Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Employment protection legislation and macroeconomic outcomes: channels of influence
  • Home
  • /
  • Employment protection legislation and macroeconomic outcomes: channels of influence
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026) /
  4. Articles

Employment protection legislation and macroeconomic outcomes: channels of influence

Authors

  • Marta Sordyl Krakow University of Economics https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8771-2988

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2026.1

Keywords

employment protection legislation, labour market dynamics, economic efficiency, social welfare

Abstract

Motivation: Employment protection legislation (EPL) plays an important role in shaping macroeconomic performance, yet its impact remains contested. Traditional analyses have focused on labour demand effects, but recent economic transformations call for a broader perspective. Globalization, technological change, and new labour market dynamics suggest that EPL may influence not only hiring and firing decisions but also productivity, innovation, income distribution and social welfare. Understanding these diverse channels is essential, as EPL can create opportunities while also generating rigidities that affect growth.
Aim: This paper systematically examines the transmission channels through which EPL affects macroeconomic outcomes. It proposes a hierarchical framework in which the effects onlabour demand are supplemented by EPL’s impact on productivity and resource allocation; labour supply and economic activity; well-being and social welfare. The study investigates how these channels shape key outcomes such as employment, unemployment, income structures, aggregate demand, total factor productivity, and social inequalities. The analysis relies on mixed-method approach, combining a comprehensive review of literature with an empirical assessment of relationships between EPL and economic performance.
Results: The findings confirm that labour demand is the dominant channel of EPL influence, but productivity, labour supply, and efficiency effects are also important in determining macroeconomic and social outcomes. EPL influences economic performance not only by regulating job security but also by shaping incentives for innovation, organizational change, and resources use. By integrating these wider mechanisms, the study provides a more comprehensive understanding of EPL’s role in the economy. It contributes to policy debates by highlighting that EPL should be assessed not solely in terms of labour market flexibility, but also with regard to its broader implications for efficiency, equity, and welfare.

References

Acemoglu, D. (2003). Cross-country inequality trends. The Economic Journal, 113(February), pp. 121-149. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00100

Adams, Z., Bishop, L., Deakin, S., Fenwick, C., Martinsson Garzelli, S., & Rusconi, G. (2018). Protection and different forms of employment: analysis of a panel of 117 countries, 1990-2013. ECGI Working Paper Series in Law: Working Paper No. 406/2018. doi:10.1111/ilr.12128

Addison, J., & Teixeira, P. (2001). The economics of employment protection. IZA Discussion Papers(381).

Agell, J. (1999). On the benefits from rigid labour markets: norms, market failures, and social insurance. The Economic Journal, 109(February), pp. F143-F164.

Agell, J. (2002). On the determinants of labour market institutions: rent seeking vs. social insurance. German Economic Review, 3(2), pp. 107-135. doi:10.1111/1468-0475.00054

Aleksynska, M., & Eberlein, F. (2016). Coverage of employment protection legislation (EPL). ILO, Geneva: Conditions of Work and Employment Series, no. 80.

Arestis, P., Ferreiro, J., & Gomez, C. (2020b). Quality of employment and employment protection. Effects of employment protection on temporary and permanent employment. No. 48/2020: ASTRIL Working Paper. doi:10.1016/j.strueco.2020.02.008

Arestis, P., Ferreiro, J., & Gomez, C. (2023). Does employment protection legislation affect employment and unemployment? Economic Modelling, 126, pp. 1-13. doi:doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106437

Arestis, P., Ferreiro, J., & Gómez, C. (2020a). Employment protection legislation and labour income shares in Europe. PANOECONOMICUS, 67(3), pp. 291-308. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2298/PAN2003291A

Arestis, P., Ferreiro, J., & Gómez, C. (2021). Labour market flexibilization and income distribution in Europe. Paneconomicus, 68(2), pp. 167-185. doi:10.2298/PAN2102167A

Auer, P., Berg, J., & Coulibaly, I. (2004). Is a stable workforce good for the economy? Insights into the tenure-productivity-employment relationship. International Labour Review, 144(3).

Autor, D., Kerr, W., & Kugler, A. (2007). Do employment protections reduce productivity? Evidence from the U.S. states. NBER Working Paper(12860). doi:10.3386/w12860

Avdagic, S. (2015). Does deregulation work? Reassessing the unemployment effects of employment protection. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 53(1), pp. 6-26. doi:10.1111/bjir.12086

Bartling, B., Fehr, E., & Schmidt, K. (2013). Use and abuse of authority: a behavioral foundation of the employment relation. Journal of the European Economic Association, 11(4), pp. 711-742.

Belloc, F. (2019). Institutional complementarities between labor laws and innovation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 15(2), pp. 235-258. doi:10.1017/S1744137418000139

Belot, M., Boone, J., & Van Ours, J. (2007). Welfare-improving employment protection. Economica, 74(295), pp. 381-396.

Bentolila, S., & Saint-Paul, G. (2003). Explaining movements in the labor share. Contributions in Macroeconomics, 3(1). doi:10.2202/1534-6005.1103

Bertola, G. (1992). Labor turnover costs and average labor demand. Journal of Labor Economics, 10(4).

Bertola, G. (2009). Labour market regulation: motives, measures, effects. Conditions of Work and Employment Series(21).

Bertoni, M., Chinet, S., & Nistico, R. (2023). Employment Protection, Job Insecurity, and Job Mobility. IZA Discussion Paper(16647).

Betcherman, G. (2015). Labor Market Regulation: What do we know about their Impacts in Developing Countries? The World Bank Research Observer, 30(1), pp. 124-153.

Betcherman, G. (2019). Designing labor market regulations in developing countries. IZA World of Labor, 57(2).

Blanchard, O., & Wolfers, J. (2000). The role of shocks and institutions in the rise of European unemployment: the aggregate evidence. The Economic Journal, 110(March), pp. C1-C33.

Blau, F., & Kahn, L. (1999). Institutions and laws in the labor market. In O. Ashenfelter, & D. Card, Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. 3). Elsevier Science B.V.

Boeri, T. (2011). Institutional reforms and dualism in European labor markets. In O. Ashenfelter, & D. Card, Handbook of Labor Economics (Vol. IV). Amsterdam: North Holland.

Boeri, T., Cahuc, P., & Zylberberg, A. (2015). The costs of flexibility-enhancing structural reforms: a literature review. OECD Economics Department Working Papers: No. 1264.

Cacciatore, M., & Fiori, G. (2016). The macroeconomic effects of goods and labor market deregulation. Review of Economic Dynamics, 20(1), pp. 1-24. doi:10.1016/j.red.2015.10.002

Calderón, C., Chong, A., & León, G. (2007). Institutional enforcement, labor-market rigidities, and economic performance. Emerging Markets Review, 8(1), pp. 38-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ememar.2006.11.001

Carmichael, L. (1989). Self-enforcing contracts, shirking, and life cycle incentives. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 3(4), pp. 65-83. doi:10.1257/jep.3.4.65

Ciminelli, G., Duval, R., & Furceri, D. (2018). Employment protection deregulation and labor shares in advanced economies. IMF Working Paper: WP/18/186.

Clark, A., & Postel-Vinay, F. (2005). Job Security and Job Protection. CEPR Discussion Paper Series(4927).

Clark, A., D'Ambrosio, C., & Lepinteur, A. (2022). Job insecurity, savings and consumption: an Italian experiment. Paper prepared for the 37th IARIW General Conference: https://iariw.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/08/Lepinteur-et-al-IARIW-2022.pdf.

De Paola, M., Nisticò, R., & Scoppa, V. (2021). Fertility decisions and employment protection: the unintended consequences of the Italian Jobs Act. CSEF Working Paper(596). Retrieved from https://www.csef.it/WP/wp596.pdf

De Stefano, V. (2014). A tale of oversimplification and deregulation: the mainstream approach to labour market segmentation and recent responses to the crisis in European countries. Industrial Law Journal, 43(3), pp. 253-285. doi:doi:10.1093/indlaw/dwu014

Deakin, S., Lele, P., & Siems, M. (2007). The evolution of labour law: calibrating and comparing regulatory regimes. International Labour Review, 146(3-4), pp. 133-162. doi:10.1111/j.1564-913X.2007.00011.x

Deakin, S., Malmberg, J., & Sakar, P. (2014). How do labour laws affect unemployment and the labour share of national income? The experience of six OECD countries, 1970-2010. International Labour Review, 153(1), pp. 1-27. doi:doi.org/10.1111/j.1564-913X.2014.00195.x

Dixon, J., Fullerton, A., & Robertson, D. (2013). Cross-national differences in workers' perceived job, labour market, and employment insecurity in Europe: empirical tests and theoretical extensions. European Sociological Review, 29(5), pp. 1053-1067. doi:10.1093/esr/jcs

Duval, R., & Loungani, P. (2019). Designing labor market institutions in emerging makret and developing economies: evidence and policy options. IMF Staff Discussion Note SDN/19/04.

Duval, R., Furceri, D., & Jalles, J. (2017). Job protection deregulation in good and bad times. IMF Working Paper(WP/17/277).

Eichhorst, W., & Marx, P. (2019). How stable is labour makret dualism? Reforms of employment protection in nine European countries. IZA DP No. 12309.

Feldmann, H. (2003). Labor Market Regulation and Labor Market Performance: Evidence Based on Surveys among Senion Business Executives. Kyklos, 56(4), pp. 509-540.

Ferreiro, J., & Gómez, C. (2020). Employment protection and labor market results in Europe. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 30, pp. 401–449. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00656-5

Freeman, R. (2007). Labor Market Institutions Around the World. NBER Working Paper Series(13242).

Giesecke, J., & Gross, M. (2004). External labour market flexibility and social inequality: temporary employment in Germany and the UK. European Societies, 6(3), pp. 347–382. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/1461669042000231456

Hamermesh, D., & Pfann, G. (1996). Adjustment cost in factor demand. Journal of Economic Literature, 34(3), pp. 1264-1292.

Heimberger, P. (2021). Does Employment Protection Affect Unemployment? A Meta-analysis. Oxford Economic Papers, 73(3), pp. 982-1007. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/oep/gpaa037

Holmlund, B. (2013). What do Labor Market Institutions Do? Working Paper 2013:23: Uppsala University.

Howell, D., Baker, D., Glyn, A., & Schmitt, J. (2007). Are Protective Labor Market Institutions at the Root of Unemployment? A Critical Review of the Evidence. Capitalism and Society, 2(1). doi:10.2202/1932-0213.1022

Inanc, H., & Kalleberg, A. (2022). Institutions, Labor Market Insecurity, and Well-Being in Europe. Social Sciences, 11(6). doi:https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci11060245

Jackman, R., Layard, R., & Nickell, S. (1996, March). Combating Unemployment: Is Flexibility Enough? CEPR Discussion Paper(293).

Kalleberg, A., & Vallas, S. (2018). Probing precarious work: thoery, research, and politics. Research in the Sociology of Work, 31, pp. 1-30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1108/S0277-283320170000031017

Kaufman, B. (1997). Labor Markets and Employment Regulation: The View of the "Old" Institutionalists. In B. Kaufman, Government Regulation of the Employment Relationship (pp. 11-56). Madison: University of Wisconsin.

Kuddo, A. (2018). Labor Regulations throughout the World: An Overview. World Bank Document. Retrieved from https://documents1.worldbank.org/curated/ar/221471546254761057/pdf/Labor-Regulations-Throughout-the-World.pdf

Ljungqvist, L. (2002). How do lay-off costs affect employment? The Economic Journal, 112(October), pp. 829-853.

Lustig, N., & McLeod, D. (1997). Minimum Wages and Poverty in Developing Countries: Some Evidence. In S. Edwards, & N. Lustig, Labor Markets in Latin America. Washington, DC.: Brookings Institution.

Martin, J., & Scarpetta, S. (2012). Setting It Right: Employment Protection, Labor Reallocation and Productivity. De Economist, 160(2), pp. 89-116.

Martinez-Matute, M., & Urtasun, A. (2022). Uncertainty and Firms' Labour Decisions. Evidence from European Countries. Journal of Applied Economics, 25(1), pp. 220-241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15140326.2021.2007724

McMillan, M., & Rodrik, D. (2011). Globalization, Structural Change and Productivity Growth. NBER Working Paper(17143). doi:10.3386/w17143

Mistrulli, P., Oliviero, T., Rotondi, Z., & Zazzaro, A. (2023). Job Protection and Mortgage Conditions: Evidence from Italian Administrative Data. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 85(6), pp. 1211-1237. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12558

Myant, M., & Brandhuber, L. (2017). Uses and abuses of the OECD's Employment Protection Legislation Index in research and EU policy making. In A. Piasna, & M. Myant, Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labor market segmentation (pp. 23-42). Brussels: ETUI.

Nickell, S., Nunziata, L., & Ochel, W. (2005). Unemployment in the OECD Since the 1960s. What Do We Know? The Economic Journal, 115(500), pp. 1-27.

OECD. (1994). OECD Jobs Study. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2004). Employment Outlook 2004. Paris: Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development.

OECD. (2006). Employment Outlook: Boosting Jobs and Incomes. Paris: OECD.

OECD. (2013). Employment Outlook 2013. Paris: OECD. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/empl_outlook-2013-en

OECD. (2019). OECD Employment Outlook 2019: The Future of Work. Paris: OECD Publishing. doi:https://doi.org/10.1787/9ee00155-en

Pages, C. (2003). Labor Market Reforms: The Good, The Bad and The Ugly. Inter-American Development Bank.

Petrin, A., & Sivadasan, J. (2006, December). Job Security Does Affect Economic Efficiency: Theory, A New Statistic, and Evidence from Chile. IPC Working Paper Series(21).

Piasna, A., & Myant, M. (2017). Myths of employment deregulation: how it neither creates jobs nor reduces labor market segmentation. Brussels: ETUI.

Pries, M., & Rogerson, R. (2005). Hiring Policies, Labor Market Institutions, and Labor Market Flows. Journal of Political Economy, 113(4).

Roy, J. (2021). The effect of employment protection legislation on international trade. Economic Modelling, 94, pp. 221-234. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2020.10.004

Rubery, J., & Piasna, A. (2016). Labour market segmentation and the EU reform agenda: Developing alternatives to the mainstream. Brussels: ETUI.

Ruiz-Valenzuela, J. (2020). Intergenerational effects of employment protection reforms. Labour Economics, 62(January). doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2019.101774

Saint-Paul, G. (2002). The Political Economy of Employment Protection. Journal of Political Economy, 110(5), pp. 672-704.

Scarpetta, S. (1996). Assessing the role of labour market policies and institutional settings on unemployment: A cross-country study. OECD Economic Studies, 26(1), pp. 43-98.

Sharpe, A., & Fard, S. (2022). The Current State of Research on the Two-Way Linkages between Productivity and Well-Being. ILO Working Paper(56).

Sordyl, M. (2024). Labour Market Institutions - the Problem of Definitions and Measurement. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law, 23(4), pp. 595-610. doi:10.12775/EiP.2024.30

Storm, S., & Nastepad, C. (2009). Labor Market Regulation and Productivity Growth: Evidence for Twenty OECD Countries (1984-2004). Industrial Relations, 48(4), pp. 629-654. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-232X.2009.00579.x

Vergeer, R., & Kleinknecht, A. (2010-2011). The impact of labor market deregulation on productivity: a panel data analysis of 19 OECD countries (1960-2004). Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 33(2), pp. 371-407.

Vosko, L. (2011). Precarious Employment and the Problem of SER-Centrism in Regulating for Decent Work. In S. Lee, & D. McCann, Regulating for Decent Work. Advances in Labour Studies. London: Palgrave Macmillan. doi:10.1057/9780230307834_3

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-03-30

How to Cite

1.
SORDYL, Marta. Employment protection legislation and macroeconomic outcomes: channels of influence. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 March 2026. Vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 5- 22. [Accessed 9 April 2026]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2026.1.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 1 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Marta Sordyl

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 55
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop