Militaryzm – ujęcie teoretyczne
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2018.021Keywords
militaryzm, ideologia, wyścig zbrojeńAbstract
While an increasing number of researchers develop an interest in security studies, the problem of militarism is systematically overlooked in scientific publications. In the Polish discourse, this phenomenon is most often identified with ideology or the military build-ups. However, these are not the only existing theoretical approaches of the militarism phenomenon. This article aims to fill a certain gap in theoretical considerations on this subject and to present the most important theoretical perspectives of militarism and also its typology. The main research problem is to find an answer to the question: how is militarism understood today?References
Bäcker, R. (2010). Autorytaryzm. Historia i Polityka, 2/3 (s. 21–25). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2010.002.
Burak, B. (2011). The Anatomy of Militarism and an Overview of Civil-Military Relations. Pobrane z: https://thegwpost.com/2011/10/20/the-anatomy-of-militarism-and-an-overview-of-civil-military-relations/.
Chalmers, J. (2004). The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.
Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research. (2016). Conflict Barometer. Heidelberg: HIIK.
Klare, M. (1978). Militarism: The Issues Today. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 9(2), 121–128.
Mabee, B., Vucetic, S. (2017). Varieties of Militarism: Towards a Typology. Pobrane z: osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/ezdqr.
Mann, M. (1996). Authoritarian and Liberal Militarism: A Contribution from Comparative and Historical Sociology. W: S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski (red.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (s. 221–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mann, M. (2003). Incoherent Empire. London: Verso.
Mutschler, M.M. (2017). Global Militarization Index 2017. Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion.
Olszanecka, N. (2018). Armia jako grupa interesu, problem stosunków cywilno-wojskowych. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 57, 170–181. DOI: 10.15804/athena.2018.57.10.
Shaw, M. (2011). Twenty-First Century Militarism: A Historical-Sociological Framework. Pobrane z: https://historicalsociology.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/shaw-twenty-first-century-militarism-a-historical-sociological-framework.pdf.
SIPRI. (2016). Military Expenditure by Region in Constant US Dollars, 1988–1996. Pobrane z: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Milex-regional-totals.pdf.
Skopin, W. (1959). Militaryzm. Warszawa: Wyd. MON.
Stavrianakis, A., Selby, J. (red.). (2013). Militarism and International Relations: Political Economy, Security and Theory. London: Routledge.
Tanter, R. (1991). Intelligence Agencies and Third World Militarization: A Case Study of Indonesia, 1966–1989, with Special Reference to South Korea, 1961–1989. Pobrane z: http://nautilus.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Revised-opening-3.pdf.
Vagts, A. (1937). A History of Militarism: Romance and Reality of a Profession. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
Wittner, L. (2016). Militarism Run Amok: Russians and Americans Get Their Kids Ready for War. Pobrane z: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-wittner/militarism-run-amok-russians-and-americans-get-their-kids-ready-for-war_b_8062364.html.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Nicolaus Copernicus University fully respects the right to privacy and protection of personal data of all authors. The authors’ personal data is not used for commercial and/or marketing purposes.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 759
Number of citations: 0
