The influence of pregnant women's physical activity on selected perinatal parameters
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2023.14.01.014Keywords
physical activity, increase in body mass, crotch injuries, labor inductionAbstract
AIM OF THE PAPER: Evaluation of influence of physical activity on selected perinatal parameters.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study included 300 women in physiological pregnancy. The group was divided to physical active and non-physical active women by KAPAS survey which they fill out retrospectively. Both groups were identical in counts. Selected perinatal parameters were monitored such as: increase of body mass, in which week the pregnancy ended, necessity of using induction labor or supply with synthetic oxytocin and crotch injuries. The respondents of both groups fill up the KAPAS questionnaire second time up to 7 days after labor to assess physical activity during pregnancy.
RESULTS: Both groups were homogenic in terms of somatic features. Increase of body mass was statistically significant lover in group of physically active women compare to non-active women. Birth mass of infant was significantly higher in the group of physically non-active women. It was proved that there is significant differences in physical activity during pregnancy between both groups. There were dependency between age and delivery term in physically active women. There were strong relationship between week when the pregnancy ended and necessity of using induction labor in both groups. There were no relationship between supplying with synthetic oxytocin during labor, crotch injuries and physical activity.
CONCLUSION: Physical activity during pregnancy decreased the percentage of labor with inductive delivery and prevents weight gain during pregnancy. Women that were active before pregnancy sustained there physical activity during pregnancy. Women that weren’t active before pregnancy also weren’t active during pregnancy. Physical activity have no relationship with crotch injury or necessity of using synthetic oxytocin during labor.
References
Gacek M, Niektóre zachowania zdrowotne oraz wybrane wskaźniki stanu zdrowia grupy kobiet ciężarnych. Probl Hig Epidemiol 2010; 91 (1): 48-53.
Banaszak-Żak B, Dobrzyń D. Czynniki warunkujące zdrowie kobiety ciężarnej. Ann UMCS .2004; 59 (14): 56 60.
Szumilewicz A, Wojtyła A, Zarębska A i wsp. Influence of prenatal physical activity on the course of labour and delivery according to the new Polish standard for prenatal care. Ann Agric Environ Med 2013; 20 (2): 380-389.
Renault K, Nørgaard K, Secher NJ et al. Physical activity during pregnancy in obese and normal-weight women as assessed by pedometer. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2010; 89 (7): 956-961.
Hegaard HK, Damm P, Hedegaard M et al. Sports and Leisure Time Physical Activity During Pregnancy in Nulliparous Women. Matern Child Health J 2011; 15: 806-813.
Susan J, DE JERSEY, Lynda J et. al. Weight gain and nutritional intake in obese pregnant women: Some clues for intervention. J Hum Nutr Diet 2011; 68: 53–59.
Kiel DW, Dodson Ea, Artal R et al. Gestational weight gain and pregnancy outcomes in obese women: how much is enough? Obstet Gynecol 2007; 110: 752-758.
LaMonte M, Blair S, Church T. Physical activity and diabetes prevention. J Appl Physiol 2005; 99: 1205-1213.
Klein MC, Kaczorowski J, Robbins JM et al. Physicians' beliefs and behaviour during a randomized controlled trial of episiotomy: consequences for women in their care. Can Med Assoc 1995;153:769-779.
Rzewnicki R, Vanden Auweele Y, De Bourdeaudhuij I, Addressing overreporting on the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ) telephone survey with a population sample. Public Health Nutr 2003, (3), 299-305
Paul H. Lee P, H, Macfarlane D, J, Lam T, H, Stewart S, M, Validity of the international physical activity questionnaire short form (IPAQ-SF): A systematic review. ISBNPA 2011, 8, 115-126
Nascimento S, L, Surita F, G, Cecatti J, G, Physical exercise during pregnancy: a systematic review. Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol 2012;24 (6):387-94
Borodulin KM, Evenson KR, Wen F et al. Physical activity patterns during pregnancy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2008; 40:190-1908
Harrison CL, Thompson RG, Teede HJ et al. Measuring physical activity during pregnancy. IJBNPA 2011l 8 (19): 114-130.
Downs DS, Lemasurier GC, Dinallo JM, Baby steps: pedometer-determined and self-reported leisure-time exercise behaviors of pregnant women, J Phys Act Health 2009; 6 (1):63-72.
Hyżyk A, Sokalska N, Ocena zmian masy ciała u kobiet w ciąży. Now Lek 2011, 80 (3), 174-177
Schneider PL, Crouter S, Lukajic O, et al. Accuracy and reliability of 10 pedometers for measuring steps over a 400-m walk. Med Sci Sports Exerc 2003; 35: 1779-1784.
Davies GA, Wolfe LA, Mottola MF, et al. Joint SOGC/CSEP clinical practice guideline: exercise in pregnancy and the post- partum period. Can J Appl Physiol 2003; 28: 330-341.
Kanadys W, M. Leszczyńska-Gorzelak B, Mierzyński R, Oleszczuk L, Kliniczne aspekty otyłości w ciąży. Klin Perinatol Ginekol Poznań 2002, 36, 145-151.
Stadnicka G, Łepecka-Klusek C, Pawłowska-Muc A, Pilewska-Kozak A, Wpływ aktywności fizycznej w okresie ciąży na przebieg porodu = The influence of physical activity during pregnancy on childbirth. J Education Health and Sport 2015;5(9):505-514.
Branecka-Woźniak D, The assessment of anxiety in pregnant women in respect of biological, medical and socio-environmental factors Pom J Life Sci 2015, 61, 4, 433–443.
Króll M, Kaczor P, Grobelny M, Jakie zagadnienia należy poruszyć w edukacji kobiet ciężarnych na temat porodu nieobciążonego patologią? Medycyna Ogólna i Nauki o Zdrowiu, 2014, Tom 20, Nr 3, 245–250.
Gayathri KV, Raddi SA, Metgud MC, Effectiveness of planned teaching program on knowledge and reducing anxiety about labor among primigravidae in selected hospitals of Belgaum, Karnataka. J. South Asian Federation Obstet Gynecol 2010; 2: 163-168.
Andersson L, Sundström-Poromaa I, Wulff M. et al. Implications of antenatal depression and anxiety for obstetric outcome. Obstet Gynecol 2010; 104: 467-476.
Martini J, Knappe S., Beesdo-Baum K. i wsp. (2010) Anxiety disorders before birth and self-perceived distress during pregnancy: Associations with maternal depression and obstetric, neonatal and early childhood outcomes. Early Human Develop. 86: 305-310.
Fridh G, Gaston-Johansson F. (1990) Do primiparas and multiparas have realistic expectations of labor. Acta Obstet. Gynecol. Scand. 69: 103-109.
Vartiainen H, Suonio S, Halonen P. i wsp. (1994) Psychosocial factors, female fertility and pregnancy: a prospective study Part II Pregnancy. J. Psychosom. Obstet. Gynaecol. 15: 77-84.
Ryding E.L, Wijma B, Wijma K. i wsp. (1998) Fear of childbirth during pregnancy may increase the risk of emergency cesarean section. Acta Obstet. Gynecol.Scand. 77: 542-547.
Balaskas J, Poród aktywny: Nowe spojrzenie na naturalny sposób rodzenia. (1997) :36-78.
Ćwiek D, Ocena wpływu edukacji w szkołach rodzenia na przebieg ciąży, porodu
i połogu oraz opiekę nad noworodkiem. Roczniki Pomorskiej Akademii Medycznej
w Szczecinie. Tom LII. Wydawnictwo PAM w Szczecinie: 2006; 1: 83.
Jóźwik M, Adamkiewicz M, Szymanowski P. i wsp. Budowa i czynność dna miednicy
u kobiet. Uaktualniony przegląd z podkreśleniem wpływu porodu drogami natury. Developmental Period Medicine, 2013, XVII, 1 s.18-30.
Opara J, Socha T, Poświata A. Pelvic floor muscle exercise as the best stress urinary incontinence prevention method in women practising competitive sport. 2016;
WHO recommendations on postnatal care of the mother and newborn (2013). World Health Organization.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Anna Wojtyla, Martyna Mączka
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 387
Number of citations: 0