Skip to main content Skip to main navigation menu Skip to site footer
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language
    • English
    • Język Polski
  • Menu
  • Home
  • Current
  • Archives
  • About
    • About the Journal
    • Submissions
    • Editorial Team
    • Scientific Counsil
    • Indexing
    • International Partners
    • Ethical standards
    • Privacy Statement
    • Wydawca
    • Contact
  • Register
  • Login
  • Language:
  • English
  • Język Polski

Torun International Studies

TRENDS IN SOUTH-SOUTH TRADE ACTIVITIES OF EAST ASIA PACIFIC AND SOUTH ASIA
  • Home
  • /
  • TRENDS IN SOUTH-SOUTH TRADE ACTIVITIES OF EAST ASIA PACIFIC AND SOUTH ASIA
  1. Home /
  2. Archives /
  3. Vol. 2 No. 16 (2022) /
  4. Articles

TRENDS IN SOUTH-SOUTH TRADE ACTIVITIES OF EAST ASIA PACIFIC AND SOUTH ASIA

Authors

  • Mateusz Smolaga Institute of Political Science and Security Studies Faculty of Social Sciences University of Szczecin https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-6266

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2022.008

Keywords

developing Asia, South-South trade, East Asia and Pacific, South Asia

Abstract

The aim of this article is to analyse trends in trade throughout the global South, focusing on two regions of Asia: East Asia and Pacific, and South Asia. Unlike many recent texts which tend to focus on the activities of China and India, and their consequences for the developed economies (mainly US and Europe), this article aims to identify trends in trade between developing countries, with a special emphasis on non-Chinese and non-Indian actors.

In attempting to measure the Asian developing regions’ engagement in the economic cooperation across the global South over the period of 2000–2019, an emphasis is placed on relative data (South-South trade as a percentage of total imports/exports), as opposed to absolute data (trade volumes for exports/imports in USD). This allows us to identify and compare trends in engagement for each individual actor regardless of their economic power. Important changes in the character of goods traded (i.e. leading import/export categories) can also be seen over the whole 20-year period.

While the participation of East Asia Pacific and South Asia in South-South trade undoubtedly grew after 2000, largely due to impressive performances of China and India. However, the economic might of these giants should not overshadow the performances of their smaller counterparts, who also play an integral role in setting the trends this article hopes to identify. In fact, in some particular years, the group of non-Chinese economies of East Asia Pacific, and the group of non-Indian countries of South Asia, outperformed both China, and India, when South-South trade was measured as a percentage of their total imports and exports.

Intraregional trade became the dominant component of East Asia Pacific trade over the 20-year period. This was not the case for South Asia, which might be seen as an obstacle for future development.

The positive experience of these two regions might be used as a blueprint to extend networks of trading relationships across the global South through which new value chains can be created. While this might be seen as somewhat controversial from a Northern perspective, it would inevitably lead to strengthening political relationships between developing regions, helping to balance the global economy, and provide opportunities for Southern-led capital flows to Africa, the Middle East, and Latin America and the Caribbean.

References

Aggarwal, S., & Chakraborty, D. (2019). Which Factors Influence India’s Intra-Industry Trade? Empirical Findings for Select Sectors. Global Business Review, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150919868343

ASEAN-Japan Centre. (2019). Global Value Chains in ASEAN: A Regional Perspective. Retrieved March 29, 2021 from https://www.asean.or.jp/en/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/GVC_A-Regional-Perspective_Paper-1-Revised_2019_full_web.pdf

Athukorala, P. (2011). South–South Trade: An Asian Perspective. DB Economics Working Paper Series, 265. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/29050/economics-wp265.pdf

Banik, N., & Gilbert, J. (2008). Regional Integration and Trade Costs in South Asia. ADB Institute Working Paper, 127. https://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/publication/155982/adbi-wp127.pdf

Bergamaschi, I., Moore, P. V., & Tickner, A. B. (2017). South-South cooperation beyond the myths: Rising donors, new aid practices? Palgrave Macmillan.

Bernhardt, T. (2016). South-South trade and South-North trade: Which contributes more to development in Asia and South America? Insights from estimating income elasticities of import demand. CEPAL Review, 118. https://doi.org/10.18356/056e0f80-en

Besherati, N. A., & MacFeely S. (2019). Defining and Quantifying South-South Cooperation, UNCTAD Research Paper, 30. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/ser-rp-2019d2_en.pdf

Bo, X. (2020, January 14). Private firms lead China's imports, exports for first time. Xinhua. http://www.xinhuanet.com/english/2020-01/14/c_138704308.htm

Bolwig, S., Ponte, S., du Toit, A., Riisgaard, L., & Halber, N. (2010). Integrating Poverty and Environmental Concerns into Value-Chain Analysis: A Conceptual Framework. Development Policy Review, 28(2).

Dahi, O. S., & Demir, F. (2017). South–South and North–South Economic Exchanges: Does it Matter Who is Exchanging What and with Whom? Journal of Economic Surveys, 31(5). https://doi.org/doi:10.1111./joes.12225

De Backer, K., De Lombaerde, P., & Iapadre, L. (2018). Analyzing Global and Regional Value Chains. International Economics, 153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inteco.2018.01.003

Didier, L. (2017). South-South Trade and Geographical Diversification of Intra-SSA Trade: Evidence from BRICs. African Development Review, 29(2). https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8268.12246

Eichenauer, V.Z., Fuchs, A. Brückner, L. (2018). The Effects of Trade, Aid, and Investment on China's Image in Developing Countries. University of Heidelberg Department of Economics Discussion Paper Series, 646. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3147206

FAO. (2017). Value chain selection: assessing climate risks and impacts. http://www.fao.org/climate-smart-agriculture-sourcebook/production-resources/module-b10-value-chains/chapter-b10-4/en/

Francois, J., & Elsig, M. (2021). Short overview of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP). European Parliament. https://doi.org/10.2861/001684

Hanson, G. H., & Robertson, R. (2008). China and the Manufacturing Exports of other Developing Countries. NBER Working Paper Series, 14497. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w14497/w14497.pdf

He, Y. (2013). Does China’s trade expansion help African development? — an empirical estimation. China Economic Review, 26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2013.04.001

IMF. (2001). Global Trade Liberalization and the Developing Countries. https://www.imf.org/external/np/exr/ib/2001/110801.htm#i

Jaganmohan, M. (2021). Petroleum sector in India - statistics & facts. https://www.statista.com/topics/5621/petroleum-sector-in-india/

KPMG. (2020). Signing of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership: Impacts for the Asia Pacific region. https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/xx/pdf/2020/11/rcep-signing-asia-pacific-impacts-november-2020.pdf

Lin, B., & Mengmeng, X. (2019). Does China become the “pollution heaven” in South-South trade? Evidence from Sino-Russian trade. Science of The Total Environment, 666. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.298

MacMillan, J. (2007). Liberal internationalism. In M. Griffiths (Ed.), International Relations Theory for the Twenty-First Century (pp. 21–34). Routledge.

Meng, J., Mi, Z., Guan, D., Li, J., Tao, S., Li, Y., Feng, K., Liu, J., Liu, Z., Wang, X., Zhang Q., & Davis, S.J. (2018). The rise of South–South trade and its effect on global CO2 emissions. Nature Communication, 9(1871). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-04337-y

Mohanty, S.K., Franssen, L., & Saha, S. (2019). The Power of International Value Chains in the Global South. International Trade Centre. https://www.intracen.org/uploadedFiles/intracenorg/Content/Publications/Global%20South%20value%20chains_final_Low-res.pdf

Panda, R. (2019). A Step Too Far: Why India Opted Out of RCEP. Global Asia, 14(4). https://www.globalasia.org/v14no4/feature/a-step-too-far-why-india-opted-out-of-rcep_rajaram-panda

Petri, P.A., & Plummer, M. (2020). RCEP: A new trade agreement that will shape global economics and politics. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/order-from-chaos/2020/11/16/rcep-a-new-trade-agreement-that-will-shape-global-economics-and-politics/

Raghavan, P. (2020, November 26). Explained: The economic implications of India opting out of RCEP. The Indian Express. https://indianexpress.com/article/explained/india-out-of-rcep-china-economy-trade-angle-7053877/

Rata, R.S. (2009). Promoting South-South Trade: Recent Developments and Options (ARTNeT Policy Brief No. 17). Asia-Pacific Research and Training Network on Trade. United Nations Economic Commission for Asia and the Pacific. https://www.unescap.org/sites/default/files/polbrief17.pdf

Salo, J. (2016). Greening Value Chains: How Large Companies in Latin America and the Caribbean Can Influence Natural Resource Use and Environmental Impact Management in Their Value Chains: Case Study. Trucost, Inter-American Development Bank, Multilateral Investment Group. https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Greening-Value-Chains-How-Large-Companies-in-Latin-America-and-the-Caribbean-Can-Influence-Natural-Resource-Use-and-Environmental-Impact-Management-in-Their-Value-Chains-Technical-Study.pdf

Shafaeddin, M. (2012). The Role of China in Regional South-South Trade in the Asia-Pacific: Prospects for Industrialization of the Low-Income Countries. TWN Trade & Development Series, 41. https://www.twn.my/title2/t&d/tnd41.pdf

Shirotori, M., & Molina, A. C. (2009). South–South Trade: The Reality Check. Issues in New Geography of International Trade, United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. United Nations. https://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctab20081_en.pdf

Suresh, E. (2020). Mapping the Intra-Industry Trade in South Asian Countries through Grubel-Lloyd Approach: A Special Focus on the Vegetable Trade. Journal of Critical Reviews, 7(13). http://www.jcreview.com/fulltext/197-1592898761.pdf

The World Factbook: India. (2021, March 22). https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/resources/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html

UNCTAD. (2015). Global value chains and South-South Trade: economic cooperation and integration among developing countries. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. https://unctad.org/system/files/official-document/gdsecidc2015d1_en.pdf

UNCTAD, & JETRO. (2008). South-South Trade in Asia: The Role of Regional Trade Agreements. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, Japan External Trade Organization. https://unctad.org/en/Docs/ditctabmisc20082_en.pdf

United Nations. (2017). Harmonized Commodity Description and Coding Systems (HS). United Nations International Trade Statistics Knowledgebase. https://unstats.un.org/unsd/tradekb/Knowledgebase/Harmonized-Commodity-Description-and-Coding-Systems-HS

United Nations. (2018a). Role of South-South cooperation and the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development: Challenges and opportunities (A/73/383). United Nations: General Assembly. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/73/383&Lang=E

United Nations. (2018b). State of South-South cooperation. Report of the Secretary-General. United Nations: General Assembly. https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/73/321&Lang=E

Varma, P., & Ramakrishnan, A. (2014). An Analysis of the Structure and the Determinants of Intra-industry Trade in Agri-food Products: Case of India and Selected FTAs. Millennial Asia, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/0976399614541193

Vidya, C.T., & Prabheesh, K.P. (2019). Intra-Industry Trade between India and Indonesia. Bulletin of Monetary Economics and Banking, 21. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/234039088.pdf

Walia, A. (2021). SECTOR: Oil & Gas. India is the 2nd largest refiner in Asia. Investindia. https://www.investindia.gov.in/sector/oil-gas

Wang, Q., & Xue, Y. (2020). Imbalance of carbon embodied in South-South trade: Evidence from China-India trade. Science of The Total Environment, 707(134473). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134473

Ward, R. (2020). RCEP trade deal: a geopolitical win for China. International Institute for Strategic Studies. https://www.iiss.org/blogs/analysis/2020/11/rcep-trade-deal

Weber, C. (2001). International Relations Theory: A critical introduction. Second edition. Routledge.

WCO. (2012). What is the Harmonized System (HS)? World Customs Organization. http://www.wcoomd.org/en/topics/nomenclature/overview/what-is-the-harmonized-system.aspx

WITS. (n.d.). Merchandise Trade Products Metadata. https://wits.worldbank.org/product-metadata.aspx?lang=en

WITS/UN COMTRADE. (2021). World Integrated Trade Solution. The World Bank, United Nations. http://wits.worldbank.org/WITS/WITS/AdvanceQuery/RawTradeData/QueryDefinition.aspx?Page=RawTradeData

WTO, & JETRO. (2011). Trade patterns and global value chains in East Asia: From trade in goods to trade in tasks. World Trade Organization, Japan External Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/booksp_e/stat_tradepat_globvalchains_e.pdf

World Bank. (2020). World Development Report 2020: Trading for Development in the Age of Global Value Chains. World Bank. https://doi.org/10.1596/978-1-4648-1457-0

WTO. (2018). World Trade Statistical Review 2018. World Trade Organization. https://www.wto.org/english/res_e/statis_e/wts2018_e/wts2018_e.pdf

Torun International Studies

Downloads

  • PDF

Published

2022-12-31 — Updated on 2022-12-31

How to Cite

1.
SMOLAGA, Mateusz. TRENDS IN SOUTH-SOUTH TRADE ACTIVITIES OF EAST ASIA PACIFIC AND SOUTH ASIA. Torun International Studies [online]. 31 December 2022, T. 2, nr 16, s. 5–30. [accessed 25.3.2023]. DOI 10.12775/TIS.2022.008.
  • PN-ISO 690 (Polish)
  • ACM
  • ACS
  • APA
  • ABNT
  • Chicago
  • Harvard
  • IEEE
  • MLA
  • Turabian
  • Vancouver
Download Citation
  • Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS)
  • BibTeX

Issue

Vol. 2 No. 16 (2022)

Section

Articles

License

Copyright (c) 2022 Torun International Studies

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Stats

Number of views and downloads: 81
Number of citations: 0

Search

Search

Browse

  • Browse Author Index
  • Issue archive

User

User

Current Issue

  • Atom logo
  • RSS2 logo
  • RSS1 logo

Information

  • For Readers
  • For Authors
  • For Librarians

Newsletter

Subscribe Unsubscribe

Language

  • English
  • Język Polski

Tags

Search using one of provided tags:

developing Asia, South-South trade, East Asia and Pacific, South Asia
Up

Akademicka Platforma Czasopism

Najlepsze czasopisma naukowe i akademickie w jednym miejscu

apcz.umk.pl

Partners

  • Akademia Ignatianum w Krakowie
  • Akademickie Towarzystwo Andragogiczne
  • Fundacja Copernicus na rzecz Rozwoju Badań Naukowych
  • Instytut Historii im. Tadeusza Manteuffla Polskiej Akademii Nauk
  • Instytut Kultur Śródziemnomorskich i Orientalnych PAN
  • Karmelitański Instytut Duchowości w Krakowie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych w Krośnie
  • Państwowa Akademia Nauk Stosowanych we Włocławku
  • Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Zawodowa im. Stanisława Pigonia w Krośnie
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ekonomiczne
  • Polskie Towarzystwo Ludoznawcze
  • Towarzystwo Miłośników Torunia
  • Towarzystwo Naukowe w Toruniu
  • Uniwersytet im. Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu
  • Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika
  • Uniwersytet w Białymstoku
  • Uniwersytet Warszawski
  • Wojewódzka Biblioteka Publiczna - Książnica Kopernikańska
  • Wyższe Seminarium Duchowne w Pelplinie / Wydawnictwo Diecezjalne „Bernardinum" w Pelplinie

© 2021- Nicolaus Copernicus University Accessibility statement Shop