The Use of Compression Sonoelastography in Multiparametric Ultrasound Examination in Cases of Benign Ovarian Formations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/JEHS.2021.11.10.021Keywords
benign ovarian formations, compression sonoelastography, ultrasound examinationAbstract
Properly diagnosed benign ovarian formations are a condition for appropriate treatment choice. Qualitative assessment of signs detected by multiparametric ultrasound, including compression elastography, is highly effective in the differential diagnosis of benign ovarian formations. Our study became especially relevant for women in the reproductive period since the correct diagnosis influenced the choice of surgical treatment in order to preserve the ovarian reserve. The detailed sonographic aspect of these formations in B-mode, Doppler mode and compression sonoelastography mode is analyzed in the article. Color Flow Mapping, power Doppler and pulsed wave Doppler were used to study blood vessels. Pulsed wave Doppler characterized blood flow quantitatively. Color Flow Mapping was used to determine vessels localization, and power Doppler was used to provide a detailed qualitative assessment of blood flow loci. Elastotype according to the Ueno scale as a qualitative feature and Strain Ratio (coefficient of deformation) as a quantitative indicator were determined for all types of benign ovarian formations. Serous and mucinous cystadenomas were found to belong to elastotypes 0 and I according to the Ueno scale, the papillary component of serous superficial papillomas was mapped as elastotype I and II, fibroids predominantly belonged to elastotype II and III, mature teratoma appertained to elastotypes IV and V. Quantitative coefficient of deformation for all benign ovarian formations ranged from 0.63 to 24.9. According to our results, ultrasound examination of ovarian formations is an accurate and highly informative method for stratification of risks in accordance with the O-RADS classification.
References
Ionescu CA, Matei A, Navolan D, Dimitriu M, Bohaltea R, Neacsu A, Ilinca C, Ples L. Correlation of ultrasound features and the Risk of Ovarian Malignancy Algorithm score for different histopathological subtypes of benign adnexal masses. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug; 97(31):11762. https://doi:10.1097/MD.0000000000011762 PMID: 30075600; PMCID: PMC6081138.
Mathieu KB, Bedi DG, Thrower SL, Qayyum A, Bast RC. Screening for ovarian cancer: imaging challenges and opportunities for improvement. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2018; 51(3): 293–303.
Egunova MA, Kutsenko IG. Differential diagnosis of benign and malignant neoplasms of the ovaries (history of the issue). Journal of Obstetrics and Women's Diseases.2016. T. 65. No. 6. S. 68-78. https://doi:10.17816/JOWD65668-78
Choi JI, Park SB, Han BH, Kim YH, Lee YH, Park HJ, et al. . Imaging features of complex solid and multicystic ovarian lesions: proposed algorithm for differential diagnosis. Clin Imaging. 2016; 40: 46–56. https://doi:10.1016/j.clinimag.2015.06.008 [PubMed] [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
Chekalova MA, Borisova MI. Experience of using compression elastography and contrast-enhanced ultrasound examination in differential diagnosis of primary and metastatic ovarian tumors in patients with uterine cancer. Tumors of the female reproductive system. 2019; 15 (3): 14-23. https://doi.org/10.17650/1994-4098-2019-15-3-14-23
Lavrik G, Golovko T, Shevchuk L, Bakai O. Possibility of exchange methods in diagnostics of malignant egg fluff. Clinical Oncology. 2019; T 9, No. 1 (33): 34-41.
Gazhonova VE. A new system for the standard of ultrasound examination of ovarian formations for predicting the risk of tumor malignancy. Obstetrics and gynecology. 2020; 10: 28-40 https://dx.doi.org/10.18565/aig.2020.10.28-40
Glanc P, Benacerraf B, Bourne T, Brown D, Coleman BG, Crum C et al. First international consensus reporton adnexal masses management recommendations. J. Ultrasound Med. 2017; 36(5): 849-63. https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jum.14197
American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists’ Committee on Practice Bulletins-Gynecology. Practice Bulletin No. 174 Summary: evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016; 128(5): 1193-5. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AOG.0000000000001763
Jacobs IJ, Menon U, Ryan A, Gentry-Maharaj A, Burnell M, Kalsi JK et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer sreening (UKCTOCS): a randomized controlled trial. Obstet.Gynecol.Surv.2016;71(6):346. https://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.ogx.0000483045.61136.eb.
Khalmukhamedova AE. Optimization of the algorithm for diagnosing ovarian tumors using ultrasound elastography. Kremlin medicine. 2017; 3: 52-63.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2021 Iryna Stasiv
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The periodical offers access to content in the Open Access system under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 416
Number of citations: 0