A multidisciplinary evaluation of robotic-assisted surgery effectiveness and its implications for healthcare education and practice - review of literature
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2025.78.57510Keywords
Laparoscopic Surgery, Robotic Surgery, surgeryAbstract
The following work is a review of the literature on the use of robots in the operating room in various fields of surgery. Due to the progress of medicine and technology, the management of a patient requiring surgery is changing and new technologies are increasingly being used, including robotic surgery and the da Vinci robot. They have found application in various fields of surgery, such as urology, gynecology, general surgery, and cardiothoracic surgery, examples of which are described in the following work. Both its positive aspects, which include precision, better visibility of the operating field and the possibility of visualization in 3D HD technology, have been discussed. On the other hand, there are also negative aspects such as the need for specialist staff training and the cost of surgery using a robot. All of the above should be taken into account when qualifying the patient for the method of performing the surgery and considering the possible benefits that he or she is able to achieve. The use of this treatment method requires an individual approach and the determination of specific indications and contraindications to ensure the greatest possible safety and the best possible outcome.
References
[1] Rivero-Moreno Y, Echevarria S, Vidal-Valderrama C, et al. Robotic Surgery: A Comprehensive Review of the Literature and Current Trends. Cureus. 2023 Jul 24;15(7):e42370.
[2] D'Souza M, Gendreau J, Feng A, et al. Robotic-Assisted Spine Surgery: History, Efficacy, Cost, And Future Trends. Robot Surg. 2019 Nov 7;6:9-23.
[3] Fairag M, Almahdi RH, Siddiqi AA, et al. Robotic Revolution in Surgery: Diverse Applications Across Specialties and Future Prospects Review Article. Cureus. 2024 Jan 12;16(1):e52148.
[4] Harky A, Hussain SMA. Robotic Cardiac Surgery: The Future Gold Standard or An Unnecessary Extravagance? Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug 27;34(4):XII-XIII.
[5] Gallego-Poveda J, Paulo N, Amorim MJ, et al. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: From Total Endoscopic To Closed-Chest Robotic. Port J Card Thorac Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb 9;30(4):15-22.
[6] Anyomih TTK, Mehta A, Sackey D, et al. Robotic versus laparoscopic general surgery in the emergency setting: a systematic review. J Robot Surg. 2024 Jul 5;18(1):281.
[7] Chopra S, Srivastava A, Tewari A. Robotic radical prostatectomy: The new gold standard. Arab J Urol. 2012 Mar;10(1):23-31.
[8] Binder J, Kramer W. Robotically-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2001;87(4):408-410.
[9] Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):431-452.
[10] Ficarra V, Novara G, Ahlering TE, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of studies reporting potency rates after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012;62(3):418-430.
[11] Ferguson EL, Ramos-Carpinteyro R, Soputro N, et al. Single-Port Robotic Radical Prostatectomy Using Transvesical and Transperineal Access in Patients with a Hostile Abdomen. J Endourol. 2024;38(2):150-158.
[12] Ramos-Carpinteyro R, Ferguson EL, Chavali JS, et al. First 100 cases of transvesical single-port robotic radical prostatectomy. Asian J Urol. 2023 Oct;10(4):416-422.
[13] Yuh B, Wilson T, Bochner B, et al. Systematic review and cumulative analysis of oncologic and functional outcomes after robot-assisted radical cystectomy. Eur Urol. 2015;67(3):402-422.
[14] Siegel R, Naishadham D, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2012. CA Cancer J Clin. 2012;62(1):10-29.
[15] Brennan P, Bogillot O, Cordier S, et al. Cigarette smoking and bladder cancer in men: a pooled analysis of 11 case-control studies. Int J Cancer. 2000;86(2):289-294.
[16] Bochner BH, Dalbagni G, Sjoberg DD, et al. Comparing Open Radical Cystectomy and Robot-assisted Laparoscopic Radical Cystectomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. Eur Urol. 2015 Jun;67(6):1042-1050.
[17] Oko M, Kycler W, Janowski J, et al. The use of the da Vinci Xi robot system in colorectal cancer resections - why is it worth it?. Pol Przegl Chir. 2021;94(2):12-18.
[18] Aradaib M, Neary P, Hafeez A, et al. Safe adoption of robotic colorectal surgery using structured training: early Irish experience. J Robot Surg. 2019;13(5):657-662.
[19] Del Gutiérrez Delgado MP, Mera Velasco S, Turiño Luque JD, et al. Outcomes of robotic-assisted vs conventional laparoscopic surgery among patients undergoing resection for rectal cancer: an observational single hospital study of 300 cases. J Robot Surg. 2022;16(1):179-187.
[20] Sian TS, Tierney GM, Park H, et al. Robotic colorectal surgery: previous laparoscopic colorectal experience is not essential. J Robot Surg. 2018;12(2):271-275.
[21] Gallego-Poveda J, Paulo N, Amorim MJ, et al. Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Repair: From Total Endoscopic To Closed-Chest Robotic. Port J Card Thorac Vasc Surg. 2024 Feb 9;30(4):15-22.
[22] Loulmet D, Carpentier A, d'Attellis N, et al. Endoscopic coronary artery bypass grafting with the aid of robotic assisted instruments. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1999 Jul;118(1):4-10.
[23] Hadaya J, Chervu NL, Ebrahimian S, et al. Clinical Outcomes and Costs of Robotic-assisted versus Conventional Mitral Valve Repair: A National Analysis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2024 Nov 11:S0003-4975(24)00941-X.
[24] Mihaljevic T, Jarrett CM, Gillinov AM, et al. Robotic repair of posterior mitral valve prolapse versus conventional approaches: potential realized. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2011 Jan;141(1):72-80.e1-4.
[25] Gillinov AM, Mihaljevic T, Javadikasgari H, et al. Early results of robotically assisted mitral valve surgery: Analysis of the first 1000 cases. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2018 Jan;155(1):82-91.e2.
[26] Massey J, Palmer K, Al-Rawi O, et al. Robotic mitral valve surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2024 Mar 5;10:1239742.
[27] Harky A, Hussain SMA. Robotic Cardiac Surgery: The Future Gold Standard or An Unnecessary Extravagance? Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2019 Aug 27;34(4):XII-XIII.
[28] Ballotta A. Robotic-Assisted Hybrid Coronary Revascularization. Am J Cardiol. 2024 Jun 15;221:128.
[29] Nisivaco S, Kitahara H, Bhasin R, et al. A decade of robotic beating-heart totally endoscopic coronary bypass (TECAB) at a single institution: Outcomes with 10-year follow-up. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2024 Aug 6:S0022-5223(24)00682-2.
[30] Capozzi VA, Scarpelli E, Armano G, et al. Update of Robotic Surgery in Benign Gynecological Pathology: Systematic Review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022 Apr 17;58(4):552.
[31] Rivas-López R, Sandoval-García-Travesí FA. Robotic surgery in gynecology: review of literature. Cir Cir. 2020;88(1):107-116. English.
[32] Iavazzo C, Mamais I, Gkegkes ID. Robotic assisted vs laparoscopic and/or open myomectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of the clinical evidence. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2016 Jul;294(1):5-17.
[33] Gitas G, Hanker L, Rody A, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecology: is the future already here? Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2022 Aug;31(6):815-824.
[34] Özbaşlı E, Güngör M. Comparison of perioperative outcomes among robot-assisted, conventional laparoscopic, and abdominal/open myomectomies. J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2021 Dec 6;22(4):312-318.
[35] Barakat EE, Bedaiwy MA, Zimberg S, et al. Robotic-assisted, laparoscopic, and abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of surgical outcomes. Obstet Gynecol. 2011 Feb;117(2 Pt 1):256-266.
[36] Soto E, Luu TH, Liu X, et al. Laparoscopy vs. Robotic Surgery for Endometriosis (LAROSE): a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):996-1002.e3.
[37] Chen SH, Li ZA, Du XP. Robot-assisted versus conventional laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of advanced stage endometriosis: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol. 2016;43(3):422-6.
[38] Balafoutas D, Wöckel A, Wulff C, et al. Implementation of robotic gynecological surgery in a German University Hospital: patient safety after 110 procedures. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2020 Dec;302(6):1381-1388.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Justyna Korus , Natalia Hopej, Aleksandra Grzegorczyk, Nicol Dardzińska, Marta Dziedziak
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/da2ab/da2ab4712fe8d3242bd41159e66e17423419d795" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 68
Number of citations: 0