Cone-beam computed tomography in implant dentistry - guidelines, current concepts and limitations for practice
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2024.51.002Keywords
Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Dental Implants, X-Rays, DentistryAbstract
This article issues scientific background of Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the importance of taking x-rays before and after implant placement in daily practice as a common care. The review will introduce cone-beam computed tomography guidelines, restrictions and intraoperartive issues for instance nerve damage and bleeding incidents. Modern CBCT technology enables specialists to avoid making a wrong diagnosis, which translates into a higher percentage of people with a positive treatment outcome.
Diagnostic radiology is a crucial element of every dental treatment planning. CBCT market is expanding gradually since two decades, there are more than 85 distinct CBCT tools available. CBCT is a three-dimensional (3D) imaging used nowadays in dentistry with increased frequency and offers volumetric data on jaw bones and teeth with relatively low radiation doses and costs. Currently, the greatest advantage of CBCT examinations over radiographs is the fact that the image obtained is presented in a 3D projection and not, as is the case, in 2D. It has the ability to help a wider range of patients, but the use of CBCT also has negative consequences. Routine or excessive use has resulted in increased radiation doses accumulating in the patient's body, which translates into an increased risk of adverse effects. The risk varies according to the age of the patient under study and is directly proportional to it, that is, it is highest for young people and lower for older people. The potential risk is also slightly higher in the female population. For this reason, creating awareness of the mandatory patient safety management of CT scans is a key process by which X-ray exposures can be optimised.
References
Venkatesh E, Elluru SV. Cone beam computed tomography: basics and applications in dentistry. J Istanb Univ Fac Dent. 2017 Dec 2;51(3 Suppl 1):S102-S121. doi: 10.17096/jiufd.00289. PMID: 29354314; PMCID: PMC5750833.
Van Assche N, Vercruyssen M, Coucke W, Teughels W, Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Accuracy of computer-aided implant placement. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012 Oct;23 Suppl 6:112-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0501.2012.02552.x. PMID: 23062136.
Guillaume B. Dental implants: A review. Morphologie. 2016 Dec;100(331):189-198. doi: 10.1016/j.morpho.2016.02.002. Epub 2016 Mar 16. PMID: 26995275.
Cherian JM, Samuel S, Sabu AM, Thomas AM, Injety RJ. Dental implants in growing patients: A quality assessment of systematic reviews. J Oral Biol Craniofac Res. 2023 Sep-Oct;13(5):610-615. doi: 10.1016/j.jobcr.2023.07.004. Epub 2023 Aug 2. PMID: 37565026; PMCID: PMC10410509.
Saini M, Singh Y, Arora P, Arora V, Jain K. Implant biomaterials: A comprehensive review. World J Clin Cases. 2015 Jan 16;3(1):52-7. doi: 10.12998/wjcc.v3.i1.52. PMID: 25610850; PMCID: PMC4295219.
Sykaras N, Iacopino AM, Marker VA, Triplett RG, Woody RD. Implant materials, designs, and surface topographies: their effect on osseointegration. A literature review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2000 Sep-Oct;15(5):675-90. PMID: 11055135.
Schulze R, Heil U, Gross D, Bruellmann DD, Dranischnikow E, Schwanecke U, Schoemer E. Artefacts in CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2011 Jul;40(5):265-73. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/30642039. PMID: 21697151; PMCID: PMC3520262.
Endo M, Tsunoo T, Nakamori N, Yoshida K. Effect of scattered radiation on image noise in cone beam CT. Med Phys. 2001 Apr;28(4):469-74. doi: 10.1118/1.1357457. PMID: 11339743.
Farman AG. Guest editorial--Self-referral: an ethical concern with respect to multidimensional imaging in dentistry? J Appl Oral Sci. 2009 Sep-Oct;17(5):i. doi: 10.1590/s1678-77572009000500001. PMID: 19936508; PMCID: PMC4327655.
Jens Wiegert, Matthias Bertram, Dirk Schaefer, Norbert Conrads, Niels Noordhoek, Kees de Jong, Til Aach, Georg Rose, "Soft-tissue contrast resolution within the head of human cadaver by means of flat-detector-based cone-beam CT," Proc. SPIE 5368, Medical Imaging 2004: Physics of Medical Imaging, (6 May 2004); https://doi.org/10.1117/12.535191
Tetradis S, White SC. A decade of cone beam computed tomography. J Calif Dent Assoc. 2010 Jan;38(1):24-6. PMID: 20178223.
Tyndall DA, Brooks SL. Selection criteria for dental implant site imaging: a position paper of the American Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial radiology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2000 May;89(5):630-7. doi: 10.1067/moe.2000.106336. PMID: 10807723.
Benavides E, Rios HF, Ganz SD, An CH, Resnik R, Reardon GT, Feldman SJ, Mah JK, Hatcher D, Kim MJ, Sohn DS, Palti A, Perel ML, Judy KW, Misch CE, Wang HL. Use of cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: the International Congress of Oral Implantologists consensus report. Implant Dent. 2012 Apr;21(2):78-86. doi: 10.1097/ID.0b013e31824885b5. PMID: 22382748.
Horner K, Islam M, Flygare L, Tsiklakis K, Whaites E. Basic principles for use of dental cone beam computed tomography: consensus guidelines of the European Academy of Dental and Maxillofacial Radiology. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2009 May;38(4):187-95. doi: 10.1259/dmfr/74941012. PMID: 19372107.
Miracle AC, Mukherji SK. Conebeam CT of the head and neck, part 2: clinical applications. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2009 Aug;30(7):1285-92. doi: 10.3174/ajnr.A1654. Epub 2009 May 20. PMID: 19461061; PMCID: PMC7051564.
Van Assche N, van Steenberghe D, Quirynen M, Jacobs R. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism. J Clin Periodontol. 2010 Apr;37(4):398-403. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-051X.2010.01535.x. PMID: 20447264.
Jacobs R, Quirynen M. Dental cone beam computed tomography: justification for use in planning oral implant placement. Periodontol 2000. 2014 Oct;66(1):203-13. doi: 10.1111/prd.12051. PMID: 25123769.
Oenning AC, Jacobs R, Pauwels R, Stratis A, Hedesiu M, Salmon B; DIMITRA Research Group, http://www.dimitra.be. Cone-beam CT in paediatric dentistry: DIMITRA project position statement. Pediatr Radiol. 2018 Mar;48(3):308-316. doi: 10.1007/s00247-017-4012-9. Epub 2017 Nov 15. PMID: 29143199.
Jacobs R, Salmon B, Codari M, Hassan B, Bornstein MM. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health. 2018 May 15;18(1):88. doi: 10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5. PMID: 29764458; PMCID: PMC5952365.
Schwindling FS, Hilgenfeld T, Weber D, Kosinski MA, Rammelsberg P, Tasaka A. In vitro diagnostic accuracy of low-dose CBCT for evaluation of peri-implant bone lesions. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2019 Dec;30(12):1200-1208. doi: 10.1111/clr.13533. Epub 2019 Sep 20. PMID: 31505065.
Aravind BS, Joy ET, Kiran MS, Sherubin JE, Sajesh S, Manchil PR. Attitude and awareness of general dental practitioners toward radiation hazards and safety. J Pharm Bioallied Sci. 2016 Oct;8(Suppl 1):S53-S58. doi: 10.4103/0975-7406.191969. PMID: 27829748; PMCID: PMC5074042.
Tschauner S, Marterer R, Nagy E, Singer G, Riccabona M, Sorantin E. Experiences with image quality and radiation dose of cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) in pediatric extremity trauma. Skeletal Radiol. 2020 Dec;49(12):1939-1949. doi: 10.1007/s00256-020-03506-9. Epub 2020 Jun 14. PMID: 32535775; PMCID: PMC7652807.
Widmann G, Bischel A, Stratis A, Kakar A, Bosmans H, Jacobs R, Gassner EM, Puelacher W, Pauwels R. Ultralow dose dentomaxillofacial CT imaging and iterative reconstruction techniques: variability of Hounsfield units and contrast-to-noise ratio. Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1060):20151055. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20151055. Epub 2016 Jan 21. PMID: 26859336; PMCID: PMC4846222.
Shen L. Implementation of CT Image Segmentation Based on an Image Segmentation Algorithm. Appl Bionics Biomech. 2022 Oct 12;2022:2047537. doi: 10.1155/2022/2047537. Retraction in: Appl Bionics Biomech. 2023 Aug 16;2023:9840516. PMID: 36276585; PMCID: PMC9581628.
Horner K, O'Malley L, Taylor K, Glenny AM. Guidelines for clinical use of CBCT: a review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2015;44(1):20140225. doi: 10.1259/dmfr.20140225. PMID: 25270063; PMCID: PMC4277440.
Fan W, Zhang J, Wang N, Li J, Hu L. The Application of Deep Learning on CBCT in Dentistry. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Jun 14;13(12):2056. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13122056. PMID: 37370951; PMCID: PMC10296994.
Matijaš, Tatjana & Jurić, Barbara. (2023). The role of CBCT in the field of dental implantology. 47. 16-27. 10.55378/rv.47.1.2.
Friedlander-Barenboim S, Hamed W, Zini A, Yarom N, Abramovitz I, Chweidan H, Finkelstein T, Almoznino G. Patterns of Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) Utilization by Various Dental Specialties: A 4-Year Retrospective Analysis from a Dental and Maxillofacial Specialty Center. Healthcare (Basel). 2021 Aug 13;9(8):1042. doi: 10.3390/healthcare9081042. PMID: 34442182; PMCID: PMC8392371.
Jacobs, R., Salmon, B., Codari, M. et al. Cone beam computed tomography in implant dentistry: recommendations for clinical use. BMC Oral Health 18, 88 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12903-018-0523-5.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Zuzanna Popińska, Daniel Ślusarczyk, Bartłomiej Żmuda, Wiktoria Jakubowska, Piotr Pisera, Aleksandra Kiełkowicz, Michał Żuberek, Filip Pactwa
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 310
Number of citations: 0