Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Counsil
    • Indexing
    • International Partners
    • Ethical standards
    • Privacy Statement
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Torun International Studies

INFLUENCE OF CEO CHARACTERISTICS ON INTERNATIONALISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS: EVIDENCE FROM POLAND
  • Home
  • /
  • INFLUENCE OF CEO CHARACTERISTICS ON INTERNATIONALISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS: EVIDENCE FROM POLAND
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 1 No. 21 (2025) /
  4. Articles

INFLUENCE OF CEO CHARACTERISTICS ON INTERNATIONALISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS

EVIDENCE FROM POLAND

Authors

  • Dorota Sobol Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w OlsztynieWydział Nauk Ekonomicznych https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2514-9560
  • Krzysztof Krukowski Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1614-4397
  • Wiesława Lizińska Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6957-2846

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2025.005

Keywords

science & technology parks, internationalisation, CEO characteristics

Abstract

Purpose: Evaluation of the influence of some characteristics describing chief executive officers who manage science and technology parks in Poland on internationalisation of these units.

Methodology/approach: The study was carried out in 2022 among 18 from 33 of all science and technology parks (STP) in Poland using a survey method and original questionnaire. In order to examine the internal consistency of the variables describing the factors involved in the internationalisation, the Cronbach’s Alpha reliability coefficient was calculated. The value of this coefficient was α=0.829; the factors selected for the analysis were than consistent. The τ Kendall’s test was employed to determine the strength and direction of relationships between: benefits versus the internationalisation index values, obstacles versus the internationalisation index values, characteristics of the park managers and the internationalisation index values.

Findings: The study failed to demonstrate a statistically significant relationship between the assessment of benefits and the value of the internationalisation index, but the parks’ managers mainly pointed to the high and very high importance of several benefits. Among the obstacles, shortage of own funds to start/continue activities is of the highest importance. The analysis confirmed a statistically significant dependence between the evaluation of obstacles by managers and the value of the internationalisation index for: lack of external funds to undertake and continue activities in this area, shortage of own funds that could be allocated to such activities, and the lack of knowledge of regulations governing business activities abroad. The study verified a statistically significant relationship between the level of internationalisation and some personal characteristics of the people who manage these parks (age, education, experience working).

Originality/value: Considering the importance and complexity of internationalisation suggests that STPs should be offered encouragement and support in this process. Of particular importance is the help to diagnose the formal and legal background of internationalisation efforts. Managers often acquire knowledge about the actual conditions underlying internationalisation only after the process has been launched.

References

Agndal, H., & Chetty, S. (2007). The impact of relationships on changes in internationalisation strategies of SMEs. European Journal of Marketing, 41(11/12), 1449–1474. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560710821251

Albahari, A., Barge-Gil, A., Pérez-Canto, S., & Landoni, P. (2022). The effect of science and technology parks on tenant firms: a literature review. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 48(4), 1489–1531. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-022-09949-7

Albahari, A., Klofsten, M., & Rubio-Romero, J. C. (2019). Science and technology parks: a study of value creation for park tenants. Journal of Technology Transfer, 44(4), 1256–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9661-9

Albahari, A., Pérez-Canto, S., Barge-Gil, A., & Modrego, A. (2017). Technology parks versus science parks: does the university make the difference? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 116, 13–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2016.11.012 Allen, J. (2007). Third generation science parks. Manchester: Manchester Science Parks Ltd.

Amal, M., & Filho, A. (2010). Internationalization of small‐ and medium‐sized enterprises: a multi case study. European Business Review, 22(6), 608–623. https://doi. org/10.1108/09555341011082916

Amoroso, S., & Hervás Soriano, F. (2019). An international perspective on science and technology parks. In S. Amoroso, A. N. Link & M. Wright (Eds.), Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development: An International Perspective (pp. 1–8). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030–30963-3_1

Anh Tu P., Khuong Ninh, L., & Thuy Huong, D. (2021). Internationalization and Turkish Manufacturing Firm Performance – Does Managerial Personality Matter? In N. M. Alsharari (Ed.), Accounting and Finance Innovations. IntechOpen. https:// doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.97432

Beckerman, W. (1956). Distance and the Pattern of Intra-European Trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 38(1), 31–40. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925556

Berger, M. & Hofer, R. (2011). The internationalisation of research technology organisations (RTO) – conceptual notions and illustrative examples from European RTOs in China. Science Technology Society, 16(1), 99–122. https://doi. org/10.1177/097172181001600106

Beugelsdijk, S., Kostova, T., Kunst, V., Spadafora, E., & Essen, M. (2017). Cultural Distance and Firm Internationalization: A Meta-Analytical Review and Theoretical Implications. Journal of Management, 44, 89–130. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206317729027

Bilkey, W. J., & Tesar, G. (1977). The Export Behavior of Smaller-Sized Wisconsin Manufacturing Firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 93–98. https://doi. org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490783

Bengtsson, L., & Löwegren, M. (2001). Internationalization in nordic and baltic science parks. A report on park activities and firm needs. Lund University Press.

Bigliardi, B., Dormio, A.I., Nosella, A., & Petroni G. (2006). Assessing science parks’ performances: directions from selected Italian case studies. Technovation, 26(4), 489–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2005.01.002

Błaszczyk, M., Kwieciński, L., Stawicka, M., & Wróblewski, M. (2018). Parki technologiczne jako element regionalnej polityki wsparcia internacjonalizacji innowacyjnych firm z sektora MŚP. CeDeWu.

Błaszczyk, M., Olszewska, K. M., & Wróblewski, M. (2023). Internationalisation of firms in the digital economy. Analysis of tenants of Polish technology parks. European Business Review, 35(2), 223–238. https://doi.org/10.1108/ebr-12-2021-0266 Bradley F. (2005). International Marketing Strategy. Harlow: Pearson Education Ltd.

Bruneel, J., Yli‐Renko, H., & Clarysse, B. (2010). Learning from experience and learning from others: how congenital and interorganizational learning substitute for experiential learning in young firm internationalization. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(2), 164–182. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.89

Cavusgil, S. T. (1984). Differences among exporting firms based on their degree of internationalization. Journal of Business Research, 12(2), 195–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(84)90006-7

Charles, D., & Ciampi Stancova, K. (2015). Research and technology organisations and smart specialisation. S3 Policy Brief Series, 15. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for prospective Technological Studies, Spain.

Chen, C., Zhan, Y., Yi, C., Li, X., & Wu, Y. J. (2020). Psychic distance and outward foreign direct investment: the moderating effect of firm heterogeneity. Management

Decision, 58(7), 1497–1515. https://doi.org/10.1108/md-06-2019-0731

Chetty, S. K., & Stangl, L. M. (2010). Internationalization and innovation in a network relationship context. European Journal of Marketing, 44(11/12), 1725–1743. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090561011079855

Child, J., Rodrigues, S. B., & Frynas, J. G. (2009). Psychic Distance, its Impact and Coping Modes. Management International Review, 49(2), 199–224. https://doi. org/10.1007/s11575-008-0136-3

Conway, T., & Swift, J. S. (2000). International relationship marketing – The importance of psychic distance. European Journal of Marketing, 34(11/12), 1391–1414. https://doi.org/10.1108/03090560010348641

Coviello, N., & Munro, H. (1997). Network relationships and the internationalisation process of small software firms. International Business Review, 6(4), 361–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-5931(97)00010-3

Cruz-Castro, L., Jonkers, K., & Sanz-Menéndez, L. (2015). The internationalisation of research institutes. In L. Wedlin & M. Nedeva (Eds.). Towards European science. Dynamics and policy of an evolving European research space (pp. 175–198). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782545514

Cui, L., Li, Y., Meyer, K. E., & Li, Z. (2014). Leadership Experience Meets Ownership Structure: Returnee Managers and Internationalization of Emerging Economy Firms. Management International Review, 55(3), 355–387. https://doi.org/10.1007/ s11575-014-0221-8

Czinkota M. R., Ronkainen I. A., & Otiz-Buonafina M., (2004), The Export Marketing Imperative. Thomson.

Dow, D. (2000). A Note on Psychological Distance and Export Market Selection. Journal of International Marketing, 8(1), 51–64. https://doi.org/10.1509/jimk.8.1.51.19563

EARTO (2015, March 15). EU R&I policy & data-driven decision making. Knowing your innovation ecosystem actors: data on European RTOs. https://www.earto.eu/wp-content/uploads/EARTO_Paper_-_Data_on_European_RTOs_-_Final_01.pdf

Edler, J. (2008). Creative internationalization: widening the perspectives on analysis and policy regarding international R&D activities. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 337–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9051-1

Edler, J., & Ebersberger, B. (2009, October 2-3). Internationalization of public research organizations. Context, strategies and effects. The Atlanta Conference on Science and Innovation Policy, Atlanta. https://smartech.gatech.edu/handle/1853/32320

Edler, J., & Polt, W. (2007). International industrial R&D—policy challenges: introduction to the special issue. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(4), 331–336. https:// doi.org/10.1007/s10961-007-9052-0

Engelman, R., Fracasso, E. M., & Zen, A. C. (2015). The impact of the incubator on the internationalization of firms. Journal of Technology Mangement & Innovation, 10(1), 29–39. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718–27242015000100003

Egwuonwu, A., Sarpong, D., & Mordi, C. (2020). Cultural intelligence and managerial relational performance: a resource advantage perspective. Journal of Intellectual Capital, 23(3), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1108/jic-07-2020-0243

Felício, J. A., Caldeirinha, V. R., & Rodrigues, R. (2012). Global mindset and the internationalization of small firms: The importance of the characteristics of entrepreneurs. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 8(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-012-0232-5

Franco, M., Haase, H., & Rodini, A. (2020). The Role of Incubators in the Internationalization Process of Incubated SMEs: A Perspective of International Cooperation. Global Business Review, 24(3), 488–509. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150920919381

Freixanet, J., & Renart, G. (2020). A capabilities perspective on the joint effects of internationalization time, speed, geographic scope and managers’ competencies on SME survival. Journal of World Business, 55(6), 101110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. jwb.2020.101110

Golonka M. (2014). Współpraca międzyorganizacyjna jako strategia umiędzynarodowienia przedsiębiorstw. In A. K. Koźmiński & D. Latusek-Jurczak (Eds.), Relacje międzyorganizacyjne w naukach o zarządzaniu (pp. 440–478). Wolters Kluwer.

Guadix, J., Carrillo-Castrillo, J., Onieva, L., & Navascués, J. (2016). Success variables in science and technology parks. Journal of Business Research, 69(11), 4870–4875. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.045

Håkanson, L., & Ambos, B. (2010). The antecedents of psychic distance. Journal of International Management, 16(3), 195–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2010.06.001

Hambrick, D. C., & Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. The Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434

Harveston, P., Kedia, B., & Davis, P. (2000). Internationalization of Born Global and Gradual Globalizing Firms: The Impact of the Manager. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 8(92), 278–286.

Herrmann, P., & Datta, D. K. (2005). Relationships between Top Management Team Characteristics and International Diversification: an Empirical Investigation. British Journal of Management, 16(1), 69–78. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00429.x

Hsu, W.-T., Chen, H.-L., & Cheng, C.-Y. (2013). Internationalization and firm performance of SMEs: The moderating effects of CEO attributes. Journal of World Business, 48(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2012.06.001

IASP (2024). Global Survey 2024: Science and technology parks and innovation districts, areas of innovation and other organized innovation spaces throughout the world. International Association of Science Parks and Areas of Innovation. https://www.iasp.ws/ our-industry/Definitions

İmer, S.T., Öktem, M.K., & Kaskatı O.T. (2021). How to increase the internationalization capacity of science & technology park firms: some lessons for the managers. Sosyoekonomi, 29(47), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.01.02

Johanson J. & Vahlne, J. E. (1990). The mechanism of internationalization. International Marketing Review, 7(4), 11–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339010137414

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The Internationalization Process of the Firm – A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Johanson, J., & Wiedersheim-Paul, F. (1975). The Internationalization of the Firm – Four Swedish Cases, The Journal of Management Studies, 12(3), 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1975.tb00514.x

Karaszewski W. (2004). Bezpośrednie inwestycje zagraniczne. Polska na tle świata. TNOiK.

Klimek, A. (2010). Internacjonalizacja polskich instytucji finansowych. Prace Naukowe Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu. Ekonomia, 12(149), 164–170.

Kontinen, T., & Ojala, A. (2010). Internationalization pathways of family SMEs: psychic distance as a focal point. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 17(3), 437–454. https://doi.org/10.1108/14626001011068725

Kuzel, M. (2018). Kapitał intelektualny organizacji w procesie polskich przedsiębiorstw i inwestorów zagranicznych. UMK.

Kyvik, O., Saris, W., Bonet, E., & Felício, J. A. (2013). The internationalization of small firms: The relationship between the global mindset and firms’ internationalization behavior. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 11(2), 172–195. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10843-013-0105-1

Lai, H.-C., & Shyu, J.Z. (2005). A comparison of innovation capacity at science parks across the Taiwan strait: the case of Zhangjiang high-tech park and Hsinchu sciencebased industrial park. Technovation, 25(7), 805–813. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. technovation. 2003.11.004

Leonidou, L. C., Katsikeas, C. S., & Piercy, N. F. (1998). Identifying Managerial Influences on Exporting: Past Research and Future Directions. Journal of International Marketing, 6(2), 74–102. https://doi.org/10.1177/1069031X9800600209

Li, P.-Y. (2016). The impact of the top management teams’ knowledge and experience on strategic decisions and performance. Journal of Management & Organization, 23(4), 504–523. https://doi.org/10.1017/jmo.2016.24

Li, P-Y. (2018). Top management team characteristics and firm internationalization: The moderating role of the size of middle managers. International Business Review, 27, 125–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.IBUSREV.2017.05.011

Lin, K. H., & Chaney, I. (2007). The Influence of Domestic Interfirm Networks on the Internationalization Process of Taiwanese SMEs. Asia Pacific Business Review, 13(4), 565–583. https://doi.org/10.1080/13602380701345499

Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2018). Geographic Proximity and Science Parks. Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Economics and Finance. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190625979.013.272

Liu, L., Henley, J., & Mousavi, M. M. (2021). Foreign interfirm networks and internationalization: Evidence from sub-Saharan Africa. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2020.100810.

Lizińska, W., & Sobol, D. (2023). Internationalization of science and technology parks in Poland versus their development phase. In: A. P. Balcerzak, & I. Pietryka (Eds.), 12th International Conference on Applied Economics Contemporary Issues in Economy, Abstract book (p. 98). Instytut Badań Gospodarczych. https://doi.org/10.24136/eep. abs.2023.1

Lizińska, W., Sobol, D., & Rūtelionė, A. (2024). Internationalisation of science and technology parks and the stage of their life: The Central European perspective. Equilibrium. Quarterly Journal of Economics and Economic Policy, 19(2), 549–590. https://doi.org/10.24136/eq.3085

Lobo, C. A., Maldonado, I., & Pinho, C. (2019). International New Ventures and Early Internationalization – Networks And Skills As Enhancing Agents. In M. Özşahin, & T. Hıdırlar (Eds.), New Challenges in Leadership and Technology Management (pp. 460–472). Future Academy. https://doi.org/10.15405/epsbs.2019.01.02.39

Lund, E. (2019). The Strategic Choices That Science and Technology Parks Must Make. In S. Amoroso, A. N. Link, & M. Wright (Eds.), Science and Technology Parks and Regional Economic Development: An International Perspective (pp. 9–24). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030–30963-3_2

MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Common method bias in marketing: Causes, mechanisms, and procedural remedies. Journal of Retailing, 88(4), 542–555. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretai.2012.08.001

Manolova, T. S., Brush, C. G., Edelman, L. F., & Greene, P. G. (2002). Internationalization of Small Firms. International Small Business Journal: Researching Entrepreneurship, 20(1), 9–31. https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242602201003

Manolova, T. S., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2010). In good company: The role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 257–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.004

Martínez-Vela, C. (2016). Benchmarking research and technology organizations (RTOs): a comparative analysis. MIT-IPC Industrial Performance Center, Working Paper Series, 16-005, 1–23. https://ipc.mit.edu/sites/default/files/2019-01/16-005.pdf

Masiello, B., & Izzo, F. (2019). Interpersonal Social Networks and Internationalization of Traditional SMEs. Journal of Small Business Management, 57(2), 658–691. https://doi.org/10.1111/jsbm.12536

McDougall, P., Shane, S. & Oviatt, B. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(6), 469–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90017-5

Mohr, A., & Batsakis, G. (2018). The Contingent Effect of TMT International Experience on Firms’ Internationalization Speed. British Journal of Management, 30(4), 869–887. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12293

Musteen, M., Datta, D. K., & Butts, M. M. (2014). Do International Networks and Foreign Market Knowledge Facilitate SME Internationalization? Evidence from the Czech Republic. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 38(4), 749–774. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12025

Neubert, M., & Van Der Krogt, A. (2017). Lean Internationalisation of High-Tech Firms. International Journal of Teaching and Case Studies, 8(2–3), 133–150. https:// doi.org/10.1504/IJTCS.2017.086679

Nielsen, S. (2010). Top Management Team Internationalization and Firm Performance. Management International Review, 50(2), 185–206. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575010-0029-0

O’Grady, S., & Lane, H. W. (1996). The Psychic Distance Paradox. Journal of International Business Studies, 27(2), 309–333. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490137

Peces, M. del C., & Trillo, M. A. (2023). Relational Capital in the Technology Sector: An International Strategic Model. Sustainability, 15(5), 4351. https://doi.org/10.3390/ su15054351

Penrose, E. (1959). The theory of the growth of the firm. Wiley.

Peyrefitte, J., Fadil, P., & Thomas, A. (2002). The Influence of Managerial Experiences on Large Firm Internationalization. The International Journal of Management, 19(4), 95–502.

Pluta-Olearnik, M. (2012). Orientacja międzynarodowa w strategii instytucji naukowych i badawczych. Prace Instytutu Lotnictwa, 4 (225), 41–53. https://doi.org/10. 5604/05096669.1077680

Powell, W.W., Koput, K.W., & Smith-Doerr, L. (1996). Inter-organizational collaboration and the locus of innovation: Networks of learning in biotechnology. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 116–145. https://doi.org/10.2307/2393988

Reid, S. D. (1981). The Decision-Maker and Export Entry and Expansion. Journal of International Business Studies, 12(2), 101–112. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave. jibs.8490581

Roecker, R., & Floriani, D. E. (2022). Cultural intelligence, international experience and early internationalization: An essay on connecting constructs. Contextus – Revista Contemporânea de Economia e Gestão, 20, 112–124. https://doi.org/10.19094/ contextus.2022.72806

Saeed, A., & Ziaulhaq, H. M. (2019). The Impact of CEO Characteristics on the Internationalization of SMEs: Evidence from the UK. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 36(3), 322–335. https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1497

Safari, A., & Chetty, S. (2019). Multilevel psychic distance and its impact on SME internationalization. International Business Review, 28(4), 754–765. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2019.03.001

Saiyed, A. A., & Ricard, A. (2021). Entrepreneurial characteristics and internationalisation of new ventures: a study of cognitive factors. Journal for Global Business Advancement, 14(2), 166. https://doi.org/10.1504/jgba.2021.115772

Santos, J., Mota, J., & Baptista, C. (2021). The role of a strategic net in international entrepreneurship: overcoming the liabilities of foreignness and outsidership in the context of the Pharma industry. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 17, 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-019-00615-3

Sanz, L., Klofsten, M., Van Dinteren, J., Jansen, P. (2023). A Taxonomy of Organised Innovation Spaces. Publications Office of the European Union.

Sedziniauskiene, R., Sekliuckiene, J., & Zucchella, A. (2019). Networks’ Impact on the Entrepreneurial Internationalization: A Literature Review and Research Agenda. Management International Review, 59(5), 779–823. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-01900395-6

Sobol, D., Lizińska, W., & Krukowski, K. (2024). Parki naukowo-technologiczne i ich rola w stymulowaniu rozwoju innowacyjności: Studium na przykładzie województwa warmińsko-mazurskiego. Ostrołęckie Towarzystwo Naukowe im. Adama Chętnika w Ostrołęce.

Sobol, D., Lizińska, W., & Nazarczuk, J. (2023). The role of science parks in Poland in the internationalization of tenant businesses. Scientific Papers of Silesian University of Technology – Organization and Management Series, 184, 535–557. https://doi. org/10.29119/1641-3466.2023.184.27

Song, H., Yoon, Y., & Kang, K. (2020). The relationship between board diversity and firm performance in the lodging industry: The moderating role of internationalization. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 86, 102461. https://doi. org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2020.102461

Squicciarini, M. (2008). Science parks’ tenants versus out-of-park firms: Who innovates more? A duration model. Journal of Technology Transfer, 33(1), 45–71. https://doi. org/10.1007/s10961-007-9037-z

Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M., & Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the Top Management Team and Firm International Diversification. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1157–1177. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630002600605

Tihanyi, L., Griffith, D. A., & Russell, C. J. (2005). The effect of cultural distance on entry mode choice, international diversification, and MNE performance: a meta-analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(3), 270–283. https://doi.org/10.1057/ palgrave.jibs.8400136

Tomelin, J., Amal, M., Zen, A. C., & Arrabito, P. (2018). Internationalisation of Science Parks: Experiences of Brazilian Innovation Environments. International Business in the Information and Digital Age, 13, 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1745886220180000013017

Unlü, H. (2022). The performance of science and technology parks under triple helix system in Turkey. In: T. Daim, M. Dabić, & Y.-S. Su (Eds.), The routledge companion to technology management (pp. 303–319). Routledge.

Vallone, T., Elia, S., Greve, P., Longoni, L., & Marinelli, D. (2019). Top Management Team Influence on Firms’ Internationalization Complexity. In R. V. Tulder, A. Verbeke & B. Jankowska (Eds.), International Business in a VUCA World: The Changing Role of States and Firms (pp. 199–226). Emerland Publishing Limited.

Vandermerwe, S., & Chadwick, M. (1989). The Internationalisation of Services. The Service Industries Journal, 9(1), 79–93. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642068900000005

Wach, K. (2014), Theoretical Framework of the Firm-Level Internationalisation in Business Studies. In A. Duréndez & K. Wach (Eds.), Patterns of Business Internationalisation in Visegrad Countries – In Search for Regional Specifics. Universidad Politécnica de Cartagena.

Williams, D. W., & Grégoire, D. A. (2014). Seeking commonalities or avoiding differences? Re-conceptualizing distance and its effects on internationalization decisions. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(3), 253–284. https://doi.org/10.1057/ jibs.2014.52

Yamin, M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2006). Online internationalisation, psychic distance reduction and the virtuality trap. International Business Review, 15(4), 339–360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2006.03.002

Yan, H., Hu, X., & Liu, Y. (2020). The international market selection of Chinese SMEs: How institutional influence overrides psychic distance. International Business Review, 29(4), 101703. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101703

Zacharewicz, T., Sanz Menendez, L., & Jonkers, K. (2017). The internationalisation of research and technology organisations. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. https://doi.org/10.2760/944413

Zahoor, N., & Al-Tabbaa, O. (2021). Post-entry internationalization speed of SMEs: The role of relational mechanisms and foreign market knowledge. International Business Review, 30(1), 101761. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2020.101761

Zieliński, M., Rogala, A., & Takemura, M. (2014). Business model of science and technology parks: comparison of European best practice. The Bulletin of the Faculty of Commerce Meiji University, 1, 15–28.

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2025-06-30

How to Cite

Sobol, D., Krukowski, K., & Lizińska, W. (2025). INFLUENCE OF CEO CHARACTERISTICS ON INTERNATIONALISATION OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY PARKS: EVIDENCE FROM POLAND. Torun International Studies, 1(21), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2025.005
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 21 (2025)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2025 Dorota Sobol, Krzysztof Krukowski, Wiesława Lizińska

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 76
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

science & technology parks, internationalisation, CEO characteristics
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop