Strategy for the development of digital competence in the national education system of Ukrainian socety
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2018.8.11.087Keywords
digital competence, digital divide, digital equality, the national education system, Ukrainian societyAbstract
The article examines the issue of the strategy for the development of digital competence in the national education system of Ukrainian society under the influence of intensive development of ICT and in the context of practical recommendations provided by UNESCO regarding the structure of ICT competence of teachers. It was determined that there is no uniform policy of ICT education transformation in public institutions of Ukraine and there are no ICT standards - competences of participants in the educational process. The conceptual vision of informatization of the national education system of Ukraine is described, in the context of strengthening the role of digital competences and technologies. A comparative analysis of the large-scale informatization of the global education system, which led to the emergence of new methods and forms of education, was carried out. It is emphasized that the national education system of Ukraine is slowly introducing new methods and forms of education, which leads to a decrease in the competitiveness of Ukrainian education in the globalized educational space, and as a result leads to a decrease in the country's competitiveness in socio-economic and scientific and technical progress as a whole.
References
B. R. Clark. 1998. Creating Entrepreneurial Universities: Organizational Pathways of Transformation. Emerald Group Publishing, Bingley.
A. Gibb, P. Hannonю Towards the entrepreneurial university? Int. J. Entrep. Educ. 2006, 4: 73–110.
M. Guerrero, D. Urbano, A. Fayolle. Entrepreneurial activity and regional competitiveness: evidence from European entrepreneurial universities. J. Technol. Transf. 2016, 41(1): 105–131.
M. Klofsten, D. Jones-Evans. Comparing academic entrepreneurship in Europe-the case of Sweden and Ireland. Small Bus. Econ. 2000, 14(4): 299–309.
J. Röpke. 1998. The entrepreneurial university: innovation, academic knowledge creation and regional development in a globalized economy. In: Working Paper. Philipps-Universität Marburg, Germany.
Verkhovna Rada Ukrainy. Zakonodavstvo Ukrainy [Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. Legislation of Ukraine], 2006. Pro osnovni kompetentsii dlia navchannia protiahom usoho zhyttia. Rekomendatsiia 2006/962/IeS Yevropeiskoho Parlamentu ta Rady (IeS) vid 18 hrudnia 2006 r. [On basic competences for lifelong learning. Recommendation 2006/962 / EC of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU) of 18 December 2006]. (in Ukrainian) [Electronic Resource] — Mode of access: http://zakon3.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/994_975
R. Vuorikari, Y. Punie, Gomez S. Carretero, G. Van den Brande. DigComp 2.0: The Digital Competence Framework for Citizens. Update Phase 1: The Conceptual Reference Model. Luxembourg Publication Office of the European Union. 2016.
UNESCO Thesaurus. [Electronic Resource] — Mode of access: http://skos.um.es/unescothes/C01046
Measuring the Information Society Report 2016, ITU. [Electronic Resource] — Mode of access: https://www.itu.int/en/ITU-D/Statistics/Documents/publications/misr2016/MISR2016-w4.pdf
L. W. Jackman, L. D. Jones. 2002. Information Literacy, Information Communications Technologies (ICT) and the Nongovermental Organization (NGO)/non profit world: as practitioner’s perspective. In Information Literacy Meeting of Experts. Prague, The Czech Republic: UNESCO, the U.S National Commission on Libraries and Information Science, and the National Forum on Information Literacy.
D. Bawden. 2001. Information and digital literacies: a review of concepts. Journal of Documentation, 57(2), 218–259.
D. Bawden. 2008. Origins and concepts of digital literacy. In C. Lankshear & M. Knobel (Eds.), Digital literacies: Concepts, policies and practices. (pp. 17–32). New York, NY: Peter Lang.
D. Bawden, L. Robinson. Promoting literacy in a digital age: approaches to training for information literacy. Learned Publishing. 2002, 15(4): 297–301.
E. E. Gallardo-Echenique, J. Minelli de Oliveira, L. Marqués-Molias,
F. Esteve-Mon. Digital Competence in the Knowledge Society. MERLOT Journal of Online Learning and Teaching. 2015, 11(1): 1–16.
A. Bundy. 2004. Australian and New Zealand information literacy framework: Principles, standards and practice (2nd. ed.). Adelaide: Australian and New Zealand Institute for Information Literacy (ANZIIL).
A. Martin. Essential E-literacy. Connected. 2003, 9: 22–24.
Recommendations Addressed to the United Nations Educational Scientific and Cultural Organization / UNESCO // Education for the Media and the Digital Age. Vienna: UNESCO, 1999, 273–274.
J. M. Pérez-Tornero. 2004. Promoting digital literacy: Understanding digital literacy (Final report. EAC/76/03). Brussels: European Commission.
C. Hague, B. Williamson. 2009. Digital participation, digital literacy and school subjects: A review of the policies, literature and evidence (p. 30). Bristol, UK: Futurelab.
A. Grizzle. 2014. Measuring Media and Information Literacy: Implications for the Sustainable Development Goal. In Singh, J., Grizzle, A., et al (2015). Media and Information Literacy for the Sustainable Development Goals. International Clearinghouse on Children, Youth and Media, NORDICOM, University of Gothenburg, Sweden.
Zvit Gromadckoi radu pri Minicterctvi osvitu i nauki Ykrainu 2016–2018 rik. [Repot Public Council under the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine, 2016–2018 year]. 97p. (in Ukrainian)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2018 Liliya Batyuk, Oksana Zhernovnykova
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 209
Number of citations: 0
