Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
    • Publication Policies
    • Duties and responsibilities
    • Authorship Changes
    • Appeals and Complaints
    • A.I. Policy
    • Protection of Personal Data
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

The innovation of enterprises and cooperation between science and business in the didactic aspect
  • Home
  • /
  • The innovation of enterprises and cooperation between science and business in the didactic aspect
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026) /
  4. Articles

The innovation of enterprises and cooperation between science and business in the didactic aspect

Authors

  • Marek Tomaszewski University of Zielona Góra https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2590-5159
  • Gabriela Tomaszewska Uniwersytet Szczeciński

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2026.7

Keywords

product innovations, process innovations, didactic-practical aspects of cooperation between science and business,, logit modelling

Abstract

Motivation: Key variables influencing enterprise innovation often include size, revenue dynamics, and technological class. Research also highlights the role of supply chain relations and geographic distance. However, there is a lack of studies addressing the impact of science–business cooperation in didactic and practical aspects on innovative activity.

Aim: This article examines whether such cooperation stimulates innovation in industrial enterprises and compares its influence with other established determinants.

Methods: The study applied logit modelling to analyze collected data and determine the direction and strength of selected independent variables’ impact on innovation-related dependent variables.

Results and Added Value: Findings indicate that cooperation between science and business contributes positively to innovation. Specifically, product innovation was supported by professional internships for students and academic staff within enterprises, as well as company-organized meetings and presentations facilitating knowledge transfer. In contrast, barriers to product innovation included entrepreneurs’ low evaluation of academic staff competencies and the ineffectiveness of certain knowledge transfer mechanisms.

Regarding process innovation, study visits by students and lecturers to enterprises, combined with effective transfer mechanisms, played a significant stimulating role.

The study concludes that didactic and practical cooperation between science and business effectively supports both product and process innovations. Its impact is comparable to that of knowledge transfer methods and enterprise ownership forms typically associated with high innovative capacity. This represents the key added value of the research, emphasizing the relevance of structured collaboration in shaping enterprise innovation strategies.

References

1. Aboal, D., & Garda, P. (2016). Technological and non-technological innovation and productivity in services vis a vis manufacturing in Uruguay. Economics of Innova-tion and New Technology, 25(5), 435-454.

https://doi.org/10.1080/10438599.2015.1073478.

2. Bachmann, F., & Kataishi, R. E. (2025). Firm size and innovative performance: a meta-analysis across of 25 years of evidence. Revista Brasileira de Inovação, 24, e025003. https://doi.org/10.20396/rbi.v24i00.8674493

3. Baldini, N. (2008). Negative effects of university patenting: Myths and grounded evidence. Scientometrics, 75(2), 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-1865-y.

3. Bąk, M. (red.) & Kulawczuk, P. (red.). (2009). Warunki skutecznej współpracy pomiędzy nauką a przedsiębiorstwami. Instytut Badań nad Demokracją i Przedsię-biorstwem Prywatnym, Warszawa.

4. Behrens, T. R., & Gray, D. O. (2001). Unintended consequences of cooperative re-search: Impact of industry sponsorship on climate for academic freedom and other graduate student outcome. Research Policy, 30(2), 179–199.

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00112-2.

5. Bozeman, B., & Boardman, C. (2013). Academic faculty in university research cen-ters: Neither capitalism's slaves nor teaching fugitives. The Journal of Higher Edu-cation, 84(1), 88–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221546.2013.11777279.

6. Carvalho, L., Costa, T., & Caiado, J. (2013). Determinants of innovation in a small open economy: A multidimensional perspective. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 14(3), 583–600.

https://doi.org/10.3846/16111699.2012.701225.

7. Choi, J. I., & Markham, S. (2019). Creating a corporate entrepreneurial ecosystem: The case of entrepreneurship education in the RTP, USA. Journal of Open Innova-tion: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 5(3), 62, 1-15.

https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc5030062.

8. Choy, S., & Delahaye, B. (2011). Partnerships between universities and workplaces: Some challenges for work-integrated learning. Studies in Continuing Education, 33(2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/0158037X.2010.546079.

9. Cinar, O., Altuntas, S., & Alan, M. A. (2021). Technology transfer and its impact on innovation and firm performance: Empirical evidence from Turkish export compa-nies. Kybernetes, 50(7), 2179–2207. https://doi.org/10.1108/K-12-2019-0828.

10. Cofré-Bravo, G., Klerkx, L., & Engler, A. (2019). Combinations of bonding, bridging, and linking social capital for farm innovation: How farmers configure different support networks. Journal of Rural Studies, 69, 53–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.04.004.

11. Costa Cavalcante, P. L. (2024). Innovation performance and its determinants: What does it take to succeed? Innovation & Management Review, 21(1), 60–76. https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-11-2021-0206.

12. Crespi, G., & Zuniga, P. (2012). Innovation and productivity: Evidence from six Latin American countries. World Development, 40(2), 273–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2011.07.010.

13. Cui, Z., & Li, E. (2022). Does industry–university–research cooperation matter? An analysis of its coupling effect on regional innovation and economic development. Chinese Geographical Science, 32(5), 915–930.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-022-1308-y

14. De Jong, J. P., & Vermeulen, P. A. (2006). Determinants of product innovation in small firms: A comparison across industries. International Small Business Journal, 24(6), 587–609. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242606069268.

15. Divisekera, S., & Nguyen, V. K. (2018). Determinants of innovation in tourism evidence from Australia. Tourism Management, 67, 157–167.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.01.010

16. Doroshenko, Y. A., Shutenko, A. I., Shutenko, E. N., & Ospishchev, P. I. (2016). The conditions and the mechanism of students’ self-realization in activity of small in-novative enterprises. International Review of Management and Marketing, 6(4), 909–914.

17. El Elj, M. (2012). Innovation in Tunisia: Empirical analysis for industrial sector. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 9(1), 183–197.

https://doi.org/10.3917/jie.009.0183.

18. Frey, M., Iraldo, F., & Testa, F. (2013). The determinants of innovation in green supply chains: Evidence from an Italian sectoral study. R&D Management, 43(4), 352–364. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12020.

19. Galán‐Muros, V., & Plewa, C. (2016). What drives and inhibits university‐business cooperation in Europe? A comprehensive assessment. R&D Management, 46(2), 369–382. https://doi.org/10.1111/radm.12180.

20. Gielen, P. M., Hoeve, A., & Nieuwenhuis, L. F. (2003). Learning entrepreneurs: Learning and innovation in small companies. European Educational Research Jour-nal, 2(1), 90–106. https://doi.org/10.2304/eerj.2003.2.1.13.

21. Goedhuys, M., & Veugelers, R. (2012). Innovation strategies, process and product innovations and growth: Firm-level evidence from Brazil. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(4), 516–529.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2011.01.004.

22. Grillitsch, M., Tavassoli, S., & Obschonka, M. (2026). Unlocking firm innovation under regional disadvantage: Can psychological openness compensate? Research Policy, 55(5), 105463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2026.105463

23. Hellman, T. (2007). The role of patents for bridging the science to market gap. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 63, 624–647.

24. Hue, T. T. (2019). The determinants of innovation in Vietnamese manufacturing firms: An empirical analysis using a technology–organization–environment framework. Eurasian Business Review, 9(3), 247–267.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s40821-019-00125-w.

25. Jaklic, A., Damijan, J. P., & Rojec, M. (2008). Innovation cooperation and innovation activity of Slovenian enterprises. LICOS Centre for Institutions and Economic Per-formance, Discussion Paper No. 201, 1-18.

http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1107204.

26. Janiszewska, M., & Janiszewski, J. (2020). Wykorzystanie regulacji podatkowych w działalności innowacyjnej polskich przedsiębiorców. BAS, Warszawa.

27. Jose Madeira Silva, M., Simoes, J., Sousa, G., Moreira, J., & Wagner Mainardes, E. (2014). Determinants of innovation capacity: Empirical evidence from services firms. Innovation, 16(3), 404–416.

https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2014.11081996.

28. Kafetzopoulos, D., & Psomas, E. (2015). The impact of innovation capability on the performance of manufacturing companies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 26(1), 104–130.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-12-2012-0117.

29. Khachatryan, K., Hakobjanyan, A., Nikoghosyan, K., & Keryan, T. (2024). Develop-ment of university–industry partnership in Armenia: university perspec-tive. Journal of International Education in Business, 17(1), 170-192.

https://doi.org/10.1108/JIEB-07-2023-0051

30. Klevorick, A. K., Levin, R. C., Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1995). On the sources and significance of interindustry differences in technological opportunities. Rese-arch Policy, 24(2), 185–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(93)00762-I.

31. Kuna-Marszałek, A., & Lisowska, R. (2013). Współpraca sfery nauki i przedsię-biorstw – przegląd badań. W: J. Różański (red.), Współpraca nauki i biznesu jako czynnik wzmacniający innowacyjność regionu łódzkiego. Wydawnictwo Biblioteka, Łódź.

32. Kuznets, S. (1966). Modern economic growth: Pattern, structure and spread. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

33. Liu, J. (2025). How does university–industry collaboration motivate enterprise participation and promote human resource development? Acta Psychologica, 260, 105686.

34. Love, J. H., & Roper, S. (1999). The determinants of innovation: R & D, technology transfer and networking effects. Review of Industrial Organization, 15, 43–64.

35. Lundvall, B. Å. (2007). National innovation systems: Analytical concept and devel-opment tool. Industry and Innovation, 14(1), 95–119.

https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710601130863.

36. Lynskey, M. J. (2004). Determinants of innovative activity in Japanese technology-based start-up firms. International Small Business Journal, 22(2), 159–196.

https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242604041312.

37. Łukaszewska, K. (2018). Ulga na działalność badawczo-rozwojową jako szansa poprawy pozycji innowacyjnej polskich przedsiębiorstw. Ruch Prawniczy, Ekono-miczny i Socjologiczny, 80(3), 181–197.

38. Malik, K., & Bergfeld, M. M. (2015). A conceptual framework for intra-company technology transfer: Cases of leveraging production process innovations across MNEs. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(10), 1129–1142.

https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1060309.

39. Mascarenhas, C., Ferreira, J. J., & Marques, C. (2018). University–industry coopera-tion: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Science and Public Policy, 45(5), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scy003.

40. Mendoza-Silva, A. (2021). Innovation capability: A systematic literature review. European Journal of Innovation Management, 24(3), 707–734.

https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-09-2019-0263.

41. Merritt, H. (2015). The role of human capital in university-business cooperation: The case of Mexico. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 6(3), 568–588.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0258-3.

42. Ministry of Science and Higher Education, Department of Implementation and Innovation. (2006). Barriers to cooperation between entrepreneurs and research centers. Warszawa.

43. Munjal, S., & Kundu, S. (2017). Exploring the connection between human capital and innovation in the globalising world. In S. Munjal & S. Kundu (Eds.), Human Capital and Innovation: Examining the Role of Globalization. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK.

44. Nikolova, L. V., Rodionov, D. G., & Mottaeva, A. B. (2016). Securitization of bank assets as a source of financing the innovation activity. International Journal of Eco-nomics and Financial Issues, 6(2), 246–252.

45. Oerlemans, L. A. G., & Pretorius, M. W. (2006). Some views on determinants of innovative outcomes of South African firms: An exploratory analysis using firm-level data. South African Journal of Science, 102, 589–593.

https://hdl.handle.net/10520/EJC96471.

46. Orazbayeva, B., Davey, T., Plewa, C., & Galán-Muros, V. (2020). Engagement of academics in education-driven university-business cooperation: A motivation-based perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 45(8), 1723-1736.

https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2019.1582013

47. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development & Statistical Office of the European Communities (OECD). (2018). Oslo manual: Guidelines for collect-ing, reporting and using data on innovation (4th ed.).

48. Pavlin, S. (2016). Considering university‐business cooperation modes from the perspective of enterprises. European Journal of Education, 51(1), 25–39.

https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12163.

49. Pereira, R., & Franco, M. (2022). Cooperation between universities and SMEs: A systematic literature review. Industry and Higher Education, 36(1), 37–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0950422221995114.

50. Pereira, R., & Franco, M. (2023). University-firm cooperation and regional devel-opment: Proposal of a model of analysis. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 14(2), 676–690. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-00947-6.

51. Pocol, C. B., Stanca, L., Dabija, D. C., Pop, I. D., & Mișcoiu, S. (2022). Knowledge co-creation and sustainable education in the labor market-driven university–business environment. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 10, 781075, 1-12.

https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2022.781075.

52. Prokop, V., & Stejskal, J. (2019). Determinants of innovation activities and SME absorption – Case study of Germany. Scientific Papers of the University of Pardubi-ce. Series D, Faculty of Economics and Administration, 46, 134-146.

https://hdl.handle.net/10195/74243.

53. Prystrom, J., & Wierzbicka, K. (2015). Finansowanie działalności innowacyjnej. Difin SA.

54. Rahmouni, M. (2017). Innovativeness of exporting firms in a developing country: The case of Tunisia. Economics Bulletin, 33(2), 914–930.

https://ssrn.com/abstract=3060361.

55. Rambe, P., & Khaola, P. (2022). The impact of innovation on agribusiness competi-tiveness: The mediating role of technology transfer and productivity. European Journal of Innovation Management, 25(3), 741–773. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-05-2020-0180

56. Rampersad, G. C. (2015). Developing university-business cooperation through work-integrated learning. International Journal of Technology Management, 68(3–4), 203–227. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2015.069664.

57. Romanovich, L., Sevostyanov, V., Romanovich, M., & Sevostyanov, M. (2014). Inno-vation activity and technology transfer of higher education. Journal of Applied En-gineering Science, 12(4), 273-276. https://doi.org/10.5937/jaes12-7164.

58. Sachpazidu-Wójcicka, K. (2017). Innovation as a determinant of the competitive-ness of Polish enterprises. Oeconomia Copernicana, 8(2), 287–299.

doi: 10.24136/ oc.v8i2.18.

59. Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, socialism and democracy (3rd ed.). New York: Harper and Row.

60. Şerbanica, C. (2011). A cause and effect analysis of university-business cooperation for regional innovation in Romania. Theoretical & Applied Economics, 18(10), 29-44.

61. Smith, A. (2016). The wealth of nations. Aegitas.

62. Sudolska, A., & Łapińska, J. (2020). Exploring determinants of innovation capabil-ity in manufacturing companies operating in Poland. Sustainability, 12(17), 7101, 1-20. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12177101.

63. Świadek, A. (2012). Wielkość przedsiębiorstw i ich struktura własności a rozwój innowacyjności w regionalnych systemach przemysłowych. Studia Regionalne i Lo-kalne, 13(47), 5–23.

64. Świadek, A. (2018). Sales range and innovative activity in the manufacturing sys-tem of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 13(4), 725–740. http://dx.doi.org/10.24136/eq.2018.035.

65. Świadek, A., & Gorączkowska, J. (2020). The institutional support for an innovation cooperation in industry: The case of Poland. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Eco-nomics and Economic Policy, 15(4), 811–831. DOI: 10.24136/eq.2020.035.

66. Terkan, R. (2014). Importance of creative advertising and marketing according to university students’ perspective. International Review of Management and Market-ing, 4(3), 239–246.

67. Western Institute. (2012). Research on the needs of entrepreneurs from Greater Poland in terms of cooperation with the R&D sector. Western Institute, Poznań.

68. Wojnicka-Sycz, E., Sycz, P. (2016). Public innovation policy and other determinants of innovativeness in Poland. The Innovation Journal: The Public Sector Innovation Journal, 21(3), 1-23.

69. Yildiz, H. E., Murtic, A., Klofsten, M., Zander, U., & Richtnér, A. (2021). Individual and contextual determinants of innovation performance: A micro-foundations per-spective. Technovation, 99, 102–130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2020.10213.

70. Zhang, H., Chen, X., Lv, Y., & Li, M. (2022). Drivers of university–business coopera-tion of university faculty from the social cognitive theory perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 1013774. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1013774

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

1.
TOMASZEWSKI, Marek and TOMASZEWSKA, Gabriela. The innovation of enterprises and cooperation between science and business in the didactic aspect . Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 June 2026. Vol. 25, no. 2, pp. 147- 174. [Accessed 24 July 2026]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2026.7.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 25 No. 2 (2026)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2026 Marek Tomaszewski, Gabriela Tomaszewska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 84
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop