Humanities
Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Announcements
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Privacy Statement
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login

Journal of Education, Health and Sport

Open relationships – challenges and dilemmas
  • Home
  • /
  • Open relationships – challenges and dilemmas
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 71 (2024) /
  4. Medical Sciences

Open relationships – challenges and dilemmas

Authors

  • Krystian Wdowiak Medical University of Lublin, 20-059 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6579-3695
  • Agnieszka Maciocha Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0008-3752-332X
  • Julia Wąż Medical University of Silesia, Wroclaw, wybrzeże Ludwika Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0000-2626-538X
  • Aleksandra Witas Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4082-2653
  • Weronika Chachaj https://orcid.org/0009-0005-6346-4878
  • Paulina Słomka Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Aleje Racławickie 1, 20-059 Lublin, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7606-1982
  • Ewa Gardocka Medical University of Silesia, Wroclaw, wybrzeże Ludwika Pasteura 1, 50-367 Wrocław, Poland https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2677-915X

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2024.71.56173

Keywords

open relationship, interpersonal relationships, sexual partners

Abstract

Introduction and objective: Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refers to various relationship types in which at least one partner, with the other’s consent, forms sexual and/or emotional connections with other people. In open relationships, partners are allowed to engage sexually with others, but emotional intimacy is reserved for the primary relationship, which takes precedence. The aim of this article is to gather the most up-to-date information on open relationships.
Material and methods:
A review of studies available on the PubMed platform (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was conducted, including articles with free full-text access that used the keywords: “open relationship”, “CNM” and "Consensual non-monogamy."
Brief Description of the State of Knowledge: CNM includes open relationships, polyamory, polyfidelity, and swinging. Interest in open relationships has increased in recent years, with more people expressing curiosity about them than those actively participating. Men, individuals with high cognitive empathy, those less prone to jealousy, and those capable of experiencing compersion—the joy from a partner’s involvement with others—are particularly interested in open relationships.
Summary:  Research suggests potential benefits of CNM, including greater relationship and sexual satisfaction compared to monogamous arrangements. However, open relationships can also pose challenges such as social stigma, the potential breakdown of the primary relationship, or complications in parenting for those involved. Despite growing interest, CNM and phenomena like compersion remain under-researched, providing an open field for further investigation into their dynamics and impact on individual and relational well-being.

References

Conley T, Moors A, Matsick J, et al. The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2013; 13, 1–30.

Barker M, Langdridge D. Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge. 2010.

Grunt-Mejer K. From monogramy to polyamory: Social perception of nonmononormative relationships. Studia Socjologiczne. 2014; 4. 159-181.

Bergdall MK, Twist (Blumer) MLC. More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 2015; 27. 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963.

Lipnicka M. Beyond the Norm of Monogamy – Consensual Non-monogamy as an Example of a “Post-modern” Relationship?. Studia Socjologiczne. 2023;3(250). https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.147165

Lehmiller JJ, Ley D, Savage D. The Psychology of Gay Men's Cuckolding Fantasies. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(4):999-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1096-0

Flicker SM, Vaughan MD, Meyers LS. Feeling Good About Your Partners' Relationships: Compersion in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(4):1569-1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01985-y

Buczel K, Szyszka P, Mara I. Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2838247/v1

Grunt-Mejer K, Łyś A. They must be sick: Consensual nonmonogamy through the eyes of psychotherapists. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2022; 37(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2019.1670787

Balzarini RN, McDonald JN, Kohut T, et al. Compersion: When jealousy-inducing situations don’t (just) induce jealousy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021; 50(4), 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1

Hunter G, Stockwell A. Toward a behavior-analytic understanding of jealousy and compersion in romantic and sexual relationships. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. 2022; 23(1), 78–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2021.1981751

Fairbrother N, Hart TA, Fairbrother M. Open Relationship Prevalence, Characteristics, and Correlates in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadian Adults [published correction appears in J Sex Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;56(6):W1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1607666]. J Sex Res. 2019;56(6):695-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1580667

Conley TD, Matsick JL, Moors A, et al. Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives On Psychological Science. 2017; 12, 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616667925

Cohen M. An exploratory study of individuals in non-traditional alternative relationships: How “Open” are We? Sexuality & Culture, 2016; 20(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9324-z

Zimmerman KJ. Clients in sexually open relationships: Considerations for therapists. Journal Of Feminist Family Therapy. 2012; 24, 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2012.648143

Herbenick D, Bowling J, Fu T, et al. Sexual diversity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative probability sample of adult women and men. PloS One. 2017; 12(e0181198). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181198

Levine EC, Herbenick D, Martinez O, et al. Open relationships, nonconsensual nonmonogamy, and monogamy among U.S. adults: Findings from the 2012 national survey of sexual health and behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2018; 7, 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1178-7

Haupert ML, Gesselman AN, Moors AC, et al. Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2017; 43, 424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675

Włodarczyk E, Chanduszko-Salska J. Friends with Benefits Relationships — review of research. Psychiatria (Psychiatry). 2014;11(1):34-42. (access 2024.07.30). https://journals.viamedica.pl/psychiatria/article/view/38036/32033/

Moors AC. Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond ‘the couple’ increased over time? Journal of Sex Research. 2017; 54, 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1178208

Aumer K, Bellew W., Ito B, et al. The happy green-eyed monogamist: Role of jealousy and compersion in monogamous and non-traditional relationships. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 2014; 17(1), 77–88.

Teding van Berkhout E, Malouff JM. The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2016; 63(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093

Ka WL, Bottcher S, Walker BR. Attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy predicted by sociosexual behavior and avoidant attachment. Current Psychology. 2022; 41, 4312–4326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00941-8

Katz M, Katz E. Reconceptualizing attachment theory through the lens of polyamory. Sexuality and Culture. 2022; 26, 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09902-0

Fleckenstein JR, Cox DW. The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2015; 30, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.976997

Morrison TG, Beaulieu D, Brockman M, et al. A comparison of polyamorous and monoamorous persons: Are there differences in indices of relationship well-being and sociosexuality? Psychology & Sexuality. 2011; 4, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.631571

Mogilski JK, Memering SL, Welling LL, et al. Monogamy versus consensual nonmonogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2017; 46, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0658-2

Séguin LJ, Blais M, Goyer M, et al. Examining relationship quality across three types of relationship agreements. Sexualities. 2017; 20, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649337

Murphy A, Joel S, Muise A. A Prospective Investigation of the Decision to Open Up a Romantic Relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020; 12. 194855061989715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619897157.

Conley T, Piemonte J, Gusakova S, et al. Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2018; 35. 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743078.

Muise A, Impett E, Kogan A, et al. Keeping the Spark Alive. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612457185.

Balzarini RN, Campbell L, Kohut T, et al. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177841. Published 2017 May 18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177841

Kelberga AK, Martinsone B. Differences in Motivation to Engage in Sexual Activity Between People in Monogamous and Non-monogamous Committed Relationships. Front Psychol. 2021;12:753460. Published 2021 Nov 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753460

Meston C, Buss DM. Why humans have sex. Arch. Sexual Behav. 2007; 36 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2

Wood JR, Milhausen RR, Jeffrey NK. Why have sex? Reasons for having sex among lesbian, bisexual, queer, and questioning women in romantic relationships. Canad. J. Hum. Sexual. 2014; 23 75–88. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2592

Grunt-Mejer K. Therapy for people in consensually non-monogamous relationships. Icm.edu.pl. Published October 13, 2013. Polish. (access 2024.07.30). https://open.icm.edu.pl/items/f78025eb-b1d1-49af-8729-9c3559a92a77

‌37. Zaleski Z, Hupka R. Psychological analysis of jealousy: A cross-cultural study. Roczniki Filozoficzne. 1991; 39–40(4), 45–66. Polish.

Brandon M. The challenge of monogamy: bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2011; 26(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2011.574114

Fleckenstein J, Bergstrand C, Cox D. What Do Polys Want?: An Overview of the 2012 Loving More Survey. 2012. http://www.lovemore.com/polyamoryresearch/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/#_ENREF_1 (access 2024.07.30)

Internet database of legal texts OpenLEX. OpenLEX. Published 2024. (access 2024.07.30). Polish. https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/kodeks-karny-16798683/art-206

World Population Review. Countries Where Polygamy Is Legal 2020. worldpopulationreview.com. Published 2023. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-where-polygamy-is-legal

Garcia MR, Leslie SW, Wray AA. Sexually Transmitted Infections. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; April 20, 2024. (access 2024.07.30)

Lehmiller JJ. A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners. J Sex Med. 2015;12(10):2022-2028. doi:10.1111/jsm.12987

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2024-11-14

How to Cite

1.
WDOWIAK, Krystian, MACIOCHA, Agnieszka, WĄŻ, Julia, WITAS, Aleksandra, CHACHAJ, Weronika, SŁOMKA, Paulina and GARDOCKA, Ewa. Open relationships – challenges and dilemmas. Journal of Education, Health and Sport. Online. 14 November 2024. Vol. 71, p. 56173. [Accessed 27 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/JEHS.2024.71.56173.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 71 (2024)

Section

Medical Sciences

License

Copyright (c) 2024 Krystian Wdowiak, Agnieszka Maciocha, Julia Wąż, Aleksandra Witas, Weronika Chachaj, Paulina Słomka, Ewa Gardocka

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 2904
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

open relationship, interpersonal relationships, sexual partners
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop