Implications of movement rehabilitation on the quality of life after brainsuses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.10.010Keywords
stroke, quality of life, rehabilitation, quality of life after strokeAbstract
Introduction: Quality of life is a broad term that covers all functional areas of a stroke patient. Quality of life is primarily determined by the consequences of brain damage, but also by other factors such as age, gender, body weight and time since the stroke. Stroke is the leading cause of disability in adults and the third leading cause of death. Because of its effects, it is one of the most serious diseases of the nervous system.
Most frequently affected are people who work in different social roles in their working environment. Worldwide, there are more than 55 million survivors of a stroke, half
of whom have a significant impact on the continued functioning of daily life.
Material and methods : The data show that 100% of respondents have had a stroke, which means they are able to make more accurate statements about rehabilitation problems. Stroke occurred in up to one in 10% of respondents. between one and three years in 15%, between three and five years in 55% of the population studied. Over five years at 20%. The participants are people who have undergone rehabilitation shortly after a stroke and some have it to this day.
Results: According to the respondents in this study, the improvement in social role competence was very strong – 7%, large – 18%, medium – 44%, small – 18%, none – 13%. At the same time, it was found that rehabilitation restored the lost functions of everyday life to the interviewees with a high degree – 60%, average – 27%, low – 13%. Rehabilitation should be an integral part of the treatment in order to adapt to the needs of the patient. In order to achieve a significant improvement, it is important to carry out the therapy systematically and for longer. These measures are taken to restore maximum or full performance, but this is not always possible. Much depends on the age of the patient, the previous and current diseases, the changes after the stroke, and the frequency and duration of rehabilitation. In summary, stroke rehabilitation is very important – it not only protects life and reduces the risk of death, but also guarantees an improvement in the quality of life.
Conclusions: Research results clearly show that rehabilitation after a stroke is very important to restore health and well-being while increasing mobility at the same time. However, respondents differed from each other, which means that it is difficult to fully compare the results. Age, the consequences of a stroke and the time after rehabilitation after a stroke have certainly influenced this.
References
Reddy M.P., Reddy V. 1997. Stroke rehabilitation. Am Fam J; 55: 1743-8.
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke. 2006. Poststroke rehabilitation fact sheet. http://www.ninds.nih.gov/disorders/stroke/poststrokerehab.
Jutai J.W. Teasell R.W. 2003.The necessity and limitations of evidence-based practice in stroke rehabilitation. Top Stroke Rehabil; 10: 71-8.
Turner-Stoke L. Introduction. 1999. Clin Rehabil; Suppl. 1, 13: 3-6.
Chronic impact of traumatic brain injury on outcome and quality of life: a narrative
review Nino Stocchetti1,2 and Elisa R. Zanier.
Bejer A, Kwolek A.: Ocena jakości życia osób starszych po udarze mózgu – doniesienie wstępne. Fizjoterapia, 2008; 16,1:52-63
Kozubski W. Choroby naczyniowe układu nerwowego. W: Kozubski, W, Liberski P, (red). Neurologia. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Lekarskie PZWL; 2006: 424-467.
Nowakowska K, Adamiak G, Jabłkowska K, Lewandowska A, Stetkiewicz A, Borkowska A. Deficyty poznawcze i zaburzenia depresyjne u chorych po udarze mózgu. Post Psychiatr Neurol. 2009;
18(3): 255-262. 3.Baune BT. The Puzzle of Predicting the Impact of Brain Infarcts on Cognitive Impairment in the Aging Brain. Stroke. 2009; 40: 667-66.
Martin S.T., Kessler M., Techniki terapeutyczne w fizjoterapii neurologicznej. Elsevier Urban&Partner Wrocław 2007.
http://www.udarowcy.com.pl/udar-mozgu/statystyki/epidemiologia-udaru mózgu ,
12.2016 r.].
Laidler P., Rehabilitacja po udarze mózgu. PZWL, Warszawa 2004.
Kasprzyk W., Fizjoterapia kliniczna. PZWL, Warszawa 2010.
http://www.active.waw.pl/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Plastycznosc-mozgu wykład
dr-MonikiLiguz_Lecznar.pdf, [06.01.2017r.].
Olszewski J., Fizjoterapia w wybranych dziedzinach medycyny. Kompendium. PZWL, Warszawa 2011.
Borowicz A. M., Jóźwiak A., Kostka J., Kostka T., Wieczorowska-Tobis K., Zasadzka E., Fizjoterapia w geriatrii. PZWL, Warszawa 2011.
Kwolek A., Fizjoterapia w neurologii i neurochirurgii. PZWL, Warszawa 2012.
Adler S. S., Beckers D., Buck M., PNF w praktyce, ilustrowany przewodnik, wyd. 3. DB Pubishing, Warszawa 2009.
Goldstein L.B.: Is there a causal relationship between the amount of alcohol consumption and stroke risk? Stroke. 2006 Jan, 37 (1), 1-2.
Lee C.D., Folsom A.R., Blair S.N.: Physical activity and stroke risk: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2003 Oct, 34 (10), 2475-81.
Song Y.M., Sung J., Davey Smith G. i wsp.: Body mass index and ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke: a prospective study in Korean men. Stroke. 2004 Apr, 35 (4), 831-6.
Babbie E., Badania społeczne w praktyce, Wyd. Naukowe PWN, Warszawa, 2004: 270.
.Buczyński J., Teoria bezpieczeństwa: procedury i metody badawcze, Przegląd Naukowo-Metodyczny. Edukacja dla Bezpieczeństwa nr 2, 2011: 53-63.
Cieślarczyk M., (red.), Metody, techniki i narzędzia badawcze oraz elementy statystyki stosowane w pracach magisterskich i doktorskich, Wyd. AON, Warszawa 2006: 22.
Członkowska A., Niewada M., Ryglewicz D., SarzyńskaDługosz I., Kobayashi A. Ocena zabezpieczenia chorych z udarem mózgu w zakresie dostępności pododdziałów udarowych w Polsce. Neurol. Neurochir. Pol. 2004; 38, 5: 353–360.
Hacke W., Kaste M., Bogusslavsky J. i wsp. Postępowanie w udarze mózgu. Aktualne (2003) zalecenia Europen Stroke Initiative. Medycyna Praktyczna 2003; 11: 75–121.
Jaracz K., Kozubski W. Jakość życia po udarze mózgu. Część I — badanie prospektywne. Udar mózgu. Problemy interdyscyplinarne 2001; 3: 55–62.
.Kwolek A. Rehabilitacja medyczna, Urban & Partner, Wrocław 2003, 10–49.
Kwolek A., Szydełko M., Domka E., Granice przeciwwskazań do rehabilitacji po udarze mózgu, Udar Mózgu 2005, tom 7, nr 1, s. 31–37.
Ryglewicz D., Wiszniewska M., Cichy S., Lechowicz W., Członkowska A. Ischemic strokes are more serve in Poland than in the United States. Neurology 2000; 54: 513–515.
Sienkiewicz P., Metody badań nad bezpieczeństwem i obronnością, Wyd. AON, Warszawa 2010: 31
Żmudzka-Wilczek, E., Bielecki, A., Opara, J., Mehlich K. (2006a). Ocena jakości życia osób po udarze mózgu przy pomocy skali S.A.-SIP 30. Cz. II. Zeszyty Metodyczno-Naukowe AWF Katowice, 20, 85–96.
Żmudzka-Wilczek E., Opara J., Mehlich K. (2006b). Ocena jakości życia osób po udarze mózgu przy pomocy skali S.A.-SIP 30. Cz. I. Zeszyty Metodyczno-Naukowe AWF w Katowicach, 20, 71–84.
Galasińska i in. 2011 Zastosowanie koncepcji PNF w rehabilitacji pacjentów po udarze mózgu, Wydziału Lekarskiego Towarzystwa Przyjaciół Nauk Poznańskiego nr 2 (2011), 126-133.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Piotr Krajewski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 437
Number of citations: 0