Risk factors and diagnosis of iatrogenic damage of periodontal structures and roots during orthodontic Mini-Implants implantation procedures - a systematic literature review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.08.042Keywords
mini-implant, orthodontic implant, orthodontic anchorage, root damageAbstract
Introduction and purpose
In recent years, Mini-Implants (MI) have gained popularity and new complications have emerged with them. The article assesses the current reports on the scale of the problem, factors and diagnostic possibilities related to iatrogenic injuries of periodontal tissues and roots.
Description of the state of knowledge
The incidence of complications was estimated to be 13.5%. Complications are more common in the mandible and are estimated at 20-27.1%. Periodontal and root damage are an important risk factor for treatment failure. The fact that the implant does not interfere with the alveolus structure gives the treatment effectiveness in 90%, and the contact with the alveolar “lamina dura” is 62.5%. Interference with the root structure is successful in only 31.2%.
Risk factors for failure include: young age, poor hygiene, smoking, area of mandibular molars, contact with the root, thickness of the bone and lack of experience. The implant between the roots is a risk of root trauma, as the location close to the tooth cemento-enamel junction, no preparation for surgery, not using surgical templates, strenuous implantation or implant migration under the influence of orthodontic forces. Radiographs are the gold standard in the diagnosis of complications, but they do not allow for a full assessment of the three-dimensional structures of the implant. A promising method is the evaluation of the torque as the implant is placed in its final location. The patient's subjective feelings are questionable in diagnosis and require further research.
Summary
There are many complications in using MI and the most important of these is damage to the structures of the periodontium and the tooth root. Despite the low failure rate, failure should be prevented by pre-operative evaluation, in-operative monitoring, and post-operative diagnostics.
References
Creekmore TD, Eklund MK. The possibility of skeletal anchorage. J Clin Orthod. 1983 Apr;17(4):266-9. PMID: 6574142.
Kim SH, Yoon HG, Choi YS, Hwang EH, Kook YA, Nelson G. Evaluation of interdental space of the maxillary posterior area for orthodontic mini-implants with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 May;135(5):635-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.06.013. PMID: 19409346.
Kim H, Kim TW. Histologic evaluation of root-surface healing after root contact or approximation during placement of mini-implants. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2011 Jun;139(6):752-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.06.042. PMID: 21640881.
Riad Deglow E, Toledano Gil S, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Bufalá Pérez M, Rodríguez Torres P, Tzironi G, Albaladejo Martínez A, López Román A, Hernández Montero S. Influence of the Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique and Mixed Reality Technology on the Accuracy of the Orthodontic Micro-Screws Placement. An In Vitro Study. J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 27;11(10):964. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100964. PMID: 34683105; PMCID: PMC8539767.
Kuroda S, Yamada K, Deguchi T, Hashimoto T, Kyung HM, Takano-Yamamoto T. Root proximity is a major factor for screw failure in orthodontic anchorage. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4 Suppl):S68-73. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.06.017. PMID: 17448389.
Aly SA, Alyan D, Fayed MS, Alhammadi MS, Mostafa YA. Success rates and factors associated with failure of temporary anchorage devices: A prospective clinical trial. J Investig Clin Dent. 2018 Aug;9(3):e12331. doi: 10.1111/jicd.12331. Epub 2018 Mar 6. PMID: 29512336.
Gintautaitė G, Kenstavičius G, Gaidytė A. Dental roots' and surrounding structures' response after contact with orthodontic mini implants: A systematic literature review. Stomatologija. 2018;20(3):73-81. PMID: 30531161.
Fabbroni G, Aabed S, Mizen K, Starr DG. Transalveolar screws and the incidence of dental damage: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul;33(5):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.014. PMID: 15183406.
Qin YJ, Zhang GD, Zhang Y, Ping YF, Zhao CY. Natural reversal of tooth discoloration and pulpal response to testing following removal of a miniscrew implant for orthodontic anchorage: a case report. Int Endod J. 2016 Apr;49(4):402-9. doi: 10.1111/iej.12459. Epub 2015 May 9. PMID: 25877019.
Lee YK, Kim JW, Baek SH, Kim TW, Chang YI. Root and bone response to the proximity of a mini-implant under orthodontic loading. Angle Orthod. 2010 May;80(3):452-8. doi: 10.2319/070209-369.1. PMID: 20050736; PMCID: PMC8985715.
Rodriguez JC, Suarez F, Chan HL, Padial-Molina M, Wang HL. Implants for orthodontic anchorage: success rates and reasons of failures. Implant Dent. 2014 Apr;23(2):155-61. doi: 10.1097/ID.0000000000000048. PMID: 24614877.
Riad Deglow E, Toledano Gil S, Zubizarreta-Macho Á, Bufalá Pérez M, Rodríguez Torres P, Tzironi G, Albaladejo Martínez A, López Román A, Hernández Montero S. Influence of the Computer-Aided Static Navigation Technique and Mixed Reality Technology on the Accuracy of the Orthodontic Micro-Screws Placement. An In Vitro Study. J Pers Med. 2021 Sep 27;11(10):964. doi: 10.3390/jpm11100964. PMID: 34683105; PMCID: PMC8539767.
Watanabe H, Deguchi T, Hasegawa M, Ito M, Kim S, Takano-Yamamoto T. Orthodontic miniscrew failure rate and root proximity, insertion angle, bone contact length, and bone density. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2013 Feb;16(1):44-55. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12003. Epub 2012 Sep 3. PMID: 23311659.
Kim SH, Kang SM, Choi YS, Kook YA, Chung KR, Huang JC. Cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of mini-implants after placement: Is root proximity a major risk factor for failure? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2010 Sep;138(3):264-76. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2008.07.026. PMID: 20816295.
Wang HN, Liu DX, Wang CL, Lü T, Liu H, Wang HL. [Influence of periodontal ligament injury on initial stability for immediately loaded mini-implant]. Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2009 Apr;27(2):224-6, 236. Chinese. PMID: 19472896.
Min KI, Kim SC, Kang KH, Cho JH, Lee EH, Chang NY, Chae JM. Root proximity and cortical bone thickness effects on the success rate of orthodontic micro-implants using cone beam computed tomography. Angle Orthod. 2012 Nov;82(6):1014-21. doi: 10.2319/091311-593.1. Epub 2012 Mar 14. PMID: 22417652; PMCID: PMC8813147.
Srinivasan S, Tee BC, Wang A, Gohel A, Kim DG, Deguchi T, Sun Z. Reliability and accuracy of assessing temporary anchorage device-tooth root contact with cone-beam computed tomography. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2021 Mar;159(3):271-280. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2020.01.020. Epub 2021 Jan 21. PMID: 33485718.
Gintautaitė G, Gaidytė A. Surgery-related factors affecting the stability of orthodontic mini implants screwed in alveolar process interdental spaces: a systematic literature review. Stomatologija. 2017;19(1):10-18. PMID: 29243679.
Papageorgiou SN, Zogakis IP, Papadopoulos MA. Failure rates and associated risk factors of orthodontic miniscrew implants: a meta-analysis. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012 Nov;142(5):577-595.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2012.05.016. PMID: 23116500.
Renjen R, Maganzini AL, Rohrer MD, Prasad HS, Kraut RA. Root and pulp response after intentional injury from miniscrew placement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009 Nov;136(5):708-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2007.12.031. PMID: 19892289.
Oh SH, Lee SR, Choi JY, Ahn HW, Kim SH, Nelson G. Geometry of anchoring miniscrew in the lateral palate that support a tissue bone borne maxillary expander affects neighboring root damage. Sci Rep. 2021 Oct 6;11(1):19880. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-99442-2. PMID: 34615963; PMCID: PMC8494793.
Qiu LL, Li S, Bai YX. [Preliminary safety and stability assessment of orthodontic miniscrew implantation guided by surgical template based on cone-beam CT images]. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jun;51(6):336-40. Chinese. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.1002-0098.2016.06.004. PMID: 27256526.
Lim G, Kim KD, Park W, Jung BY, Pang NS. Endodontic and surgical treatment of root damage caused by orthodontic miniscrew placement. J Endod. 2013 Aug;39(8):1073-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joen.2013.04.037. Epub 2013 May 29. PMID: 23880281.
Cornelis MA, Tepedino M, Cattaneo PM, Nyssen-Behets C. Root repair after damage due to screw insertion for orthodontic miniplate placement. J Clin Exp Dent. 2019 Dec 1;11(12):e1133-e1138. doi: 10.4317/jced.56472. PMID: 31824593; PMCID: PMC6894909.
Kravitz ND, Kusnoto B. Risks and complications of orthodontic miniscrews. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2007 Apr;131(4 Suppl):S43-51. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2006.04.027. PMID: 17448385.
Liou EJ, Pai BC, Lin JC. Do miniscrews remain stationary under orthodontic forces? Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2004 Jul;126(1):42-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2003.06.018. PMID: 15224057.
Oba MK, Marañón-Vásquez GA, Romano FL, Oliveira-Santos C. Additional intraoral radiographs may change the judgment regarding the final position of orthodontic mini-implants. Dental Press J Orthod. 2018 Mar-Apr;23(2):54-61. doi: 10.1590/2177-6709.23.2.054-061.oar. PMID: 29898158; PMCID: PMC6018447.
Meursinge Reynders R, Ladu L, Ronchi L, Di Girolamo N, de Lange J, Roberts N, Plüddemann A. Insertion torque recordings for the diagnosis of contact between orthodontic mini-implants and dental roots: a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 31;5:50. doi: 10.1186/s13643-016-0227-3. PMID: 27036120; PMCID: PMC4818448.
McEwan, Michael B. Evaluation of insertion torque of orthodontic miniscrew implants in relation to tooth root contact. Saint Louis University ProQuest Dissertations Publishing, 2012. 1505761.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Hubert Nieścior, Dominika Sereda, Aleksandra Metelska, Jakub Metelski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 355
Number of citations: 0