The terror of athletes - Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction, grafts and moden techniques
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2024.57.008Keywords
ACL, arthroscopy, graft types, ACL reconstruction, reviewAbstract
Introduction
The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a prevalent sports-related injury, constituting nearly half of knee injuries. This narrative review explores the evolution of ACL reconstruction surgeries, emphasizing graft types and their pros and cons.
Current state of knowledge
The ideal ACL graft choice depends on factors like age, lifestyle, and demands. Autografts are the current standard, with the Quadriceps Tendon graft offering similar outcomes and fewer complications. Allografts are a secondary option for older, low-demand patients due to a shorter recovery period. Artificial grafts have limited use, lacking strong evidence for clinical advantages but may be considered for suturing torn ACL stumps and in cases were quick recovery is essential.
Summary
Contemporary orthopedic practitioners must possess comprehensive knowledge of various ACL reconstruction graft types to tailor interventions precisely to individual patient requirements. The selection of a graft should be rooted in a profound comprehension of patients' lifestyles, medical histories, and specific demands, thereby mitigating the subjective impact of any associated limitations for the patient.
References
Risberg MA, Lewek M, Snyder-Mackler L. A systematic review of evidence for anterior cruciate ligament rehabilitation: how much and what type? Phys Ther Sport. 2004;5(3):125–145.
Chung KS, Kim JH, Kong DH, Park I, Kim JG, Ha JK. An Increasing Trend in the Number of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Korea: A Nationwide Epidemiologic Study. Clin Orthop Surg. 2022 Jun;14(2):220-226. doi: 10.4055/cios20276. Epub 2021 Nov 24. PMID: 35685966; PMCID: PMC9152897.
Csintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT. Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J. 2008 Summer;12(3):17-21. doi: 10.7812/TPP/07-140. PMID: 21331205; PMCID: PMC3037119.
D'Ambrosi R, Meena A, Arora ES, Attri M, Schäfer L, Migliorini F. Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a historical view. Ann Transl Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(10):364. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-87. Epub 2023 Jun 19. PMID: 37675316; PMCID: PMC10477645.
Sasaki N, Ishibashi Y, Tsuda E, Yamamoto Y, Maeda S, Mizukami H, Toh S, Yagihashi S, Tonosaki Y. The femoral insertion of the anterior cruciate ligament: discrepancy between macroscopic and histological observations. Arthroscopy. 2012;28:1135–1146.
Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Williams A. The anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and its relevance to the technique of reconstruction. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(8):1020-1026. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.98B8.37117
Śmigielski R, Zdanowicz U, Drwięga M, Ciszek B, Ciszkowska-Łysoń B, Siebold R. Ribbon like appearance of the midsubstance fibres of the anterior cruciate ligament close to its femoral insertion site: a cadaveric study including 111 knees.
Iliopoulos E, Galanis N, Zafeiridis A, Iosifidis M, Papadopoulos P, Potoupnis, M, Geladas N, Vrabas IS, Kirkos J (2017) Anatomic single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction improves walking economy: hamstrings tendon versus patellar tendon grafts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(10):3155–3162
Mohtadi N, Chan D, Barber R, Oddone Paolucci E (2015) A randomized clinical trial comparing patellar tendon, hamstring tendon, and doublebundle ACL reconstructions: patient-reported and clinical outcomes at a minimal 2-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med 25(4):321–331
Sajovic M, Stropnik D, Skaza K (2018) Long-term comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A 17-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 46(8):1800–1808
Akoto R, Albers M, Balke M, Bouillon B, Hoher J (2019) ACL reconstruction with quadriceps tendon graft and press-fit fixation versus quadruple hamstring graft and interference screw fixation - a matched pair analysis after one year follow up. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 20(1):109
Belk JW, Kraeutler MJ, Marshall HA, Goodrich JA, McCarty EC (2018) Quadriceps tendon autograft for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of comparative studies with minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 34(5):1699–1707
Lind M, Nielsen TG, Soerensen OG, Mygind-Klavsen B, Faunř P (2020) Quadriceps tendon grafts does not cause patients to have inferior subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction than do hamstring grafts: a 2-year prospective randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 54(3):183–187
Martin-Alguacil JL, Arroyo-Morales M, Martín-Gomez JL, Monje-Cabrera IM, Abellán-Guillén JF, Esparza-Ros F, Lozano ML, Cantarero-Villanueva I (2018) Strength recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadriceps tendon versus hamstring tendon autografts in soccer players: a randomized controlled trial. Knee 25(4):704–714
Runer A, Wierer G, Herbst E, Hepperger C, Herbort M, Gfoller P, Hoser C, Fink C (2018) There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome
Runer, A., Keeling, L., Wagala, N. et al. Current trends in graft choice for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction – part II: In-vivo kinematics, patient reported outcomes, re-rupture rates, strength recovery, return to sports and complications. J EXP ORTOP 10, 40 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40634-023-00601-3
Andrez TN, Chagas JBM, D'Oliveira LB. GRAFTS FOR ANTERIOR CRUCIATE LIGAMENT RECONSTRUCTION: SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS. Acta Ortop Bras. 2022;30(6):e256048. Published 2022 Dec 16. doi:10.1590/1413-785220223006e256048
Brophy RH, Schmitz L, Wright RW, Dunn WR, Parker RD, Andrish JT, McCarty EC, Spindler KP (2012) Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group. The Am J Sports Med 40(11):2517–2522
Bergeron JJ, Sercia QP, Drager J, Pelet S, Belzile EL. Return to baseline physical activity after bone-patellar tendon-bone versus hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Sports Med. 2021;50(8):2292-303.
Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL. A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy.
Wasserstein D, Sheth U, Cabrera A, Spindler KP: A systematic review of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autograft compared with allograft in young patients. Sports Health 2015;7:207-216.
Keizer MNJ, Hoogeslag RAG, van Raay JJAM, Otten E, Brouwer RW: Superior return to sports rate after patellar tendon autograft over patellar tendon allograft in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 2018;26:574-581.
Maletis GB, Chen J, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT: Age-related risk factors for revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A cohort study of 21,304 patients from the kaiser Permanente anterior cruciate ligament registry. Am J Sports Med 2016;44:331-336.
Parchi PD, Ciapini G, Paglialunga C, Giuntoli M, Picece C, Chiellini F, Lisanti M, Scaglione M. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with LARS artificial ligament-clinical results after a long-term follow-up. Joints. 2018;6(2):75–79. doi: 10.1055/s-0038-1653950.
Tiefenboeck TM, et al. Clinical and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the LARS system at a minimum follow-up of 10 years. Knee. 2015;22(6):565–568.
Magnussen, R. A., Carey, J. L., Spindler, K. P. (2011). Rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 41(2), 98-112. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2011.3396.
Mariscalco, M. W., Flanigan, D. C., Mitchell, J., & Pedroza, A. D. (2013). The influence of hamstring autograft size on patient-reported outcomes and risk of revision after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) Cohort Study. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 29(12), 1948-1953. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2013.08.027.
Xergia, S. A., McClelland, J. A., Kvist, J., & Vasiliadis, H. S. (2011). Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction grafts and their influence on knee kinematics and laxity: A systematic review of in vivo comparisons. Arthroscopy: The Journal of Arthroscopic & Related Surgery, 27(9), 1259-1271. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2011.04.003.
Fu, F. H., Bennett, C. H., Ma, C. B., Menetrey, J., Lattermann, C., & Current, Concepts. (2000). Current Concepts Review: Current Trends in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction. Part II. Operative Procedures and Clinical Correlations. The American Journal of Sports Medicine, 28(1), 124-130. doi: 10.1177/03635465000280012001.
Feller, J. A., Webster, K. E., & Gavin, B. (2001). Early post-operative morbidity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: patellar tendon versus hamstring graft. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 9(4), 260-266. doi: 10.1007/s001670100198.
Zaffagnini, S., Marcacci, M., Lo Presti, M., Giordano, G., Iacono, F., Neri, M. P., ... & Kon, E. (2003). Prospective and randomized evaluation of ACL reconstruction with three techniques: a clinical and radiographic evaluation at 5 years follow-up. Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy, 11(3), 135-141. doi: 10.1007/s00167-003-0413-6.
Claes S, Vereecke E, Maes M, Victor J, Verdonk P, Bellemans J. Anatomy of the anterolateral ligament of the knee. J Anat. 2013;223(4):321-328.
Helito CP, Helito PVP, Costa HP, et al. Evaluation of the anterolateral ligament of the knee by means of magnetic resonance examination. Rev Bras Ortop. 2014;49(3):242-247.
Sonnery-Cottet B, Thaunat M, Freychet B, Pupim BH, Murphy CG, Claes S. Outcome of a Combined Anterior Cruciate Ligament and Anterolateral Ligament Reconstruction Technique With a Minimum 2-Year Follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1598-1605.
Daggett M, Helito CP, Cullen M, Andrade M, Bonadio MB, Pécora JR, Camanho GL, LaPrade RF. Effect of anterolateral complex reconstruction on the biomechanical outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees under pivot shift. Am J Sports Med. 2019;47(8):1791-1798.
Zhu T, Zhou J, Hwang J, Xu X. Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Clinical Outcomes After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Jan 31;10(1):23259671211061535. doi: 10.1177/23259671211061535. PMID: 35127959; PMCID: PMC8811441.
Shen L, Yuan T, Chen S, et al. The temporal effect of platelet-rich plasma on pain and physical function in the treatment of knee osteoarthritis: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Orthop Surg Res. 2017;12(1):16.
Xie X, Zhang C, Tuan RS. Biology of platelet-rich plasma and its clinical application in cartilage repair. Arthritis Res Ther. 2014;16(1):204.
Costa-Almeida R, Calejo I, Gomes ME. Mesenchymal Stem Cells Empowering Tendon Regenerative Therapies. Int J Mol Sci. 2019 Jun 19;20(12):3002. doi: 10.3390/ijms20123002. PMID: 31248196; PMCID: PMC6627139.
Ayala-Cuellar AP, Kang JH, Jeung EB, Choi KC. Roles of Mesenchymal Stem Cells in Tissue Regeneration and Immunomodulation. Biomol Ther (Seoul). 2019 Jan 1;27(1):25-33. doi: 10.4062/biomolther.2017.260. PMID: 29902862; PMCID: PMC6319543.
Bi F, Chen Y, Liu J, Hu W, Tian K. Bone Mesenchymal Stem Cells Contribute to Ligament Regeneration and Graft-Bone Healing after Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Silk-Collagen Scaffold. Stem Cells Int. 2021 Apr 23;2021:6697969. doi: 10.1155/2021/6697969. PMID: 33981343; PMCID: PMC8088362.
Sundman EA, Cole BJ, Karas V, Della Valle C, Tetreault MW, Mohammed HO, Fortier LA. The anti-inflammatory and matrix restorative mechanisms of platelet-rich plasma in osteoarthritis. Am J Sports Med. 2014;42(1):35-41.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Kinga Woźniak , Magdalena Jung, Patryk Hedesz, Monika Gardian-Baj, Maximilian Jung, Aleksandra Żuk-Łapan, Aleksandra Doryń, Emilia Babula, Justyna Popczyńska, Aleksandra Włodarczyk, Andrzej Taras
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 313
Number of citations: 0
