28. Valgimigli M, Frigoli E, Heg D, et al. Dual Antiplatelet Therapy after PCI in Patients at High Bleeding Risk. New England Journal of Medicine. 2021; 385: 1643-1655.
29. Virani SS, Newby LK, Arnold SV, et al. 2023 AHA/ACC/ACCP/ASPC/NLA/PCNA Guideline for the Management of Patients With Chronic Coronary Disease: A Report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Joint Committee on Clinical Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2023; 148: e9-e119.
30. Bohula EA, Aylward PE, Bonaca MP, et al. Efficacy and Safety of Vorapaxar With and Without a Thienopyridine for Secondary Prevention in Patients With Previous Myocardial Infarction and No History of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack. Circulation. 2015; 132: 1871-1879.
31. Bonaca MP, Scirica BM, Braunwald E, et al. Coronary stent thrombosis with vorapaxar versus placebo: results from the TRA 2° P-TIMI 50 trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014; 64: 2309-2317.
32. Morrow DA, Braunwald E, Bonaca MP, et al. Vorapaxar in the Secondary Prevention of Atherothrombotic Events. New England Journal of Medicine. 2012; 366: 1404-1413.
33. Scirica BM, Bonaca MP, Braunwald E, et al. Vorapaxar for secondary prevention of thrombotic events for patients with previous myocardial infarction: a prespecified subgroup analysis of the TRA 2°P-TIMI 50 trial. Lancet. 2012; 380: 1317-1324.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hubert Bochenek, Anna Bielicka, Michał Bzoma, Julia Gugulska, Irmina Czerepak, Marcin Kapij, Karolina Niewczas, Adrianna Brzozowska
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 47
Number of citations: 0