Labor anesthesia - the current state of knowledge
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2022.12.03.016Keywords
labor analgesia, recent reportsAbstract
Labor anesthesia has a long history from the era of ether and chloroform in the mid-nineteenth century to the present day - methods of a comprehensive approach to the treatment of labor pain using evidence-based medicine (EBM). The latest techniques of regional analgesia include low-dose epidural analgesia to allow patients to walk and patient-controlled infusion of anesthetic into the OA space, advances in pharmacotherapy have allowed the use of remifentanil for patient-controlled intravenous analgesia (PCA), new local anesthetics and adjuvants for analgesia have emerged epidural such as Ropivacaine, Levobupivacaine, Sufentanil, Clonidine, Neostigmine. The use of nitrous oxide in a mixture with oxygen and inhaled anesthetics in the form of personal vaporizers with methoxyflurane (Penthrox) seems to be a promising method of relieving labor pains. Technological advances, such as the use of ultrasound to locate the epidural space in difficult cases, minimize unsuccessful epidural anesthesia. The introduction of novel drug delivery methods such as Patient Controlled Epidural (PCEA) pumps improved the overall rate of maternal satisfaction and made it possible to tailor an appropriate analgesic regimen for each woman giving birth. Recent randomized trials and Cochrane analyzes have shown that the association of epidural anesthesia with increased rates of cesarean delivery and long-term back pain remains a myth. Studies have also shown that newer, low-dose analgesia regimens do not have a statistically significant effect on the duration of labor and the onset of breastfeeding, and that they reduce the percentage of instrumental births, thus improving maternal and fetal safety.
References
Chestnut DH. Labor Epidural Analgesia and Breastfeeding. Anesthesiology. 2017 Oct;127(4):593-595. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001794. PMID: 28926438.
Smith A, Laflamme E, Komanecky C. Pain Management in Labor. Am Fam Physician. 2021 Mar 15;103(6):355-364. PMID: 33719377.
H. Elsharkawy, A. Sonny, K.J. Chin Localization of epidural space: a review of available technologies J AnaesthesiolClinPharmacol, 33 (2017), pp. 16-27, 10.4103/0970-9185.202184
Lieberman BA, Rosenblatt DB, Belsey E, Packer M, Redshaw M, Mills M, et al. The effects of maternallyadministeredpethidineorepiduralbupivacaine on the fetus and newborn. B J ObstetGynaecol 1979;86:598–606;
Koehntop DE, Rodman JH, Brundage DM, Hegland MG, Buckley JJ. Pharmacokinetics of fentanyl in neonates. AnesthAnalg 1986;65 227–232;
Kuhnert BR, Kuhnert PM, Philipson EH, Syracuse CD. Disposition of meperidine and normeperidinefollowingmultipledoses in labor. II. Fetus and neonate. Am J ObstetGynecol 1985;151:410–415;
Nicolle E, Devillier P, Delanoy B, Durand C, Bessard G. Therapeutic monitoring of nalbuphine: transplacental transfer and estimatedpharmacokinetics in the neonate. Eur J ClinPharmacol 1996;49:485–489;
Chay PC, Duffy BJ, Walker JS. Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamicrelationships of morphine in neonates. ClinPharmacolTher 1992;51:334–342;
Lynn AM, Slattery JT. Morphinepharmacokinetics in earlyinfancy. Anesthesiology 1987;66:136–13
Vallejo MC, Zakowski MI. Pro-Con Debate: Nitrous Oxide for Labor Analgesia. Biomed Res Int. 2019 Aug 20;2019:4618798. doi: 10.1155/2019/4618798. PMID: 31531352; PMCID: PMC6720045.
Porter KM, Dayan AD, Dickerson S, Middleton PM. The role of inhaled methoxyflurane in acute pain management. Open Access Emerg Med. 2018 Oct 18;10:149-164. doi: 10.2147/OAEM.S181222. PMID: 30410414; PMCID: PMC6200081.
P. Sultan, C. Murphy, S. Halpern, B. Carvalho The effect of low concentrations versus high concentrations of local anesthetics for labour analgesia on obstetric and anesthetic outcomes: a meta-analysis Can J Anaesth, 60 (2013), pp. 840-854, 10.1007/s12630-013-9981-z
Traynor A.J., Aragon M., Ghosh D., Choi R.S., Dingmann C., Tran Z.V., et al. Obstetric anesthesia workforce survey: a 30-year update AnesthAnalg, 122 (2016), pp. 1939-1946, 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001204
Simmons S.W., Taghizadeh N., Dennis A.T., Hughes D., Cyna A.M. Combined spinal-epidural versus epidural analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database SystRev, 10 (2012), p. CD003401, 10.1002/14651858.CD003401.pub3
Collis R.E., Davies D.W.L., Aveling W. Randomisedcomparison of combinedspinal-epidural and standard epiduralanalgesia in labour Lancet, 345 (1995), pp. 1413-1416, 10.1016/S0140-6736(95)92602-X
Van de Velde M., Teunkens A., Hanssens M., Vandermeersch E., Verhaeghe J. Intrathecal sufentanil and fetalheartrateabnormalities: a double-blind, double placebo-controlledtrialcomparingtwoforms of combinedspinalepiduralanalgesia with epiduralanalgesia in labor AnesthAnalg, 98 (2004), pp. 1153-1159
Cappiello E., O'Rourke N., Segal S., Tsen L.C. A randomizedtrial of dural punctureepiduraltechniquecompared with the standard epiduraltechnique for laboranalgesiaAnesthAnalg, 107 (2008), pp. 1646-1651, 10.1213/ane.0b013e318184ec14
Sng B.L., Sia A.T.H. Maintenance of epidural labour analgesia: the old, the new and the future Best Pract Res ClinAnaesthesiol, 31 (2017), pp. 15-22, 10.1016/j.bpa.2017.01.002
WHO recommendations Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience World Health Organization, Geneva (2018)
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Jacek Janowski
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 1910
Number of citations: 0