Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Counsil
    • Indexing
    • International Partners
    • Ethical standards
    • Privacy Statement
    • Publisher
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Torun International Studies

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY COOPERATION WITH THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
  • Home
  • /
  • COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY COOPERATION WITH THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 1 No. 17 (2023): A modern model of cooperation between universities and social and business environment. An international context /
  4. Articles

COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY COOPERATION WITH THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY

Authors

  • Mateusz Wojciech Kuliński Uczelnia Łazarskiego https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2078-2981

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2023.007

Keywords

higher education, university, socio-economic environment, evaluation, quality of education

Abstract

Purpose: The purpose of this scientific article is to conduct a comparative analysis of the evaluation of university cooperation with the socio-economic environment, using the examples of the Republic of Poland and the Federal Republic of Germany, and to identify the differences between the analysed systems as a determining factor for the superiority of the German higher education system over the Polish system.

Methodology: Three research methods were employed to achieve the chosen research objective: the formal-dogmatic method (dogmatic-legal), the comparative law method (legal comparativism), and the empirical method (empirical research) as an auxiliary method. The formal-dogmatic method was used to analyse the logical and linguistic regulations governing the institutional framework of agencies responsible for the quality of education in Poland and Germany. The comparative law method will be implemented through classical comparative legal research aimed at analysing the similarities and differences in legal regulations regarding the evaluation of university cooperation with the socio-economic environment in the Republic of Poland and the Federal Republic of Germany. The empirical method was used as an auxiliary method to analyse the thesis presented by the author, which is the superiority of German universities over Polish universities.

Findings: The article points out fundamental differences in the legal status of agencies responsible for the quality of education and the systems of quality evaluation in the area of university cooperation with the socio-economic environment in the Republic of Poland and the Federal Republic of Germany. Furthermore, the author identifies this state of affairs as one of the factors determining the superiority of the German higher education system over the Polish system.

Originality/value: The chosen research objective represents an unexplored field so far. There is a lack of studies in the domestic and European markets that aim to systematically compare the evaluation of university cooperation with the socio-economic environment in the Republic of Poland and the Federal Republic of Germany. The conducted analysis and the resulting conclusions effectively fill this gap.

References

Act of 12 September 1990 on Higher Education (Journal of Laws, 1990, No. 65, item 385).

Act of 20 July 2001 amending the Law on Higher Education, the Law on Higher Vocational Schools, and amending certain other laws (Journal of Laws, 2001, No. 85, item 924).

Act of 20 July 2018 - Law on Higher Education and Science (Journal of Laws, 2018, item 1668, as amended).

Act of 26 June 1997 on Higher Vocational Schools (Journal of Laws, 1997, No. 96, item 590).

Balicki, A. & Pyter, M., & Zięba, B. (2021). Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz. (Law on Higher Education and Science. A Comment). C.H. Beck.

Bednarczyk-Płachta, A. (2016). Status szkoły wyższej jako podmiotu administracji publicznej. (The status of a higher education institution as a public administration entity). Wolters Kluwer.

Bugaj, J.M., & Budzanowska-Drzewiecka, M. (Ed.). (2022). Jakość kształcenia akademickiego. (Quality of academic education). Jagiellonian University Press.

Centre for Science and Technology Studies (Dutch: Centrum voor Wetenschap en Technologische Studies, CWTS) at Leiden University in the Netherlands. (2021). CWTS Leiden Ranking 2022. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2022

European Standards and Guidelines for Quality Assurance in the European Higher Education Area, ESG.

Hochschulrahmengesetz in der Fassung der Bekanntmachung vom 19. Januar 1999 (BGBl. I S. 18), das zuletzt durch Artikel 1 des Gesetzes vom 15. November 2019 (BGBl. I S. 1622) geändert worden ist Ländergemeinsame Strukturvorgaben der KMK gemäß §9 Abs.2 HRG für die Akkreditierung von Bachelor- und Masterstudiengängen.

Huther, O., & Krucken, G. (2018). Higher Education in Germany – Recent Developments in an International Perspective. Springer Cham.

Izdebski, H., & Zieliński, J.M. (2019). Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz. (Law on Higher Education and Science. A Comment). Wolters Kluwer.

Jakubowski, A. (Ed.). (2023). Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz. (Law on Higher Education and Science. A Comment). C.H. Beck.

Kozień, A. (2021). Administracyjnoprawna problematyka współpracy uczelni z otoczeniem społeczno-gospodarczym. (Administrative and legal issues of cooperation between universities and the socio-economic environment). Jagiellonian University Press.

Leja, K. (2013). Zarządzanie uczelnią. Koncepcje i współczesne wyzwania. (University management. Concepts and contemporary challenges). Wolter Kluwer.

Polska Komisja Akredytacyjna. (2023). Misja Polskiej Komisji Akredytacyjnej. https://www.pka.edu.pl/o-pka/misja-pka/

Przyszczypkowski, K., & Cytlak, I. (Ed.). (2021). Uniwersytet. Wspólnota różnorodności i różnicy. (University. A community of diversity and difference). Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM.

Quacquarelli Symonds. (2022). Quacquarelli Symonds World University Rankings, Retrieved June 1, 2023. https://www.topuniversities.com/university-rankings/world-university-rankings/2022

Regulation of the Minister of Science and Higher Education of 12 September 2018 on program evaluation criteria (Journal of Laws, item 1787).

Resolution No. 66/2019 of the Presidium of the Polish Accreditation Committee dated 28 February 2019 on guidelines for preparing a self-assessment report.

ShanghaiRanking Consultancy. (2022). Academic Ranking of World Universities 2022. http://www.shanghairanking.com/rankings/arwu/2022

Statute of the Polish Accreditation Committee (consolidated text, taking into account the changes introduced by the resolution of the Polish Accreditation Committee No. 1/2019, dated 18 February 2019), attachment to the resolution No. 4/2018 of the Polish Accreditation Committee dated 13 December 2018, attachment No. 4 to the Statute of the Polish Accreditation Committee.

Świstak, M. (2022). Autonomia publicznych uczelni akademickich w Polsce. (Autonomy of public universities in Poland). Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej.

Szewior, K. (2018). Akredytacja w niemieckim szkolnictwie wyższym. Zarys zagadnienia. (Accreditation in German higher education. An Outline). Oficyna Wydawnicza ASPRA-JR.

Szewior, K. (2019). Pomiędzy ewaluacją i akredytacją. Polska percepcja niemieckich doświadczeń w kontekście polityk publicznych. (Between evaluation and accreditation. Polish perception of German experience in the context of public policies). Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, 4. https://doi.org/10.17951/en.2019.4.81-93

Szewior, K. (2020). Zmiana modelu zarządzania i nadzoru nad jakością kształcenia w szkolnictwie wyższym. Perspektywa doświadczeń Republiki Federalnej Niemiec. (Changing the model of management and supervision over the quality of education in higher education. Perspective of the experience of the Federal Republic of Germany). Przegląd Europejski, 2. https://doi.org/10.31338/1641-2478pe.2.20.9

Times Higher Education. (2023). Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2023. https://www.timeshighereducation.com/world-university-rankings/2023/world-ranking

University-Business Cooperation in Europe. (2017). State of University-Business Cooperation. POLAND. University Perspective. Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and privet organisations. https://www.ub-cooperation.eu/index/reports

University-Business Cooperation in Europe. (2017). State of University-Business Cooperation. GERMANY. University Perspective. Study on the cooperation between higher education institutions and public and private organisations. https://www.ub-cooperation.eu/index/reports

Waltoś, S., & Rozmus, A. (Ed.). (2016). Szkolnictwo wyższe w Polsce. Ustrój. Prawo. Organizacja. (Higher education in Poland. Regime. Law. Organization). Wolters Kluwer.

Woźnicki, J. (Ed.). (2019). Prawo o szkolnictwie wyższym i nauce. Komentarz. (Law on Higher Education and Science. A Comment). Wolters Kluwer.

Torun International Studies

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2023-06-30

How to Cite

Kuliński, M. W. (2023). COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS OF THE EVALUATION OF UNIVERSITY COOPERATION WITH THE SOCIO-ECONOMIC ENVIRONMENT ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF POLAND AND THE FEDERAL REPUBLIC OF GERMANY. Torun International Studies, 1(17), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2023.007
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 1 No. 17 (2023): A modern model of cooperation between universities and social and business environment. An international context

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2023 Mateusz Wojciech Kuliński

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 365
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

higher education, university, socio-economic environment, evaluation, quality of education
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Instytut Tomistyczny
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polska Fundacja Przemysłu Kosmicznego
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Komisji Edukacji Narodowej w Krakowie
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop