Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Counsil
    • Indexing
    • International Partners
    • Ethical standards
    • Privacy Statement
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Torun International Studies

THE EFFECT OF COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM (CEAS) ON NIGERIAN IRREGULAR MIGRANTS
  • Home
  • /
  • THE EFFECT OF COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM (CEAS) ON NIGERIAN IRREGULAR MIGRANTS
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 1 No. 21 (2025) /
  4. Articles

THE EFFECT OF COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM (CEAS) ON NIGERIAN IRREGULAR MIGRANTS

Authors

  • Peter Irabor Osun State University https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8019-8795

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2025.006

Keywords

Common European Asylum System, CEAS, migration, Nigerian irregular migrants, Nigeria

Abstract

The Common European Asylum System (CEAS) focused on the harmonisation and procedure for granting asylum to eligible migrants and safeguarding the rights of those in need of protection across European Union (EU) member states. This study appraised the performance of CEAS on Nigerian irregular migrants and examined the challenges of CEAS for them. The study relied on qualitative data through Individual In-depth Interviews (IDIs) conducted on representatives from European External Action Service, European Union’s delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS, Frontex, International Organisation for Migration, Nigeria Immigration Service, Idia Renaissance, and the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Persons. Preliminary findings showed that majority of Nigerian irregular migrants seeking asylum are not necessarily refugees but economic migrants who seek better life in Europe and, due to this, they change their nationality and give false impression in order to be granted asylum. The difficulty for the EU immigration officials to establish evidence regarding their true identity makes it possible for Nigerian irregular migrants to remain in reception centres for a longer period; some of them do not wait to complete their biometric registration, while others deliberately withdraw asylum applications in order to abscond and reapply in different EU countries. Some of the challenges of CEAS for Nigerian irregular migrants, according to the findings, include slow handling of asylum requests, which consequently led to overcrowded reception centres, conflicting interests of EU member states regarding commitment and procedure of CEAS, as well as strict asylum procedure, which violate the rule of law and rights of migrants who seek genuine protection in EU member states. This study concluded that the handling of CEAS has resulted in the increase of Nigerian irregular migrants that applied for asylum, consequently increasing the number of pending asylum applications across Europe.

References

Adeola, G. L., & Oluyemi, F. O. (2012). The political and security implications of cross border migration between Nigeria and her francophone neighbours. International Journal of Social Science Tomorrow, 1(3), 1–2.

Beirens, H. (2018). Cracked foundation, structural weaknesses in the Common EuropeanAsylum System. Migration Policy Institute Europe.

Bulletin of the European Communities. (1985). Guidelines for a community policy on migration. Bulletin of the European Communities, 18(7), 1–5.

Capoccia, G., & Kelemen, D. R. (2007). The study of critical junctures. Theory, narrative and counterfactuals in historical institutionalism. World Politics, 59(3), 341–

369. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100020852

Castles, S. (2012). Methodology and methods: Conceptual issues. In M. Berriane & H. de Haas (Eds.), African migrations research: Innovative methods and methodologies, (pp.15–38). African World Press.

Chandna, R. C. (2008). The geography of population: Concepts, determinants and patterns. Kalyani Publishers.

Collett, E. (2015). The development of EU policy on immigration and asylum: Rethinking coordination and leadership [Policy brief No. 8.]. Migration Policy Institute Europe.

Crawley, H., & Blitz, B. K. (2018). Common agenda or Europe’s agenda? Internationalprotection, human rights and migration from the Horn of Africa. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 44(15), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369183X.2018.1468393

Czaika, M., & Hobolth, M. (2014). Deflection into irregularity? (Working Paper No. 84). International Migration Institute.

Czaika, M., & Hobolth, M. (2016). Do restrictive asylum and visa policies increase irregular migration into Europe? European Union Politics, 17(3), 345–365. https:// doi.org/10.1177/1465116516633299

David, P. A. (2007). Path dependence: A foundational concept for historical social science. Cliometrica, 1(2), 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-006-0005-x

Eisenstad, S. N. (1954). The absorption of immigrants: A comparative study based mainly on the Jewish community in Palestine and the state of Israel. Routledge & Kegan Paul. Eurostat. (2017). Key figures on Europe. Publications Office of the European Union.

European Asylum Support Office. (2014). Article 15(c) Qualification Directive (2011/95/ EU): Judicial analysis. https://euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/article-15cqualification-directive-201195eu-a-judicial-analysis.pdf

European Asylum Support Office. (2015). Country of origin information report: Nigeria – Sex trafficking of women. https://euaa.europa.eu/sites/default/files/public/BZ0415678ENN.pdf

European Asylum Support Office. (2016). An introduction to the Common European AsylumSystem for courts and tribunals: A judicial analysis. https://euaa.europa.eu/ sites/default/files/public/BZ0216138ENN.PDF

European Asylum Support Office. (2020). EASO special report: Asylum trends and COVID-19, Issue 2.

European Commission. (2016). Establishing a new partnership framework with thirdcountries under the European Agenda on Migration (COM(2016) 385 final). https://ec.europa.eu/ home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/ proposalimplementationpackage/docs/20160607/communication_external_aspects_ eam_towards_new_migration_ompact_en.pdf

European Commission. (2017a). The new European consensus on development – EU andmember states sign joint strategy to eradicate poverty [Press release]. https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_17_1503

European Commission. (2017b). Establishing a common return handbook to be used bymember states’ competent authorities when carrying out return related tasks (COM(2017) 6505 final).

European Council. (2010). The Stockholm programme – An open and secure Europe serving and protecting citizens. Official Journal of the European Union, 4(5), 1–38. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2010:115:0001:00 38:EN:PDF

European Migration Network. (2012). Practical measures to reduce irregular migration. https://home-affairs.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2020-09/345._summary_of_practi-cal_measures_to_reduce_irregular_migration_en.pdf

European Parliament. (2018). Migration and asylum: A challenge for Europe. https://www. europarl.europa.eu/RegData/etudes/PERI/2017/600414/IPOL_PERI(2017)600414_ EN.pdf

European Union. (2010). Regulation (EU) No. 439/2010 of the European Parliament and ofthe Council of 19 May 2010 establishing a European Asylum Support Office. Official Journal of the European Union, L132, 11–28. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/ legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32010R0439

Faure, R., Gavas, M., & Knoll, A. (2015). Challenges to a comprehensive EU migration and asylum policy. European Centre for Development Policy Management.

Frontex. (2020). Risk analysis for 2020. Risk analysis unit. Frontex Reference No: 1218/2020. Publications Office of the European Union.

Frontex. (2021). Risk analysis for 2021. Risk analysis Unit. Frontex Reference No: 3665/2021. Publications Office of the European Union.

Garson, J. P., & Loizillon, A. (2003). Changes and challenges – Europe and migration from1950 to present. In The economic and social aspects of migration (pp. 45–67). OECD Publishing.

Ghio, D., & Blangiardo, G. C. (2019). Exploring the link between irregular migration and asylum: The case of Italy. Genus, 75(14), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118019-0060-3

Guild, E., & Minderhoud, P. (Eds.), (2011). The first decade of EU migration and asylumlaw. Martnus Nijho Publishers.

Helbling, M., & Leblang, D. (2019). Controlling immigration? How regulations affect migration flows. European Journal of Political Research, 58(1), 248–269. https://doi. org/10.1111/1475-6765.12279

Ikwuyatum, G. O. (2016). The pattern and characteristics of inter and intra-regional migration in Nigeria. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 6(7), 114–124.

International Organization for Migration. (2013). World migration report 2013: Migrant wellbeing and development. https://publications.iom.int/system/files/pdf/wmr2013_ en.pdf

International Organization for Migration. (2017). Niger – Flow monitoring overview (2016– 2017). https://www.globaldtm.info/niger-flow-monitoring-overview-2016-2017/

International Organization for Migration. (2018). Comprehensive migration flow survey brief: Nigerian migrants (to Europe).

Katznelson, I. (1997). Structure and configuration in comparative politics. In M. I. Lichbach & A. S. Zuckerman (Eds.), Comparative politics: Rationality, culture, and structure (pp. 81–112). Cambridge University Press.

Kirwin, M., & Anderson, J. (2018). Identifying the factors driving West African migration. West African Papers, 17, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eb3b2806-en

Koser, K., & McAuliffe, M. (2013). Establishing an evidence-base for future policy development on irregular migration to Australia. Irregular Migration Research Programme, Occasional Paper Series.

Kuthiala, S. K., Castles, S., & Kosack, G. (1975). Immigrant workers and class structure in Western Europe. Contemporary Sociology, 4(5), 534. https://doi.org/10.2307/2063648

Martiniello, M. (2006). The new migratory Europe: Towards a proactive immigration policy? In C. A. Parsons, & T. M. Smeeding (Eds.), Immigration and the transformation of Europe, 298–326. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511493577

Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83(2), 340–363. https://doi. org/10.2307/j.ctv1f886rp.6

Namara, F. (2018). Integrated border management and migration: A crisis concept or a concept in crisis? In K. Bamberg, F. Fabbri & F. Namara. Competing priorities at the EU’s external border. European Policy Centre, Issue Paper.

Oberti, C. (2021). What happens to migrants who are rescued at sea and land in Italy? Info Migrants. https://www.infomigrants.net/en/post/30527/what-happens-to-migrants-who-are-rescued-at-sea-and-land-in-italy/

Obi-Ani, P., Obi-Ani, N. G., & Isiani, M. C. (2020). A historical perspective of Nigerian immigrants in Europe. Cogent Arts & Humanities, 7(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/ 10.1080/23311983.2020.1846262

Okeoghene, E. B. (2017). International migration and the study of socio-economic development in Nigeria: The role of Nigerian Immigration Service. Masters Dissertation, Covenant University, Ota, Ogun State.

Pierson, P. (1996). The path to European integration: A historical institutionalist analysis. Comparative Political Studies, 29(2), 123–163. https://doi.org/10.1177/ 001041409602900

Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in time: History, institutions, and social analysis. Princeton University Press. http://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctt7sgkg

Pollack, M. (2009). The new institutionalisms and European integration. In A. Wiener & T. Diez (Eds.), European integration theory (pp. 125–144). Oxford: Hampshire.

Van Mol, C., & de Valk, H. (2016). Migration and immigrants in Europe: A historical and demographic perspective. In B. Garcés-Mascareñas, R. Penninx (Eds.), Integration processes and policies in Europe. International Migration, Integration and Social Cohesion (IMISCOE) Research Series, Springer International Publishing.

R1. (2021). Interview held with the European Union delegation to Nigeria and ECOWAS on the 19th of September.

R2. (2021). Interview held with the programme coordinator, International Organisation for Migration-Nigeria, Abuja on the 8th of September.

R3. (2021). Interview held with the National Agency for the Prohibition of Trafficking in Person (NAPTIP) on 6th of September.

R4. (2021). Interview held with the European External Action Service (EEAS), West Africa Division, Brussels, Belgium on the 3rd of September.

R5. (2021). Interview held with the programme coordinator, Idia Renaissance on 25th of October.

R6. (2021). Interview held with the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) on the 5th of August.

R7. (2021), Interview held with Frontex in Warsaw, Poland on the 11th of October.

Schmidt, V. (2006). Discursive institutionalism: The explanatory power of ideas and discourse. Annual Review of Political Science, 11(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1146/ annurev.polisci.11.060606.135342

Seefar. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on migration intentions and human trafficking in Benin City, Nigeria. Issue Paper.

Seilonen, J. J. J. (2016). Fortress Europe – A brief history of the European migration and asylum policy. A historical institutionalist analysis of the migration and asylum policy, and the impacts of the current migration crisis (Master’s Thesis, University of Helsinki). University of Helsinki.

Steinmo, S. (2008). Historical institutionalism. In D. Della Porta & M. Keating (Eds.), Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences. A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511801938

Streeck, W. & Thelen, K. (2005). Introduction: institutional change in advanced political economies. In W. Streeck & K. Thelen (Eds.), Beyond continuity: Change in advanced political economies (pp. 1–39). Oxford University Press. https://doi. org/10.1093/oso/9780199280452.001.0001

Suddaby, R., Foster, W. M., & Mills, A. J. (2014). Historical institutionalism. In M. Bucheli & R. D. Wadhwani (Eds.), Organizations in time: History, theory, methods. Oxford University Press.

Suddaby, R., & Greenwood, R. (2011). Methodological issues in researching institutional change. In D. A. Buchanan & A. Bryman (Eds.), The sage handbook of organizational research methods. Paperback Edition. Sage Publications Ltd.

Tardis, M. (2018). European Union partnerships with African countries on migration: A common issue with conflicting interests. Notes de l’ Ifri, Centre for Migration and Citizenship.

Toscano, F. (2013). The second phase of the Common European Asylum System: A step forward in the protection of asylum seekers? (Working Paper No. 7.) Institute for European Studies.

Wickramasinghe, A. A., & Wimalarantana, W. (2016). International migration and migration theories: Social affairs. A Journal of the Social Science, 11, 3–33.

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Irabor, P. (2025). THE EFFECT OF COMMON EUROPEAN ASYLUM SYSTEM (CEAS) ON NIGERIAN IRREGULAR MIGRANTS. Torun International Studies, 1(21), 111–132. https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2025.006
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 21 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Peter Irabor

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 79
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

Common European Asylum System, CEAS, migration, Nigerian irregular migrants, Nigeria
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop