Neo-militant Democracy and (Un)fulfilled Destination of Consolidated Democracies? The Inner Six in Comparative Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2022.010Keywords
neo-militant democracy, European Union, Inner Six, anti-democratic legal measures, civic freedoms, political rightsAbstract
Drawing upon the methods of qualitative source analysis and process tracing, the study addresses the following research questions: How was the national legislation of consolidated democracies positioned to neo-militant democracy measures during the recovery from the great financial crisis (2007–2009)? To what extent was democracy prone to authoritarian abuse depending on a neo-militant democracy rule implementation? It advances arguments to reject Carlo Invernizzi Accetti’s and Ian Zuckerman’s hypothesis that if the freedom of political actors is restricted through militant democracy measures, democracy becomes more prone to authoritarian abuse in the long run. In the founding states of the EU, neo-militant democracy measures functioned in the legal structures long before the outbreak of the great financial crisis, during the crisis (2007–2009), and in the period of recovery. The states restricted democratic freedoms of speech, the press, association, and assembly. Belgium, Luxembourg, and Germany also limited organization in political parties. Moreover, during the recovery from the crisis, that is, a period of particular vulnerability of democracy to authoritarian abuse, the lists of relevant precautions were extended in France, Italy, and Germany. In these states, strengthening neo-militant democracy measures was neither a factor undermining democracy nor making it prone to drift towards a hybrid or authoritarian regime.
References
Chen, K.W. (2021). Dealing with Disinformation from the Perspective of Militant Democracy: A Case Study of Taiwan’s Struggle to Regulate Disinformation. In: Ch. Sieber-Gasser, & A. Ghibellini (eds.). Democracy and Globalization: Legal and Political Analysis on the Eve of the 4th Industrial Revolution (pp. 125–147). Cham: Springer.
Engler, S., Brunner, P., Loviat, R., Abou-Chadi, T., Leemann, L., Glaser, A., & Kübler, D. (2021). Democracy in Times of the Pandemic: Explaining the Variation of COVID-19 Policies across European Democracies. West European Politics, 44(5–6), 1077–1102. DOI: 10.1080/01402382.2021.1900669.
Erdmann, G. (2011). Decline of Democracy: Loss of Quality, Hybridisation and Breakdown of Democracy. In: G. Erdmann, & M. Kneuer (eds.). Regression of Democracy? (pp. 21–58). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.
Freedom in the World (2009). The Annual Survey of Political Rights & Civil Liberties. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_2009_complete_book.pdf.
Freedom in the World (2010). The Annual Survey of Political Rights & Civil Liberties. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-03/FIW_2010_Complete_Book_Scan.pdf.
Freedom in the World (2011). The Annual Survey of Political Rights & Civil Liberties. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_2011_complete_book.pdf.
Freedom in the World (2012). The Annual Survey of Political Rights & Civil Liberties. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/2020-02/Freedom_in_the_World_2012_complete_book.pdf.
Freedom in the World (2013). Democratic Breakthroughs in the Balance: Selected Data from Freedom House’s Annual Survey of Political Rights and Civil Liberties. Retrieved from: https://www.freedomhouse.org/sites/default/files/FIW%202013%20Booklet.pdf.
Freedom in the World (2017). France. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/france/freedom-world/2017.
Freedom in the World (2018). France. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/france/freedom-world/2018.
Freedom in the World (2019). France. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/country/france/freedom-world/2019.
Freedom in the World (2021). Aggregate Category and Subcategory Scores, 2003–2021. Retrieved from: https://freedomhouse.org/report/freedom-world/2021/democracy-under-siege/countries-and-regions.
Horder, J. (2021). Online Free Speech and the Suppression of False Political Claims. ILSA Journal of International and Comparative Law, 8(1), 15–52. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3827192.
Invernizzi Accetti, C., & Zuckerman, I. (2017). What’s Wrong with Militant Democracy? Political Studies, 65(1_suppl), 182–199. DOI: 10.1177/0032321715614849.
Invernizzi Accetti, C., & Zuckerman, I. (2019). Militant Democracy as Decisionist Liberalism. In: D. Bessner, & N. Guilhot (eds.). The Decisionist Imagination: Sovereignty, Social Science and Democracy in the 20th Century (pp. 64–84). New York: Berghahn Books.
Kirshner, A.S. (2014). A Theory of Militant Democracy: The Ethics of Combatting Political Extremism. New Haven, London: Yale University Press.
Kreuder-Sonnen, C. (2018). An Authoritarian Turn in Europe and European Studies? Journal of European Public Policy, 25(3), 452–464. DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1411383.
Loewenstein, K. (1937). Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, I. The American Political Science Review, 31(3), 417–432. DOI: 10.2307/1948164.
Malkopoulou, A. (2021). Greece: A Procedural Defence of Democracy against the Golden Dawn. European Constitutional Law Review, 17(2), 177–201. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019621000146.
Morlino, L., & Quaranta, M. (2016). What is the Impact of the Economic Crisis on Democracy? Evidence from Europe. International Political Science Review, 37(5), 618–633. DOI: 10.1177/0192512116639747.
Müller, J.W. (2016). Protecting Popular Self-Government from the People? New Normative Perspectives on Militant Democracy. Annual Review of Political Science, 19, 249–265. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-polisci-043014-124054.
Pech, L. (2010). ‘A Union Founded on the Rule of Law’: Meaning and Reality of the Rule of Law as a Constitutional Principle of EU Law. European Constitutional Law Review, 6(3), 359–396. DOI: 10.1017/S1574019610300034.
Rak, J., & Bäcker, R. (eds.) (2022). Neo-militant Democracies in the Post-communist Member States of the European Union. London, New York: Routledge.
Tomini, L., & Wagemann, C. (2018). Varieties of Contemporary Democratic Breakdown and Regression: A Comparative Analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 57(3), 687–716. DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.12244.
Tyulkina, S. (2015). Militant Democracy: Undemocratic Political Parties and Beyond. Abingdon, New York: Routledge.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Joanna Rak
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-nd/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Nicolaus Copernicus University fully respects the right to privacy and protection of personal data of all authors. The authors’ personal data is not used for commercial and/or marketing purposes.Stats
Number of views and downloads: 381
Number of citations: 0