Relocation preferences in the Era of Work From Home: Theoretical Framework
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2026.2Keywords
Work-From-Home, Remote work, Relocation, Residential mobility, Housing preferencesAbstract
Motivation: The COVID-19 pandemic catalysed an unprecedented global expansion of work-from-home (WFH) arrangements. While the prevalence of remote work has receded from its peak, it has stabilized since 2022 at levels well above those observed before the crisis. This shift indicates that WFH has evolved into a lasting feature of contemporary labour markets rather than a temporary disruption. Beyond transforming how work is organized, remote work influences daily routines, professional interactions, and social engagement. One domain where these effects are particularly salient is residential choice. By altering preferences regarding both housing attributes and location, WFH has the potential to reshape urban spatial patterns, reinforce suburbanization, and stimulate development in peripheral or rural areas.
Aim: This paper aims to develop a multidisciplinary theoretical framework to examine how WFH shapes relocation processes. Building on neoclassical economics, relocation theories such as life-cycle and life-course approaches, and Stress-Threshold Model, it conceptualizes WFH as a distinct trigger of migration. The paper adopts a conceptual framework-building approach, synthesizing interdisciplinary theoretical perspectives through a systematic review of the literature.
Results: The proposed framework emphasizes that WFH may significantly reshape stated residential preferences regarding both dwelling attributes and location, yet these shifts do not automatically translate into actual relocation. Whether preferences result in moves depends not only on individual dissatisfaction, as outlined in the Stress-Threshold Model, but also on market conditions and structural constraints. Relocation decisions therefore often reflect compromises rather than straightforward adjustments. The framework also suggests that short-distance mobility will remain central in hybrid work contexts, though broader spatial effects may emerge over time. These findings highlight avenues for future research, particularly qualitative studies on how preferences are negotiated across life-course stages and housing markets, and under what conditions WFH operates as a meaningful relocation trigger.
References
Aksoy, C. G., Barrero, J. M., Bloom, N., Davis, S. J., Dolls, M., & Zarate, P. (2025). The global persistence of work from home. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 122(27), e2509892122–e2509892122. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2509892122
Albinowski, M. (2024). Post-COVID developments in remote work, migrations, and selfemployment in the EU. WeLaR https://projectwelar.eu/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/Post-COVID-developments-in-remote-work-migrations-and-self-employment-in-the-EU-WeLaR_D4.4.pdf
Alonso, W. (1960). A Theory of the Urban Land Market. Papers in Regional Science, 6(1), 149–157. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5597.1960.tb01710.x
Bolter, K., Bartik, T. J., Hershbein, B. J., Miller-Adams, M., Adams, L., Asquith, B. J., Hernandez, A., Huisman, K., Lendel, I. V, Pepin, G., Timmeney, B. F., Truesdale, B. C., & Truskinovsky, Y. (2024). Policies for Place: How to Make Sustainable Investments in Communities. W.E. Upjohn Institute for Employment Research. https://www.upjohn.org/remote-works-quiet-impact-rural-communities
Braesemann, F., Stephany, F., Teutloff, O., Ka, O., Graham, M., & Lehdonvirta, V. (2022). The global polarisation of remote work. PLoS ONE, 17(10), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0274630
Brown, L. A., & Moore, E. G. (1970). The Intra-Urban Migration Process: A Perspective. Geografiska Annaler. Series B, Human Geography, 52(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.2307/490436
Brown, T., & King, P. (2006). The Power to Choose : Effective Choice and Housing Policy. European Journal of Housing Policy ISSN:, 6718. https://doi.org/10.1080/14616710500055729
Caplin, A., & Leahy, J. (2010). Economic Theory and the World of Practice : A Celebration of the (S, s) Model. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 183–202.
Chekmarev, O., Manilov, A., & Ulimbashev, A. (2021). COVID-19 pandemic is a stimulus for sustainable development of rural areas and labor markets. E3S conference, 01007, 1–8.
Clark, W. A. V. (1992). Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context Residential Preferences and Residential Choices in a Multiethnic Context. 29(3), 451–466.
Coulombel, N. (2010). Residential choice and household behavior: State of the Art. SustainCity Working Paper.
Coulter, R., Ham, M. van, & Findlay, A. M. (2016). Re-thinking residential mobility: Linking lives through time and space. Progress in Human Geography, 40(3), 352–374. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309132515575417
Directive 2019/1158, European Parliament and of the Council. (2019). Directive (EU) 2019/1158 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 June 2019 on work-life balance for parents and carers, L 188, 79–93. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A32019L1158
Ellen, I. G., & Hempstead, K. (2002). Workers Telecommuting and the Demand for Urban Living : A Preliminary Look at White-collar. Urban Studies, 39(4), 749–766. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980220119552
Ettema, D. (2010). The impact of telecommuting on residential relocation and residential preferences. The Impact of Telecommuting on Residential Relocation and Residential Preferences, 3(1), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.v3i1.61
Fukuda, Y. (2024). Urban exodus in Tokyo during the COVID-19 pandemic. Applied Economics Letters, 31(3), 202–206. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504851.2022.2130136
Gonzalez-Leonardo, M., Rowe, F., & Fresolone-caparr, A. (2022). Rural revival ? The rise in internal migration to rural areas during the COVID-19 pandemic . Who moved and Where ? Journal of Rural Studies, 96(November), 332–342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2022.11.006
Hostettler Macias, L., Ravalet, E., & Rérat, P. (2022). Potential rebound effects of teleworking on residential and daily mobility. Geography Compass, 16(9), e12657. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12657
Ilham, M. A., Fonzone, A., Fountas, G., & Mora, L. (2024). To move or not to move : A review of residential relocation trends after. Cities, 151(November 2023), 105078. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105078
Jaakkola, E. (2020). Composition, context and capability: The constitutive role of conceptual contributions to theory. AMS Review, 10(1–2), 9–27. https:// 10.1007/s13162-020-00161-0
Jansen, S., Coolen, H., & Goetgeluk, R. (2011). The Measurement and Analysis of Housing Preference and Choice (S. Jansen, H. Coolen, & R. Goetgeluk (eds.)). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-8894-9
Kain, J. F., & Quigley, J. M. (1970). Measuring the Value of Housing Quality JOHN. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65(330), 532–548.
Kim, S.-W. (1997). Impacts of telecommuting polices on urban spatial structure and the environment: Home-based and center-based telecommuting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.
Kim, S. N. (2016). Two traditional questions on the relationships between telecommuting, job and residential location, and household travel: revisited using a path analysis. Annals of Regional Science, 56(2), 537–563. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-016-0755-8
King, R., Skeldon, R., & Vullnetari, J. (2008). Internal and International Migration: Bridging the Theoretical Divide. Sussex Centre for Migration Research, Issue 52.
Kitamura, R., Nilles, J., Conroy, P., & Fleming, D. M. (1990). Telecommuting as a Transportation Planning Measure: Initial Results of California Pilot Project. Transportation Research Record, 1285, 98–104. https://escholarship.org/uc/item/6j96d49k
Knuepling, L., Sternberg, R., & Otto, A. (2025). Rural areas as winners of COVID-19, digitalization and remote working? Empirical evidence from recent internal migration in Germany. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 18(1), 227–248. https://doi.org/10.1093/cjres/rsae033
Kryczka, P., Sikorski, D., Figlus, T., & Lisowska-kierepka, A. (2025). Defining suburbanization in Central and Eastern Europe: A systematic literature review. Cities, 158, 105626. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2024.105626
Li, J., Auchincloss, A. H., Rodriguez, D. A., Moore, K. A., Roux, A. V. D., & Sánchez, B. N. (2020). Determinants of Residential Preferences Related to Built and Social Environments and Concordance between Neighborhood Characteristics and Preferences. 62–77.
Lund, J. R., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (1994). Telecommuting and residential location: theory and implications for commute travel in monocentric metropolis. Transportation Research Record, 1463, 10–14.
Macias, L. H., Ravalet, E., & Rérat, P. (2025). How does telework impact daily and residential mobilities: New geographies of working and living in Switzerland. Applied Geography, 178(January). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2025.103591
Mancinelli, F., & Germann Molz, J. (2024). Moving with and against the state: digital nomads and frictional mobility regimes. Mobilities, 19(2), 189–207. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2023.2209825
McFadden, D. (1977). Modeling the Choice of Residential Location. Cowles Foundation Discussion Papers, 710, 72–77.
Molin, E., Oppewal, H., & Timmermans, H. (1996). Predicting consumer response to new housing : a stated choice experiment. Neth. J. of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 297–311.
Morrison, P., Bryan, T. M., & Swanson, D. A. (2004). Internal Migration and Short-distance Mobility. In The Methods and Materials of Demography. J. S. Siegel, D. A. Swanson and H. Shryock, eds. San Diego, California: Elsevier Academic Press.
Muhammad, S., Ottens, H. F. L., Ettema, D., & de Jong, T. (2007). Telecommuting and residential locational preferences: a case study of the Netherlands. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 22(4), 339–358. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-007-9088-3
Mulder, C. (1996). Housing choice: assumptions and approaches. Netherlands Journal of Housing and the Built Environment, 11(3), 209–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02496589
Mulder, C. H., & Hooimeijer, P. (1999). Residential relocations in the life course. In L. J. G. van Wissen & P. A. Dijkstra (Eds.), Population issues: An interdisciplinary focus (pp. 159–186). Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers. https://hdl.handle.net/11245/1.427069
Nilles, J. M. (1975). Telecommunications and Organizational Decentralization. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 23(10), 1142–1147. https://doi.org/10.1109/TCOM.1975.1092687
Nilles, J. M. (1991). Telecommuting and urban sprawl: mitigator or inciter? Transportation, 18(4), 411–432. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00186567
Ory, D. T., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2006). Which came first, the telecommuting or the residential relocation? An empirical analysis of causality. University of California Transportation Center, Working Papers qt18r9588k, 590–609.
Pickles, A., & Davies, R. (1985). The Longitudinal Analysis of Housing Careers. Journal of Regional Science, 25(1), 85–101. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9787.1985.tb00295.x
Ramani, A., & Bloom, N. (2022). The Donut Effect of Covid-19 on Cities. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series, No. 28876, 1–40. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28876
Rhee, H. (2009). Telecommuting and urban sprawl. Transportation Research Part D, 14(7), 453–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2009.05.004
Rossi, P. H. (1980). Why Families Move (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications Ltd.
Rowe, F., Calafiore, A., Arribas, D., Samardzhiev, K., & Fleischmann, M. (2023). Urban exodus ? Understanding human mobility in Britain during the COVID ‐ 19 pandemic using Meta ‐ Facebook data. Population, Space and Place, November 2022, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2637
Samuelson, P. (1938). A Note on the Pure Theory of Consumer ’ s Behaviour Published by : Wiley on behalf of The London School of Economics and Political Science and The Suntory and Toyota International Centres for Economics and Related Disciplines A Note on the Pure Theory of. Economica, 5(17), 61–71. https://www.jstor.org/stable/2548836
Sen, A. K. (1977). Rational Fools : A Critique of the Behavioral Foundations of Economic Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 6(4), 317–344. http://www.jstor.org/stable/2264946?seq=1&cid=pdf-reference#references_tab_contents
Shen, Q. (2000). New telecommunications and residential location flexibility. Environment and Planning A, 32(January 1999), 1445–1463. https://doi.org/10.1068/a3292
Shlay, A. B. (2012). Residential Preferences. In The Encyclopedia of Housing (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452218380.n212
Smith, A. (1776). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. ELECBOOK CLASSICS.
Spring, A., Gillespie, B. J., & Mulder, C. H. (2024). Internal migration following adverse life events: Assessing the likelihood of return migration and migration toward family amenities. Population, Space and Place, 30(3), Article e11. https://doi.org/10.1002/psp.2711
Tanaś, J., Trojanek, M., & Trojanek, R. (2019). SENIORS ’ REVEALED PREFERENCES IN THE HOUSING. 12(1), 353–365. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-789X.2019/12-1/22
Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A Pure Theory of Local Expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1826343
Timmermans, H., Molin, E., & Noortwijk, L. Van. (1994). HOUSING CHOICE PROCESSES : STATED VERSUS REVEALED MODELLING APPROACHES. The Netherlands Journal of Housing and Environmental Research, 9(3), 215–227.
van Ham, M. (2012). Economics of Housing Choice. In S. J. Smith (Ed.), International Encyclopedia of Housing and Home (pp. 42–46). Elsevier.
Vij, A., Ardeshiri, A., Crommelin, L., Denham, T., Beer, A., Vij, A., Ardeshiri, A., Crommelin, L., Denham, T., Covid-, A. B., Urban, S., Dynamics, G., Vij, A., Ardeshiri, A., Crommelin, L., & Denham, T. (2024). COVID-19 , Shifting Urban Growth Dynamics and Preferences for Regional Living in Australia COVID-19. 1146. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2024.2311667
Weisheit, J. (2018). Should I stay or should I go? A systematic literature review about the conceptualization and measurement of international relocation mobility readiness. Journal of Global Mobility, 6(2), 129–157. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGM-01-2018-0003
Whetten, D. A. (1989). What constitutes a theoretical contribution? Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 490–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/258554
Wildish, B. (2015). Housing Choice and Preference: A Review of the Literature (Issue TR2015/019).
Wong, G. K. M. (2002). A conceptual model of the household ’ s housing decision-making process: the economic perspective. Review of Urban & Regional Development Studies, 14(3), 217–234. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-940X.00055
Woźniak-Jęchorek, B., Kuźmar, S., & Bole, D. (2024). Moving to the suburbs? Exploring the potential impact of work-from-home on suburbanization in Poland. ArXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2412.07459
Yarina, L., & Wescoat, J. L. (2023). Spectrums of Relocation: A typological framework for understanding risk-based relocation through space, time and power. Global Environmental Change, 79(March), 102650. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102650
Zax, J. S. (1994). When is a move a migration? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 24(3), 341–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0166-0462(93)02034-Z
Zhu, P. (2013). Telecommuting, Household Commute and Location Choice. Urban Studies, 50(12), 2441–2459. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098012474520
Zukin, S. (1987). Gentrification: Culture and Capital in the Urban Core. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 129–147. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.13.080187.001021
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Sławomir Kuźmar
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 39
Number of citations: 0
