Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
    • Publication Policies
    • Duties and responsibilities
    • Authorship Changes
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • A.I. Policy
    • Protection of Personal Data
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Effectiveness of European Green Deal implementation in EU countries: a DEA/Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach
  • Home
  • /
  • Effectiveness of European Green Deal implementation in EU countries: a DEA/Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026) /
  4. Articles

Effectiveness of European Green Deal implementation in EU countries

a DEA/Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach

Authors

  • Magdalena Olczyk Politechnika Gdańska Wydział Zarządzania i Ekonomii https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4880-5890
  • Justyna Kujawska Politechnika Gdańska https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0416-3048

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2026.8

Keywords

European Green Deal, Data Envelopment Analysis, Benefit-of-the-Doubt, efficiency frontier, European Union, Eurostat indicators

Abstract

Motivation: The European Green Deal (EGD) provides a common EU framework for climate neutrality, resource efficiency and a just transition, but Member States differ markedly in structural conditions and implementation capacity. Existing assessments rely mostly on monitoring exercises, composite indicators or MCDA rankings; less attention has been paid to frontier-based efficiency benchmarking of EGD outcomes.

Aim: The study assesses relative EGD effectiveness in 25 EU countries using a DEA/Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach and Eurostat EGD indicators. The analysis covers 2013-2021, with 2019 treated as the strategic reference point. A SAW index is calculated from 20 transformed indicators, while the DEA/BoD model uses five indicators selected through correlation analysis, variance analysis, PCA and LASSO.

Results: The results show substantial heterogeneity. Sweden, Latvia and Estonia hold strong positions in both the composite indicator and DEA/BoD assessment. In 2021, the efficiency-frontier or super-efficient group includes Sweden, Latvia, Lithuania, Portugal, Estonia, Ireland, the Netherlands, Croatia and Finland, whereas Czechia, Belgium, Poland and Bulgaria show the largest efficiency reserves. Contribution-share and robustness checks indicate the importance of waste generation and PM2.5-related premature mortality. DEA/BoD complements ranking-based assessments by identifying benchmark countries, frontier distance and efficiency reserves.

References

Black, C., & Cisternino, S. (Eds). (2025). Delivering the EU Green Deal – Progress towards targets. Publications Office of the European Union. https://op.europa.eu/en/publication-detail/-/publication/33a4bbe1-e2b0-11ef-be2a-01aa75ed71a1/language-en.

Camanho, A. S., Mello, J., & Dyson, R. G. (2023). Benefit-of-the-doubt composite indicators and use of weight restrictions. In P. Macedo, V. Moutinho, & M. Madaleno (Eds.), Advanced mathematical methods for economic efficiency analysis (pp. 93–112). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-29583-6_6.

Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision-making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(78)90138-8.

Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., & Van Puyenbroeck, T. (2007). An introduction to ‘benefit of the doubt’ composite indicators. Social Indicators Research, 82(1), 111–145. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-006-9029-7.

Cherchye, L., Moesen, W., Rogge, N., Van Puyenbroeck, T., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., Liska, R., & Tarantola, S. (2008). Creating composite indicators with DEA and robustness analysis: The case of the Technology Achievement Index. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 59(2), 239–251. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jors.2602445.

Ciot, M. G. (2022). Implementation perspectives for the European Green Deal in Central and Eastern Europe. Sustainability, 14(7), Article 3947. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14073947.

Dyson, R. G., Allen, R., Camanho, A. S., Podinovski, V. V., Sarrico, C. S., & Shale, E. A. (2001). Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. European Journal of Operational Research, 132(2), 245–259. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(00)00149-1.

European Commission. (2019). The European Green Deal (COM(2019) 640 final). Retrieved 20.11.2024 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=COM:2019:640:FIN.

European Union. (2021c). Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 establishing the framework for achieving climate neutrality (‘European Climate Law’). Official Journal of the European Union, L 243, 1–17.

Eurostat. (2023). European Green Deal indicators. European Commission. Retrieved 20.11.2024 from https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/european-green-deal/indicators.

Hereu-Morales, J., Segarra, A., & Valderrama, C. (2024). The European (Green?) Deal: A systematic analysis of environmental sustainability. Sustainable Development, 32(1), 647–661. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2671.

Karadağ, M., Gül, M., Yücesan, M., Ortiz-Barrios, M., Ishizaka, A., & Khan, J. (2025). Evaluation of Green Deal compliance performance with a hybrid comparative multi-attribute decision model. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 98, Article 102163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2025.102163.

Koundouri, P., Alamanos, A., Plataniotis, A., Stavridis, C., Perifanos, K., & Devves, S. (2024). Assessing the sustainability of the European Green Deal and its interlinkages with the SDGs. npj Climate Action, 3, Article 23. https://doi.org/10.1038/s44168-024-00104-6.

Leonard, M., Pisani-Ferry, J., Shapiro, J., Tagliapietra, S., & Wolf, G. (2021). The geopolitics of the European Green Deal. International Organisations Research Journal, 16(2), 204–235. https://doi.org/10.17323/1996-7845-2021-02-10.

Lewis, H. F., & Sexton, T. R. (2004). Data envelopment analysis with reverse inputs and outputs. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 21(2), 113–132. https://doi.org/10.1023/B:PROD.0000016868.69586.b4.

Marelli, L., Trane, M., Barbero Vignola, G., Gastaldi, C., Guerreiro Miguel, M., Delgado Callicó, L., Borchardt, S., Mancini, L., Sanye Mengual, E., Gourdon, T., et al. (2025). Delivering the EU Green Deal – Progress towards targets. Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/3105205.

Michalewska-Pawlak, M. (2024). The impact of the European Green Deal strategy on the evolution of EU regional policy after 2021. Politeja, 21(1(88/2)), 227–239. https://doi.org/10.12797/Politeja.20.2024.88.2.15.

OECD. (2008). Handbook on constructing composite indicators: Methodology and user guide. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264043466-en.

Olczyk, M., & Kuc-Czarnecka, M. (2025). European Green Deal Index: A new composite tool for monitoring European Union’s Green Deal strategy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 495, Article 145077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145077.

Ottomano Palmisano, G., Rocchi, L., Negri, L., & Piscitelli, L. (2025). Evaluating the progress of the EU countries towards implementation of the European Green Deal: A multiple criteria approach. Land, 14(1), Article 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/land14010141.

Ozdemir, S., Demirel, N., Zaralı, F., & Çelik, T. (2024). Multi-criteria assessment framework for evaluation of Green Deal performance. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 31, 4686–4704. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-023-31370-2.

Pianta, M., & Lucchese, M. (2020). Rethinking the European Green Deal: An industrial policy for a just transition in Europe. Review of Radical Political Economics, 54(2), 633–641. https://doi.org/10.1177/0486613420938207.

Rosenow, J. (2022). Europe on the way to net zero: What challenges and opportunities? PLOS Climate, 1(7), Article e0000058. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000058.

Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Uncertainty and sensitivity analysis techniques as tools for the quality assessment of composite indicators. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 168(2), 307–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-985X.2005.00350.x.

Seiford, L. M., & Zhu, J. (2002). Modeling undesirable factors in efficiency evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research, 142(1), 16–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(01)00293-4.

Sikora, A. (2021). European Green Deal – Legal and financial challenges of the climate change. ERA Forum, 21(4), 681–697. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12027-020-00637-3.

Simar, L., & Wilson, P. W. (1998). Sensitivity analysis of efficiency scores: How to bootstrap in nonparametric frontier models. Management Science, 44(1), 49–61. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.44.1.49.

Topcu, M., Ozdemir, S., & Demirel, N. (2025). Exploring the role of socio-economic factors in European Green Deal performance. Environmental Conservation, 52(4), 188–195. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892925100106.

Tutak, M., & Brodny, J. (2024). Disparities among EU-27 countries in the implementation of the European Green Deal strategy goals. Smart and Sustainable Built Environment. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1108/SASBE-07-2024-0266.

von der Leyen, U. (2019). Political guidelines for the next European Commission 2019–2024. European Commission. https://commission.europa.eu/document/download/063d44e9-04ed-4033-acf9-639ecb187e87_en?filename=political-guidelines-next-commission_en.pdf.

von Homeyer, I., Oberthür, S., & Dupont, C. (2022). Implementing the European Green Deal during the evolving energy crisis. Journal of Common Market Studies, 60(S1), 125–136. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcms.13397.

Walheer, B. (2024). A sequential benefit-of-the-doubt composite indicator. European Journal of Operational Research, 316(1), 228–239. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2024.01.029.

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Poh, K. L. (2006). Comparing aggregating methods for constructing the composite environmental index: An objective measure. Ecological Economics, 59(3), 305–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2005.10.018.

Downloads

  • PDF

Additional Files

  • Supplement

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
OLCZYK, Magdalena and KUJAWSKA, Justyna. Effectiveness of European Green Deal implementation in EU countries: a DEA/Benefit-of-the-Doubt approach. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 June 2026. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 175- 198. [Accessed 24 July 2026]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2026.8.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Magdalena Olczyk, JUSTYNA KUJAWSKA

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 78
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop