Divine foreknowledge and providence in the commentaries of Boethius and Aquinas on the De interpretatione 9 of Aristotle

David Torrijos-Castrillejo

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/BPTh.2020.006

Abstrakt


Boethius represents one of the most important milestones in Christian reflection about fate and providence, especially considering that he takes into account Proclus’ contributions to these questions. For this reason, TheConsolation of philosophy is considered a crucial work for the development of this topic. However, Boethius also exposes his ideas in his commentary on the book that constitutes one of the oldest and most relevant texts on the problem of future contingents, namely Aristotle’s De interpretatione. Although St. Thomas refers to Boethius many times in his systematic works and even devotes two commentaries to two of his theological opuscules, it is of special interest that both authors composed a commentary on the abovementioned work of Aristotle. The commentary of Saint Thomas does not interpret the whole book, but it does study the pages about future contingents in dialogue with Boethius. We will study such texts in our presentation. They constitute one of the greatest contributions of Aquinas to the problem of necessity and contingency and therefore to the vexata quaestioof divine intervention in the world and particularly in human free will. Not only Augustin but also Aristotle (read by Boethius) and Nemesius of Emesa will be decisive in Aquinas’ perception of this matter.


Słowa kluczowe


providence; determinism; free will; divine foreknowledge; Aristotle’s commentaries

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)

Bibliografia


Ammonius, On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9; Boethius, On Aristotle’s On Interpretation 9, transl. D. Blank & N. Kretzmann, Ithaca 1998.

Basilius Magnus, Ex codice CCXLVI. Fragmentum Commentarii S. Basilii in Isaiam Prophetam, in: Bibliotheca Casinensis seu codices manuscripti qui in tabulario Casinensi asseruantur, Monte Cassino 1880, vol. 4.1, pp. 302-305, vol. 4.2, pp. 391-434.

Brock S. L., Causality and Necessity in Thomas Aquinas, Quaestio 2 (2002), pp. 217-240.

Denifle H., Chartularium Universitatis Parisiensis, vol. 1, Parisiis 1889.

Dobler E., Fälsche Väterzitate bei Thomas von Aquin: Gregorius, Bischof von Nyssa oder Nemesius Emesenus, Freiburg 2001.

Goris H.J.M.J., Free Creatures of an Eternal God. Thomas Aquinas on God’s Infallible Foreknowledge and Irresistible Will, Nijmegen 1996.

Kretzmann N., ‘Nos ipsi principia sumus.’ Boethius and the basis of contingency, in: Divine Omniscience and Omnipotence in Medieval Philosophy, T. Rudavski (ed.), Dordrecht 1985, pp. 23-50.

Lipatov N.A., The problem of the authorship of the Commentary on the Prophet Isaiah attributed to St. Basil the Great, in: Studia Patristica, vol. 27, Papers presented at the Eleventh International Conference on Patristic Studies held in Oxford 1991, E.A. Livingstone (ed.), Leuven 1993, pp. 42-48.

McInerny R., Aquinas Against the Averroists, On There Being Only One Intellect, West Lafayette 1993.

McInerny R., Boethius & Aquinas, Washington 2012.

Meiser C., Anicii Manlii Severini Boetii Comentarii in Librum Aristotelis ΠΕΡΙ ΕΡΜΗΝΕΙΑΣ, Lipsiae 1880.

Nemesius Emesenus, De natura hominis: Traduction de Burgundio de Pise, G. Verbeke, J. R. Moncho (ed.), Leiden 1975.

Porro P., “Lex necessitatis vel contingentiae”. Necessità, contingenza e provvidenza nell’universo di Tommaso d’Aquino, Revue des sciences philosophiques et théologiques 96 (2012), pp. 401-450.

Porro P., Thomas Aquinas. A Historical and Philosophical Profile, Washington 2016.

Roszak P., Exégesis y metafísica. En torno a la hermenéutica bíblica de santo Tomás de Aquino, Salmanticensis 61 (2014), pp. 301-323.

Roszak P., Language, Metaphysics and the Bible. The Philosophical Background of Aquinas’s exegesis of Sacred Scripture, European Journal of Science and Theology 5 (2018), pp. 123-135.

Sharples R., Fate, prescience and free will, in: The Cambridge Companion to Boethius, J. Marenborn (ed.), Cambridge 2009, pp. 207-227.

Telfer W., Cyril of Jerusalem and Nemesius of Emesa, Louisville 1955.

Te Velde R.A., Participation and Substantiality in Thomas Aquinas, Leiden 1995.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia, vol. 7/2, Commentum in quartum librum Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi, Parmae 1858.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia, vol. 14, In psalmos Davidis expositio, Parmae 1863.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia iussu impensaque Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 4, Pars prima Summae theologiae, Romae 1888.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia iussu edita Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 14, Summa contra gentiles, Romae 1926.

Thomae Aquinatis, Scriptum super libros Sententiarum magistri Petri Lombardi episcopi Parisiensis, vol. 1, Parisiis 1929.

Thomae Aquinatis, Quaestiones disputatae et quaestiones duodecim quodlibetales, vol. 5, Quaestiones quodlibetales, Romae 1931.

Thomae Aquinatis, Catena aurea in quatuor Evangelia, vol. 2, Expositio in Lucam et Ioannem, Taurini 1953.

Thomae Aquinatis, In duodecim libros Metaphysicorum Aristotelis Expositio, Romae 1964.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 28, Expositio super Isaiam ad litteram, Romae 1974.

Thomae Aquinatis, Opera omnia iussu Leonis XIII P. M. edita, vol. 1*/1, Expositio libri Peryermeneias, Roma/Paris 1989.

Thomae Aquinatis, On the Truth of the Catholic Faith, New York 1955-57.

Torrell J.-P., Initiation à saint Thomas d’Aquin, Fribourg/Paris 2008.

Torrijos-Castrillejo D., La providence chez Saint-Thomas d’Aquin comme compréhension de la totalité, in: Institutions et destitutions de la Totalité. Explorations de l’œuvre de Christian Godin, C. Brunier-Coulin (ed.), Paris 2016, pp. 293-318.

Torrijos-Castrillejo D., Tomás de Vío, Cayetano: Sobre la providencia y el hado, Revista española de teología 78 (2018), pp. 459-500.

Torrijos-Castrillejo D., El aristotelismo en los primeros autores cristianos griegos, in: Eulogía. Estudios sobre cristianismo primitivo. Homenaje a Mercedes López Salvá, P. de Paz Amérigo, I. Sanz Extremeño (ed.), Madrid 2018, pp. 541-565.


##plugins.generic.alm.title##

##plugins.generic.alm.loading##

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM






ISSN (print) 1689-5150
ISSN (online) 2450-7059

Partnerzy platformy czasopism