Innovations in the treatment of cervical spine myelopathy – a comprehensive review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2024.67.55079Keywords
Cervical myelopathy, spinal cord, decompression, laminoplastyAbstract
Introduction and aim of the study
Myelopathy of the cervical spine is a set of symptoms resulting from compression of the spinal cord. There are many causes that may lead to this disorder, including degenerative changes, ligament ossification and tumors. Middle-aged and older patients usually suffer from it, and its diagnosis is expected to increase as the population gets older. Due to non-specific and initially mild symptoms, cervical myelopathy is usually diagnosed in later stages, often when the patient's fitness and independence are significantly impaired. The aim of the study is to present the current state of knowledge about myelopathy of the cervical spine, methods of its effective diagnosis, and to present available therapeutic options, because early diagnosis and optimal treatment enable patients to maintain their ability to work and improve their overall quality of life.
Materials and methods
The literature included in the PubMed, BioMed Central and Polish Medical Platform databases is searched by means of the words such as cervical myelopathy, decompression, spinal cord, corpectomy, discectomy. Quoted sources in selected works were also used.
Conclusion
Surgical treatment is the most effective method to improve the clinical condition of people suffering from cervical myelopathy. Both anterior and posterior approach surgeries are characterized by similar effectiveness, and the choice of a specific method depends on the patient's general condition, the degree of cervical lordosis, and the number of affected spinal segments. Due to the correct diagnosis of the disease and applying treatment, it is possible to slow down the progression of the disease and improve the quality of life of patients.
References
Heary RF, MacDowall A, Agarwal N. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A two decade experience. J Spinal Cord Med. 2018 Jul 26;42(4):1-9. doi: 10.1080/10790268.2018.1471780. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 30048224; PMCID: PMC6718135.
Ayub AA, Anwar HA, Cervical myelopathy, Orthop. Trauma, 2015;29(6)
Bakhsheshian J, Mehta VA, Liu JC. Current Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Global Spine J. 2017 Sep;7(6):572-586. doi: 10.1177/2192568217699208. Epub 2017 May 31. PMID: 28894688; PMCID: PMC5582708.
Wu JC, Ko CC, Yen YS, Huang WC, Chen YC, Liu L, Tu TH, Lo SS, Cheng H. Epidemiology of cervical spondylotic myelopathy and its risk of causing spinal cord injury: a national cohort study. Neurosurg Focus. 2013 Jul;35(1):E10. doi: 10.3171/2013.4.FOCUS13122. PMID: 23815246.
Boogaarts HD, Bartels RH. Prevalence of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 2:139-41. doi: 10.1007/s00586-013-2781-x. Epub 2013 Apr 25. PMID: 23616201.
Gibson J, Nouri A, Krueger B, Lakomkin N, Nasser R, Gimbel D, Cheng J. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Clinical Review. Yale J Biol Med. 2018 Mar 28;91(1):43-48. PMID: 29599656; PMCID: PMC5872640.
Zhang T, Pope J. Cervical spine involvement in rheumatoid arthritis over time: results from a meta-analysis. Arthritis Res Ther. 2015 May 31;17(1):148. doi: 10.1186/s13075-015-0643-0. PMID: 26026719; PMCID: PMC4449959.
Nguyen HV, Ludwig SC, Silber J, Gelb DE, Anderson PA, Frank L, Vaccaro AR. Rheumatoid arthritis of the cervical spine. Spine J. 2004 May-Jun;4(3):329-34. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2003.10.006. PMID: 15125859.
Naylor RM, Lenartowicz KA, Graff-Radford J, Jones DT, Cutsforth-Gregory JK, Graff-Radford NR, Elder BD. High prevalence of cervical myelopathy in patients with idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2020 Oct;197:106099. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2020.106099. Epub 2020 Jul 17. PMID: 32702575.
Baptiste DC, Fehlings MG. Pathophysiology of cervical myelopathy. Spine J. 2006 Nov-Dec;6(6 Suppl):190S-197S. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2006.04.024. PMID: 17097538.
Tu J, Vargas Castillo J, Das A, Diwan AD. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Insights into Its Pathobiology and Molecular Mechanisms. J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 15;10(6):1214. doi: 10.3390/jcm10061214. PMID: 33804008; PMCID: PMC8001572.
Kozubski W, i Liberski P, Neurologia. Tom 1, wyd. 2, PZWL
Muhle C, Wiskirchen J, Weinert D, Falliner A, Wesner F, Brinkmann G, Heller M. Biomechanical aspects of the subarachnoid space and cervical cord in healthy individuals examined with kinematic magnetic resonance imaging. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998 Mar 1;23(5):556-67. doi: 10.1097/00007632-199803010-00008. PMID: 9530787.
Sayıt E, Aghdasi B, Daubs MD, Wang JC. The Occupancy of the Components in the Cervical Spine and Their Changes with Extension and Flexion. Global Spine J. 2015 Oct;5(5):396-405. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1550089. Epub 2015 May 15. PMID: 26430594; PMCID: PMC4577318.
Hashizume Y, Iijima S, Kishimoto H, Yanagi T. Pathology of spinal cord lesions caused by ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament. Acta Neuropathol. 1984;63(2):123-30. doi: 10.1007/BF00697194. PMID: 6428155.
Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist. 2010 May;16(3):176-87. doi: 10.1097/NRL.0b013e3181da3a29. PMID: 20445427.
Prusiński A, Neurologia praktyczna, wyd. 3, PZWL
Hu P, He Z, Cui J, Wan Y. Pathological changes of cervical spinal canal in cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A retrospective study on 39 cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019 Jun;181:133-137. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2019.04.016. Epub 2019 Apr 15. PMID: 31039495.
Morishita Y, Naito M, Hymanson H, Miyazaki M, Wu G, Wang JC. The relationship between the cervical spinal canal diameter and the pathological changes in the cervical spine. Eur Spine J. 2009 Jun;18(6):877-83. doi: 10.1007/s00586-009-0968-y. Epub 2009 Apr 9. PMID: 19357877; PMCID: PMC2899662.
Liu FJ, Sun YP, Shen Y, Ding WY, Wang LF. Prognostic value of magnetic resonance imaging combined with electromyography in the surgical management of cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Exp Ther Med. 2013 Apr;5(4):1214-1218. doi: 10.3892/etm.2013.934. Epub 2013 Jan 30. PMID: 23596492; PMCID: PMC3627454.
Harrop JS. Cervical myelopathy: is it all just one disease? World Neurosurg. 2011 Mar-Apr;75(3-4):441-2. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2010.11.029. PMID: 21600490.
Opara J, Orkiszewska-Mokry K, Klinimetria w mielopatii szyjnej, Aktual. Neurol., t. 10, nr 2, 2010.
Choi SH, Kang CN. Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: Pathophysiology and Current Treatment Strategies. Asian Spine J. 2020 Oct;14(5):710-720. doi: 10.31616/asj.2020.0490. Epub 2020 Oct 14. PMID: 33108837; PMCID: PMC7595811.
Lebl DR, Bono CM. Update on the Diagnosis and Management of Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015 Nov;23(11):648-60. doi: 10.5435/JAAOS-D-14-00250. PMID: 26498584.
Fan XW, Wang ZW, Gao XD, Ding WY, Yang DL. The change of cervical sagittal parameters plays an important role in clinical outcomes of cervical spondylotic myelopathy after multi-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. J Orthop Surg Res. 2019 Dec 11;14(1):429. doi: 10.1186/s13018-019-1504-3. PMID: 31829200; PMCID: PMC6907178.
Kong C, Li XY, Sun XY, Guo MC, Ding JZ, Yang YM, Lu SB. The ratio of C2-C7 Cobb angle to T1 slope is an effective parameter for the selection of posterior surgical approach for patients with multisegmental cervical spondylotic myelopathy. J Orthop Sci. 2020 Nov;25(6):953-959. doi: 10.1016/j.jos.2019.12.008. Epub 2020 Jan 9. PMID: 31928852.
Emery SE. Anterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: which? When? How? Eur Spine J. 2015 Apr;24 Suppl 2:150-9. doi: 10.1007/s00586-015-3784-6. Epub 2015 Feb 5. PMID: 25652554.
Deora H, Kim SH, Behari S, Rudrappa S, Rajshekhar V, Zileli M, Parthiban JKBC; World Federation of Neurosurgical Societies (WFNS) Spine Committee. Anterior Surgical Techniques for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: WFNS Spine Committee Recommendations. Neurospine. 2019 Sep;16(3):408-420. doi: 10.14245/ns.1938250.125. Epub 2019 Sep 30. PMID: 31607073; PMCID: PMC6790738.
Abduljabbar FH, Teles AR, Bokhari R, Weber M, Santaguida C. Laminectomy with or Without Fusion to Manage Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy. Neurosurg Clin N Am. 2018 Jan;29(1):91-105. doi: 10.1016/j.nec.2017.09.017. PMID: 29173440.
Wang L, Wang Y, Yu B, Li Z, Liu X. Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. J Clin Neurosci. 2015 Mar;22(3):450-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2014.08.022. Epub 2014 Dec 15. PMID: 25523126.
Chen T, Zhang X, Meng F, Zhang T, Zhao Y, Yan J, Xu G, Zhao W. Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. World Neurosurg. 2021 Nov;155:82-93. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.08.032. Epub 2021 Aug 21. PMID: 34425291.
Peolsson A, Hedlund R, Vavruch L, et al. Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a prospective, randomized study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003;28(1):20-30. doi:10.1097/01.BRS.0000038872.93185.3E. PMID: 12544918.
Casey AT, Crockard HA, Bland JM, Stevens J, Howes J, Ellamushi H. Surgery on the cervical spine in rheumatoid arthritis: a prospective evaluation of risk factors predicting outcome. J Neurosurg. 1996;85(2):197-205. doi:10.3171/jns.1996.85.2.0197. PMID: 8692398.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Marta Kozikowska, Agnieszka Pociecha, Bożena Kmak
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 60
Number of citations: 0