Mathematical Structure: Knowledge, Representation and Interpretation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.12775/ths.2002.021Keywords
mathematics, abstraction processes, analogy, indecomposablesAbstract
The main theme of this article is to show the abstraction processes of mathematics allow hierarchies of structure, in which for example a ‘comparison’ becomes an object and so allows for methods of comparison themselves to be compared. Further, a representation of an object need not be unique, and the comparison of representations is important for our understanding and use of an abstraction process.References
Brown, R. and Porter, T., 1989, Why we made an exhibition, in Souvenir Guide to the Pop Maths Road Show, Royal Society/ Joint Mathematics Council 10-12.
Brown, R. and Porter, T., 1990, Making a mathematical exhibition, in The popularization of mathematics, edited A. G. Howson and J.-P. Kahane, ICMI Study Series, Cambridge University Press, 51-64.
Brown, R. and Porter, T., The methodology of mathematics, Math. Gazette, July (1995) (1995) 322-335.
Ehresmann, A. And Vanbremeersch, J.-P., 1987, Hierarchical Evolutive Systems: a mathematical model for complex systems, Bull of Math. Biology, 549, 13-50.
Kelly, K., 1994, Out of control: The new biology of machines, London, Fourth Estate.
Paton, R., 1997, Verbs and.Text metaphors in biology, Acta Biotheoretica, 45, 1-15.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
Stats
Number of views and downloads: 593
Number of citations: 0
