How to restore your voice? - rehabilitation methods after laryngectomy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.09.092Keywords
voice rehabilitation, total laryngectomy, speech disordersAbstract
Introduction: The voice is an unique communication tool, characteristic of each person alone. Lacking the ability to communicate through it, can negatively affect mental health. It turns out that voice and speech rehabilitation after surgery is widely used and allows patients to improve their functioning, giving them a chance to live a normal life.
Aim of the study: The purpose of the study was to review the knowledge of voice and speech rehabilitation options for patients after laryngectomy and the results of the methods used. The text is intended to educate professionals and patients who are undergoing surgical treatment and experience concerns about their future functioning.
Materials and Methods: Scientific articles were reviewed using the PubMed database using the keywords: voice rehabilitation; total laryngectomy; speech disorders.
State of the art: Prevalent methods of voice and speech rehabilitation in patients after total laryngectomy include the teaching of esophageal speech, tracheoesophageal speech and the use of an artificial larynx. Of these, esophageal speech appears to be the least effective method. Under certain circumstances, an artificial larynx may be the optimal choice among certain groups of patients. Numerous studies cited prove tracheoesophageal speech to achieve the best results measurable by commonly used indicators.
Summary: Total laryngectomy is not a sentence for patients. Effective rehabilitation significantly improves the quality of life and communication. It is difficult to unequivocally indicate which method of voice and speech rehabilitation is most beneficial for patients - the choice should be tailored to the individual and its preferences and chances. In his work, the specialist should seek a compromise between obtaining the best acoustic results and acceptance of the method by the patient.
References
Kaye R, Tang CG, Sinclair CF. The electrolarynx: voice restoration after total laryngectomy. Med Devices (Auckl). 2017;10:133-140. doi: 10.2147/MDER.S133225. PMID: 28684925; PMCID: PMC5484568. English.
Krishnamurthy A and Khwajamohiuddin S. Analysis of Factors Affecting the Longevity of Voice Prosthesis Following Total Laryngectomy with a Review of Literature. Indian J Surg Oncol. 2018;9(1):39–45. English.
Allegra E, La Mantia I, Bianco MR et al. Verbal performance of total laryngectomized patients rehabilitated with esophageal speech and tracheoesophageal speech: impacts on patient quality of life. Psychol Res Behav Manag. 2019;12:675–681. English.
Arenaz Búa B, Pendleton H, Westin U et al. Voice and swallowing after total laryngectomy. Acta Otolaryngol. 2018;138(2):170-174. doi: 10.1080/00016489.2017.1384056. Epub 2017 Oct 5. PMID: 28978261. English.
Galli A, Giordano L, Biafora M et al. Voice prosthesis rehabilitation after total laryngectomy: are satisfaction and quality of life maintained over time? Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. June 2019;39(3):62–168. English.
Zenga J, Goldsmith T, Bunting G et al. State of the art: Rehabilitation of speech and swallowing after total laryngectomy. Oral Oncol. 2018;86:38-47. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2018.08.023. Epub 2018 Sep 12. PMID: 30409318.
Zagor M, Czarnecka P, Janoska-Jaździk M. Rehabilitacja głosu. Medycyna Praktyczna dla pacjentów; badania i zabiegi. https://www.mp.pl/pacjent/badania_zabiegi/181694,rehabilitacja-glosu [dostęp: 06.09.2022r.]. Polish.
Iype EM, Janardhanan D, Patil S et al. Voice Rehabilitation After Laryngectomy: A Regional Cancer Centre Experience and Review of Literature. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020;72(4):518-523. doi: 10.1007/s12070-019-01707-w. Epub 2019 Jul 25. PMID: 33088785; PMCID: PMC7544801. English.
Van Sluis KE, van der Molen L, van Son RJJH et al. Objective and subjective voice outcomes after total laryngectomy: a systematic review. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2018;275(1):11-26. doi: 10.1007/s00405-017-4790-6. Epub 2017 Oct 31. PMID: 29086803; PMCID: PMC5754416. English.
Staffieri A, Mostafea BE, Varghese BT et al. Cost of tracheoesophageal prostheses in developing countries. Facing the problem from an internal perspective. Acta Otolaryngol. 2006;126(1):4-9. doi: 10.1080/00016480500265935. PMID: 16308247. English.
Souza FGR, Santos IC, Bergmann A et al. Quality of life after total laryngectomy: impact of different vocal rehabilitation methods in a middle income country. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2020;18(1):92. doi: 10.1186/s12955-020-1281-z. PMID: 32245483; PMCID: PMC7126368. English.
Finizia C, Bergman B. Health-related quality of life in patients with laryngeal cancer: a post-treatment comparison of different modes of communication. Laryngoscope. 2001;111(5):918-23. doi: 10.1097/00005537-200105000-00031. PMID: 11359178. English.
Ţiple C, Drugan T, Dinescu FV et al. The impact of vocal rehabilitation on quality of life and voice handicap in patients with total laryngectomy. J Res Med Sci. 2016;21:127. doi: 10.4103/1735-1995.196609. PMID: 28331513; PMCID: PMC5348966. English.
Heaton JT, Robertson M, Griffin C. Development of a wireless electromyographically controlled electrolarynx voice prosthesis. Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2011;2011:5352-5. doi: 10.1109/IEMBS.2011.6091324. PMID: 22255547; PMCID: PMC8981260.
Li S, Enepekides D, Cohen L. Endoscopic Removal of a Displaced Tracheoesophageal Voice Prosthesis. ACG Case Rep J. 2021;8(11):e00708. doi: 10.14309/crj.0000000000000708. PMID: 34815981; PMCID: PMC8604002.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joanna Borowik, Wojciech Brodowski, Katarzyna Basta-Arciszewska, Piotr Pawłowski, Aleksandra Swora, Przemysław Żelazny, Sebastian Bróż, Oliwer Sygacz, Joanna Filipczak, Sara Dankiewicz
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 523
Number of citations: 0