Open relationships – challenges and dilemmas
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2024.71.56173Keywords
open relationship, interpersonal relationships, sexual partnersAbstract
Introduction and objective: Consensual non-monogamy (CNM) refers to various relationship types in which at least one partner, with the other’s consent, forms sexual and/or emotional connections with other people. In open relationships, partners are allowed to engage sexually with others, but emotional intimacy is reserved for the primary relationship, which takes precedence. The aim of this article is to gather the most up-to-date information on open relationships.
Material and methods: A review of studies available on the PubMed platform (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/) was conducted, including articles with free full-text access that used the keywords: “open relationship”, “CNM” and "Consensual non-monogamy."
Brief Description of the State of Knowledge: CNM includes open relationships, polyamory, polyfidelity, and swinging. Interest in open relationships has increased in recent years, with more people expressing curiosity about them than those actively participating. Men, individuals with high cognitive empathy, those less prone to jealousy, and those capable of experiencing compersion—the joy from a partner’s involvement with others—are particularly interested in open relationships.
Summary: Research suggests potential benefits of CNM, including greater relationship and sexual satisfaction compared to monogamous arrangements. However, open relationships can also pose challenges such as social stigma, the potential breakdown of the primary relationship, or complications in parenting for those involved. Despite growing interest, CNM and phenomena like compersion remain under-researched, providing an open field for further investigation into their dynamics and impact on individual and relational well-being.
References
Conley T, Moors A, Matsick J, et al. The fewer the merrier?: Assessing stigma surrounding consensually non-monogamous romantic relationships. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy. 2013; 13, 1–30.
Barker M, Langdridge D. Understanding non-monogamies. Routledge. 2010.
Grunt-Mejer K. From monogramy to polyamory: Social perception of nonmononormative relationships. Studia Socjologiczne. 2014; 4. 159-181.
Bergdall MK, Twist (Blumer) MLC. More Than Two: A Practical Guide to Ethical Polyamory, by Franklin Veaux and Eve Rickert. Journal of Feminist Family Therapy. 2015; 27. 40-45. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2015.1005963.
Lipnicka M. Beyond the Norm of Monogamy – Consensual Non-monogamy as an Example of a “Post-modern” Relationship?. Studia Socjologiczne. 2023;3(250). https://doi.org/10.24425/sts.2023.147165
Lehmiller JJ, Ley D, Savage D. The Psychology of Gay Men's Cuckolding Fantasies. Arch Sex Behav. 2018;47(4):999-1013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-017-1096-0
Flicker SM, Vaughan MD, Meyers LS. Feeling Good About Your Partners' Relationships: Compersion in Consensually Non-Monogamous Relationships. Arch Sex Behav. 2021;50(4):1569-1585. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-021-01985-y
Buczel K, Szyszka P, Mara I. Exploring Compersion: A Study on Polish Consensually Non-Monogamous Individuals and Adaptation of the COMPERSe Questionnaire. 2023. https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-2838247/v1
Grunt-Mejer K, Łyś A. They must be sick: Consensual nonmonogamy through the eyes of psychotherapists. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2022; 37(1), 58–81. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2019.1670787
Balzarini RN, McDonald JN, Kohut T, et al. Compersion: When jealousy-inducing situations don’t (just) induce jealousy. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 2021; 50(4), 1311–1324. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-020-01853-1
Hunter G, Stockwell A. Toward a behavior-analytic understanding of jealousy and compersion in romantic and sexual relationships. European Journal of Behavior Analysis. 2022; 23(1), 78–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/15021149.2021.1981751
Fairbrother N, Hart TA, Fairbrother M. Open Relationship Prevalence, Characteristics, and Correlates in a Nationally Representative Sample of Canadian Adults [published correction appears in J Sex Res. 2019 Jul-Aug;56(6):W1. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1607666]. J Sex Res. 2019;56(6):695-704. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2019.1580667
Conley TD, Matsick JL, Moors A, et al. Investigation of consensually nonmonogamous relationships: Theories, methods, and new directions. Perspectives On Psychological Science. 2017; 12, 205–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691616667925
Cohen M. An exploratory study of individuals in non-traditional alternative relationships: How “Open” are We? Sexuality & Culture, 2016; 20(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-015-9324-z
Zimmerman KJ. Clients in sexually open relationships: Considerations for therapists. Journal Of Feminist Family Therapy. 2012; 24, 272–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/08952833.2012.648143
Herbenick D, Bowling J, Fu T, et al. Sexual diversity in the United States: Results from a nationally representative probability sample of adult women and men. PloS One. 2017; 12(e0181198). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181198
Levine EC, Herbenick D, Martinez O, et al. Open relationships, nonconsensual nonmonogamy, and monogamy among U.S. adults: Findings from the 2012 national survey of sexual health and behavior. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2018; 7, 1439–1450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-018-1178-7
Haupert ML, Gesselman AN, Moors AC, et al. Prevalence of experiences with consensual nonmonogamous relationships: Findings from two national samples of single Americans. Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy. 2017; 43, 424. https://doi.org/10.1080/0092623X.2016.1178675
Włodarczyk E, Chanduszko-Salska J. Friends with Benefits Relationships — review of research. Psychiatria (Psychiatry). 2014;11(1):34-42. (access 2024.07.30). https://journals.viamedica.pl/psychiatria/article/view/38036/32033/
Moors AC. Has the American public’s interest in information related to relationships beyond ‘the couple’ increased over time? Journal of Sex Research. 2017; 54, 677–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499.2016.1178208
Aumer K, Bellew W., Ito B, et al. The happy green-eyed monogamist: Role of jealousy and compersion in monogamous and non-traditional relationships. Electronic Journal of Human Sexuality. 2014; 17(1), 77–88.
Teding van Berkhout E, Malouff JM. The efficacy of empathy training: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 2016; 63(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/cou0000093
Ka WL, Bottcher S, Walker BR. Attitudes toward consensual non-monogamy predicted by sociosexual behavior and avoidant attachment. Current Psychology. 2022; 41, 4312–4326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00941-8
Katz M, Katz E. Reconceptualizing attachment theory through the lens of polyamory. Sexuality and Culture. 2022; 26, 792–809. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12119-021-09902-0
Fleckenstein JR, Cox DW. The association of an open relationship orientation with health and happiness in a sample of older US adults. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2015; 30, 94–116. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2014.976997
Morrison TG, Beaulieu D, Brockman M, et al. A comparison of polyamorous and monoamorous persons: Are there differences in indices of relationship well-being and sociosexuality? Psychology & Sexuality. 2011; 4, 75–91. https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2011.631571
Mogilski JK, Memering SL, Welling LL, et al. Monogamy versus consensual nonmonogamy: Alternative approaches to pursuing a strategically pluralistic mating strategy. Archives of Sexual Behavior. 2017; 46, 407–417. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-015-0658-2
Séguin LJ, Blais M, Goyer M, et al. Examining relationship quality across three types of relationship agreements. Sexualities. 2017; 20, 86–104. https://doi.org/10.1177/1363460716649337
Murphy A, Joel S, Muise A. A Prospective Investigation of the Decision to Open Up a Romantic Relationship. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2020; 12. 194855061989715. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550619897157.
Conley T, Piemonte J, Gusakova S, et al. Sexual satisfaction among individuals in monogamous and consensually non-monogamous relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships. 2018; 35. 509-531. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265407517743078.
Muise A, Impett E, Kogan A, et al. Keeping the Spark Alive. Social Psychological and Personality Science. 2012; https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612457185.
Balzarini RN, Campbell L, Kohut T, et al. Perceptions of primary and secondary relationships in polyamory. PLoS One. 2017;12(5):e0177841. Published 2017 May 18. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0177841
Kelberga AK, Martinsone B. Differences in Motivation to Engage in Sexual Activity Between People in Monogamous and Non-monogamous Committed Relationships. Front Psychol. 2021;12:753460. Published 2021 Nov 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.753460
Meston C, Buss DM. Why humans have sex. Arch. Sexual Behav. 2007; 36 477–507. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-007-9175-2
Wood JR, Milhausen RR, Jeffrey NK. Why have sex? Reasons for having sex among lesbian, bisexual, queer, and questioning women in romantic relationships. Canad. J. Hum. Sexual. 2014; 23 75–88. https://doi.org/10.3138/cjhs.2592
Grunt-Mejer K. Therapy for people in consensually non-monogamous relationships. Icm.edu.pl. Published October 13, 2013. Polish. (access 2024.07.30). https://open.icm.edu.pl/items/f78025eb-b1d1-49af-8729-9c3559a92a77
37. Zaleski Z, Hupka R. Psychological analysis of jealousy: A cross-cultural study. Roczniki Filozoficzne. 1991; 39–40(4), 45–66. Polish.
Brandon M. The challenge of monogamy: bringing it out of the closet and into the treatment room. Sexual and Relationship Therapy. 2011; 26(3), 271–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14681994.2011.574114
Fleckenstein J, Bergstrand C, Cox D. What Do Polys Want?: An Overview of the 2012 Loving More Survey. 2012. http://www.lovemore.com/polyamoryresearch/2012-lovingmore-polyamory-survey/#_ENREF_1 (access 2024.07.30)
Internet database of legal texts OpenLEX. OpenLEX. Published 2024. (access 2024.07.30). Polish. https://sip.lex.pl/akty-prawne/dzu-dziennik-ustaw/kodeks-karny-16798683/art-206
World Population Review. Countries Where Polygamy Is Legal 2020. worldpopulationreview.com. Published 2023. https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/countries-where-polygamy-is-legal
Garcia MR, Leslie SW, Wray AA. Sexually Transmitted Infections. In: StatPearls. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; April 20, 2024. (access 2024.07.30)
Lehmiller JJ. A Comparison of Sexual Health History and Practices among Monogamous and Consensually Nonmonogamous Sexual Partners. J Sex Med. 2015;12(10):2022-2028. doi:10.1111/jsm.12987
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Krystian Wdowiak, Agnieszka Maciocha, Julia Wąż, Aleksandra Witas, Weronika Chachaj, Paulina Słomka, Ewa Gardocka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 161
Number of citations: 0