Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Journal Information
  • Current
  • Archives
  • Editorial Team
  • Fees
  • Ethics and Policies
  • Submission
  • Register
  • Login

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Valuation of copyrights to audiovisual works: transparency practices of the copyright management organizations in the European Union
  • Home
  • /
  • Valuation of copyrights to audiovisual works: transparency practices of the copyright management organizations in the European Union
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 20 No. 3 (2021) /
  4. Articles

Valuation of copyrights to audiovisual works: transparency practices of the copyright management organizations in the European Union

Authors

  • Paweł Kossecki Polish National Film, Television and Theatre School in Łódź https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1479-8554
  • Oguzhan Akin Kozminski University in Warsaw https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9806-8297

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/EiP.2021.033

Keywords

intangible asset valuation, intellectual property, copyrights; licensing, European Union directive, collective management organizations

Abstract

Motivation: The functioning of the audiovisual sector strongly depends on the use of copyrights and related rights. Problems with their clearing could harm the functioning of companies and might even lead to strong financial problems. The distribution of copyright-protected audiovisual works requires the licensing of rights by different rightsholders. Some of them are represented by Copyright Management Organizations (CMOs), which allow users to clear rights for many works without individual negotiations. Fees paid to CMOs for copyright-protected content constitute a significant part of operating costs for companies like TV stations, cable operators, VoD (Video on Demand) platforms. In case of intellectual properties for audiovisual works, CMOs make the valuation. They have been facing legal challenges due to subjective valuations as a result of being monopolies in the local market of the represented country and lack of transparency.

Aim: This work explores the transparency of 21 CMOs in 4 EU countries due to their expected to be an integrated market status as the result of political and economic amalgamation. In addition to the adoption of The European Union Directive on collective management of copyright and multi-territorial licensing of rights, as part of the EU’s Digital Single Market project, this exploratory research, with comparative analysis of CMOs using the linear ordering methods, explains the necessity of an epagogic approach to creating correct institutions besides directives and laws, such as central observation, an ombudsman for conflict management, or an official body to employ these features in one structure to actively govern the market.

Results: The conducted analysis allowed us to reflect on the importance of transparency and taxonomic mapping of the audiovisual market landscape will be the guideline to flatten the copyright valuation divergence in the EU and eventually will pave the way for fewer disputes and more innovations.

References

AIPA. (2011). Skupni sporazum. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.aipa.si/media/uploads/files/qmHTRGvPYeoK.pdf.

AIPA. (2019). Letno poročilo. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.aipa.si/media/uploads/reports/WsUuLLfPqolNV.pdf.

AIPA. (2021). Joint agreement. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.aipa.si/sl/Dokumenti/Tarifa.

AKM. (2019a). Annual report. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.akm.at/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2020/07/AKM_AnnualReport19_online_engl.pdf.

AKM. (2019b). Transparenzbericht. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.akm.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/AKM-Transparenzbericht-2019.pdf.

AKM. (2020). Autonomer Tarif für kommerzielles Privatfernsehen. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.akm.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/AT-AKM-fuer-kommerzielles-Privatfernsehen-ab-1.11.2020.pdf.

AKM. (2021). Mandatory publications. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from AKM: https://www.akm.at/ueber-uns/pflichtveroeffentlichungen.

Brad, S., & Bently, L. (1999). The making of modern intellectual property law: the British experience. Cambridge University Press.

Caplan, B. (2013). Semi-rivalry and fiscal externalities. Retrieved 27.02.2021 from https://www.econlib.org/archives/2013/06/semi-rivalry.html.

CISAC. (2021). The role of collective management organisations. Retrieved 27.02.2021 from https://www.cisac.org/Newsroom/expert-articles/role-collective-management-organisations.

Demmou, L., Stefanescu, I., & Arquié, A. (2019). Productivity growth and finance: the role of intangible assets, a sector level analysis. Retrieved 27.02.2021 from http://www.oecd.org/officialdocuments/publicdisplaydocumentpdf/?cote=ECO/WKP(2019)16&docLanguage=En.

Depoorter, B., & Parisi, F. (2002). Fair use and copyright protection: a price theory explanation. International Review of Law and Economics, 21(4), 453–473. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0144-8188(01)00071-0.

Directive (EU) 2019/790 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 17 April 2019 on copyright and related rights in the Digital Single Market and amending Directives 96/9/EC and 2001/29/EC (OJ L 130, 17.5.2019).

Directive 2001/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2001 on the harmonisation of certain aspects of copyright and related rights in the information society (OJ L 167, 22.6.2001).

Directive 2014/26/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 February 2014 on collective management of copyright and related rights and multi-territorial licensing of rights in musical works for online use in the internal market (OJ L 84, 20.3.2014).

Dziechciarz, J. (2002). Ekonometria. Akademia Ekonomiczna we Wrocławiu.

ECJ Case 395/87. (1989). ECJ decision in Ministere Public v Jean-Louis Tournier. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61987CJ0395&qid=1614628268840.

ECJ Case 402/85. (1987). ECJ decision in G. Basset vs. SACEM. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61985CJ0402&qid=1614628090758.

ECJ Case C-351/12. (2014). ECJ decision in Ochranný svaz autorský pro práva k dílům hudebním o.s. (OSA) v Léčebné lázně Mariánské Lázně a.s. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:62012CJ0351&from=EN.

ECJ Case C-52/07. (2008). ECJ decision in Kanal 5 Ltd, TV 4 AB v Föreningen Svenska Tonsättares Internationella Musikbyrå. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A62007CA0052&qid=1614628381363.

ECJ decision in Joined Cases 110/88, 241/88 and 242/88. (1989). Francois Lucazeau v Societe des Auteurs, Compositeurs et Editeurs de Musique (SACEM) and SACEM v Xavier Debelle and Christian Soumagnac. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A61988CJ0110&qid=1614628663431.

EU. (1995). Green paper on copyright and related rights in the information society. Retrieved 12.03.2021 from https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=LEGISSUM:l24152.

European Commission. (2015). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: a digital single market strategy for Europe (COM/2015/0192).

Filmex. (2019a). Avoimuusraportti. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.filmex.fi/site/assets/files/1152/avoimuusraportti_2019.pdf.

Filmex. (2019b). Yle-arkisto tilitysohjesääntö. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.filmex.fi/site/assets/files/1152/tilitysohjesaanto-29_3_2019.pdf.

Filmex. (2021). General principles governing Filmex. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.filmex.fi/toiminta.

FMU. (2018). Organizational cooperation. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.muusikkojenliitto.fi/info.

FMU. (2021). Musicians’ union tariffs. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.muusikkojenliitto.fi/wp-content/uploads/2021/02/Liksalista_2021_ENG_v2.pdf.

Gans, J. (2012). Information wants to be shared. Harvard Business Review Press.

GDA. (2019). Relatório de atividades. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gda.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/RELATORIO_GDA_2019_FINAL.pdf.

Gedipe. (2020a). Relatorio transparencia. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gedipe.org/site_gedipe/main/Documento?i=338&s=5.

Gedipe. (2020b). Tabela universal: direitos de retransmissão por cabo ou meios similares de retransmissão, tarifário e escalões. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gedipe.org/site_gedipe/main/Documento?i=369&s=12.

Gedipe. (2021). Regulamento de reclamações e resolução de litígios. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gedipe.org/site_gedipe/main/Documento?i=381&s=14.

Gilbert, K. (2009). The valuation of copyright-related intangible assets. Insights, 35–46.

Gramex. (2019a). Gramexin avoimuus raportti vuodelta. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gramex.fi/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/Avoimuusraportti-painoversio_FI_2020_low.pdf.

Gramex. (2019b). Vuosikatsaus. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gramex.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Vuosikatsaus-2019-FINAL_low.pdf.

Gramex. (2021a). Handling of complaints and settlement. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.gramex.fi/portfolio-items/yhteishallinnointiin-liittyvien-valitusten-kasittely-ja-riitojen-ratkaiseminen.

Gramex. (2021b). Online store. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://shop.gramex.fi/fi/shop/av.

Hooijer, R., & Baloyi, J.J. (2016). Collective management organizations: tool kit, neighboring rights. Retrieved 01.03.2021 from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_emat_2016_2.pdf.

IPF. (2005). Tarifo. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.ipf.si/media/1021/t-radiodifuzija.pdf.

IPF. (2018). Pogodba o pogojih. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.ipf.si/media/110323/pogodba-o-pogojih-uporabe-fonogramov-pri-retransmisiji-tv-in-radijskih-programov-v-ponudbi-operaterja.pdf.

IPF. (2019). Letno porocilo. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.ipf.si/media/110686/letno-porocilo-ipf-2019.pdf.

IPF. (2021). Members and voting rights. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.ipf.si/en/creators/have-you-authorised-ipf-ko-yet/#ipfkomembership.

Kopiosto. (2019). Kopiosto in 2019. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.kopiosto.fi/app/uploads/2018/11/07145025/Kopiosto-in-2019.pdf.

Kopiosto. (2020). Activities. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.kopiosto.fi/kopiosto/kopiosto/toiminta.

Kopiosto. (2021). Price list of copy channels. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.kopiosto.fi/kopiosto/teosten-kayttajille/tv-kanavien-edelleen-lahettaminen/tv-kanavien-edelleen-lahettaminen-yhteisantenniverkoissa/kopiosto-kanavien-hinnasto.

Kossecki, P. (2012). Metodologia określania wartości praw autorskich: kalkulacja odszkodowań do celów prawnych. E-Mentor, 3(45), 46–50.

Kossecki, P. (2014). Valuation of copyrights for law purposes: collecting societies and cable operators. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2482047.

Kossecki, P. (2015). Valuation and value creation of cable tv operators: cable operators and copyright fees. PWSFTViT.

Kossecki, P. (2020). What is the value of the film copyrights: an analysis of basic methods of valuation. PWSFTViT. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3580949.

Kossecki, P., Akin, O., & Wachowicz, J., (2021). Valuation of intellectual property rights, copyrights to audiovisual works: an international comparison of copyright management organizations. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3968559.

LM. (2016). Möglichkeiten für beschwerden und alternative. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://literar.at/docs/default-source/downloads/neu-beschwerdem%C3%B6glichkeit.pdf?sfvrsn=eba145e5_4.

LM. (2019). Geschäftsbericht. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://literar.at/docs/default-source/downloads/gb-2019-online.pdf?sfvrsn=db05be5_2.

LM. (2021). Kabel-TV Tarif 2021. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://literar.at/docs/default-source/downloads/tarife-ktv-2021.pdf?sfvrsn=4c4c58e5_6.

LSG. (2016). LSG-Tarif für OTT TV. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.lsg.at/LSG-Tarif%20f%C3%BCr%20OTT%20TV%2001-2020.pdf.

LSG. (2019). Geschäftsbericht und transparenzbericht. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.lsg-interpreten.com/wp-content/uploads/Bericht_LSG_2019_15092020_2.pdf.

LSG. (2021). Perception of ancillary copyrights GmbH publications. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.lsg.at/voe.html.

Moberly, M.D. (2014). Safeguarding intangible assets. Elsevier.

MPLC. (2019). Rightsholder licensing agreement. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.mplc.es/files/MPLC%20Rightsholder%20Agreement%202019.pdf.

NCB. (2019). Transparency report. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.ncb.dk/pdf/TransparencyReport-2019.pdf.

NCB. (2020). Complaints and dispute resolution. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.ncb.dk/pdf/Complaints-and-disputes.pdf.

NCB. (2021). Using music in tv productions within the Nordic region. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from http://www.ncb.dk/pdf/av-pricelist-gentv-en.pdf.

Ostrom, E. (2010). Beyond markets and states: polycentric governance of complex economic systems. American Economic Review, 100(3), 641–672. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.3.641.

Pastor, D., Glova, J., Lipták, F., & Kováč, V. (2017). Intangibles and methods for their valuation in financial terms: literature Review. Intangible Capital, 13(2), 387–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.3926/ic.752.

Rumniak, P. (2011). Procesowe podejście do wyceny składników niematerialnych. Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego, 41(668), 285–294.

SACD. (2021). Two centuries of experience. Retrieved 28.02.2021 from https://www.sacd.fr/en/two-centuries-experience.

SAZAS. (2006). Pravilnik o javni priobčitvi glasbenih del. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.sazas.org/Portals/0/Documents/SAZAS%20dokumenti/Pravilniki%20in%20statuti/Pravilnik%20o%20javni%20priobcitvi%20glasbenih%20del.pdf.

SAZAS. (2018). Rules on the distribution. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.sazas.org/Portals/0/Documents/Dokumenti%20v%20EN/InterniAkti-EN_ZKUASP/Distribution-Rules_SAZAS_ko_2018-06.pdf.

SAZAS. (2019). Annual report. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.sazas.org/Portals/0/Documents/Dokumenti%20v%20EN/Annual-Business-Report_2019-EN_SAZAS-Society-ko.pdf.

Smith, G.V., & Parr, R.L. (2005). Intellectual property, valuation, exploitation, and infringement damages. John Willey & Sons.

SPA. (2012). TV broadcast licensing fees. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.spautores.pt/assets_live/5302/tv_broadcast_licensing_fees.pdf.

SPA. (2019). Relatorio E contas da direccao. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.spautores.pt/assets_live/14099/relat_rio_e_contas_da_direc_o_2019.pdf.

SPA. (2020). Anexo ao regulamento de repartição de direitos. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.spautores.pt/assets_live/14003/tabelacomiss_es.pdf.

SPA. (2021). Quem somos. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.spautores.pt/spa/quem-somos.

Teosto. (2018). Free-to-end user audiovisual content. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.teosto.fi/app/uploads/2021/01/15104808/free_to_enduser_audiovisual_content_pricelist.pdf.

Teosto. (2019a). 2019 Tilinpäätös. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.teosto.fi/app/uploads/2021/02/19111514/teosto_tilinpaatos_2019_fi.pdf.

Teosto. (2019b). Avoimuusraportti 2019. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.teosto.fi/app/uploads/2021/02/19111526/teosto_avoimuusraportti_2019_fi-1.pdf.

Teosto. (2021). Work organization. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.teosto.fi/tietoa-teostosta/organisaatio.

VAM. (2019). Transparency report. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from https://www.vam.cc/fileadmin/user_upload/Berichte/VAM_Transparenzbericht_2019_inkl_Beurteilung_Bilanz.pdf.

VAM. (2020). Bezugsberechtigte. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.vam.cc/fileadmin/user_upload/Verzeichnisse/Bezugsberechtigte_2021_03_09_geordnet.pdf.

VAM. (2021a). Für die integrale kabelweitersendung. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from https://www.vam.cc/fileadmin/user_upload/Vertraege/Einzelvertrag_Kabelnetzbetreiber.pdf.

VAM. (2021b). Kabel TV-entgelt 2021. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.vam.cc/fileadmin/user_upload/Tarife/6_Tarif_KabelTV_VAM_2021.pdf.

VDFS. (2016). Möglichkeiten für beschwerden. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from https://www.vdfs.at/files/moeglichkeiten_fuer_beschwerden_und_alternative_streitbeilegung_2.pdf.

VDFS. (2020). Kabel-TV tarif. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from https://www.vdfs.at/files/tarife-ktv-2020.pdf.

VDFS. (2021). The members of the VdFS. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from https://www.vdfs.at/1-0-Ueber-die-Verwertungsgesellschaft-der-Filmschaffenden.html#DieMitgliederderVdFS.

VGR. (2016). Inquiries & complaints. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from http://www.vg-rundfunk.at/anfragen-und-beschwerden.

VGR. (2019). Transparenzbericht. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from http://www.vg-rundfunk.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/Transparenzbericht-2019-VGR.pdf.

VGR. (2020). VGR tarifverlautbarung. Retrieved 14.03.2021 from http://www.vg-rundfunk.at/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Kabel_Tarifverlautbarung_27102020.pdf.

Webster, E., & Jensen, P. H. (2006). Investment in intangible capital: an enterprise perspective. Economic Record, 82(256), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.2006.00296.x.

WIPO. (2016). Collective management organizations: tool kit, neighboring rights. Retrieved 27.02.2021 from https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo_pub_emat_2016_2.pdf.

WIPO. (2020). Berne convention for the protection of literary and artistic works. Retrieved 27.02.2021 from https://www.wipo.int/export/sites/www/treaties/en/documents/pdf/berne.pdf.

ZAMP. (2019). Letno poročilo. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.zamp-zdruzenje.si/doc/zamp-letno-porocilo-2019-spletna-objava.pdf.

ZAMP. (2020). Uradni list: vsebina uradnega lista. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.zamp-zdruzenje.si/doc/dogovor-za-ureditev-medsebojnih-razmerij-v-zvezi-z-uporabo-avtorskih-del-med-zkos-ter-zsodt-na-eni-strani-ter-zamp-uradni-list-1082-27-2016.pdf.

ZAMP. (2021). Membership in ZAMP. Retrieved 13.03.2021 from https://www.zamp-zdruzenje.si/avtorji/vclanitev.html.

Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2021-09-30

How to Cite

1.
KOSSECKI, Paweł and AKIN, Oguzhan. Valuation of copyrights to audiovisual works: transparency practices of the copyright management organizations in the European Union. Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law. Online. 30 September 2021. Vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 543-571. [Accessed 29 December 2025]. DOI 10.12775/EiP.2021.033.
  • ISO 690
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 20 No. 3 (2021)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Paweł Kossecki, Oguzhan Akin

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 4271
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

User

User

Contact

Principal Contact
Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl
Support Contact
Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

cross_check

The journal content is indexed in CrossCheck, the CrossRef initiative to prevent scholarly and professional plagiarism

Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie
Ekonomia i Prawo. Economics and Law
Katedra Ekonomii 
Wydział Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania 
Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu 
ul. Gagarina 13A 
87-100 Toruń

Principal Contact

Piotr Wiśniewski
psw@umk.pl

Support Contact

Grzegorz Kopcewicz
Phone (56) 611 26 93
greg@umk.pl

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop